Abstract
Floating population has had a tremendous impact on China’s urban development in the past three decades. Understanding this population’s settlement intention in cities is crucial for China’s process of urbanization. Based on a nationwide survey, this paper focuses on the floating population’s intention for urban settlement and effect factors. The empirical evidence shows that more than half of migrants provide positive answers to the question about long-term settlement plan. Using logistic regression model, factors including socio-economic, occupational, institutional, neighbourhood and origin–destination characteristics are examined. Results indicate that majority of the variables are significantly associated with settlement intention. For example, having more welfare benefits, self-occupied housing and better social integration are representative indications of a long-term settlement plan. This study also highlights non-physical neighbourhood characteristics such as social participation, interaction with locals, and migrant’s attitude to the destination city as important factors of settlement intention.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Cao, G., Li, M., Ma, Y., Tao, R.: Self-employment and intention of permanent urban settlement: evidence from a survey of migrants in China’s four major urbanising areas. Urban Stud. 52(4), 639–664 (2015)
Chai, J.C.H., Chai, B.K.: China’s floating population and its implications. J. Soc. Econ. 24(7/8/9), 1038–1051 (1997). doi:10.1108/03068299710179008
Chan, K.W., Liu, T., Yang, Y.: Hukou and non-hukou migrations in China: comparisons and contrasts. Int. J. Populat. Geogr. 5(6), 425–448 (1999)
Chan, K.W., Zhang, L.: The Hukou system and rural-urban migration in China: processes and changes. China Quart. 160(160), 818–855 (1999)
Chen, J., Guo, F., Wu, Y.: One decade of urban housing reform in China: urban housing price dynamics and the role of migration and urbanization, 1995–2005. Habitat Int. 35(1), 1–8 (2011)
Cheng, Z., Wang, H.: Do neighbourhoods have effects on wages? A study of migrant workers in urban China. Habitat Int. 38(4), 222–231 (2013)
Connelly, R., Roberts, K., Zheng, Z.: The settlement of rural migrants in urban China-some of China’s migrants are not ‘floating’ anymore. J. Chin. Econ. Bus. Stud. 9(3), 283–300 (2011)
Du, H., Li, S.: Is it really just a rational choice? The contribution of emotional attachment to temporary migrants’ intention to stay in the host city in Guangzhou. China Rev. 12(1), 73–93 (2012)
Fan, C.C.: Settlement intention and split households: findings from a survey of migrants in Beijing’s urban villages. China Rev. 11(2), 11–41 (2011)
Fan, C.C.: The elite, the natives, and the outsiders: migration and labor market segmentation in urban China. Ann. Assoc. Am. Geogr. 92(1), 103–124 (2002). doi:10.1111/1467-8306.00282
Gao, H.: China’s left-behind. World Policy J. 30(2), 29–38 (2013)
Goldstein, S., Goldstein, A.: Permanent and temporary migration differentials in China. East-West Center, Honolulu (1991)
Goodkind, D., West, L.A.: China’s floating population: definitions, data and recent findings. Urban Stud. 39(12), 2237–2250 (2002). doi:10.1080/0042098022000033845
