Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Proxy assessment of quality of life in pediatric clinical trials: Application of the Health Utilities Index 3

  • Published:
Quality of Life Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background: With increased cure rates, pediatric oncology protocols increasingly seek to document the impact of treatment on patients’ disease, symptoms, and functional capacity. Procedure: Nurses as proxy respondents used the Health Utilities Index 3 (HUI3) to assess the health-related quality of life (HRQL) in twenty-five patients (age 6 years or older) enrolled on a frontline protocol for leukemia. HRQL observations (n = 70) were made at three different time points to coincide with high-dose methotrexate therapy. Additionally, the proxy respondents evaluated the ease of use of the instrument and the data quality. Results: As patients’ health status declined, the number of unassessable HRQL items increased. These missing data made scoring cumbersome and precluded calculation of the overall HRQL scores for nearly 50% of the patients. Conclusions: Use of the provider proxy-assessed HUI3 in pediatric cancer trials may result in a high proportion of missing data. Trials may benefit more from the use of HRQL measures that consider the acuity of the child’s illness, domains specific and sensitive to both disease and treatment, and items that can be proxy-assessed independent of input from parent or patient. Evaluations that combine child self-reports with both parent and provider reports may ultimately provide the most reliable and comprehensive perspective on children’s quality of life.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. DA Revicki D Osoba D Fairclough etal. (2000) ArticleTitleRecommendations on health related quality of life research to support labeling and promotional claims in the United States Qual Life Res 9 IssueID8 887–900 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M3ivVCgsQ%3D%3D Occurrence Handle11284208

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. D Scott T. Garrood (2000) ArticleTitleQuality of life measures: Use and abuse Baillere’s Clinical Rheumatology 14 IssueID4 663–687 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M%2Fpt1Ojug%3D%3D

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. JL Wallander M Schmitt HM. Koot (2001) ArticleTitleQuality of life measurement in children and adolescents: Issues, instruments, and applications J Clin Psychol 57 IssueID4 571–585 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M3os1Kltw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle11255207

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. MK Soni D. Cella (2002) ArticleTitleQuality of Life and symptom measures in oncology: An overview Am J Managed Care 8 IssueID18 Suppl s560–s573

    Google Scholar 

  5. LS Matza AR Swensen EM Flood K Secnik N. Kline-Leidy (2004) ArticleTitleAssessment of health-related quality of life in children: A review of conceptual, methodological, and regulatory issues Value Health 7 IssueID1 79–92 Occurrence Handle14720133

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. LR Rajmil M Herdman M FernandezDe Sanmamed etal. (2004) ArticleTitleGeneric health-related quality of life instruments in children and adolescents: A qualitative analysis of content J Adol Health 34 37–45

    Google Scholar 

  7. C Eiser R. Morse (2001) ArticleTitleThe measurement of quality of life in children: Past and future perspectives Dev Behav Pediatr. 22 IssueID4 248–256 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3MvovVOrug%3D%3D

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. MH Liang RA Lew G Stucki PR Fortin L. Daltroy (2002) ArticleTitleMeasuring clinically important changes with patient-oriented questionnaires Med Care. 40 IssueID4 Suppl II45–II51 Occurrence Handle12064581

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. DL Patrick YP. Chiang (2000) ArticleTitleMeasurement of health outcomes in treatment effectiveness evaluations: Conceptual and methodological challenges Med Care 38 IssueID9 Suppl II14–II25 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3cvntlOkug%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10982087

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. M. Dijkers (1999) ArticleTitleMeasuring quality of life: Methodological issues Am J Phy Med Rehabil 78 286–300 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1M3ntVamtg%3D%3D

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. J Horsman W Furlong D Feeny G. Torrance (2003) ArticleTitleThe health utilities index (HUI): Concepts, measurement properties and applications Health and Quality of Life Outcomes 1 54 Occurrence Handle14613568

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. PM Fayers DJ Hand K Bjordal M. Groenvold (1997) ArticleTitleCausal indicators in quality of life research Qual Life Res 6 IssueID5 393–406 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByiH3srmtlU%3D Occurrence Handle9290306

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. WJ Furlong DH Feeny GW Torrance RD. Barr (2001) ArticleTitleThe health utilities index (HUI) system for assessing health-related quality of life in clinical studies Ann Med 33 IssueID5 375–384 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3MvksFWqtA%3D%3D Occurrence Handle11491197

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. D. Osoba (1999) ArticleTitleWhat has been learned from measuring health related quality of life in clinical oncology? Euro J Cancer 35 IssueID11 1565–1570 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c7jvV2iug%3D%3D

