Skip to main content
Log in

Change in quality of life of people with stroke over time: True change or response shift?

  • Published:
Quality of Life Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In many studies, assessments of change in self-report measures such as health-related quality of life must account for potential response shift, including reconceptualization and changes in internal standards of measurement. Objective: The objective of our study was to compare healthy controls and individuals with stroke on the extent to which changes in internal standards and reconceptualization of health related quality of life (HRQL) occurs over the first 6 months post-stroke. Methods: Confirmatory factor analysis was used to assess invariance of the SF-36 measurement model over time among 238 individuals with stroke and 392 controls, separately. This procedure assessed changes over time in the factor loadings, variances, and covariances of responses, and compared the extent of change between individuals with stroke and those in the control group. In addition a multisample comparison was made between individuals with stroke and members of the control group at the first evaluation in order to assess invariance of the SF-36 measurement model between the groups. The controls were considered to be a ‘proxy’ for the stroke cohort prior to the stroke. Results: We found no evidence of reconceptualization and changes in internal standards over time when the groups were assessed separately. There was a significant difference in the factor covariances (reconceptualization) between the two groups at the time of the first evaluation. However, measurement error was also significant for this comparison. Conclusion: This study indicates that the improvement in HRQL over time is real rather than a result of reconceptualization or a recalibration. If response shift does occur with stroke it is likely to be mediated by the event itself and not the recovery process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • LS Williams M Weinberger LE Harris DO Clark J Biller (1999) ArticleTitleDevelopment of a stroke-specific quality of life scale. Stroke 30 IssueID7 1362–1369

    Google Scholar 

  • PW Duncan GP Samsa M Weinberger et al. (1997) ArticleTitleHealth status of individuals with mild stroke. Stroke 28 IssueID4 740–745

    Google Scholar 

  • R Haan Particlede N Aaronson M Limburg RL Hewer Crevel H van (1993) ArticleTitleMeasuring quality of life in stroke. Stroke 24 IssueID2 320–327

    Google Scholar 

  • RB King (1996) ArticleTitleQuality of life after stroke. Stroke 27 IssueID9 1467–1472

    Google Scholar 

  • PW Duncan D Wallace SM Lai D Johnson S Embretson LJ Laster (1999) ArticleTitleThe Stroke Impact Scale Version 2.0. Evaluation of reliability, validity, and sensitivity to change. Stroke 30 IssueID10 2131–2140

    Google Scholar 

  • PJ Allison D Locker JS Feine (1997) ArticleTitleQuality of life: A dynamic construct. Soc Sci Med 45 IssueID2 221–230

    Google Scholar 

  • LJ Cronbach L Furby (1970) ArticleTitleHow should we measure ‘change’–Or should we? Psychol Bull 74 68–80

    Google Scholar 

  • MA Sprangers CE Schwartz (1999) ArticleTitleIntegrating response shift into health-related quality of life research: A theoretical model. Soc Sci Med 48 IssueID11 1507–1515

    Google Scholar 

  • RT Golembiewski S Yeager (1975) ArticleTitleMeasuring change and persistence in human affairs: Types of change generated by OD designs. J Appl Behav Sci 12 IssueID2 133–157

    Google Scholar 

  • NE Mayo (1993) ArticleTitleEpidemiology and recovery. Phys Med Reh: State Art Rev 7 IssueID1 1–25

    Google Scholar 

  • PW Duncan LB Goldstein RD Horner PB Landsman GP Samsa DB Matchar (1994) ArticleTitleSimilar motor recovery of upper and lower extremities after stroke. Stroke 25 IssueID6 1181–1188

    Google Scholar 

  • D Wade HR Langton (1987) ArticleTitleFunctional abilities after stroke: The first three months. J Neurol Neurosur Psych 50 177–182

    Google Scholar 

  • CE Schwartz MAG Sprangers (2000) Adaptation to Changing Health: Response Shift in Quality-of-life research EditionNumber1 American Psychological Association Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • TO engs M Yu E Luistro (2001) ArticleTitleHealth-related quality of life after stroke–A comprehensive review. Stroke 32 IssueID4 964–971

    Google Scholar 

  • IS Breetvelt FS Dam ParticleVan (1991) ArticleTitleUnderreporting by cancer patients: The case of response-shift. Soc Sci Med 32 IssueID9 981–987

    Google Scholar 

  • InstitutionalAuthorNameStatistics Canada (1999) How healthy are Canadians? Government of Canada Ottawa 9–119

    Google Scholar 

  • SD Decker R Schulz (1985) ArticleTitleCorrelates of life satisfaction and depression in middle-aged and elderly spinal cord-injured persons. Am J Occup Ther 39 IssueID11 740–745