Gu, C., Shen, J.: Transformation of urban socio-spatial structure in socialist market economies: the case of Beijing. Habitat Int. 27(1), 107–122 (2003)
Gu, P., Ma, X.: Investigation and analysis of a floating population’s settlement intention and environmental concerns: a case study in the Shawan River Basin in Shenzhen, China. Habitat Int. 39(7), 170–178 (2013)
Hao, P., Tang, S.: Floating or settling down: the effect of rural landholdings on the settlement intention of rural migrants in urban China. Environ. Plan. A (2015). doi:10.1177/0308518X15597131
Hu, F., Xu, Z., Chen, Y.: Circular migration, or permanent stay? Evidence from China’s rural–urban migration. China Econ. Rev. 22(1), 64–74 (2011)
Larcker, D.F., Rusticus, T.O.: On the use of instrumental variables in accounting research. J. Account. Econ. 49(3), 186–205 (2010). doi:10.1016/j.jacceco.2009.11.004
Li, B.: Floating population or urban citizens? Status, social provision and circumstances of rural-urban migrants in China. Soc. Policy Adm. 40(2), 174–195 (2006)
Liang, Z., Ma, Z.: China’s floating population: new evidence from the 2000 census. Popul. Dev. Rev. 30(3), 467–488 (2004)
National Bureau of Statistics: National survey report on rural migrant workers 2013. http://www.stats.gov.cn/tjsj/zxfb/201405/t20140512_551585.html (2014). Retrieved 26 Nov 2015
Natinlal Bureau of Statistics: China City Statistical Yearbook (2012)
Rozelle, S., Taylor, J.E., deBrauw, A.: Migration, remittances, and agricultural productivity in China. Am. Econ. Rev. 89(2), 287–291 (1999)
Sampson, R.J.: Racial stratification and the durable tangle of neighborhood inequality. Ann. Am. Acad. Polit. Soc. Sci. 621(1), 260–280 (2009)
Seeborg, M.C., Jin, Z., Zhu, Y.: The new rural-urban labor mobility in China: causes and implications. J. Socio-Econ. 29(1), 39–56 (2000)
Shen, J.: A study of the temporary population in Chinese cities. Habitat Int. 26(3), 363–377 (2002)
Shen, J.: Rural development and rural to urban migration in China 1978–1990. Geoforum 26(4), 395–409 (1995)
Shen, J., Huang, Y.: The working and living space of the ‘foating population’ in China. Asia Pacific Viewp. 44(1), 51–62 (2003)
Solinger, D.J.: Contesting citizenship in urban China: peasant migrants, the state and the logic of the market. University of California Press, Berkeley (1999)
Song, Y., Zenou, Y., Ding, C.: Let’s not throw the baby out with the bath water: the role of urban villages in housing rural migrants in China. Urban Stud. 45(2), 313–330 (2008). doi:10.1177/0042098007085965
State Council: Notice of the general office of the state council on actively and steadily promoting the reform of the household registration system http://www.gov.cn/zwgk/2012-02/23/content_2075082.htm (2012). Retrieved 26 Nov 2015
State Council: The new urbanization state plan (2014–2020) http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/2014-03/16/content_2640075.htm (2013). Retrieved 26 Nov 2015
Tang, S., Feng, J.: Cohort differences in the urban settlement intentions of rural migrants: a case study in Jiangsu Province, China. Habitat Int. 49, 357–365 (2015). doi:10.1016/j.habitatint.2015.06.009
Tang, S., Feng, J.: Understanding the settlement intentions of the floating population in the cities of Jiangsu Province, China. Asian Pacific Migr. J. 21(4), 509–532 (2012)
Tang, S., Hao, P., Huang, X.: Land conversion and urban settlement intentions of the rural population in China: a case study of suburban Nanjing. Habitat Int. 51, 149–158 (2016). doi:10.1016/j.habitatint.2015.10.023
Wang, J., Cui, Z., Cui, H., Wei, C., Harada, K., Minamoto, K., Ueda, A.: Quality of life associated with perceived stigma and discrimination among the floating population in Shanghai, China: a qualitative study. Health Promot. Int. 25(4), 394–402 (2010a)
Wang, Y., Wang, Y., Wu, J.: Housing migrant workers in rapidly urbanizing regions: a study of the Chinese Model in Shenzhen. Hous. Stud. 25(1), 83–100 (2010b)
Wong, T., Yeow, M., Zhu, X.: Building a global city: negotiating the massive influx of floating population in Shanghai. J. Hous. Built Environ. 20(1), 21–50 (2005). doi:10.1007/s10901-005-6763-0
Wu, W.: Sources of migrant housing disadvantage in urban China. Environ. Plann. A 36(7), 1285–1304 (2004)
Yang, X., Goldstein, S.: Population movement in Zhejiang Province, China: the impact of government policies. Int. Migr. Rev. 24(3), 509–533 (1990)
Yue, Z.S., Li, S.Z., Feldman, M.W., Du, H.F.: Floating choices: a generational perspective on intentions of rural-urban migrants in China. Environ. Plann. A 42(3), 545–562 (2010). doi:10.1068/a42161
Zhang, C., Chai, Y.W.: Un-gated and integrated Work Unit communities in post-socialist urban China: a case study from Beijing. Habitat Int. 43, 79–89 (2014). doi:10.1016/j.habitatint.2014.01.011
Zhang, K.H., Song, S.: Rural–urban migration and urbanization in China: evidence from time-series and cross-section analyses. China Econ. Rev. 14(4), 386–400 (2003)
Zhao, Y.: Causes and consequences of return migration: recent evidence from China. J. Comp. Econ. 30(2), 376–394 (2002)
Zhu, Y.: China’s floating population and their settlement intention in the cities: beyond the Hukou reform. Habitat Int. 31(1), 65–76 (2007)
Zhu, Y.: The floating population’s household strategies and the role of migration in China’s regional development and integration. Int. J. Popul. Geogr. 9(6), 485–502 (2003)
Zhu, Y., Chen, W.: The settlement intention of China’s floating population in the cities: recent changes and multifaceted individual-level determinants. Popul. Space Place 16(4), 253–267 (2010). doi:10.1002/psp.544
Acknowledgments
This work is financially supported by the National 985 Project of Non-traditional Security at Huazhong University of Science and Technology and National Natural Science Found of China (Grant No. 41401631) and National Social Science Fund of China (Grant No. 13CJY035). Authors are thankful to the anonymous reviewers for their comments and suggestions. Any remaining errors are the authors’ own responsibility.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendices
Appendix 1
x1 | x2 | x3 | x4 | x5 | x6 | x7 | x8 | x9 | x10 | x11 | x12 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
x1 | 1 | |||||||||||
x2 | −0.0553 | 1 | ||||||||||
x3 | −0.0547 | 0.3602 | 1 | |||||||||
x4 | −0.0196 | 0.0228 | 0.2075 | 1 | ||||||||
x5 | −0.0043 | −0.0562 | −0.1632 | −0.067 | 1 | |||||||
x6 | −0.0259 | −0.0115 | 0.0715 | 0.255 | −0.0012 | 1 | ||||||
x7 | 0.1211 | 0.0319 | −0.0439 | −0.0345 | 0.0576 | −0.066 | 1 | |||||
x8 | 0.136 | 0.0873 | −0.0122 | −0.066 | −0.0135 | 0.0161 | 0.1338 | 1 | ||||
x9 | 0.2725 | 0.1176 | −0.0107 | −0.0494 | 0.0429 | −0.1207 | 0.2446 | 0.6359 | 1 | |||
x10 | 0.1682 | 0.0551 | −0.0525 | −0.0492 | 0.0533 | −0.0642 | 0.1657 | 0.5006 | 0.5962 | 1 | ||
x11 | 0.0079 | −0.0086 | 0.0446 | 0.4305 | 0.0023 | 0.1733 | 0.009 | −0.0421 | −0.0089 | −0.0211 | 1 | |
x12 | −0.0039 | −0.0631 | −0.0419 | 0.01 | 0.0867 | 0.1069 | −0.0077 | −0.0409 | −0.1103 | −0.0625 | −0.0054 | 1 |
x13 | −0.0159 | 0.0423 | −0.0006 | 0.0939 | 0.0923 | 0.0545 | 0.018 | 0.021 | 0.0501 | 0.0057 | 0.1186 | −0.0824 |
x14 | 0.0121 | 0.0089 | 0.0215 | 0.0517 | −0.0043 | 0.0707 | −0.0151 | −0.0024 | 0.0236 | 0.0026 | 0.0404 | 0.0281 |
x15 | −0.0002 | −0.0069 | −0.0042 | 0.0859 | 0.0432 | 0.0758 | 0.0106 | −0.0194 | 0.0043 | 0.0056 | 0.0849 | 0.0177 |
x16 | −0.0332 | −0.0029 | 0.0448 | 0.141 | 0.0453 | 0.0898 | −0.0079 | −0.0664 | −0.0217 | −0.031 | 0.0888 | 0.0276 |
x17 | −0.0001 | 0.0024 | 0.0294 | 0.1354 | 0.0521 | 0.0242 | 0.0043 | −0.0571 | 0.0428 | 0.0052 | 0.1298 | −0.1177 |
x18 | 0.018 | −0.0079 | −0.0223 | −0.0171 | 0.0271 | −0.0145 | −0.0026 | −0.0102 | 0.0109 | 0.0081 | −0.0155 | 0.0102 |
x19 | −0.0006 | −0.0209 | −0.0352 | 0.0177 | 0.0426 | −0.003 | 0.0038 | −0.0193 | 0.0123 | 0.0107 | 0.0144 | 0.0005 |
x20 | −0.0327 | 0.0267 | 0.0825 | 0.0111 | −0.0743 | 0.0314 | −0.0201 | 0.0087 | −0.0565 | −0.0288 | −0.0099 | 0.0179 |
x21 | 0.016 | 0.0065 | 0.0117 | 0.0047 | −0.0664 | −0.0642 | −0.0458 | −0.0326 | 0.0594 | 0.021 | 0.0002 | −0.2686 |
x22 | −0.005 | 0.0169 | 0.034 | −0.0171 | 0.0162 | −0.0179 | 0.0223 | 0.0561 | 0.0589 | 0.0273 | 0.0309 | −0.0938 |
x23 | −0.0275 | 0.0029 | −0.0064 | −0.0651 | −0.04 | −0.1546 | 0.0713 | −0.0405 | 0.0804 | 0.0128 | −0.0392 | −0.2527 |
x13 | x14 | x15 | x16 | x17 | x18 | x19 | x20 | x21 | x22 | x23 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
x1 | |||||||||||
x2 | |||||||||||
x3 | |||||||||||
x4 | |||||||||||
x5 | |||||||||||
x6 | |||||||||||
x7 | |||||||||||
x8 | |||||||||||
x9 | |||||||||||
x10 | |||||||||||
x11 | |||||||||||
x12 | |||||||||||
x13 | 1 | ||||||||||
x14 | 0.0356 | 1 | |||||||||
x15 | 0.074 | 0.2579 | 1 | ||||||||
x16 | 0.0542 | 0.3158 | 0.237 | 1 | |||||||
x17 | 0.1364 | 0.0875 | 0.0854 | 0.1165 | 1 | ||||||
x18 | 0.0026 | 0.0281 | 0.0132 | 0.0238 | 0.0336 | 1 | |||||
x19 | 0.0128 | 0.0454 | 0.028 | 0.049 | 0.0553 | 0.3838 | 1 | ||||
x20 | −0.0596 | −0.0922 | −0.0617 | −0.0782 | −0.1155 | −0.1508 | −0.1458 | 1 | |||
x21 | 0.0704 | 0.0566 | 0.0329 | 0.0579 | 0.2211 | 0.0289 | 0.0387 | −0.0898 | 1 | ||
x22 | 0.0444 | 0.0087 | 0.0275 | 0.0021 | 0.0492 | 0.0055 | 0.0111 | −0.033 | 0.1387 | 1 | |
x23 | 0.0189 | 0.0091 | 0.0684 | 0.0321 | 0.1218 | −0.0045 | 0.0207 | −0.0405 | 0.2715 | 0.4014 | 1 |
Appendix 2