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. C Sanders M Egger J Donovan et al. (1998) ArticleTitleReporting on quality of life in randomized controlled trials: Bibliographic study BMJ 317 191–194

    Google Scholar 

  16. M. Sullivan (2002) ArticleTitleThe new subjective medicine: Taking the patient’s point of view on health care and health Social Sci Med 56 IssueID7 1595–1604

    Google Scholar 

  17. C Eiser R. Morse (2001) ArticleTitleCan parents rate their child’s health-related quality of life? Results of a systematic review Qual Life Res 10 347–357 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD38%2FjsVymtQ%3D%3D Occurrence Handle11763247

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. GH Verrips MC Stuifbergen AL den Ouden et al. (2001) ArticleTitleMeasuring health status using the Health Utilities Index: Agreement between raters and between modalities of administration J Clin Epidemiol 54 IssueID5 475–481 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M3ovVeqtQ%3D%3D Occurrence Handle11337210

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. C LeGales N Costet JC Gentet etal. (1999) ArticleTitleCross-cultural adaptation of a health status classification system in children with cancer. First results of the French adaptation of the Health Utilities Index Marks 2 and 3 Int J Cancer Suppl 12 112–118 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c7ksFyqsA%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10679881

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. AW Glaser K Davies D Walker D. Brazier (1997) ArticleTitleInfluence of proxy respondents and mode of administration on health status assessment following central nervous system tumours in childhood Qual Life Res 6 IssueID1 43–53 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByiB3Mnhs1c%3D Occurrence Handle9062441

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. MAG Sprangers NK. Aaronson (1992) ArticleTitleThe role of health care provides and significant others in evaluating the quality of life of patients with chronic disease: A review J Clin Epidemiol 45 743–760 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:By2A3Mjpslc%3D Occurrence Handle1619454

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. C Eiser R. Morse (2001) ArticleTitleQuality of life measures in chronic diseases of childhood Health Technol Assess 5 IssueID4 1–157 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M7mtlaktw%3D%3D

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. DL Patrick P. Erickson (1993) Health status and health policy: Quality of Life in Health Care Evaluation and Resource Allocation Oxford University Press New York

    Google Scholar 

  24. D Feeny A Leiper RD Barr etal. (1993) ArticleTitleThe comprehensive assessment of health status in survivors of childhood cancer: Application to high risk acute lymphoblastic leukaemia Br J Cancer 67 IssueID5 1047–1052 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByyB28vhsl0%3D Occurrence Handle8494697

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. GW Torrance W Furlong D Feeny M. Boyle (1995) ArticleTitleMulti-attribute preference functions: Health Utilities Index PharmacoEconomics 7 IssueID6 503–520 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:BymD2cjptVw%3D Occurrence Handle10155336

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. D Feeny W Furlong G. Torrance (1999) ArticleTitleThe health utilities index: An update Qual Life Newslett 22 8–9

    Google Scholar 

  27. RD Barr MKR Pai S Weitzman et al. (1994) ArticleTitleA multi-attribute approach to health status measurement and clinical management illustrated by an application to brain tumors in childhood Int J Oncol 4 639–648

    Google Scholar 

  28. DH Feeny W Furlong RD Barr GW Torrance P Rosenbaum S. Weitzman (1992) ArticleTitleA comprehensive multi-attribute system for classifying the health status of survivors of childhood cancer J Clin Oncol 10 IssueID6 923–928 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:By2B28fpsVI%3D Occurrence Handle1316952

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. D Feeny W Furlong GW Torrance et al. (2002) ArticleTitleMultiattribute and single-attribute utility functions for the Health Utilities Index Mark 3 System Med Care 40 IssueID2 113–128 Occurrence Handle11802084

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. S Kaasa MJ Hjermstad MS Jordhoy F Wisloff JH. Loge (1998) ArticleTitleCompliance in quality of life data: A Norwegian experience Stat Med 17 IssueID5–7 623–632 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1c3htV2rsg%3D%3D Occurrence Handle9549811

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. D Curran M Bacchi SF Schmitz G Molenberghs RJ. Sylvester (1998) ArticleTitleIdentifying the types of missingness in quality of life data from clinical trials Stat Med 17 739–756 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1c3htV2ruw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle9549820

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. DL Fairclough HF Peterson V. Chang (1998) ArticleTitleWhy are missing quality of life data a problem in clinical trials of cancer therapy? Stat Med 17 667–677 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1c3htV2rtg%3D%3D Occurrence Handle9549815

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. RJA Little DB. Rubin (1987) Statistical Analysis with Missing Data J. Wiley and Sons New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  34. Furlong WJ, Feeny DH, Torrance GW. McMaster Health Utilities Index: Algorithm for determining health status classification levels, health states, health-related quality of life scores and single attribute level utility scores from HUI 2.3 40-item interviewer-administered health status questionnaires, 1998

  35. G Velikova D Stark P. Selby (1999) ArticleTitleQuality of life instruments in oncology Eur J Cancer 35 IssueID11 1571–1580 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c7jvV2iuw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10673964

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. D Cella EA Hahn K. Dineen (2002) ArticleTitleMeaningful change in cancer-specific quality of life scores: Differences between improvement and worsening Qual Life Res 11 IssueID3 207–221 Occurrence Handle12074259

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. F Roila E. Cortesi (2001) ArticleTitleQuality of life as a primary end point in oncology Ann Oncol 12 IssueID(Suppl 3 S3–6

    Google Scholar 

  38. JW Varni M Seid CA. Rode (1999) The PedsQL: measurement model for the pediatric quality of life inventory.Med Care 37 IssueID2 126–139 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1M7ks1OhsA%3D%3D

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. JW Varni TM Burwinkle JR Jacobs M Gottschalk F Kaufman etal. (2003) ArticleTitleThe PedsQL in type 1 and type 2 diabetes: Reliability and validity of the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory Generic Core Scales and type 1 Diabetes Module Diabetes Care 26 IssueID3 631–637 Occurrence Handle12610013

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. D Raphael E Rukholm I Brown P Hill-Bailey E. Donato (1996) ArticleTitleThe quality of life profile-adolescent version: Background, description and initial validation J Adol Hlth 19 366–375 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByiD1cfjs1Q%3D

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. EM LeCoq AJP Boeke PD Bezemer J Bruil JThM. vanEijk (2000) ArticleTitleClinimetric properties of a parent report on their offspring’s quality of life J Clin Epidemiol 53 139–146 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c7psFKqtg%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10729685

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. R. Cummins (1997) Directory of Instruments to Measure Quality of Life and Cognate Areas Australia: Deakin University Melbourne

    Google Scholar 

  43. S Saigal D Feeny W Furlong et al. (1994) ArticleTitleComparison of the health related quality of life of extremely low birth weight children and a reference group of children at age eight years J Pediatr 125 418–425 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByuA2M7ktlY%3D Occurrence Handle8071752

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. RD Barr C Petrie W Furlong et al. (1997) ArticleTitleHealth related quality of life during post inducing chemotherapy in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia in remission: An influence of corticosteroid therapy Int J Oncol 11 333–339 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DyaK2sXlt1Ggsbo%3D

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. RD Barr W Furlong S Dawson et al. (1993) ArticleTitleAn assessment of global health status in survivors of acute lymphoblastic leukemia in childhood Am J Pediatr Hematol Oncol 15 284–290 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByyA3Mbgs1c%3D Occurrence Handle8328641

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. RJ Gemke GJ. Bonsel (1996) ArticleTitleReliability and validity of a comprehensive health status measure in a heterogeneous population of children admitted to intensive care J Clin Epidemiol 49 IssueID3 327–333 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:BymB2srnslY%3D Occurrence Handle8676181

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. MH Boyle W Furlong D Feeny G Torrance J. Hatcher (1995) ArticleTitleReliability of the Health Utilities Index – Mark III used in the 1991 Cycle 6 General Social Survey health Questionnaire Qual Life Res 1 IssueID4 249–257

    Google Scholar 

  48. AC Whitton H Rhydderch W Furlong D Feeny RD. Barr (1997) ArticleTitleSelf-reported comprehensive health status of adult brain tumor patients using the Health Utilities Index Cancer 80 IssueID2 258–265 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByiA28%2FgtFU%3D Occurrence Handle9217039

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. RK. Mulhern (1999) ArticleTitleCorrelation of the Health Utilities Index Mark 2 Cognition Scale and neuropsychological functioning among survivors of childhood medulloblastoma Int J Cancer Suppl 12 91–94 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c7ksFyruw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10679878

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. K Nixon-Speechley E Maunsell M Desmeules etal. (1999) ArticleTitleMutual concurrent validity of the child health questionnaire and the health utilities index: An exploratory analysis using survivors of childhood cancer Int J Cancer Suppl 12 95–105 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c7ksFyqsg%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10679879

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. RD Barr D Chalmers S DePauw W Furlong Weitzman␣S D. Feeny (2000) ArticleTitleHealth related quality of life in survivors of Wilms’ tumor and advanced neuroblastoma: A cross-sectional study J Clin Oncol 18 IssueID18 3280–3287 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3cvotlemtg%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10986061

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. RD Barr A Gonzalez M Longchong etal. (2001) ArticleTitleHealth status and health-related quality of life in survivors of cancer in childhood in Latin American: A MISPHO feasibility study Int J Oncol 19 IssueID2 413–421 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3MzptFSltw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle11445861

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Q Wang W Furlong D Feeny G Torrance R. Barr (2002) ArticleTitleHow robust is the Health Utilities Index Mark 2 utility function? Med Decis Making 22 IssueID4 350–358 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3sXpslekt7Y%3D Occurrence Handle12150600

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. LeGales C Buron N Costet S Rosman PR. Slama (2002) ArticleTitleDevelopment of a preference-weighted health status␣classification system in France: The Health Utilities Index 3 Health Care Manage Sci 5 IssueID1 41–51

    Google Scholar 

  55. M Silberfeld S Rueda M Krahn G. Naglie (2002) ArticleTitleContent validity for dementia of three generic preference based health related quality of life instruments Qual Life Res 11 IssueID1 71–79 Occurrence Handle12003057

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. KW Smith NE Avis SF. Assmann (1999) ArticleTitleDistinguishing between quality of life and health status in quality of life research: A meta-analysis Qual Life Res 8 IssueID5 447–459 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1MvgtlCqtg%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10474286

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. JG Trudel M Rivard PL Dobkin JM Leclerc P. Robaey (1998) ArticleTitlePsychometric properties of the Health Utilities Index Mark 2 system in paediatric oncology patients Qual Life Res 7 IssueID5 421–432 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1czls1Omsw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle9691722

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. RA Oostenbrink HA Moll ML. Essink-Bot (2002) ArticleTitleThe EQ-5D and the Health Utilities Index for permanent sequelae after meningitis A head-to-toe comparison. J Clin Epidemiol 55 IssueID8 791–799

    Google Scholar 

  59. JA Kopec JI Williams T To PC. Austin (2001) ArticleTitleCross-cultural comparisons of health status in Canada using the Health Utilities Index Ethnic Health 6 IssueID1 41–50 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD38%2FhtFClug%3D%3D

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. JA Kopec SE Schultz V Goel J. Ivan-Williams (2001) ArticleTitleCan the health utilities index measure change? Med Care 39 IssueID6 562–574 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3Mzkt1WjsQ%3D%3D Occurrence Handle11404641

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Dlugos D, Ravina B, Jacobstein C, Chimwaza A, Siderowf A. (2000) Comments on: Applicability of the Health Utilities index to a population of childhood survivors of central nervous system tumours in the UK. Glaser AW, Furlong W, Waltzer DA, etal. Eur J Cancer 1999; 35: 256–261; Eur J Cancer 36(11): 1459–1460

  62. C. Jenkinson (1999) ArticleTitleDeath by questionnaire: Quality of life measurement could seriously damage your health J Health Serv Res Policy 4 IssueID3 129–130 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1MzltlShtQ%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10538875

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. CR Kennedy K. Leyland (1999) ArticleTitleComparison of screening instruments for disability and emotional behavioral disorders with a generic measure of health related quality of life in survivors of childhood brain tumors Int J Cancer Suppl 12 106–111 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c7ksFyqsw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10679880

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. ZM Younossi N Boparai M McCormick LL Price G. Guyatt (2001) ArticleTitleAssessment of utilities and health-related quality of life in patients with chronic liver disease Am J Gastroenterol 96 IssueID2 579–583 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M7ot12lsg%3D%3D Occurrence Handle11232711

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Nursing Research, St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee, USA

    Cheryl L. Cox, Pam Hinds & Elizabeth Burghen

  2. Department of Biostatistics, St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee, USA

    Shelly Lensing & Shesh N. Rai

  3. Department of Hematology-Oncology, St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, 332. Lauderdale St., Memphis, TN, 38105-2794, USA

    Ching-Hon Pui

Authors
  1. Cheryl L. Cox
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Shelly Lensing
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Shesh N. Rai
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Pam Hinds
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Elizabeth Burghen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Ching-Hon Pui
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cheryl L. Cox.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cox, C.L., Lensing, S., Rai, S.N. et al. Proxy assessment of quality of life in pediatric clinical trials: Application of the Health Utilities Index 3. Qual Life Res 14, 1045–1056 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-004-4714-y

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-004-4714-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation