Abstract
Introduction. The Hong Kong Chinese version of the WHOQOL-BREF was designed as a self-administered questionnaire and has limitations in clinical application on subjects who have limitations in reading or writing. An interview version is therefore needed to avoid sampling biases in clinical studies. Since there are significant differences in the written Chinese and spoken Cantonese, which is a dialect commonly spoken among people in Hong Kong, and adaptation process for converting the written Chinese into spoken Cantonese was necessary. The interview version was designed to allow administration in both face-to-face interview and telephone interview mode. Methods. Three members of the research team translated the formal written Chinese in the self-administered version of the WHOQOL-BREF(HK) into colloquial Cantonese separately. Brief notes extracted from the facet definitions of the WHOQOL-100 were added in brackets after some questions to further explain the intention of the questions. Two series of focus groups were conducted and subsequently the field test version was produced. 329 subjects were recruited by convenient sampling method for the field test. Results. The interview version and the self-administered version was found equivalent. The ICC values of the domain scores ranged from 0.73 in the environment domain to 0.83 in the psychological domain. The face-to-face interview and telephone interview mode of administration were also found equivalent. The ICC for the domain scores ranged from 0.76 in the social interaction domain to 0.84 in the psychological domain. The other psychometric properties of the interview version were found comparable to the self-administered version. Conclusion. The self-administered and the interview version of the WHOQOL-BREF are regarded as identical in group comparison. The authors advise that it is acceptable to use different versions on different subjects in the same study, provided that the same version is applied on the same subject throughout the study.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- WHOQOL:
-
World Health Organization Quality of Life
- BREF:
-
abbreviated version
References
World Health Organisation. Measuring Quality of Life: The Development of the World Health Organisation Quality of Life Instrument (WHOQOL). Geneva: WHO, 1992.
World Health Organisation. Resources for New WHOQOL Centres. HO/MNH/PSF/95.2, Geneva: WHO, 1993.
World Health Organisation. The World Health Organisation quality of life assessment (WHOQOL): Position paper from the World Health Organisation. Soc Sci Med 1995; 41(10): 1403–1409.
World Health Organisation. WHOQOL-100 Facet Definitions and Questions. WHO/MNH/PSF/95.1.B. Rev.1, Geneva: WHO, 1995.
World Health Organisation. Field Trial: WHOQOL-100. The 100 Questions with Response scales. MNH/PSF 95.1D Rev.1, 1995.
World Health Organisation. Development of the WHOQOL-BREF from the WHOQOL-100. Geneva: WHO, 1997.
Leung KF, Tay M, Cheng S, Lin F. Hong Kong Chinese version World Health Organisation Quality of Life – Abbreviated version. Hong Kong Hospital Authority, 1997.
JE Brazier R Harper NM Jones A O’Cathain KJ Thomas T Usherwood L. Westlake (1992) ArticleTitleValidating the SF-36 health survey questionnaire: New outcome measure for primary care Brit Med J. 305 IssueID6846 160–164 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK38zos1Wgug%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10.1136/bmj.305.6846.160 Occurrence Handle1285753 Occurrence Handle1883187
V Hayes J Morris C Wolfe M. Morgan (1995) ArticleTitleThe SF-36 health survey questionnaire: is it suitable for use with older adults? Age Aging 24 IssueID2 120–125 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK2MzhtlKhug%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10.1093/ageing/24.2.120
Portney LC, Watkins MP. Foundations of Clinical Research – Applications to Practice. Appleton & Lange, P. 514. 1993.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Leung, K.F., Wong, W.W., Tay, M.S.M. et al. Development and validation of the interview version of the Hong Kong Chinese WHOQOL-BREF. Qual Life Res 14, 1413–1419 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-004-4772-1
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-004-4772-1