Skip to main content
Log in

Mutual funds relationships and performance analysis

  • Published:
Quality & Quantity Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The present paper aims at exploring the equity exposure of Italian equity mutual funds as they emerge from their portfolio holdings at the date of December 31st, 2010. The technique adopted in the analysis considers the construction of a bipartite network and the detection of the overlap of portfolios held by mutual funds. The relationship among stocks due to their presence in the same portfolios is analyzed, too. Methods typical of complex networks are then applied. The comparison with several performance measures allows to discuss features of active/passive style management for institutional portfolios.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Funds are: Acomea Italia, Alboino Re, Allianz Azioni All Stars, Allianz Azioni Italia, Anm Italia, Arca Azioni Italia, Azimut Trend Italia, Bim Azionario Italia, Bim Azionario Small Cap Italia, Bnl Azioni Italia, Bnl Azioni Italia Pmi, Carige Azionario Italia, Eurizon Azioni Pmi Italia, Eurizon Focus Azioni Italia, Euromobiliare Azioni Italiane, Fideuram Italia, Fondersel Italia, Fondersel Pmi Italia, Fonditalia Equity Italy, Gestnord Azioni Italia, Interfund Equity Italy, Leonardo Italian Opportunity, Norvega Azionario Italia, Optima Azioni Italia, Optima Small Caps Italia, Pacto Azionario Italia, Pioneer Azionario Crescita, Prima Geo Italia, Symphonia Azionario Italia, Symphonia Azionario Small Caps, Ubi Pramerica Azioni Italia, Zenit Azionario Italia.

  2. The Annual Report of each fund includes the first 50 stocks—ranked according to the market value of the holding—and however all the stocks exceeding 0, 5 % of mutual funds’ assets.

  3. The power law distribution shows few dominant observations to the left and many small observations in a very long tail to the right.

  4. We remind that given any matrix \(A\in R^{n\times m}\) representing a network, \(\overline{A} =sign(A)\in R^{n\times m}\) and the vector \(e=(1,1,\ldots ,1)^{T}\in R^{m}\), the out-degree \(k_{out} \) can be calculated as \(k_{out} =\overline{A{}{}} e\). Given the vector \(e=(1,1,\ldots ,1)^{T}\in R^{n}\),   \(k_{in} =\overline{A}^{T}e\). If \(\overline{A} =\overline{A}^{T}\), then \(k=k_{out} =k_{in} \) is the node-degree.

  5. The FTSE MIB Index (http://www.ftse.com/products/indices/italia-series) is the primary benchmark index for the Italian equity market and represents the large cap component of the FTSE Italia All-Share Index. Capturing approximately 80 % of the domestic market capitalization, the FTSE MIB Index measures the performance of the 40 most liquid and capitalized Italian shares and seeks to replicate the broad sector weights of the Italian stock market.

  6. The present sample of funds contains 39 out of the 40 FTSE MIB.

  7. The values for each funds are Bim Azionario Small Cap Italia (4), Bnl Azioni Italia Pmi (7), Fondersel Pmi Italia (6), Optima Small Caps Italia (3), Symphonia Azionario Small Caps (10).

  8. The benchmark of Alboino Re is 100 % FTSE Italia All-Share Index.

  9. Several approaches are useful: the construction of a portfolio of not more than a specified number of stocks, which best tracks the index historically, or the selection of a smaller set of stocks that matches the index in the percent invested in a pre-specified set of characteristics (e.g. sector, industry or size of capitalization).

  10. At the date of the analysis, the first 20 stocks for size represented approximately 70 % of the entire stock market capitalization, whereas the percentage of the first 40 stocks increases to 85 %.

  11. We recall that systematic (or systemic) risk is the product of the market model beta squared and the variance of the index return.

References

  • Arnerich, T., Demers-Arntson, S., Perkins, J., Pruit, T.J., Spicer, X., Spruill, L.: Active Versus Passive Investment Management: Putting the debate into perspective, Arnerich Massena & Associates Inc. (2007)

  • Ausloos, M., Petroni, F.: Statistical dynamics of religions and adherents. Europhys. Lett. 77, 38002 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barry S.: GSAM, Re-thinking the Active vs. Passive Debate. Perspectives. Insights on Today’s Insights on Today’s Investment Issues (2010)

