Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Sociodemographic, Disease Status, and Illness Perceptions Predictors of Global Self-ratings of Health and Quality of Life Among those with Coronary Heart Disease – One Year Follow-up Study

  • OriginalPaper
  • Published:
Quality of Life Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This one-year follow-up study (n = 130 at baseline, n =2745 at follow-up, aged 45–74 years) examined the relationship of patients’ perceptions of coronary heart disease (CHD) and illness-related factors with global health status and global quality of life (QOL) ratings. The independent variables were CHD history (myocardial infarction, revascularisation), CHD severity (use of nitrates, CHD risk factors and co-morbidities) and illness perceptions. In multivariate regression analysis, CHD history and severity explained 13% of variance in global health status and 8% in global QOL ratings at the baseline. Illness perceptions increased the share of explained variance by 18% and 16% respectively. In the follow-up, illness perceptions explained a significant but modest share of variance in change in health status and QOL when baseline health status and QOL and CHD severity were adjusted for more symptoms being attributed to CHD, severe perceived consequences of CHD, as well as a weak belief in the controllability of CHD were related to poor global health status and QOL ratings. In structural path models associations of CHD severity factors were mediated by illness perceptions. The association of disease severity with dependent variables was weaker after controlling for illness perceptions. Cognitive representations of CHD contribute to both global health status and QOL ratings and they also mediate the associations between CHD severity and well-being. No gender differences were found in associations of illness perceptions with health status or QOL ratings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Leventhal H, Colman S (1997) Quality of life: a process view. Psychol Health 12:753–767

    Google Scholar 

  2. Alonso J, Ferrer M, Gandek B, et al. (2004) Health-related quality of life associated with chronic conditions in eight countries: results from the International Quality of Life Assessment (IQOLA) Project. Qual Life Res 13(2):283–298

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Torres M, Calderón S, Díaz I, Chacón A, Fernández F, Martínez I (2004) Health-related quality of life in coronary heart disease compared to norms in Spanish population. Qual Life Res 13:1401–1407

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Brown N, Melville M, Gray D, et al. (1999) Quality of life four years after acute myocardial infarction: short form 36 scores compared with a normal population. Heart 81:352–358

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Plevier CM, Mooy JM, Marang-van de Mheen MEA, et al (2001) Persistent impaired functioning in survivors of a myocardial infarction? Qual Life Res 10:123–132

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Bardage C, Isacson DG (2001). Hypertension and health-related quality of life. an epidemiological study in Sweden. J Clin Epidemiol 54(2):172–181

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Jensen BO, Peterson K (2003). The illness experiences of patients after a first time myocardial experience. Patient Educ Couns 51:123–131

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Stewart M, Davidson K, Meade D, Hirth A, Makrides L (2000) Myocardial infarction: survivors’ and spouses’ stress, coping, and support. J Adv Nurs 31(6):1351–1360

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Brorsson B, Bernstein SJ, Brook RH, Werko L (2002) Quality of life of patients with chronic stable angina before and four years after coronary revascularisation compared with a normal population. Heart 87(2):140–145

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Hlatky MA, Boothroyd DB, Melsop KA, et al. (2004). Medical costs and quality of life 10 to 12 years after randomization to angioplasty or bypass surgery for multivessel coronary artery disease. Circulation 110(14):1960–1966

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Jarvinen O, Julkunen J, Saarinen T, Laurikka J, Tarkka MR (2005) Effect of diabetes on outcome and changes in quality of life after coronary artery bypass grafting. Ann Thorac Surg 79(3):819–824

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Brorson B, Bernstein SJ, Brook RH, Werkö L (2001). Quality of life of chronic angina patients 4 years after coronary angioplasty or coronary bypass surgery. J Intern Med 249:47–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Lockyer L, Bury M (2001) The construction of a modern epidemic: the implications for women of a gendering of coronary heart disease. J Adv Nurs 39(5):432–440

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Hochman JS, Tamis JE, Thompson TD, et al (1999). Sex, clinical presentation, and outcome in patients with acute coronary syndromes. Global use of strategies to open occluded coronary arteries in acute coronary syndromes IIb investigators. N Engl J Med 341(4):226–232

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Hetemaa T, Keskimaki I, Manderbacka K, Leyland AH, Koskinen S (2003). How did the recent increase in the supply of coronary operations in Finland affect socioeconomic and gender equity in their use? J Epidemiol Community Health 57(3):178–185

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Hallman T, Burell G, Setterlind S, Oden A, Lisspers J. (2001) Psychosocial risk factors for coronary heart disease, their importance compared with other risk factors and gender differences in sensitivity. J Cardiovasc Risk 8(1):39–49

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Brezinka V, Kittel F (1996) Psychosocial factors of coronary heart disease in women: A review. Soc Sci Med 42:1351–1365

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Leventhal H, Leventhal EA, Contrada RJ (1998). Self-regulation, health, and behaviour: A perceptual-cognitive approach. Psychol Health 13:717–733

    Google Scholar 

  19. Petrie KJ, Weinman J, Sharpe N, Buckley J (1996). Role of patients’ view of their illness in predicting return to work and functioning after myocardial infarction: Longitudinal study. Br Med J 312:1191–1194

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Cooper A, Lloyd G, Weinman J, Jackson G (1999) Why patients do not attend cardiac rehabilitation: Role of intentions and illness beliefs. Heart 82:234–236

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Whitmarsh A, Koutantji M, Sidell K (2003). Illness perceptions, mood and coping in predicting attendance at cardiac rehabilitation. Br J Health Psychol 8(Pt 2):209–221

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Figueiras MJ, Weinman J (2003) Do similar patient and spouse perceptions of myocardial infarction predict recovery? Psychol Health 18(2):201–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Manderbacka K (1998) Examining what self-rated health question is understood to mean by respondents. Scand J Soc Med 26(2):145–153

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Idler EL, Benyamini Y (1997) Self-rated health and mortality: A review of twenty-seven community studies. J Health Soc Behav 38:21–37

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Lundberg O, Manderbacka K (1996) Assessing reliability of a measure of self-rated health. Scand J Soc Med 24(3):218–224

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Fleiss J (1981) Statistical Methods for Rates and Propotions. John Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  27. Boer A, Lanschot J, Stalmier P, van Sandick J, Hulscher J, de Haes J, Spangers MAG (2004) Is a single-item visual analogy scale as valid, reliable and responsive as multi-item scales in measureingquality of life? Qual Life Res 13:311–320

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Heinonen H, Aro A, Aalto A-M, Uutela A (2004) Is the evaluation of the global quality of life determined by emotional status? Qual Life Res 13:1347–1356

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Smith K, Avis N, Assman S (1999) Distinguishing between quality of life and health status in quality of life research: A meta-analysis. Qual Life Res 8:447–459

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Weinman J, Petrie KJ, Moss-Morris R, Horne R (1996) The illness perception questionnaire: A new method for assessing the cognitive representations of illness. Psychol Health 11:431–445

    Google Scholar 

  31. Scharloo M, Kaptein A, Weinman J, et al (1998). Illness perceptions, coping and functioning in patients with rheumatoid arthritis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and psoriasis. J Psychosom Res 44:537–585

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Moss-Morris R, Weinman J, Petrie KJ, Horne R, Cameron LD, Buick D (2002) The revised illness perception questionnaire (IPQ-R). Psychol Health 17:1–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Aalto AM, Heijmans M, Weinman J, Aro AR (2005) Illness perceptions in coronary heart disease. Sociodemographic, illness-related, and psychosocial correlates. J Psychosom Res 58(5):393–402

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Chow GC (1960) Tests of equality between sets of coefficients in two linear regressions. Econometrica 28:591–605

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Green W (2000) Econometric Analysis. Prentice-Hall Inc., New jersey

    Google Scholar 

  36. Baron RM, Kenny DA (1986) The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J Pers Soc Psychol 51:1173–1182

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Helakorpi S, Patja K, Prättälä R, Aro AR, Uutela A. Suomalaisen aikuisvästön terveyskäyttäytyminen ja terveys, kevät 2002. Helsinki: Kansanterveyslaitoksen julkaisuja B12/2002; 2002

  38. Huxley R, Neil A, Collins R (2002) Unraveling the fetal origins hypothesis: Is there really an inverse association between bithweight and subsequent blood pressure? Lancet 360:659–656

