Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The use of mixed methods research in the field of behavioural sciences

  • Published:
Quality & Quantity Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Mixed methods research involves the combined use of quantitative and qualitative methods in the same research study, and it is becoming increasingly important in several scientific areas. The aim of this paper is to review and compare through a mixed methods multiple-case study the application of this methodology in three reputable behavioural science journals: the Journal of Organizational Behavior, Addictive Behaviors and Psicothema. A quantitative analysis was carried out to review all the papers published in these journals during the period 2003–2008 and classify them into two blocks: theoretical and empirical, with the latter being further subdivided into three subtypes (quantitative, qualitative and mixed). A qualitative analysis determined the main characteristics of the mixed methods studies identified, in order to describe in more detail the ways in which the two methods are combined based on their purpose, priority, implementation and research design. From the journals selected, a total of 1,958 articles were analysed, the majority of which corresponded to empirical studies, with only a small number referring to research that used mixed methods. Nonetheless, mixed methods research does appear in all the behavioural science journals studied within the period selected, showing a range of designs, where the sequential equal weight mixed methods research design seems to stand out.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Acosta M.C., Eissenberg T., Nichter M., Balster R.L., TERN (Tobacco Etiology Research Network): Characterizing early cigarette use episodes in novice smokers. Addict. Behav. 33(1), 106–121 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aragonés J.I., Izurieta C., Raposa G.: Revisando el concepto de desarrollo sostenible en el discurso social. Psicothema 15(2), 221–226 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  • Arce R., Tortosa F., Alfaro E.: Veredictos y análisis del contenido de las deliberaciones de los tribunales de jueces y jurados en el contexto jurídico español. Psicothema 15(1), 127–135 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  • Arce R., Fariña F., Seijo D.: Razonamientos judiciales en procesos de separación. Psicothema 17(1), 57–63 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergman M., (ed.): Advances in Mixed Methods Research. Sage, London (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyatzis R.E.: Using tipping points of emotional intelligence and cognitive competencies to predict financial performance of leaders. Psicothema 18(Sup.1), 124–131 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradizza C.M., Collins R.L., Vincent P.C., Falco D.L.: It does the job: young adults discuss their malt liquor consumption. Addict. Behav. 31(9), 1559–1577 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bryman A.: Integrating quantitative and qualitative research: how is it done?. Qual. Res. 6, 97–113 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caldwell S., Farmer S., Fedor D.: The influence of age on volunteer contributions in a nonprofit organization. J. Organ. Behav. 29, 311–333 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Challiol H., Mignonac K.: Relocation decision-making and couple relationships: a quantitative and qualitative study of dual-earner couples. J. Organ. Behav. 26, 247–274 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Creswell J.: Research Design. Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methods Approaches, 2nd edn. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  • Creswell J., Plano-Clark V.: Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research. Sage Thousand, Oaks, CA (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  • Creswell J., Plano Clark V., Gutmann M., Hanson W.: Advanced mixed methods research designs. In: Tashakkori, A., Teddlie, C. (eds) Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social & Behavioral Research, pp. 209–240. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  • Creswell J.W., Fetters M., Ivankova N.V.: Designing a mixed methods study in primary care. Ann. Fam. Med. 2(1), 7–12 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donnelly D., Quirin J.: An extension of Lee and Mitchell’s unfolding model of voluntary turnover. J. Organ. Behav. 27, 59–77 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drach-Zahavy A., Freund A.: Team effectiveness under stress: a structural contingency approach. J. Organ. Behav. 28, 423–450 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forthofer M.: Status of mixed methods research in nursing. In: Tashakkori, A., Teddlie, C. (eds) Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social & Behavioral Research, pp. 527–540. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  • García N., Fidalgo R.: Diferencias en la conciencia de los procesos psicológicos de la escritura: mecánicos frente a substantivos y otros. Psicothema 15(1), 41–48 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  • Grandey A., Dickter D., Sin H.: The customer is not always right: customer aggression and emotion regulation of service employees. J. Organ. Behav. 25, 397–418 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greene J.: Mixed Methods in Social Inquiry. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  • Greene J., Caracelli V., Graham W.: Toward a conceptual framework for mixed-method evaluation designs. Educ. Eval. Policy Anal. 11, 255–274 (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanson W., Creswell J.W., Plano Clark V.L., Petska K., Creswell J.D.: Mixed methods research designs in counseling psychology. J. Couns. Psychol. 52, 224–235 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hart L., Smith S., Swars S., Smith M.: An examination of research methods in mathematics education. J. Mixed Methods Res. 3, 26–41 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ivankova N.V., Creswell J.W., Stick S.L.: Using mixed-methods sequential explanatory design: from theory to practice. Field Methods 18(1), 3–20 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jick T.: Mixing qualitative and quantitative methods: triangulation in action. Admin. Sci. Quart. 24, 602–611 (1979)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson B., Onwuegbuzie A.: Mixed methods research: a research paradigm whose time has come. Educ. Res. 33(7), 14–26 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  • Lam S., Dreher G.: Gender, extra-firm mobility, and compensation attainment in the United States and Hong Kong. J. Organ. Behav. 25, 791–805 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leech N., Onwuegbuzie A.J.: A typology of mixed methods research designs. Qual. Quant. 43, 265–275 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leonard J., Levine D., Joshi A.: Do birds of a feather shop together? The effects on performance of employees’ similarity with one another and with customers. J. Organ. Behav. 25, 731–754 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levy O.: The influence of top management team attention patterns on global strategic posture of firms. J. Organ. Behav. 26, 797–819 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lievens F., De Paepe A.: An empirical investigation of interviewer-related factors that discourage the use of high structure interviews. J. Organ. Behav. 25, 29–46 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lilius J., Worline M., Maitlis S., Kanov J., Dutton J., Frost P.: The contours and consequences of compassion at work. J. Organ. Behav. 29, 193–218 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu C., Spector P., Shi L.: Cross-national job stress: a quantitative and qualitative study. J. Organ. Behav. 28, 209–239 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore S., Grunberg L., Greenberg E.: A longitudinal exploration of alcohol use and problems comparing managerial and nonmanagerial men and women. Addict. Behav. 28(4), 687–703 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan D.: Practical strategies for combining qualitative and quantitative methods: applications to health research. Qual. Health Res. 8, 362–376 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morse J.: Approaches to qualitative-quantitative methodological triangulation. Nurs. Res. 40, 120–123 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nembhard I., Edmondson A.: Making it safe: the effects of leader inclusiveness and professional status on psychological safety and improvement efforts in health care teams. J. Organ. Behav. 27, 941–966 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niglas K.: The Combined Use of Qualitative and Quantitative Methods in Educational Research. Tallinn Pedagogical University Press, Tallinn (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen K., Randall R., Albertsen K.: Participants’ appraisals of process issues and the effects of stress management interventions. J. Organ. Behav. 28, 793–810 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nordqvist C., Johansson K., Lindqvist K., Bendtsen P.: Attitude changes among emergency department triage staff after conducting routine alcohol screening. Addict. Behav. 31(2), 191–202 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Onwuegbuzie A.J.: Effect sizes in qualitative research: a prolegomenon. Qual. Quant. 37, 393–409 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Onwuegbuzie A.J., Johnson R.B.: Mixed method and mixed model research. In: Johnson, R.B., Christensen, L.B. (eds) Educational Research: Quantitative, Qualitative, and Mixed Approaches, pp. 408–431. Allyn and Bacon, Needham Heights, MA (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  • Onwuegbuzie, A.J., Leech, N.: generalization practices in qualitative research: a mixed methods case study. Qual. Quant. (2009). doi:10.1007/s11135-009-9241-z