  • Batagelj, V., Mrvar, A.: Pajek, analysis and visualization of large networks. In: Juenger, M., Mutzel, P. (eds.) Graph Drawing Software. Springer, Berlin (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, N.C., Wei, K.D., Wermers, R.: Analyst recommendations, mutual fund herding, and overreaction in stock prices. Manag. Sci. 60(1), 1–20 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caparrelli, F., D’Arcangelis, A.M., Cassuto, A.: Herding in the Italian stock market: a case of behavioral finance. J. Behav. Finance 5(4), 222–230 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chevalier, J., Ellison, G.: Career concerns of mutual fund managers. Q. J. Econ. 114(2), 389–432 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clauset, A., Shalizi, C.R., Newman, M.E.J.: Power-law distributions in empirical data. SIAM Rev. 51(4), 661–703 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cremers M., Ferreira M. A., Matos P.P., Starks L.T.: The mutual fund industry worldwide: explicit and closet indexing, fees, and performance (2013). SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1830207 or doi:10.2139/ssrn.1830207

  • D’Errico, M., Grassi, R., Stefani, S., Torriero, A.: Shareholding networks and centrality: an application to the Italian financial market. In: Naimzada, A., Stefani, S., Torriero, A. (eds.) Network, Topology and Dynamics. Theory and Applications to Economics and Social Systems, pp. 215–228. Springer, Berlin (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  • Fama, E.F., French, K.R.: Luck versus skill in the cross-section of mutual fund returns. J. Finance 65, 1915–1947 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gabaix, X.: Power laws in economics and finance. Ann. Rev. Econ. 1, 255–293 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grassi, R.: Vertex centrality as a measure of information flow in Italian corporate board networks. Phys. A 389, 2455–2464 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grassi, R., Stefani, S., Torriero, A.: Some new results on the eigenvector centrality. J. Math. Sociol. 31(3), 237–24 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grassi, R., Scapellato, R., Stefani, S., Torriero, A.: Betweenness centrality: extremal values and structural properties. In: Naimzada, A., Stefani, S., Torriero, A. (eds.) Network, Topology and Dynamics. Theory and Applications to Economics and Social Systems, pp. 161–176. Springer, Berlin (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  • Grassi, R., Stefani, S., Torriero, A.: Extremal properties of graphs and eigencentrality in trees with a given degree sequence. J. Math. Sociol. 34(2), 115–135 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grinblatt, M., Titman, S., Wermers, R.: Momentum investment strategies, portfolio performance and herding: a study of mutual fund behavior. Am. Econ. Rev. 85, 1088–1105 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kacperczyk, M., Seru, A.: Fund manager use of public information: new evidence on managerial skills. J. Finance 62(2), 485–528 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lux, T.: Financial power laws: empirical evidence, models, mechanisms. In: Cioffi-Revilla, C. (ed.) Proceedings from the International Workshop on Power Laws in the Social Sciences, Fairfax, VA: Center for Social Complexity, George Mason University (2007)

  • Newman, M.E.J., Barabási, A.-L., Watts, D.J.: The Structure and Dynamics of Networks. Princeton University Press, Princeton and Oxford (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  • Rotundo G.: Centrality measures in shareholding networks. In: Duman E., Atiya A. (eds.) Use of Risk Analysis in Computer-Aided Persuasion, NATO Science for Peace and Security Series—E, Human and Societal Dynamics, Amsterdam, Vol. 88, 12–28 (2011)

  • Rotundo, G., D’Arcangelis, A.M.: Ownership and control in shareholding networks. J. Econ. Interact. Coord. 5(2), 191–219 (2010a)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rotundo, G., D’Arcangelis, A.M.: Network analysis of ownership and control structure in the Italian Stock market. Adv. Appl. Stat. Sci. 2(2), 255–273 (2010b)

    Google Scholar 

  • Rotundo, G., D’Arcangelis, A.M.: Network of companies: an analysis of market concentration in the Italian stock market. Qual. Quant. 48(4), 1893–1910 (2014)

  • Schneeweis, T., Crowder, G.B., Kazemi, H.: The New Science of Asset Allocation: Risk Management in a Multi-Asset World. Wiley, Hoboken (2010)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sharpe, W. F.: The Sharpe ratio. J. Portfolio Manag., Fall 21(1), 49–58 (1994)

  • Solis, R.: Visualizing stock-mutual fund relationships through social network analysis. Global J. Finance Bank Issues 3(3), 8–22 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  • Taleb, N.N.: The Black Swan: The Impact of the Highly Improbable. Random House, New York (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wermers, R.: Mutual fund herding and the impact on stock prices. J. Finance 54, 581–622 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anna Maria D’Arcangelis.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

D’Arcangelis, A.M., Rotundo, G. Mutual funds relationships and performance analysis. Qual Quant 49, 1573–1584 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-014-0066-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-014-0066-z

Keywords

Navigation