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Robinson-Whelen S, Kiecolt-Glaser J (1997) The importance of social versus temporal comparison appraisals among older adults. J Appl Soc Psychol 27(11):959–966

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Jylhä M, Leskinen E, Alanen E, Leskinen AL, Heikkinen E (1986) Self-rated health and associated factors among men of different ages. J Gerontol 41(6):710–717

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Damian J, Ruigomez A, Pastor V, Martin-Moreno JM (1999) Determinants of self assessed health among Spanish older people living at home. J Epidemiol Commun Health 53(7):412–416

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Manderbacka K, Lundberg O (1996) Examining points of reference of self-rated health among Swedish oldest old. Arch Gerontol Geriatr 23(1):47–60

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Schnittker J (2005) When mental health becomes health: age and the shifting meaning of self-evaluations of general health. Milbank Q 83(3):397–423

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Jang Y, Poon LW, Martin P (2004) Individual differences in the effects of disease and disability on depressive symptoms: The role of age and subjective health. Int J Aging Hum Dev 59(2):125–137

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Idler EL (1993) Age differences in self-assessments of health: Age changes, cohort differences, or survivorship? J Gerontol 48(6):S289–S300

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Hetemaa T, Manderbacka K, Reunanen A, Koskinen S, Keskimäki I. Socioeconomic inequities in invasive cardiac procedures among patients with incident angina pectoris or myocardial infarction. Scand J Public Health (in press)

  47. Weissman MM, Leaf PJ, Tischler GL, et al (1988) Affective disorders in five United States communities. Psychol Med 18(1):141–53

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Pirkola SP, Isometsa E, Suvisaari J, Aro H, Joukamaa M, Poikolainen K, et al (2005) DSM-IV mood-, anxiety- and alcohol use disorders and their comorbidity in the Finnish general population – Results from the Health 2000 Study. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 40(1):1–10

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Jorm AF, Windsor TD, Dear KB, Anstey KJ, Christensen H, Rodgers B (2005) Age group differences in psychological distress: The role of psychosocial risk factors that vary with age. Psychol Med 35(9):1253–1263

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Christensen H, Jorm AF, Mackinnon AJ, et al (1999). Age differences in depression and anxiety symptoms: A structural equation modelling analysis of data from a general population sample. Psychol Med 29(2):325–S339

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Nickel JT, Brown KJ, Smith BA (1990) Depression and anxiety among chronically ill hearth patients: Age differences in risk and predicotrs. Res Nurs Health 13:87–97

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Crilley JG, Farrer M (2001) Impact of first myocardial infarction on self-perceived health status. Qjm 94(1):13–18

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Grace SL, Evindar A, Kung TN, Scholey PE, Stewart DE (2004) Automatic referral to cardiac rehabilitation. Med Care 42(7):661–669

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Edwards R, Suresh R, Lynch S, Clarkson P, Stanley P (2001) Illness perceptions and mood in chronic fatique syndrome. J Psychosom Res 50:65–68

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Jopson NM, Moss-Morris R. The role of illness severity and illness representations in adjusting to multiple sclerosis. J Psychosom Res 2003; 54(6):503–511; discussion 513–514

    Google Scholar 

  56. Orbell S, Johnston M, Rowley D, Espley A, Davey P (1998) Cognitive representations of illness and functional and affective adjustment following surgery for osteoarthritis. Soc Sci Med 47(1):93–102

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Rutter CL, Rutter DR (2002). Illness representation, coping and outcome in irritable bowel syndrome. Br J Health Psychol 7:377–S391

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Schiaffino KM, Shawaryn MA, Blum D (1998) Examining the impact of illness representations on psychological adjustment to chronic illnesses. Health Psychol 17:262–268

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Scharloo M, Kaptein AA, Weinman JA, Willems LN, Rooijmans HG (2000) Physical and psychological correlates of functioning in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. J Asthma 37(1):17–29

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anna-Mari Aalto.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Aalto, AM., Aro, A.R., Weinman, J. et al. Sociodemographic, Disease Status, and Illness Perceptions Predictors of Global Self-ratings of Health and Quality of Life Among those with Coronary Heart Disease – One Year Follow-up Study. Qual Life Res 15, 1307–1322 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-006-0010-3

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-006-0010-3

Keywords

Navigation