    Google Scholar 

  • RE Millsap B Sandra (1988) ArticleTitleAlpha, beta, and gamma change in evaluation research: A structural equation approach. J Appl Psychol 73 IssueID3 574–584

    Google Scholar 

  • P Norman (1996) ArticleTitleThe interpretation of change in verbal reports: Implications for health psychology. Psychol Health 11 IssueID2 301–314

    Google Scholar 

  • N Schmitt (1982) ArticleTitleThe use of analysis of covariance structures to assess beta and gamma change. Source. Mult Behav Res 17 IssueID3 343–358

    Google Scholar 

  • WA Randolph (1989) ArticleTitleHow can OD consultants and researchers assess gamma change? A comparison of two analytical procedures. J Manage 15 IssueID4 633–648

    Google Scholar 

  • Millsap RE, Sandra B. Alpha, beta, and gamma change in evaluation research: A structural equation approach. J Appl Psychol 1988; 73(3).

  • J Schaubroeck (1989) ArticleTitleConfirmatory factor analytic procedures for assessing change during organizational entry. J Appl Psychol 74 IssueID6 892–900

    Google Scholar 

  • RB Kline (1998) Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling. The Guilford Press New York

    Google Scholar 

  • MK Lindell (1980) ArticleTitleEquivocality of factor incongruence as an indicator of type of change in OD Interventions. Acad Manage Rev 5 IssueID1 105–107

    Google Scholar 

  • CE Schwartz MA Sprangers (1999) ArticleTitleMethodological approaches for assessing response shift in longitudinal health-related quality-of-life research. Soc Sci Med 48 IssueID11 1531–1548

    Google Scholar 

  • J Bernhard A Lowy R Maibach C Hurny (2001) ArticleTitleResponse shift in the perception of health for utility evaluation: An explorative investigation. Eur J Cancer 37 IssueID14 1729–1735

    Google Scholar 

  • MA Sprangers FS Dam ParticleVan J Broersen et al. (1999) ArticleTitleRevealing response shift in longitudinal research on fatigue–the use of the thentest approach. Acta Oncol 38 IssueID6 709–718 Occurrence Handle10.1080/028418699432860 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1MvltVGqtA%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10522761

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • D Postulart EM Adang (2000) ArticleTitleResponse shift and adaptation in chronically ill patients. Med Decis Making 20 IssueID2 186–193

    Google Scholar 

  • NE Mayo S Wood-Dauphinee R Cote L Durcan J Carlton (2001) ArticleTitleActivity, participation, and quality of life six months post-stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehab 83 1035–1042

    Google Scholar 

  • JE Ware SuffixJr KK Snow M Kosinski B Gandek (1993) Health Survey: Manual & Interpretation Guide. The Health Institute, New England Medical Center Boston, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • CA McHorney JE Ware SuffixJr JF Lu CD Sherbourne (1994) ArticleTitleThe MOS 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): III. Tests of data quality, scaling assumptions, and reliability across diverse patient groups. Med Care 32 IssueID1 40–66 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByuC3cvjs1M%3D Occurrence Handle8277801

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • CA McHorney JE Ware SuffixJr W Rogers AE Raczek JF Lu (1992) ArticleTitleThe validity and relative precision of MOS short- and long-form health status scales and Dartmouth COOP charts. Results from the Medical Outcomes Study. Med Care 30(Suppl 5) MS253–MS265

    Google Scholar 

  • JE Brazier R Harper N Jones et al. (1992) ArticleTitleValidating the SF-36 health survey questionnaire: New outcome measure for primary care. Br Med J 305 160–164 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:By2A1cnhtlw%3D

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • B Modan DK Wagener (1992) ArticleTitleSome epidemiological aspects of stroke: Mortality/morbidity trends, age, sex, race, socioeconomic status. Stroke 23 1230–1236

    Google Scholar 

  • P Dorman J Slattery B Farrell M Dennis P Sandercock (1998) ArticleTitleQualitative comparison of the reliability of health status assessments with the EuroQol and SF-36 questionnaires after stroke. United Kingdom Collaborators in the International Stroke Trial. Stroke 29 IssueID1 63–68

    Google Scholar 

  • JE Ware SuffixJr M Kosinski S–D Keller (1994) SF-36 Physical & Mental Scales: A User’s Manual. The Health Institute, New England Medical Center Boston, Massachusetts