  • Onwuegbuzie A.J., Teddlie C.: A framework fro analyzing data in mixed methods research. In: Tashakkori, A., Teddlie, C. (eds) Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social and Behavioral Research, pp. 351–383. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  • Onwuegbuzie, A.J., Johnson, R.B., Collins, K.M.T.: Assessing legitimation in mixed research: a new framework. Qual. Quant.(2009). doi:10.1007/s11135-009-9289-9

  • Ostroff C., Shin Y., Kinicki A.: Multiple perspectives of congruence: relationships between value congruence and employee attitudes. J. Organ. Behav. 26, 591–623 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patterson M., West M., Wall T.: Integrated manufacturing, empowerment, and company performance. J. Organ. Behav. 25, 641–665 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pérez-González A., Williams G.: Programa integral para la enseñanza de habilidades a niños con autismo. Psicothema 17(2), 233–244 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  • Plano Clark, V.L.: Cross-disciplinary analysis of the use of mixed methods in physics education research, counseling psychology, and primary care. (Doctoral dissertation, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, 2005). Dissert. Abstracts Int. 66, 02A (2005)

  • Plano Clark V.L., Huddleston-Casas C.A., Churchill S.L., O’Neil Green D., Garrett A.L.: Mixed methods approaches in family science research. J. Fam. Issues 29, 1543–1566 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plano Clark V.L., Garrett A.L., Leslie-Pelecky D.L.: Applying three strategies for integrating quantitative and qualitative databases in a mixed methods study of a non-traditional graduate education program. Field Methods 22(2), 154–174 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Powell H., Mihalas S., Onwuegbuzie A., Suldo S., Daley C.: Mixed methods research in school psychology: a mixed methods investigation of trends in the literature. Psychol. Schools 45(4), 291–309 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rafaeli A.: Sense-making of employment: on whether and why people read employment advertising. J. Organ. Behav. 27, 747–770 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rallis S., Rossman G.: Mixed methods in evaluation contexts: a pragmatic framework. In: Tashakkori, A., Teddlie, C. (eds) Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social & Behavioral Research, pp. 491–512. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  • Rocco T., Bliss L., Gallagher S., Perez-Prado A., Alacaci C., Dwyer W., Fine J., Pappamihiel E.: The pragmatic and dialectical lenses: two views of mixed methods use in education. In: Tashakkori, A., Teddlie, C. (eds) Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social & Behavioral Research, pp. 595–615. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodríguez G., Triana B., Hernández M.H.: La experiencia familiar y la atribución de roles parentales. Psicothema 17(3), 363–369 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  • Sale J.E.M., Brazil K.: A strategy to identify critical appraisal criteria for primary mixed-method studies. Qual. Quant. 38, 351–365 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stotts A.L., Mooney M.E., Sayre S.L., Novy M., Schmitz J.M., Grabowski J.: Illusory predictors: generalizability of findings in cocaine treatment retention research. Addict. Behav. 32(12), 2819–2836 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tashakkori A., Teddlie C.: Mixed Methodology. Combining Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  • Tashakkori, A., Teddlie, C. (eds): Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social & Behavioral Research. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  • Teddlie C., Tashakkori A.: A general typology of research designs featuring mixed methods. Res. Schools 13, 12–28 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  • Teddlie, C., Tashakkori, A. (eds): Foundations of Mixed Methods Research: Integrating Quantitative and Qualitative Techniques in the Social and Behavioural Sciences. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  • Terry P., Wright K.A.: Self-reported driving behaviour and attitudes towards driving under the influence of cannabis among three different user groups in England. Addict. Behav. 30(3), 619–623 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Varela J., Rial A., García E.: Presentación de una escala de satisfacción con los servicios sanitarios de atención primaria. Psicothema 15(5), 656–661 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  • Villar F., Triadó C., Solé C., Osuna M.J.: Patrones de actividad cotidiana en personas mayores: ¿es lo que dicen hacer lo que desearían hacer?. Psicothema 18(1), 149–155 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright R.: Mapping cognitions to better understand attitudinal and behavioural responses in appraisal research. J. Organ. Behav. 25, 339–374 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yin R.K.: Applications of Case Study Research. Sage, Newbury Park, CA (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  • Yin R.K.: Case study Research: Designs and Methods, 3rd edn. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA (2003)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Dept. Metodologia de les Ciències del Comportament, Facultat de Psicologia, Universitat de Barcelona, Passeig Vall d’Hebron, 171, 08035, Barcelona, Spain

    Olatz Lopez-Fernandez

  2. Department of Management, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Alicante, San Vicente del Raspeig, Spain

    Jose F. Molina-Azorin

Authors
  1. Olatz Lopez-Fernandez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jose F. Molina-Azorin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Olatz Lopez-Fernandez.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lopez-Fernandez, O., Molina-Azorin, J.F. The use of mixed methods research in the field of behavioural sciences. Qual Quant 45, 1459–1472 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-011-9543-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-011-9543-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation