Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Psychometric evaluation of the Taiwanese version of the Kiddo-KINDL® generic children’s health-related quality of life instrument

  • Published:
Quality of Life Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Health-related quality of life measures are increasingly being used in evaluating health care outcome around the world. There is a demand for the development of quality of life measures to be used cross-culturally. The aim of this study is to evaluate the psychometric properties of the Taiwanese version of Kiddo-KINDL®, a health-related quality of life questionnaire.

Methods

The original German-version of Kiddo-KINDL® was translated into Chinese (Taiwanese) via the forward/backward translation process. Psychometric testing was performed with a national sample of 1,985 healthy students between the ages of 12 and 16. Data were analyzed based on 1,675 usable questionnaires.

Results

The reliability coefficients were α = 0.81 (overall) and −0.31 to 0.84 for six subscales. The subscales with low Cronbach’s α were “school” and “friends.” Test–retest reliability was 0.77. Convergent validity was examined with the broadly used Taiwanese version of the Adolescent Depressive Mood Self-Detecting Scale. The result was satisfactory. Construct validity was further examined with exploratory factor analysis. The six-factor solution explained 45.2% of the variance. The construct of Kiddo-KINDL® (Taiwanese version) appeared to be appropriate for measuring health-related quality of life in healthy adolescents.

Conclusions

Kiddo-KINDL® (Taiwanese version) is a relatively reliable and valid questionnaire of adolescents’ health-related quality of life. However, items in the “school” and “friends” subscales need to be further modified to be more culturally appropriate.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Fuh, J. L., Wang, S. J., Lu, S. R., & Juang, K. D. (2005). Assessing quality of life for adolescents in Taiwan. Psychiatry & Clinical Neurosciences, 59(1), 11–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Yeh, C. H., & Hung, L.C. (2003). Construct validity of newly developed quality of life assessment instrument for child and adolescent cancer patients in Taiwan. Psycho-Oncology, 12(4), 345–356.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bullinger, M., Petersen, C., Schmidt, S., Baars, R. M., & The DISABKIDS Group. (2002). European pediatric health-related quality of life assessment. Quality of Life Newsletter, 29, 5–6.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Varni, J. W., Seid, M., & Kurtin, P. S. (2003). The PedsQoL™ 4.0: Reliability and validity of the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory™ Version 4.0 Generic Core Scales in healthy and patient populations. Medical Care, 39, 800–812.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Landgraf, J. M., Maunsell, E., Nixon-Speechley, K., et al. (1998). Canadian-French, German, and United Kingdom versions of the Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ-PF50): Methodology and preliminary item scaling results. Quality of Life Research, 7(5), 433–445.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Ravens-Sieberer, U., & Bullinger, M. (1998). Assessing health-related quality of life in chronically ill children with the German KINDL: First psychometric and content analytical results. Quality of Life Research, 7(5), 399–407.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Landgraf, J. M., Abetz, L., & Ware, J. E. (1999). The CHQ user’s manual (2nd ed.). Boston: HealthAct.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ravens-Sieberer, U., & Bullinger, M. (2000). Manual of KINDL® questionnaire for measuring health-related quality of life in children and adolescents - revised version. Retrieved October 9, 2006, from http://www.kindl.org/fragebogenE.html.

  9. Wee, H. L., Lee, W. W. R., Ravens-Seiberer, U., Erhart, M., & Li, S. C. (2005). Validation of the English version of the KINDL R generic children’s health-related quality of life instrument for an Asian population – results from a pilot study. Quality of Life Research, 14, 1193–1200.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Wee, H. L., Ravens-Sieberer, U., Erhart, M., & Li, S. C. (2007). Factor structure of the Singapore English version of the KINDL® children quality of life questionnaire. Health & Quality of Life Outcomes, 5(4), 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Helseth, S., & Lund, T. (2005). Assessing health-related quality of life in adolescents: Some psychometric properties of the first Norwegian version of KINDL®. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences, 19(2), 102–109.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Fernandez-Lopez, J. A., Fernandez Fidalgo, M., Cieza, A., & Ravens-Sieberer, U. (2004). Measuring health-related quality of life in children and adolescents: Preliminary validation and reliability of the Spanish version of the KINDL questionnaire. Atencion Primaira, 33(8), 434–442.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. The WHOQOL Group. (1995). The world health organization quality of life assessment (WHOQOL): Position paper from the world health organization. Social Science & Medicine, 41(10), 1403–1409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Beaton, D. E., Bombardier, C., Guillemin, F., & Ferraz, M. B. (2000). Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-reported measures. Spine, 25(24), 3186–3191.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Berle, J., & McKenna, S. P. (2004). Quality of life in depression scale: Adaptation and evaluation of the psychometric properties of the Norwegian version. Journal of Psychiatry, 58(6), 439–446.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Goldney, R. D., Fisher, L. J., Grande, E. D., & Taylor, A. W. (2004). Subsyndromal depression: Prevalence, use of health services and quality of life in Australian population. Social Psychiatry Psychiatric Epidemiology, 39, 293–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Wegener, S., Redoblado-Hodge, M. A., Lucas, S., et al. (2005). Relative contribution of psychiatric symptoms and neuropsychological function to quality of life in first-episode psychosis. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 39, 487–492.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. John Tung Foundation. (2006). The develop of Adolescent Depressive Mood Self-Detecting Scale (ADMSS) and it’s reliability, validity and index scores. Taipei: John Tung Foundation.

  19. Polit, D. E., & Beck, C. T. (2004). Assessing data quality. In D. E. Polit & C. T. Beck (Eds.), Nursing research: Principle and methods (7th ed.). Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.

  20. Carmines, E. G., & Zeller, R. A. (1979). Reliability and validity. Thousand Oak, CA: Sage publications.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Tsao, Y. L. (2004). A comparison of American and Taiwanese students: Their math perception. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 31(3), 206–213.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Herdman, M., Fox-Rushby, J., & Badia, X. (1998). A model of equivalence in the cultural adaptation of HRQoL instruments: The universalist approach. Quality of Life Research, 7, 323–335.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Guillemin, F., Bombardier, C., & Beaton, D. (1993). Cross-cultural adaptation of health-related quality of life measures: Literature review and proposed guidelines. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 46(12), 1417–1432.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Ravens-Sieberer, U., & Bullinger, M. (2001). The revised KINDL-R: Final results on reliability, validity and responsiveness of a modular HRQOL instrument for children and adolescents. Quality of Life Research, 10(3), 199.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to extend sincere appreciation to the people who participated in the study. Thanks also to the College of Nursing, Taipei Medical University (TMUN-094-001) in Taiwan, who funded the study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lu-I Chang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lee, PH., Chang, LI. & Ravens-Sieberer, U. Psychometric evaluation of the Taiwanese version of the Kiddo-KINDL® generic children’s health-related quality of life instrument. Qual Life Res 17, 603–611 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-008-9328-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-008-9328-3

Keywords

Navigation