    Google Scholar 

  • PJ Dorman M Dennis P Sandercock (1999) ArticleTitleHow do scores on the EuroQol relate to scores on the SF-36 after stroke? Stroke 30 IssueID10 2146–2151

    Google Scholar 

  • JJ Putten Particlevan der JC Hobart JA Freeman AJ Thompson (1999) ArticleTitleMeasuring change in disability after inpatient rehabilitation: Comparison of the responsiveness of the Barthel index and the Functional Independence Measure. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatr 66 IssueID4 480–484

    Google Scholar 

  • RH Harwood S Ebrahim (2000) ArticleTitleA comparison of the responsiveness of the Nottingham extended activities of daily living scale, London handicap scale and the SF-36. Disabil Rehabil 22 786–793

    Google Scholar 

  • C Anderson S Laubscher R Burns (1996) ArticleTitleValidation of the Short Form 36 (SF-36) health survey questionnaire among stroke patients. Stroke 27 IssueID10 1812–1816

    Google Scholar 

  • CA McHorney JE Ware AE Raczek (1993) ArticleTitleThe MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): II. Psychometric and Clincal Tests of Validity in Measuring physical and mental health constructs. Med Care 31 247–263 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByyC1MnisVI%3D Occurrence Handle8450681

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • R Cote RN Battista C Wolfson J Boucher J Adam V Hachinski (1989) ArticleTitleThe Canadian neurological scale: Validation and reliability assessment. Neurology 39 638–643

    Google Scholar 

  • MF Folstein SE Folstein PR McHugh (1975) ArticleTitle‘Mini-mental state’. A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res 12 IssueID3 189–198 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:CSmD2s7mtVE%3D Occurrence Handle1202204

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • CV Granger BB Hamilton (1990) ArticleTitleMeasurement of stroke rehabilitation outcome in the 1980s. Stroke 21(Suppl 9) II46–II47

    Google Scholar 

  • FI Mahoney DW Barthel (1965) ArticleTitleFunctional evaluation: The Barthel lndex. Md St Med J 14 61–65 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:CCqD28zks1I%3D

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • SC Loewen BA Anderson (1988) ArticleTitleReliability of the Modified Motor Assessment Scale and the Barthel Index [see comments]. Phys Ther 68 IssueID7 1077–1081

    Google Scholar 

  • D Shinar CR Gross JP Mohr et al. (1985) ArticleTitleInterobserver variability in the assessment of neurologic history and examination in the Stroke Data Bank. Arch Neurol 42 557–565

    Google Scholar 

  • CW Roy J Togneri E Hay B Pentland (1988) ArticleTitleAn inter-rater reliability study of the Barthel Index. Int J Rehabil Res 11 IssueID1 67–70

    Google Scholar 

  • CV Granger LS Dewis NC Peters CC Sherwood JE Barrett (1979) ArticleTitleStroke rehabilitation: Analysis of repeated Barthel index measures. Arch Phys MedRehabil 60 14–17

    Google Scholar 

  • GE Gresham TF Phillips ML Labi (1980) ArticleTitleADL status in stroke: relative merits of three standard indexes. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 61 IssueID8 355–358

    Google Scholar 

  • DT Wade Hewer R Langton (1987) ArticleTitleFunctional abilities after stroke: Measurement, natural history and prognosis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatr 50 IssueID2 177–182

    Google Scholar 

  • I Wellwood MS Dennis CP Warlow (1995) ArticleTitleA comparison of the Barthel Index and the OPCS disability instrument used to measure outcome after acute stroke. Age Ageing 24 54–57

    Google Scholar 

  • I McDowell C Newell (1996) Measuring Health: A Guide to Rating Scales and Questionnaires EditionNumber2 Oxford University Press New York

    Google Scholar 

  • SL Wood-Dauphinee MA Opzoomer JI Williams B Marchand WO Spitzer (1988) ArticleTitleAssessment of global function: The Reintegration to Normal Living Index. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 69 IssueID8 583–590

    Google Scholar 

  • S Wood-Dauphinee JI Williams (1987) ArticleTitleReintegration to normal living as a proxy to quality of life. J Chron Dis 40 IssueID6 491–502

    Google Scholar 

  • Bentler PM. EQS Structural Equation Program Manual. Encino, 1995.

