Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Ethnic differences in quality of life in adolescents among Chinese, Malay and Indians in Singapore

  • Published:
Quality of Life Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background: Health-related quality of life in adolescents and ethnic and cultural differences are not well characterized. We used the Quality of Life Questionnaire for Adolescents (QOLQA) to examine ethnic differences in reported QOL scores among Chinese, Malay and Indian ethnicities in Singapore. Methods: The 70-item QOLQA measuring five QOL domains (physical, psychological, independence, social and environmental) was administered to a random sample of 1363 school-children aged 10–15 years, representative of the ethnic composition of Singapore adolescents (Chinese 72%, Malays 20% and Indians 8%). Results: Indians reported the highest overall QOL (mean 3.71 ± SD 0.54) compared to Chinese (3.59 ± 0.43), p <0.05, and Malays (3.58 ± 0.44), p < 0.05. In particular, Indians had significantly higher psychological QOL scores (3.73 ± 0.61) compared to Chinese (3.55 ± 0.54), p < 0.01. On the other hand, Chinese scored highest on physical and independence domains (3.97 ± 0.54), p < 0.01 compared to Malays (3.82 ± 0.55). There were no statistically significant gender differences in QOL scores. QOL declined significantly from age 10 to 15 for overall score, psychological, physical (p < 0.01) and environmental (p < 0.05). Lower socio-economic status and the self-report of a significant health problem were significantly associated with lower overall QOL and most domains. These ethnic differences persisted after adjusting for differences in socio-economic and health status. Psychometric properties and known group construct validity appeared to be similar across different ethnic groups, but compared to Chinese (r = 0.39) or Malays (r = 0.39), Indians showed a higher correlation of psychological scores with physical score (r = 0.59) and with other domain scores. Conclusion: Significant ethnic differences in reported adolescent quality of life among Chinese, Malays and Indians in Singapore that are independent of socio-economic and health status suggest important cultural differences.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. R. Schabas (1992) Opportunities for Health. Ontario. Ministry of Health Toronto

    Google Scholar 

  2. P. Rosenbaum et al. (1990) Pediatrics: Assessing quality of life B. Spilker (Eds) Quality of Life Assessments in Clinical Trials. Raven Press New York 205–215

    Google Scholar 

  3. JM Landgraf et al. (1996) The Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ): A User’s Manual The Health Institute Boston, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  4. WL Stone KL. Lemanek (1990) Developmental issues in children’s self-reports AM. La Greca (Eds) Through the Eyes of the Child: Obtaining Self-reports from Children and Adolescents. Allyn & Bacon Boston 18–56

    Google Scholar 

  5. X Wang N Matsuda H Ma N. Shinfuku (2000) ArticleTitleComparative study of quality of life between the Chinese and Japanese adolescent populations Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 54 IssueID2 147–152 Occurrence Handle10803807

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. S Schmidt M. Bullinger (2003) ArticleTitleCurrent issues in cross-cultural quality of life instrument development Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 84 IssueID4 Suppl 2 S29–S34 Occurrence Handle12692769

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. NB Anderson CA. Armstead (1995) ArticleTitleTowards understanding the association of socioeconomic status and health: A new challenge for the biophysical approach Psychosom Med. 57 213–225 Occurrence Handle7652122

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. BE Meyerowitz J Richardson S Hudson B. Leedham (1998) ArticleTitleEthnicity and cancer outcomes: Behavioural and psychological considerations Psychol Bull. 13 IssueID1 47–70

    Google Scholar 

  9. PA Johnson L Goldman EJ Orav et al. (1995) ArticleTitleComparison of the medical outcome study short-form 36-item health survey in Black patients and White patients with acute chest pain Med Care. 33 IssueID2 145–160 Occurrence Handle7837823

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. K Ashing-Giwa PA Ganz L. Petersen (1999) ArticleTitleQuality of life of African-American long term breast carcinoma survivors Cancer. 85 IssueID2 418–426 Occurrence Handle10023710

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. S Tennstedt BH. Chang (1998) ArticleTitleThe relative contribution of ethnicity versus socioeconomic status in explaining differences in disability and receipt of informal care J Gerontol Ser B, Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 53 IssueID2 S61–S70