Independent variables | Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | Model 4 | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
B | SE | Cd | B | SE | Cd | B | SE | Cd | B | SE | Cd | |
Constant | 0.519*** | 0.017 | 0.212*** | 0.020 | −0.821*** | 0.062 | −0.261*** | 0.065 | ||||
X1 Gender (Ref. = male) | ||||||||||||
Female | −0.036** | 0.016 | 1.18 | −0.045*** | 0.016 | 1.18 | −0.075*** | 0.017 | 1.19 | −0.076*** | 0.017 | 1.19 |
X2 Age(years) (Ref. = middle 25–50) | ||||||||||||
Young < 25 | −0.147*** | 0.025 | 1.65 | −0.099*** | 0.025 | 1.67 | −0.093*** | 0.026 | 1.67 | −0.115*** | 0.027 | 1.67 |
Old 50–60 | −0.280*** | 0.033 | 1.04 | −0.278*** | 0.033 | 1.04 | −0.294*** | 0.035 | 1.04 | −0.312*** | 0.035 | 1.05 |
X3 Marital status (Ref. = married) | ||||||||||||
Single | −0.037 | 0.023 | 1.68 | −0.049** | 0.023 | 1.68 | 0.181*** | 0.025 | 1.72 | 0.186*** | 0.025 | 1.73 |
X4 Educational attainment (Ref. = junior high school and below) | ||||||||||||
Senior high school | 0.249*** | 0.019 | 1.10 | 0.211*** | 0.019 | 1.15 | 0.184*** | 0.020 | 1.16 | 0.187*** | 0.020 | 1.16 |
Vocational school and college levels and above | 0.666*** | 0.030 | 1.23 | 0.543*** | 0.032 | 1.45 | 0.526*** | 0.033 | 1.48 | 0.491*** | 0.034 | 1.48 |
X5 Duration of residence (years) (Ref. = short-term < 5) | ||||||||||||
Medium-term 5–20 | 0.474*** | 0.016 | 1.07 | 0.431*** | 0.016 | 1.08 | 0.340*** | 0.017 | 1.11 | 0.294*** | 0.017 | 1.12 |
Long-term 20–65 | 0.740*** | 0.061 | 1.03 | 0.688*** | 0.062 | 1.03 | 0.501*** | 0.063 | 1.04 | 0.410*** | 0.064 | 1.04 |
X6 Medical insurance status (Ref. = no) | ||||||||||||
Yes | 0.522*** | 0.022 | 1.35 | 0.486*** | 0.023 | 1.37 | 0.446*** | 0.023 | 1.39 | 0.367*** | 0.024 | 1.41 |
Unclear | −0.018 | 0.050 | 1.01 | −0.060 | 0.050 | 1.01 | 0.086 | 0.053 | 1.02 | 0.018 | 0.053 | 1.02 |
X7 Relative income level in comparison with local residents’ (Ref. = comparable 0.5–1.5) | ||||||||||||
Lower < 0.5 | 0.386*** | 0.019 | 1.57 | 0.357*** | 0.019 | 1.58 | 0.472*** | 0.020 | 1.59 | 0.386*** | 0.020 | 1.62 |
Higher > 1.5 | −0.113** | 0.025 | 1.09 | −0.116*** | 0.025 | 1.09 | −0.171*** | 0.026 | 1.10 | −0.096*** | 0.027 | 1.12 |
X8 Industry (Ref. = tertiary industry) | ||||||||||||
Primary industry | 0.438*** | 0.049 | 1.31 | 0.526*** | 0.049 | 1.32 | 0.413*** | 0.052 | 1.36 | 0.360*** | 0.052 | 1.37 |
Secondary industry | −0.406*** | 0.018 | 1.23 | −0.416*** | 0.018 | 1.23 | −0.325*** | 0.019 | 1.27 | −0.411*** | 0.020 | 1.30 |
Not easily classified | −0.123*** | 0.033 | 2.60 | −0.076** | 0.033 | 2.61 | −0.212*** | 0.034 | 2.65 | −0.164*** | 0.034 | 2.65 |
X10 Nature of employment unit (Ref. = private-owned) | ||||||||||||
State-owned | −0.096*** | 0.033 | 1.17 | −0.070** | 0.033 | 1.18 | −0.079** | 0.035 | 1.18 | −0.007 | 0.035 | 1.19 |
Collective-owned | 0.132*** | 0.045 | 1.29 | 0.154*** | 0.045 | 1.29 | 0.132*** | 0.047 | 1.29 | 0.177*** | 0.047 | 1.29 |
Foreign-funded | 0.023 | 0.039 | 1.20 | −0.029 | 0.039 | 1.20 | 0.044 | 0.041 | 1.21 | −0.067 | 0.041 | 1.21 |
Not easily classified | 0.118*** | 0.024 | 2.23 | 0.145*** | 0.024 | 1.24 | 0.129*** | 0.025 | 2.24 | 0.128*** | 0.026 | 2.24 |
X11 Hukou status (Ref. = agricultural) | ||||||||||||
Non-agricultural | 0.283*** | 0.023 | 1.30 | 0.275*** | 0.024 | 1.32 | 0.241*** | 0.025 | 1.32 | |||
Unclear | −0.234 | 0.172 | 1.00 | −0.189 | 0.180 | 1.00 | −0.173 | 0.182 | 1.00 | |||
X12 Temporary residence permits (Ref. = no) | ||||||||||||
Yes | 0.474*** | 0.016 | 1.08 | 0.534*** | 0.016 | 1.11 | 0.322*** | 0.017 | 1.24 | |||
Unclear or unsuited | −0.013 | 0.062 | 1.03 | 0.137** | 0.066 | 1.03 | 0.119* | 0.066 | 1.03 | |||
X13 Housing type (Ref. = rental housing by private accommodation) | ||||||||||||
Low-rent housing provided by government | 0.572*** | 0.161 | 1.00 | 0.544*** | 0.161 | 1.00 | ||||||
Free housing provided by employer or borrowed housing | −0.306*** | 0.025 | 1.12 | −0.351*** | 0.025 | 1.13 | ||||||
Self-occupied housing | 0.265*** | 0.024 | 1.24 | 0.284*** | 0.024 | 1.25 | ||||||
Informal housing | −0.222*** | 0.035 | 1.03 | −0.221*** | 0.035 | 1.03 | ||||||
X14 Participation in community activities (Ref. = no) | ||||||||||||
Yes | 0.062*** | 0.019 | 1.18 | 0.070*** | 0.019 | 1.18 | ||||||
X15 Participation in elections (Ref. = no) | ||||||||||||
Yes | −0.036 | 0.027 | 1.13 | 0.025 | 0.027 | 1.14 | ||||||
X16 Participation in public service activities (Ref. = no) | ||||||||||||
Yes | 0.102*** | 0.018 | 1.19 | 0.135*** | 0.018 | 1.19 | ||||||
X17 Interpersonal status (Ref. = interact with floaters coming from hometown) | ||||||||||||
Rarely interact with people | −0.109*** | 0.026 | 1.15 | −0.052* | 0.027 | 1.16 | ||||||
Interact with other floaters | 0.168*** | 0.028 | 1.15 | 0.171*** | 0.028 | 1.15 | ||||||
Interact with locals coming from hometown | 0.179*** | 0.025 | 1.20 | 0.290*** | 0.026 | 1.22 | ||||||
Interact with other locals | 0.048** | 0.020 | 1.37 | 0.168*** | 0.020 | 1.42 | ||||||
X18 Attitude towards the current place of residence (Ref. = dislike) | ||||||||||||
Like | 0.716*** | 0.055 | 1.22 | 0.718*** | 0.055 | 1.22 | ||||||
X19 Concerm about the current place of residence (Ref. = no) | ||||||||||||
Yes | 0.573*** | 0.044 | 1.21 | 0.610*** | 0.044 | 1.21 | ||||||
X20 Happiness (Ref. = better than that at the place of origin) | ||||||||||||
Same as that at the place of origin | −0.949*** | 0.016 | 1.07 | −0.981*** | 0.017 | 1.07 | ||||||
Worse than that at the place of origin | −1.717*** | 0.058 | 1.05 | −1.789*** | 0.058 | 1.05 | ||||||
X21 Floating range (Ref. = Inter-provincial) | ||||||||||||
Intra-provincial | −0.002 | 0.020 | 1.36 | |||||||||
Intra-city | −0.353*** | 0.024 | 1.37 | |||||||||
X22 Area of origin (Ref. = central) | ||||||||||||
East | −0.159*** | 0.023 | 1.86 | |||||||||
West | −0.112*** | 0.024 | 2.23 | |||||||||
X23 Area of destination (Ref. = east) | ||||||||||||
Central | −0.748*** | 0.029 | 1.80 | |||||||||
West | −0.517*** | 0.024 | 2.19 | |||||||||
Pseudo R2 | 0.0385 | 0.0478 | 0.1018 | 0.1122 |
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tan, S., Li, Y., Song, Y. et al. Influence factors on settlement intention for floating population in urban area: a China study. Qual Quant 51, 147–176 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-015-0299-5
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-015-0299-5