Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Influence factors on settlement intention for floating population in urban area: a China study

  • Published:
Quality & Quantity Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Floating population has had a tremendous impact on China’s urban development in the past three decades. Understanding this population’s settlement intention in cities is crucial for China’s process of urbanization. Based on a nationwide survey, this paper focuses on the floating population’s intention for urban settlement and effect factors. The empirical evidence shows that more than half of migrants provide positive answers to the question about long-term settlement plan. Using logistic regression model, factors including socio-economic, occupational, institutional, neighbourhood and origin–destination characteristics are examined. Results indicate that majority of the variables are significantly associated with settlement intention. For example, having more welfare benefits, self-occupied housing and better social integration are representative indications of a long-term settlement plan. This study also highlights non-physical neighbourhood characteristics such as social participation, interaction with locals, and migrant’s attitude to the destination city as important factors of settlement intention.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Cao, G., Li, M., Ma, Y., Tao, R.: Self-employment and intention of permanent urban settlement: evidence from a survey of migrants in China’s four major urbanising areas. Urban Stud. 52(4), 639–664 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chai, J.C.H., Chai, B.K.: China’s floating population and its implications. J. Soc. Econ. 24(7/8/9), 1038–1051 (1997). doi:10.1108/03068299710179008

    Google Scholar 

  • Chan, K.W., Liu, T., Yang, Y.: Hukou and non-hukou migrations in China: comparisons and contrasts. Int. J. Populat. Geogr. 5(6), 425–448 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chan, K.W., Zhang, L.: The Hukou system and rural-urban migration in China: processes and changes. China Quart. 160(160), 818–855 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, J., Guo, F., Wu, Y.: One decade of urban housing reform in China: urban housing price dynamics and the role of migration and urbanization, 1995–2005. Habitat Int. 35(1), 1–8 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, Z., Wang, H.: Do neighbourhoods have effects on wages? A study of migrant workers in urban China. Habitat Int. 38(4), 222–231 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Connelly, R., Roberts, K., Zheng, Z.: The settlement of rural migrants in urban China-some of China’s migrants are not ‘floating’ anymore. J. Chin. Econ. Bus. Stud. 9(3), 283–300 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Du, H., Li, S.: Is it really just a rational choice? The contribution of emotional attachment to temporary migrants’ intention to stay in the host city in Guangzhou. China Rev. 12(1), 73–93 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  • Fan, C.C.: Settlement intention and split households: findings from a survey of migrants in Beijing’s urban villages. China Rev. 11(2), 11–41 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  • Fan, C.C.: The elite, the natives, and the outsiders: migration and labor market segmentation in urban China. Ann. Assoc. Am. Geogr. 92(1), 103–124 (2002). doi:10.1111/1467-8306.00282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gao, H.: China’s left-behind. World Policy J. 30(2), 29–38 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, S., Goldstein, A.: Permanent and temporary migration differentials in China. East-West Center, Honolulu (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodkind, D., West, L.A.: China’s floating population: definitions, data and recent findings. Urban Stud. 39(12), 2237–2250 (2002). doi:10.1080/0042098022000033845

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gu, C., Shen, J.: Transformation of urban socio-spatial structure in socialist market economies: the case of Beijing. Habitat Int. 27(1), 107–122 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gu, P., Ma, X.: Investigation and analysis of a floating population’s settlement intention and environmental concerns: a case study in the Shawan River Basin in Shenzhen, China. Habitat Int. 39(7), 170–178 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hao, P., Tang, S.: Floating or settling down: the effect of rural landholdings on the settlement intention of rural migrants in urban China. Environ. Plan. A (2015). doi:10.1177/0308518X15597131

    Google Scholar 

  • Hu, F., Xu, Z., Chen, Y.: Circular migration, or permanent stay? Evidence from China’s rural–urban migration. China Econ. Rev. 22(1), 64–74 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larcker, D.F., Rusticus, T.O.: On the use of instrumental variables in accounting research. J. Account. Econ. 49(3), 186–205 (2010). doi:10.1016/j.jacceco.2009.11.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, B.: Floating population or urban citizens? Status, social provision and circumstances of rural-urban migrants in China. Soc. Policy Adm. 40(2), 174–195 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liang, Z., Ma, Z.: China’s floating population: new evidence from the 2000 census. Popul. Dev. Rev. 30(3), 467–488 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Bureau of Statistics: National survey report on rural migrant workers 2013. http://www.stats.gov.cn/tjsj/zxfb/201405/t20140512_551585.html (2014). Retrieved 26 Nov 2015

  • Natinlal Bureau of Statistics: China City Statistical Yearbook (2012)

  • Rozelle, S., Taylor, J.E., deBrauw, A.: Migration, remittances, and agricultural productivity in China. Am. Econ. Rev. 89(2), 287–291 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sampson, R.J.: Racial stratification and the durable tangle of neighborhood inequality. Ann. Am. Acad. Polit. Soc. Sci. 621(1), 260–280 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seeborg, M.C., Jin, Z., Zhu, Y.: The new rural-urban labor mobility in China: causes and implications. J. Socio-Econ. 29(1), 39–56 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shen, J.: A study of the temporary population in Chinese cities. Habitat Int. 26(3), 363–377 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shen, J.: Rural development and rural to urban migration in China 1978–1990. Geoforum 26(4), 395–409 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shen, J., Huang, Y.: The working and living space of the ‘foating population’ in China. Asia Pacific Viewp. 44(1), 51–62 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solinger, D.J.: Contesting citizenship in urban China: peasant migrants, the state and the logic of the market. University of California Press, Berkeley (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  • Song, Y., Zenou, Y., Ding, C.: Let’s not throw the baby out with the bath water: the role of urban villages in housing rural migrants in China. Urban Stud. 45(2), 313–330 (2008). doi:10.1177/0042098007085965

    Google Scholar 

  • State Council: Notice of the general office of the state council on actively and steadily promoting the reform of the household registration system http://www.gov.cn/zwgk/2012-02/23/content_2075082.htm (2012). Retrieved 26 Nov 2015

  • State Council: The new urbanization state plan (2014–2020) http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/2014-03/16/content_2640075.htm (2013). Retrieved 26 Nov 2015

  • Tang, S., Feng, J.: Cohort differences in the urban settlement intentions of rural migrants: a case study in Jiangsu Province, China. Habitat Int. 49, 357–365 (2015). doi:10.1016/j.habitatint.2015.06.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tang, S., Feng, J.: Understanding the settlement intentions of the floating population in the cities of Jiangsu Province, China. Asian Pacific Migr. J. 21(4), 509–532 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tang, S., Hao, P., Huang, X.: Land conversion and urban settlement intentions of the rural population in China: a case study of suburban Nanjing. Habitat Int. 51, 149–158 (2016). doi:10.1016/j.habitatint.2015.10.023

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, J., Cui, Z., Cui, H., Wei, C., Harada, K., Minamoto, K., Ueda, A.: Quality of life associated with perceived stigma and discrimination among the floating population in Shanghai, China: a qualitative study. Health Promot. Int. 25(4), 394–402 (2010a)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Y., Wang, Y., Wu, J.: Housing migrant workers in rapidly urbanizing regions: a study of the Chinese Model in Shenzhen. Hous. Stud. 25(1), 83–100 (2010b)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wong, T., Yeow, M., Zhu, X.: Building a global city: negotiating the massive influx of floating population in Shanghai. J. Hous. Built Environ. 20(1), 21–50 (2005). doi:10.1007/s10901-005-6763-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, W.: Sources of migrant housing disadvantage in urban China. Environ. Plann. A 36(7), 1285–1304 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, X., Goldstein, S.: Population movement in Zhejiang Province, China: the impact of government policies. Int. Migr. Rev. 24(3), 509–533 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yue, Z.S., Li, S.Z., Feldman, M.W., Du, H.F.: Floating choices: a generational perspective on intentions of rural-urban migrants in China. Environ. Plann. A 42(3), 545–562 (2010). doi:10.1068/a42161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, C., Chai, Y.W.: Un-gated and integrated Work Unit communities in post-socialist urban China: a case study from Beijing. Habitat Int. 43, 79–89 (2014). doi:10.1016/j.habitatint.2014.01.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, K.H., Song, S.: Rural–urban migration and urbanization in China: evidence from time-series and cross-section analyses. China Econ. Rev. 14(4), 386–400 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, Y.: Causes and consequences of return migration: recent evidence from China. J. Comp. Econ. 30(2), 376–394 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu, Y.: China’s floating population and their settlement intention in the cities: beyond the Hukou reform. Habitat Int. 31(1), 65–76 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu, Y.: The floating population’s household strategies and the role of migration in China’s regional development and integration. Int. J. Popul. Geogr. 9(6), 485–502 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu, Y., Chen, W.: The settlement intention of China’s floating population in the cities: recent changes and multifaceted individual-level determinants. Popul. Space Place 16(4), 253–267 (2010). doi:10.1002/psp.544

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work is financially supported by the National 985 Project of Non-traditional Security at Huazhong University of Science and Technology and National Natural Science Found of China (Grant No. 41401631) and National Social Science Fund of China (Grant No. 13CJY035). Authors are thankful to the anonymous reviewers for their comments and suggestions. Any remaining errors are the authors’ own responsibility.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yanan Li.

Appendices

Appendix 1

 

x1

x2

x3

x4

x5

x6

x7

x8

x9

x10

x11

x12

x1

1

           

x2

−0.0553

1

          

x3

−0.0547

0.3602

1

         

x4

−0.0196

0.0228

0.2075

1

        

x5

−0.0043

−0.0562

−0.1632

−0.067

1

       

x6

−0.0259

−0.0115

0.0715

0.255

−0.0012

1

      

x7

0.1211

0.0319

−0.0439

−0.0345

0.0576

−0.066

1

     

x8

0.136

0.0873

−0.0122

−0.066

−0.0135

0.0161

0.1338

1

    

x9

0.2725

0.1176

−0.0107

−0.0494

0.0429

−0.1207

0.2446

0.6359

1

   

x10

0.1682

0.0551

−0.0525

−0.0492

0.0533

−0.0642

0.1657

0.5006

0.5962

1

  

x11

0.0079

−0.0086

0.0446

0.4305

0.0023

0.1733

0.009

−0.0421

−0.0089

−0.0211

1

 

x12

−0.0039

−0.0631

−0.0419

0.01

0.0867

0.1069

−0.0077

−0.0409

−0.1103

−0.0625

−0.0054

1

x13

−0.0159

0.0423

−0.0006

0.0939

0.0923

0.0545

0.018

0.021

0.0501

0.0057

0.1186

−0.0824

x14

0.0121

0.0089

0.0215

0.0517

−0.0043

0.0707

−0.0151

−0.0024

0.0236

0.0026

0.0404

0.0281

x15

−0.0002

−0.0069

−0.0042

0.0859

0.0432

0.0758

0.0106

−0.0194

0.0043

0.0056

0.0849

0.0177

x16

−0.0332

−0.0029

0.0448

0.141

0.0453

0.0898

−0.0079

−0.0664

−0.0217

−0.031

0.0888

0.0276

x17

−0.0001

0.0024

0.0294

0.1354

0.0521

0.0242

0.0043

−0.0571

0.0428

0.0052

0.1298

−0.1177

x18

0.018

−0.0079

−0.0223

−0.0171

0.0271

−0.0145

−0.0026

−0.0102

0.0109

0.0081

−0.0155

0.0102

x19

−0.0006

−0.0209

−0.0352

0.0177

0.0426

−0.003

0.0038

−0.0193

0.0123

0.0107

0.0144

0.0005

x20

−0.0327

0.0267

0.0825

0.0111

−0.0743

0.0314

−0.0201

0.0087

−0.0565

−0.0288

−0.0099

0.0179

x21

0.016

0.0065

0.0117

0.0047

−0.0664

−0.0642

−0.0458

−0.0326

0.0594

0.021

0.0002

−0.2686

x22

−0.005

0.0169

0.034

−0.0171

0.0162

−0.0179

0.0223

0.0561

0.0589

0.0273

0.0309

−0.0938

x23

−0.0275

0.0029

−0.0064

−0.0651

−0.04

−0.1546

0.0713

−0.0405

0.0804

0.0128

−0.0392

−0.2527

 

x13

x14

x15

x16

x17

x18

x19

x20

x21

x22

x23

x1

           

x2

           

x3

           

x4

           

x5

           

x6

           

x7

           

x8

           

x9

           

x10

           

x11

           

x12

           

x13

1

          

x14

0.0356

1

         

x15

0.074

0.2579

1

        

x16

0.0542

0.3158

0.237

1

       

x17

0.1364

0.0875

0.0854

0.1165

1

      

x18

0.0026

0.0281

0.0132

0.0238

0.0336

1

     

x19

0.0128

0.0454

0.028

0.049

0.0553

0.3838

1

    

x20

−0.0596

−0.0922

−0.0617

−0.0782

−0.1155

−0.1508

−0.1458

1

   

x21

0.0704

0.0566

0.0329

0.0579

0.2211

0.0289

0.0387

−0.0898

1

  

x22

0.0444

0.0087

0.0275

0.0021

0.0492

0.0055

0.0111

−0.033

0.1387

1

 

x23

0.0189

0.0091

0.0684

0.0321

0.1218

−0.0045

0.0207

−0.0405

0.2715

0.4014

1

Appendix 2

Independent variables

Model 1

Model 2

Model 3

Model 4

B

SE

Cd

B

SE

Cd

B

SE

Cd

B

SE

Cd

Constant

0.519***

0.017

 

0.212***

0.020

 

−0.821***

0.062

 

−0.261***

0.065

 

X1 Gender (Ref. = male)

 Female

−0.036**

0.016

1.18

−0.045***

0.016

1.18

−0.075***

0.017

1.19

−0.076***

0.017

1.19

X2 Age(years) (Ref. = middle 25–50)

 Young < 25

−0.147***

0.025

1.65

−0.099***

0.025

1.67

−0.093***

0.026

1.67

−0.115***

0.027

1.67

 Old 50–60

−0.280***

0.033

1.04

−0.278***

0.033

1.04

−0.294***

0.035

1.04

−0.312***

0.035

1.05

X3 Marital status (Ref. = married)

 Single

−0.037

0.023

1.68

−0.049**

0.023

1.68

0.181***

0.025

1.72

0.186***

0.025

1.73

X4 Educational attainment (Ref. = junior high school and below)

 Senior high school

0.249***

0.019

1.10

0.211***

0.019

1.15

0.184***

0.020

1.16

0.187***

0.020

1.16

 Vocational school and college levels and above

0.666***

0.030

1.23

0.543***

0.032

1.45

0.526***

0.033

1.48

0.491***

0.034

1.48

X5 Duration of residence (years) (Ref. = short-term < 5)

 Medium-term 5–20

0.474***

0.016

1.07

0.431***

0.016

1.08

0.340***

0.017

1.11

0.294***

0.017

1.12

 Long-term 20–65

0.740***

0.061

1.03

0.688***

0.062

1.03

0.501***

0.063

1.04

0.410***

0.064

1.04

X6 Medical insurance status (Ref. = no)

 Yes

0.522***

0.022

1.35

0.486***

0.023

1.37

0.446***

0.023

1.39

0.367***

0.024

1.41

 Unclear

−0.018

0.050

1.01

−0.060

0.050

1.01

0.086

0.053

1.02

0.018

0.053

1.02

X7 Relative income level in comparison with local residents’ (Ref. = comparable 0.5–1.5)

 Lower < 0.5

0.386***

0.019

1.57

0.357***

0.019

1.58

0.472***

0.020

1.59

0.386***

0.020

1.62

 Higher > 1.5

−0.113**

0.025

1.09

−0.116***

0.025

1.09

−0.171***

0.026

1.10

−0.096***

0.027

1.12

X8 Industry (Ref. = tertiary industry)