    Google Scholar 

  12. SM Skevington et al. (1999) ArticleTitleSelecting national items for the WHOQOL: Conceptual and psychometric considerations Soc Sci Med. 48 473–487 Occurrence Handle10075173

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. The WHOQOL Group. The World Health Organization quality of life assessment (WHOQOL): Development and general psychometric properties. Soc Sci Med 1998; 46(12): 1569–1585

    Google Scholar 

  14. H Ma CD Wang N Shinfuku et al. (1999) ArticleTitleValidity and reliability of QOL questionnaire for adolescents (Chinese version) Chin Mental Health J. 13 18–19

    Google Scholar 

  15. K Burstorm et al. (2001) ArticleTitleHealth-related quality of life by disease and socio-economic group in the general population in Sweden Health Policy. 55 IssueID1 51–69 Occurrence Handle11137188

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. BH Wai C Hong KE. Heok (1999) ArticleTitleSuicidal behavior among young people in Singapore Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 21 IssueID2 128–133 Occurrence Handle10228894

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. EK. Ung (2003) ArticleTitleYouth suicide and parasuicide in Singapore Ann Acad Med Singapore. 32 IssueID1 12–18 Occurrence Handle12625092

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. J Thumboo et al. (2003) ArticleTitleQuality of life in an urban Asian population: the impact of ethnicity and socio-economic status Soc Sci Med. 56 1761–1772 Occurrence Handle12639592

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. LL Hourani et al. (1986) ArticleTitleDeterminants of perceived mental health status and help-seeking behavior: Preliminary testing of a conceptual model Soc Sci Med. 22 IssueID10 1081–1086 Occurrence Handle3738554

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. CG. Helman (1990) Culture, Health and Illness: An Introduction for Health Professionals Wright London.

    Google Scholar 

  21. A. Kleinman (1987) ArticleTitleAnthropology and psychiatry: The role of culture in cross-cultural research on illness Cult Med Psychiatry. 151 447–454

    Google Scholar 

  22. D Raphael E Rukholm I Brown et al. (1996) ArticleTitleThe quality of life profile – adolescent version: Background, description, and initial validation J Adolescent Health. 19 366–375

    Google Scholar 

  23. LT Berntsson L. Kohler (2001) ArticleTitleQuality of life among children aged 2–17 years in the five Nordic countries. Comparison between 1984 and 1996 Eur J Public Health. 11 IssueID4 437–445 Occurrence Handle11766487

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. M Apajasalo H Sintonen C Holmberg et al. (1996) ArticleTitleQuality of life in early adolescence: A sixteen-dimensional health-related measure (16D) Qual Life Res. 5 IssueID2 205–211 Occurrence Handle8998489

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. S Haugland et al. (2001) ArticleTitleSubjective health complaints in adolescence. A cross-national comparison of prevalence and dimensionality. Eur J Public Health. 11 IssueID1 4–10 Occurrence Handle11276570

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. LT Berntsson L. Kohler (2001) ArticleTitleQuality of life among children aged 2–17 years in the five Nordic countries. Comparison between 1984 and 1996 Eur J Public Health. 11 IssueID4 437–445 Occurrence Handle11766487

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. D Raphael E Rukholm I Brown et al. (1996) ArticleTitleThe quality of life profile – adolescent version: Background, description, and initial validation J Adolescent Health. 19 366–375

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychological Medicine, National University of Singapore, National University Hospital, 5 Lower Kent Ridge Road, Singapore, 119074, Singapore

    Tze Pin Ng & Lionel Chee Chong Lim

  2. Mount Elizabeth Medical Centre, Singapore

    Aizhen Jin

  3. International Center for Medical Research, Kobe University School of Medicine, Japan

    N. Shinfuku

Authors
  1. Tze Pin Ng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Lionel Chee Chong Lim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Aizhen Jin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. N. Shinfuku
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tze Pin Ng.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ng, T.P., Lim, L.C.C., Jin, A. et al. Ethnic differences in quality of life in adolescents among Chinese, Malay and Indians in Singapore. Qual Life Res 14, 1755–1768 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-005-1741-2

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-005-1741-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation