Skip to main content
Log in

Psychometric properties of the Personal and Social Performance scale (PSP) among individuals with schizophrenia living in the community

  • Published:
Quality of Life Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Symptoms and cognitive impairments of schizophrenia affect social integration and functioning. Accurate measurement is essential in evaluating treatment needs and outcomes. The Personal and Social Performance scale (PSP; Morosini et al. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica 101(4):323–329, 2000) is a clinical tool assessing social functioning in rehabilitation settings.

Methods

One hundred and twenty-nine patient/informant dyads at eight US sites participated in this study. Patients were at least 18 years old, have had schizophrenia/schizoaffective disorder for one year or more, and were currently residing in the community. Informants were at least 21 years old, cared for the patient for at least one month, and had contact at least twice weekly. The PSP, Personal Evaluation of Transitions in Treatment (PETiT), Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS), Clinical Global Impressions—Severity (CGI-S), and Quality of Life Scale (QLS) tools were completed. Analyses focused on descriptive statistics, item characteristics, reliability, and validity.

Results

Patients were community-dwelling outpatients without severe difficulties. The PSP scores were well correlated with each other and related measures. Socially useful activities and personal and social relationships were the strongest indicators, suggesting separate aspects of functioning. Internal consistency reliability was adequate (α = 0.76). The PSP was sensitive to differences in social functioning by clinical severity.

Conclusions

The PSP suggested scale reliability and validity among outpatients. Future examination should expand validity analyses and evaluate responsiveness.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

ANOVA:

Analysis of variance

CGI-S:

Clinical Global Impressions—Severity

DSM-IV:

Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, fourth edition

GAF:

Global Assessment of Functioning scale

HRQL:

Health-related quality of life

ICC:

Intraclass correlation coefficient

IRB:

Institutional Review Board

MCID:

Minimum clinically important difference

PANSS:

Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale

PETiT:

Personal Evaluation of Transitions in Treatment

PSP:

Personal and Social Performance scale

QLS:

Quality of Life Scale

SAS:

Statistical Analysis System

SD:

Standard deviation

SOFAS:

Social and Occupational Functioning Assessment Scale

™:

Trademark

VADO:

Skills assessment and definition of goals (translated into English)

References

  1. National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH). (2007). When someone has schizophrenia. Available online at: http://www.nimh.nih.gov/publicat/schizoph.cfm.

  2. American Psychiatric Association (APA). (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, 4th edition, text revision. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Jablensky, A. (2000). Epidemiology of schizophrenia: the global burden of disease and disability. European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience, 250(6), 274–285. doi:10.1007/s004060070002.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Kessler, R. C., McGonagle, K. A., Zhao, S., Nelson, C. B., Hughes, M., Eshleman, S., et al. (1994). Lifetime and 12-month prevalence of DSM-III-R psychiatric disorders in the United States. Results from the National Comorbidity Survey. Archives of General Psychiatry, 51(1), 8–19.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Regier, D. A., Narrow, W. E., Rae, D. S., Manderscheid, R. W., Locke, B. Z., & Goodwin, F. K. (1993). The de facto US mental and addictive disorders service system. Epidemiologic catchment area prospective 1-year prevalence rates of disorders and services. Archives of General Psychiatry, 50(2), 85–94.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. World Health Organization (WHO). (2006). Schizophrenia. Home page at: http://www.who.int/mental_health/management/schizophrenia/en/.

  7. Addington, J., & Addington, D. (2000). Neurocognitive and social functioning in schizophrenia: a 2.5 year follow-up study. Schizophrenia Research, 44(1), 47–56. doi:10.1016/S0920-9964(99)00160-7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Bell, M. D., & Bryson, G. (2001). Work rehabilitation in schizophrenia: does cognitive impairment limit improvement? Schizophrenia Bulletin, 27(2), 269–279.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Bryson, G., & Bell, M. D. (2003). Initial and final work performance in schizophrenia: cognitive and symptom predictors. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 191(2), 87–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Bryson, G., Bell, M. D., Kaplan, E., & Greig, T. (1998). The functional consequences of memory impairments on initial work performance in people with schizophrenia. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 186(10), 610–615. doi:10.1097/00005053-199810000-00004.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Gaite, L., Vázquez-Barquero, J. L., Borra, C., Ballesteros, J., Schene, A., Welcher, B., et al. (2002). Quality of life in patients with schizophrenia in five European countries: the EPSILON study. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 105(4), 283–292. doi:10.1034/j.1600-0447.2002.1169.x.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Green, M. F., Kern, R. S., Braff, D. L., & Mintz, J. (2000). Neurocognitive deficits and functional outcome in schizophrenia: are we measuring the “right stuff”? Schizophrenia Bulletin, 26(1), 119–136.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Kasckow, J. W., Twamley, E., Mulchahey, J. J., Carroll, B., Sabai, M., Strakowski, S. M., et al. (2001). Health-related quality of well-being in chronically hospitalized patients with schizophrenia: comparison with matched outpatients. Psychiatry Research, 103(1), 69–78. doi:10.1016/S0165-1781(01)00260-8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. McGurk, S. R., Mueser, K. T., Harvey, P. D., LaPuglia, R., & Marder, J. (2003). Cognitive and symptom predictors of work outcomes for clients with schizophrenia in supported employment. Psychiatric Services (Washington, DC), 54(8), 1129–1135. doi:10.1176/appi.ps.54.8.1129.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Palmer, B. W., Heaton, R. K., Gladsjo, J. A., Evans, J. D., Patterson, T. L., Golshan, S., et al. (2002). Heterogeneity in functional status among older outpatients with schizophrenia: employment history, living situation, and driving. Schizophrenia Research, 55(3), 205–215. doi:10.1016/S0920-9964(01)00218-3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Pinikahana, J., Happell, B., Hope, J., & Keks, N. A. (2002). Quality of life in schizophrenia: a review of the literature from 1995 to 2000. International Journal of Mental Health Nursing, 11(2), 103–111. doi:10.1046/j.1440-0979.2002.00233.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Sharma, T., & Antonova, L. (2003). Cognitive function in schizophrenia. Deficits, functional consequences, and future treatment. The Psychiatric Clinics of North America, 26(1), 25–40. doi:10.1016/S0193-953X(02)00084-9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Burns, T., & Patrick, D. (2007). Social functioning as an outcome measure in schizophrenia studies. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 116(6), 403–418. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0447.2007.01108.x.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Morosini, P. L., Magliano, L., Brambilla, L., Ugolini, S., & Pioli, R. (2000). Development, reliability and acceptability of a new version of the DSM-IV Social and Occupational Functioning Assessment Scale (SOFAS) to assess routine social functioning. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 101(4), 323–329.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Davidson, M., Emsley, R., Kramer, M., Ford, L., Pan, G., Lim, P., et al. (2007). Efficacy, safety and early response of paliperidone extended-release tablets (paliperidone ER): results of a 6-week, randomized, placebo-controlled study. Schizophrenia Research, 93(1–3), 117–130. doi:10.1016/j.schres.2007.03.003.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Kane, J., Canas, F., Kramer, M., Ford, L., Gassmann-Mayer, C., Lim, P., et al. (2007). Treatment of schizophrenia with paliperidone extended-release tablets: a 6-week placebo-controlled trial. Schizophrenia Research, 90(1–3), 147–161. doi:10.1016/j.schres.2006.09.012.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Marder, S. R., Kramer, M., Ford, L., Eerdekens, E., Lim, P., Eerdekens, M., et al. (2007). Efficacy and safety of paliperidone extended-release tablets: results of a 6-week, randomized, placebo-controlled study. Biological Psychiatry, 62(12), 1363–1370. doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2007.01.017.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Gigantesco, A., Vittorielli, M., Pioli, R., Falloon, I. R. H., Rossi, G., & Morosini, P. (2006). The VADO approach in psychiatric rehabilitation: a randomized controlled trial. Psychiatric Services (Washington, DC), 57(12), 1778–1783. doi:10.1176/appi.ps.57.12.1778.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Bodlund, O., Kullgren, G., Ekselius, L., Lindström, E., & von Knorring, L. (1994). Axis V—Global Assessment of Functioning Scale. Evaluation of a self-report version. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 90(5), 342–347. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0447.1994.tb01604.x.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Hall, R. C. (1995). Global assessment of functioning. A modified scale. Psychosomatics, 36(3), 267–275.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Rhee, C. G., & Kim, Y. H. (2006). The newer assessment tools for functionings and the Personal and Social Performance Scale in patients with schizophrenia. Korean Journal of Psychopharmacology, 17(2), 128–142.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Heinrichs, D. W., Hanlon, T. E., & Carpenter, W. T., Jr. (1984). The Quality of Life Scale: an instrument for rating the schizophrenic deficit syndrome. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 10(3), 388–398.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Vorunganti, L. N., & Awad, A. G. (2002). Personal evaluation of transitions in treatment (PETiT): a scale to measure subjective aspects of antipsychotic drug therapy in schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Research, 56(1–2), 37–46. doi:10.1016/S0920-9964(01)00161-X.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Kay, S. R., Fiszbein, A., & Opler, L. A. (1987). The Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) for schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 13(2), 261–276.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Guy, W. (1976). The Clinical Global Impression Scale. In ECDEU assessment manual for psychopharmacology (revised). Rockville, MD: National Institute for Mental Health.

  31. SAS Institute, Inc. (2002–2003). SAS software, Version 9.1. Cary, NC: SAS Institute, Inc.

  32. Cronbach, L. J., & Warrington, W. G. (1951). Time-limit tests: estimating their reliability and degree of speeding. Psychometrika, 16(2), 167–188. doi:10.1007/BF02289113.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Hays, R. D., & Revicki, D. A. (2005). Reliability and validity, including responsiveness. In P. Fayers & R. D. Hays (Eds.), Assessing quality of life in clinical trials (2nd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Gagnon, D. D., Adriaenssen, I., Nasrallah, H., & Morosini, P. (2006). Reliability, validity, and sensitivity to change of the Personal and Social Performance Scale in patients with stable schizophrenia. Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Psychiatric Association, Toronto, Canada, May 2006.

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was sponsored by Wyeth Research, Collegeville, PA. We thank David Strutton, PhD and Arthur S. Zbrozek, MS at Wyeth Research for their support in implementing the study and their helpful comments toward improving this paper. Alan S. Bellack, PhD, ABPP at the University of Maryland and Kim T. Mueser, PhD at New Hampshire-Dartmouth Psychiatric Research Center provided thoughtful review and assistance in the development of a conceptual framework and revision of item content. Jennifer Hanlon, MPH, Sally Mannix, BA, and Meghan Werner, MPP provided project management support throughout the study and Sandra Macker, BS provided statistical programming support. Also, we thank the many staff members who worked on this project at each study site, in particular, José M. Canive, MD, F.R.C.P. and Robin R. Douglas, MA, CCRC at New Mexico VA Healthcare System; Deepak D’Souza, MD and Corie Palazzolo, BA at Connecticut Mental Health Center, Yale University; Robert L. Weisman, DO and Lisa McCartan, MA, CCRC at Strong Ties Community Support Program, University of Rochester Medical Center; Scott Stroup, MD, MPH and Marianne Livingston, LCSW at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill; Henry A. Nasrallah, MD and Tracie Northern, MA at Psychiatric Professional Services, Inc., University of Cincinnati Medical Center; Corinne Cather, PhD and Thomas W. Quinlin, BA at North Suffolk Mental Health Association, Freedom Trail Clinic; Irving Belz, MD and Susan Lyngaas, LSW at Tri-County Mental Health Mental Retardation (MHMR) Services; and Saroj Brar, MD and Mira Sugar, RN of Cleveland, OH.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ariane K. Kawata.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kawata, A.K., Revicki, D.A. Psychometric properties of the Personal and Social Performance scale (PSP) among individuals with schizophrenia living in the community. Qual Life Res 17, 1247–1256 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-008-9400-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-008-9400-z

Keywords

Navigation