 Primary industry

0.438***

0.049

1.31

0.526***

0.049

1.32

0.413***

0.052

1.36

0.360***

0.052

1.37

 Secondary industry

−0.406***

0.018

1.23

−0.416***

0.018

1.23

−0.325***

0.019

1.27

−0.411***

0.020

1.30

 Not easily classified

−0.123***

0.033

2.60

−0.076**

0.033

2.61

−0.212***

0.034

2.65

−0.164***

0.034

2.65

X10 Nature of employment unit (Ref. = private-owned)

 State-owned

−0.096***

0.033

1.17

−0.070**

0.033

1.18

−0.079**

0.035

1.18

−0.007

0.035

1.19

 Collective-owned

0.132***

0.045

1.29

0.154***

0.045

1.29

0.132***

0.047

1.29

0.177***

0.047

1.29

 Foreign-funded

0.023

0.039

1.20

−0.029

0.039

1.20

0.044

0.041

1.21

−0.067

0.041

1.21

 Not easily classified

0.118***

0.024

2.23

0.145***

0.024

1.24

0.129***

0.025

2.24

0.128***

0.026

2.24

X11 Hukou status (Ref. = agricultural)

 Non-agricultural

   

0.283***

0.023

1.30

0.275***

0.024

1.32

0.241***

0.025

1.32

 Unclear

   

−0.234

0.172

1.00

−0.189

0.180

1.00

−0.173

0.182

1.00

X12 Temporary residence permits (Ref. = no)

 Yes

   

0.474***

0.016

1.08

0.534***

0.016

1.11

0.322***

0.017

1.24

 Unclear or unsuited

   

−0.013

0.062

1.03

0.137**

0.066

1.03

0.119*

0.066

1.03

X13 Housing type (Ref. = rental housing by private accommodation)

 Low-rent housing provided by government

      

0.572***

0.161

1.00

0.544***

0.161

1.00

 Free housing provided by employer or borrowed housing

      

−0.306***

0.025

1.12

−0.351***

0.025

1.13

 Self-occupied housing

      

0.265***

0.024

1.24

0.284***

0.024

1.25

 Informal housing

      

−0.222***

0.035

1.03

−0.221***

0.035

1.03

X14 Participation in community activities (Ref. = no)

 Yes

      

0.062***

0.019

1.18

0.070***

0.019

1.18

X15 Participation in elections (Ref. = no)

 Yes

      

−0.036

0.027

1.13

0.025

0.027

1.14

X16 Participation in public service activities (Ref. = no)

 Yes

      

0.102***

0.018

1.19

0.135***

0.018

1.19

X17 Interpersonal status (Ref. = interact with floaters coming from hometown)

 Rarely interact with people

      

−0.109***

0.026

1.15

−0.052*

0.027

1.16

 Interact with other floaters

      

0.168***

0.028

1.15

0.171***

0.028

1.15

 Interact with locals coming from hometown

      

0.179***

0.025

1.20

0.290***

0.026

1.22

 Interact with other locals

      

0.048**

0.020

1.37

0.168***

0.020

1.42

X18 Attitude towards the current place of residence (Ref. = dislike)

 Like

      

0.716***

0.055

1.22

0.718***

0.055

1.22

X19 Concerm about the current place of residence (Ref. = no)

 Yes

      

0.573***

0.044

1.21

0.610***

0.044

1.21

X20 Happiness (Ref. = better than that at the place of origin)

 Same as that at the place of origin

      

−0.949***

0.016

1.07

−0.981***

0.017

1.07

 Worse than that at the place of origin

      

−1.717***

0.058

1.05

−1.789***

0.058

1.05

X21 Floating range (Ref. = Inter-provincial)

 Intra-provincial

         

−0.002

0.020

1.36

 Intra-city

         

−0.353***

0.024

1.37

X22 Area of origin (Ref. = central)

 East

         

−0.159***

0.023

1.86

 West

         

−0.112***

0.024

2.23

X23 Area of destination (Ref. = east)

 Central

         

−0.748***

0.029

1.80

 West

         

−0.517***

0.024

2.19

Pseudo R2

0.0385

0.0478

0.1018

0.1122

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tan, S., Li, Y., Song, Y. et al. Influence factors on settlement intention for floating population in urban area: a China study. Qual Quant 51, 147–176 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-015-0299-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-015-0299-5

Keywords

Navigation