  • RH Hoyle (1995) Structural Equation Modeling: Concepts, Issues, and Application. Sage Publications, c1995 Thousand Oaks

    Google Scholar 

  • D Kaplan (1955) Structural Equation Modeling: Foundations and extensions. Sage Publications, c2000 Thousand Oaks, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • LA Hayduk (1987) Structural Equation Modeling with LISREL: Essentials and Advances. Johns Hopkins University Press, c1987 Baltimore

    Google Scholar 

  • KA Bollen (1989) Structural Equations with Latent Variables. Wiley and Sons New York

    Google Scholar 

  • O Siddiqui MW Ali (1999) ArticleTitleLinear structural equation model in analyzing quality-of-life-data from clinical trials. J Biopharm Stat 9 IssueID4 661–681

    Google Scholar 

  • A Satorra PM Bentler (1994) Corrections to test statistics and standard errors in covariance structure analysis. Eye Particlevon Alexander Clogg C Clifford (Eds) Latent Variables Analysis: Applications for Developmental Research. Sage Publications, Inc. Thousand Oaks, CA, US 399–419

    Google Scholar 

  • PS Curran SG West JF Finch (1996) ArticleTitleThe Robustness of test Statistics to nonnormality and specification error in confirmatory factor analysis. Psychol Meth 1 16–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Nevitt J, Hancock GR. Improving the root mean square error of approximation for nonnormal conditions in structural equation modeling. 2000; 68(3): 251–268.

  • KG oreskog D Sorbom (1979) Advances in Factor Analysis and Structural Equation Models. ABT Books Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • GB Jarnlo L Ceder KG Thorngren (1984) ArticleTitleEarly rehabilitation at home of elderly patients with hip fractures and consumption of resources in primary care. Scand J Prim Health Care 2 105–112

    Google Scholar 

  • WM Hopman T Towheed T Anastassiades et al. (2000) ArticleTitleCanadian normative data for the SF-36 health survey. Can Med Assoc J 163 IssueID3 265–271

    Google Scholar 

  • HS Jorgensen H Nakayama HO Raaschou et al. (1995) ArticleTitleOutcome and time course of recovery in stroke. Part II: Time course of recovery. The Copenhagen Stroke Study. Arch Phys Med Rehab 76 IssueID5 406–412

    Google Scholar 

  • AA Armenakis JN Wilmoth (1977) ArticleTitleAn algorithm for assessing factor structure congruence. Educ Psychol Measure 37 IssueID1 213–214

    Google Scholar 

  • WA Randolph DF Elloy (1989) ArticleTitleA comparison of two methods for evaluating the similarity of factor analytic solutions. J Manage 15 633–648

    Google Scholar 

  • N Schmitt E Pulakos A Lieblein (1984) ArticleTitleComparison of three techniques to assess group-level beta and gamma change. J Appl Psychol 8 249–260

    Google Scholar 

  • JR Terborg GS Howard SE Maxwell (1980) ArticleTitleEvaluating planned organizational change: A method for assessing alpha, beta, and gamma change. Acad Manage Rev 5 IssueID1 109–121

    Google Scholar 

  • BO Muthen PJ Curran (1997) ArticleTitleGeneral longitudinal modeling of individual differences in experimental designs: A latent variable framework for analysis and power estimation. Psychol Meth 2 IssueID4 371–402

    Google Scholar 

  • JB Willett AG Sayer (1994) ArticleTitleUsing covariance structure-analysis to detect correlates and predictors of individual change over time. Psychol Bull 116 IssueID2 363–381

    Google Scholar 

  • CA McHorney JE Ware ParticleJr AE Raczek (1993) ArticleTitleThe MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): II. Psychometric and clinical tests of validity in measuring physical and mental health constructs. Med Care 31 IssueID3 247–263 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByyC1MnisVI%3D Occurrence Handle8450681

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • GE Simon DA Revicki L Grothaus M Vonkorff (1998) ArticleTitleSF-36 summary scores: are physical and mental health truly distinct? Med Care 36 IssueID4 567–572

    Google Scholar 

  • MW Nortvedt T Riise K Myhr HI Nyland (2000) ArticleTitlePerformance of the SF-36, SF-12, and RAND-36 summary scales in a multiple sclerosis population. Med Care 38(28 ref) 1022–1028

    Google Scholar 

  • University of Kansas Pepper Center for Aging. Stroke Toolbox. 2002. www2.kumc.edu/coa/Stroke_Toolbox/stroke-tool.htm.

  • S Ahmed NE Mayo S Wood-Dauphinee J Hanley (2001) ArticleTitleResponse Shift In The Assessment Of Health Related Quality of Life (HRQL) Post-Stroke. Qual Life Res 10 IssueID3 202–204

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sara Ahmed.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ahmed, S., Mayo, N.E., Corbiere, M. et al. Change in quality of life of people with stroke over time: True change or response shift?. Qual Life Res 14, 611–627 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-004-3708-0

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-004-3708-0

Keywords

Navigation