Abstract
Background
Health-related quality of life measures are increasingly being used in evaluating health care outcome around the world. There is a demand for the development of quality of life measures to be used cross-culturally. The aim of this study is to evaluate the psychometric properties of the Taiwanese version of Kiddo-KINDL®, a health-related quality of life questionnaire.
Methods
The original German-version of Kiddo-KINDL® was translated into Chinese (Taiwanese) via the forward/backward translation process. Psychometric testing was performed with a national sample of 1,985 healthy students between the ages of 12 and 16. Data were analyzed based on 1,675 usable questionnaires.
Results
The reliability coefficients were α = 0.81 (overall) and −0.31 to 0.84 for six subscales. The subscales with low Cronbach’s α were “school” and “friends.” Test–retest reliability was 0.77. Convergent validity was examined with the broadly used Taiwanese version of the Adolescent Depressive Mood Self-Detecting Scale. The result was satisfactory. Construct validity was further examined with exploratory factor analysis. The six-factor solution explained 45.2% of the variance. The construct of Kiddo-KINDL® (Taiwanese version) appeared to be appropriate for measuring health-related quality of life in healthy adolescents.
Conclusions
Kiddo-KINDL® (Taiwanese version) is a relatively reliable and valid questionnaire of adolescents’ health-related quality of life. However, items in the “school” and “friends” subscales need to be further modified to be more culturally appropriate.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Fuh, J. L., Wang, S. J., Lu, S. R., & Juang, K. D. (2005). Assessing quality of life for adolescents in Taiwan. Psychiatry & Clinical Neurosciences, 59(1), 11–18.
Yeh, C. H., & Hung, L.C. (2003). Construct validity of newly developed quality of life assessment instrument for child and adolescent cancer patients in Taiwan. Psycho-Oncology, 12(4), 345–356.
Bullinger, M., Petersen, C., Schmidt, S., Baars, R. M., & The DISABKIDS Group. (2002). European pediatric health-related quality of life assessment. Quality of Life Newsletter, 29, 5–6.
Varni, J. W., Seid, M., & Kurtin, P. S. (2003). The PedsQoL™ 4.0: Reliability and validity of the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory™ Version 4.0 Generic Core Scales in healthy and patient populations. Medical Care, 39, 800–812.
Landgraf, J. M., Maunsell, E., Nixon-Speechley, K., et al. (1998). Canadian-French, German, and United Kingdom versions of the Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ-PF50): Methodology and preliminary item scaling results. Quality of Life Research, 7(5), 433–445.
Ravens-Sieberer, U., & Bullinger, M. (1998). Assessing health-related quality of life in chronically ill children with the German KINDL: First psychometric and content analytical results. Quality of Life Research, 7(5), 399–407.
Landgraf, J. M., Abetz, L., & Ware, J. E. (1999). The CHQ user’s manual (2nd ed.). Boston: HealthAct.
Ravens-Sieberer, U., & Bullinger, M. (2000). Manual of KINDL® questionnaire for measuring health-related quality of life in children and adolescents - revised version. Retrieved October 9, 2006, from http://www.kindl.org/fragebogenE.html.
Wee, H. L., Lee, W. W. R., Ravens-Seiberer, U., Erhart, M., & Li, S. C. (2005). Validation of the English version of the KINDL R generic children’s health-related quality of life instrument for an Asian population – results from a pilot study. Quality of Life Research, 14, 1193–1200.
Wee, H. L., Ravens-Sieberer, U., Erhart, M., & Li, S. C. (2007). Factor structure of the Singapore English version of the KINDL® children quality of life questionnaire. Health & Quality of Life Outcomes, 5(4), 1–8.
Helseth, S., & Lund, T. (2005). Assessing health-related quality of life in adolescents: Some psychometric properties of the first Norwegian version of KINDL®. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences, 19(2), 102–109.
Fernandez-Lopez, J. A., Fernandez Fidalgo, M., Cieza, A., & Ravens-Sieberer, U. (2004). Measuring health-related quality of life in children and adolescents: Preliminary validation and reliability of the Spanish version of the KINDL questionnaire. Atencion Primaira, 33(8), 434–442.
The WHOQOL Group. (1995). The world health organization quality of life assessment (WHOQOL): Position paper from the world health organization. Social Science & Medicine, 41(10), 1403–1409.
Beaton, D. E., Bombardier, C., Guillemin, F., & Ferraz, M. B. (2000). Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-reported measures. Spine, 25(24), 3186–3191.
Berle, J., & McKenna, S. P. (2004). Quality of life in depression scale: Adaptation and evaluation of the psychometric properties of the Norwegian version. Journal of Psychiatry, 58(6), 439–446.
Goldney, R. D., Fisher, L. J., Grande, E. D., & Taylor, A. W. (2004). Subsyndromal depression: Prevalence, use of health services and quality of life in Australian population. Social Psychiatry Psychiatric Epidemiology, 39, 293–298.
Wegener, S., Redoblado-Hodge, M. A., Lucas, S., et al. (2005). Relative contribution of psychiatric symptoms and neuropsychological function to quality of life in first-episode psychosis. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 39, 487–492.
John Tung Foundation. (2006). The develop of Adolescent Depressive Mood Self-Detecting Scale (ADMSS) and it’s reliability, validity and index scores. Taipei: John Tung Foundation.
Polit, D. E., & Beck, C. T. (2004). Assessing data quality. In D. E. Polit & C. T. Beck (Eds.), Nursing research: Principle and methods (7th ed.). Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
Carmines, E. G., & Zeller, R. A. (1979). Reliability and validity. Thousand Oak, CA: Sage publications.
Tsao, Y. L. (2004). A comparison of American and Taiwanese students: Their math perception. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 31(3), 206–213.
Herdman, M., Fox-Rushby, J., & Badia, X. (1998). A model of equivalence in the cultural adaptation of HRQoL instruments: The universalist approach. Quality of Life Research, 7, 323–335.
Guillemin, F., Bombardier, C., & Beaton, D. (1993). Cross-cultural adaptation of health-related quality of life measures: Literature review and proposed guidelines. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 46(12), 1417–1432.
Ravens-Sieberer, U., & Bullinger, M. (2001). The revised KINDL-R: Final results on reliability, validity and responsiveness of a modular HRQOL instrument for children and adolescents. Quality of Life Research, 10(3), 199.
Acknowledgements
We would like to extend sincere appreciation to the people who participated in the study. Thanks also to the College of Nursing, Taipei Medical University (TMUN-094-001) in Taiwan, who funded the study.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lee, PH., Chang, LI. & Ravens-Sieberer, U. Psychometric evaluation of the Taiwanese version of the Kiddo-KINDL® generic children’s health-related quality of life instrument. Qual Life Res 17, 603–611 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-008-9328-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-008-9328-3