Skip to main content
Log in

Determination of the efficiency of the world railway companies by method of DEA and comparison of their efficiency by Tobit analysis

  • Published:
Quality & Quantity Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper attempts to measure the performance of railway companies that produce passenger and freight services around the world. The data covering 10 years from 2000 to 2009 is analyzed first via the data envelopment analysis method in order to obtain technical efficiency and allocative efficiency scores of 31 railway companies for the purpose of the study. In the analysis conducted by use of the CCR model, while total 17 firms were efficient in the first year, this figure reaches to 18 companies for the last year with one more addition. While only two companies seem efficient in the first year, this figure goes down to one for the last year. With input oriented and variable return analysis conducted by use of the BCC model, the firms having technical efficiency at the beginning of the period were 20 in number. At the end of the period, the figure reaches to 24. Next, the outputs of DEA are correlated by Tobit regression and tried to determine decisiveness of the outputs on the efficiency. It has been seen that the same output composition used with Tobit analysis gives more compliant results with the allocative efficiency scores rather than with the technical efficiency scores.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Atkinson S.E., Cornwell C.: Estimating radial measures of productivity growth: frontier vs non-frontier approaches. J. Product. Anal. 10, 35–46 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banker R.D., Charnes A., Cooper W.W.: Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiency in DEA. Manag. Sci. 30, 1078–1092 (1984)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cantos P., Pastor J.M., Serrano L.: Productivity, efficiency and technical change in the European railways: a non-parametric approach. Transportation 26(4), 337–357 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charnes A., Cooper W.W., Rhodes E.: Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2, 429–444 (1978)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charnes A., Cooper W.W., Rhodes E.: Short communication: measuring the efficiency of decision making units. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 3, 339 (1979)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coelli T.A., Perelman S.: A comparison of parametric and non-parametric distance functions: with application to European railways. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 117, 326–339 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, W.W., Seiford, L.M., Tone, K.: Introduction to Data Envelopment Analysis and its Uses. Springer, New York (2006)

  • Cowie J.: The technical efficiency of public and private ownership in the rail industry: the case of swiss. J. Transp. Econ. Policy 33(3), 241–251 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  • Çekerol G.S., Nalçakan M.: Lojistik Sektörü  Içerisinde Türkiye Demiryolu. Yurtiçi Yük Taşıma Talebinin Ridge Regresyonla Analizi. Marmara Üniversitesi  I. I.B.F. Dergisi 31(2), 321–344 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  • Debreu G.: The coefficient of resource utilization. Econometrica 19(3), 273–292 (1951)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duman,  I.: Demiryollarının Yeniden Yapılanma  Ihtiyacı ve TCDD’deki Gelişmeler. In: Proceedings, Uluslararası Demiryolu Sempozyumu, (2). Ankara (2006)

  • Evren G., Vitoşoğlu Y.: Türkiye’de Demiryolu Ağırlıklı Kombine Yük Taşımacılı ğı Olanaklarının Araştırılması.  ITÜ Dergisi Seria D 7(1), 77–88 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  • Farrell M.J.: The measurement of productive efficiency. J. R. Stat. Soc. 120(3), 253–281 (1957)

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham D.J.: Productivity and efficiency in urban railways: parametric and non-parametric estimates. Transp. Res. E 44(1), 84–99 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greene, W.H.: Econometric analysis, 3rd edn. Prentice Hall, New Jersey (1997)

  • Jitsuzumi T., Nakamura A.: Socio-economic causes of inefficiency in japanese railways: application of DEA for managers and policymakers. Plan. Sci. 44, 161–173 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim H., Choi C., Woo J., Choi Y., Kim K., Wu D.: Efficiency of the modal shift and environmental policy on the Korean railroad. Stoch. Environ. Res. Risk Assess. 25(3), 91–97 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koopmans, T.C.: An analysis of production as an efficient combination of activities. In: Koopmans, T.C. (ed.) Activity Analysis of Production and Allocation. Wiley, New Jersey (1951)

  • Kumbhakar, S.C., Lovell, C.A.K.: Stochastic Frontier Analysis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2000)

  • Lan L.W., Lin E.T.J.: Performance measurement for railway transport: stochastic distance functions with inefficiency and ineffectiveness effects. J. Transp. Econ. Policy 40(3), 383–408 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  • Loizides J., Tsionas E.G.: Dynamic distributions of productivity growth in European railways. J. Transp. Econ. Policy 38(1), 45–76 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  • Merkert R., Hensher D.A.: The impact of strategic management and fleet planning on airline efficiency: a random effects tobit model based on dea efficiency scores. Transp. Res. 45/A, 686–695 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  • Nashand A.S.J., Nash C.A.: Benchmarking of train operating firms: a transaction cost efficiency analysis. Transp. Plan. Technol. 33(1), 35–53 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sabri, K., Colson, G.E., Mbangala, A.M.: Multiple criteria and multiple periods performance analysis: the comparison of North African railways. In: AIP Conference Proceedings, Computing Anticipatory Systems: CASYS’07-Eighth International Conference, vol. 1051, pp.351–365. Melville (2008)

  • Scheraga C.A.: Operational efficiency versus financial mobility in the global airline industry: a data envelopment and tobit analysis. Transp. Res. 38/A, 383–404 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  • Şaşamaz, Ç.: Karyollarında ve Demiryollarında Verimlilik Analizi. Unpublished Dissertation, Pamukkale University, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü (2008)

  • TCDD, (Turkish Republic State Railways). Türkiye Cumhuriyeti Devlet Demiryolları  Istatistik Yıllı ğı 2006–2010. http://www.tcdd.gov.tr/Upload/Files/ContentFiles/2010/istatistik/20062010yillik.pdf (2011). Accessed 1 Feb 2012

  • Tobin J.: Estimation of relationship for limited dependent variables. Econometrica 26(1), 24–36 (1958)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UIC (International Union of Railways). Railway Time-Series Data 1970–2009. http://www.uic.org/etf/publication/publication-detail.php?code_pub=302/70-09xl (2010). Accessed 1 Feb 2012

  • Wang S., Liao C.: Cost structure and productivity growth of the Taiwan railway. Transp. Res. E 42, 317–339 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu M.: Assessing the technical efficiency, service effectiveness, and technical effectiveness of the world’s railways through NDEA analysis. Transp. Res. A 42, 1283–1294 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ali Kabasakal.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kutlar, A., Kabasakal, A. & Sarikaya, M. Determination of the efficiency of the world railway companies by method of DEA and comparison of their efficiency by Tobit analysis. Qual Quant 47, 3575–3602 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-012-9741-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-012-9741-0

Keywords

Navigation