Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Measuring the quality of work: the case of the Italian social cooperatives

  • Published:
Quality & Quantity Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Quality of work has within a short time become a major subject of study and discussion in labour economy. Its quantification is a challenging task because it implies the translation of various subjective perceptions into a single objective measure (composite indicator). In this paper, the method used to construct measures is the Rating Scale Model and the available data come from the Survey on Italian Social Cooperatives carried out in 2007. The validity of the obtained Rasch measures is tested with respect to some overall variables of the quality of work. Moreover, using inferential confidence intervals, these measures are utilized to evaluate the differences in the perception of the quality of work due to worker (gender, age and education) and cooperative (type, dimension and geographic area) characteristics, work characteristics (service area, membership, time and type of contract) and work incentives (economic, professional and learning).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson N., Schalk R.: The psychological contract in retrospect and prospect. J. Organ. Behav. 19, 637–647 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andrich D.: A rating formulation for ordered response categories. Psychometrika 43, 561–573 (1978)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andrich D., de Jong J.H.A.L., Sheridan B.E.: Diagnostic opportunities with the Rasch model for ordered response categories. In: Rost, J., Langeheine, R. (eds) Application of Latent Trait and Latent Class Models in the Social Science, Waxmann, Munster (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  • Bénabou R., Tirole J.: Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation. Rev. Econ. Stud. 70, 489–520 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benz M.: Not for the profit, but for the satisfaction? Evidence on worker well-being in non-profit firms. Kyklos 58, 155–176 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bond T.G., Fox C.M.: Applying the Rasch Model Fundamental Measurement in the Human Sciences, 2nd edn. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowling N.A., Beehr T.A., Lepisto L.R.: Beyond job satisfaction: a five-year prospective analysis of the dispositional approach to work attitudes. J. Vocat. Behav. 69, 315–330 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brentari E., Golia S.: Measuring job satisfaction in the social service sector with the Rasch model. J. Appl. Meas. 9, 45–56 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  • Brentari E., Golia S., Manisera M.: Models for categorical data: a comparison between the Rasch model and Nonlinear Principal Component Analysis. Statisticas & Applicazioni V(1), 53–77 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  • Borzaga C., Tortia E.: Worker motivations, job satisfaction, and loyalty in public and nonprofit social services. Nonprof. Volunt. Sec. Quarter. 35(2), 225–248 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowen D.E., Gilliland S.W., Folger R.: HRM service fairness: how being fair with employees spill over to customers. Organ Dyn. 27, 7–23 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carpita, M.: On the inferential confidence intervals for pairwise comparisons. In: Italian Statistical Society, Proceedings of the XLIII Scientific Meeting, pp. 563–566. Cleup, Padova (2006)

  • Carpita M. (ed.): La qualità del lavoro nelle cooperative sociali, misure e modelli statistici. Franco Angeli, Milan (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  • Carpita M., Manisera M.: On the imputation of missing data in surveys with Likert-type scales. J. Class. 28, 93–112 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark A.E.: Job satisfaction in Britain. Br. J. Ind. Relat. 34, 189–217 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark A.E.: Job satisfaction and gender: why are women so happy at work?. Labour Econ. 4, 341–372 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark A.E.: What really matters in a job? Hedonic measurement using quit data. Labour Econ. 8(2), 223–242 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark A., Oswald A.: Satisfaction and comparison income. J. Public Econ. 61, 359–381 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark A.E., Georgellis Y., Sanfey P.: Job satisfaction, wages and quits: evidence from German panel data. Res. Labor Econ. 17, 95–121 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole N.D., Flint D.H.: Perceptions of distributive and procedural justice in employee benefits: flexible versus traditional benefit plans. J Managerial Psychol. 19(1), 19–40 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Bustillo Llorente M.R., Macias E.F.: Job satisfaction as an indicator of the quality of work. J. Soc. Econ. 34, 656–673 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Denton D.W., Kleiman L.S.: Job tenure as a moderator of the relationship between autonomy and satisfaction. Appl. H.R.M. Res. 6(2), 105–114 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission: Improving quality in work: a review of recent progress. COM 2003, 728 final, Brussels (2003)

  • European Commission: Measuring the quality of employment in the EU. In: Employment in Europe Report, Chapter 4. Directorate-General for Employment, Social Affairs and Equal Opportunities, Brussels (2008)

  • Freeman R.B.: Job satisfaction as an economic variable. Am. Econ. Rev. 68(2), 135–141 (1978)

    Google Scholar 

  • Frey B.S.: Not Just for the Money, An Economic Theory of Personal Motivation. Elgar Publishing Limited, Cheltenham (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  • Frey B.S.: On the relationship between intrinsic and extrinsic work motivation. Int. J. Ind. Organ. 15, 427–439 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frey B.S., Stutzer A.: Happiness research: state and prospects. Rev. Soc. Econ. 63(2), 207–228 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gagné M., Deci E.L.: Self-determination theory and work motivation. J. Organ. Behav. 26, 331–362 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gazioglu S., Tansel A.: Job satisfaction in Britain: individual and job related factors. Appl. Econ. 38, 1163–1171 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein H., Healy M.J.R.: The graphical presentation of a collections of means. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. A 158(1), 175–177 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green F.: Assessing job quality in the affluent economy. In: Green, F. (eds) Demanding Work, Princeton University Press, Princeton (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  • Green F.: Well-being, job satisfaction and labour mobility. Labour Econ. 17, 897–903 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamermesh D.: Economic aspects of job satisfaction. In: Ashenfelter, O., Oates, W. (eds) Essays in Labor Market Analysis, pp. 53–72. John Wiley, New York (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamermesh D.S.: The changing distribution of job satisfaction. Hum. Resource 36, 1–30 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Janssen O., Van Yperen N.W.: Employees’ goal orientations, the quality of leader-member exchange, and the outcomes of job performance and job satisfaction. Acad. Manage. J. 47(3), 368–384 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leete L.: Wage equity and employee motivation in nonprofit and for-profit organizations. J. Econ. Behav. Organ. 43(4), 423–446 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levy-Garboua L., Montmarquette C.: Reported job satisfaction: what does it mean?. J. Soc. Econ. 33, 135–151 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levy-Garboua L., Montmarquette C., Simonnet V.: Job satisfaction and quits. Labour Econ. 14(2), 251–268 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linacre J.M.: Optimizing rating scale category effectiveness. J. Appl. Meas. 3, 85–106 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  • Locke L.A.: What is job satisfaction?. Organ. Behav. Hum. Perf. 4, 309–336 (1969)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Locke L.A.: The nature and causes of job satisfaction. In: Dunnette, M.D. (eds) Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Rand McNally Publication Company, Chicago (1976)

    Google Scholar 

  • Manisera M., Van der Kooij A.J., Dusseldorp E.: Identifying the component structure of satisfaction scales by nonlinear Principal Components Analysis. Qual. Technol. Quant. Manage. 7(2), 97–115 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  • Marasini D., Migliorati S.: On the use of inferential confidence intervals. Statistica & Applicazioni VII(1), 3–14 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  • Mosca M., Musella M., Pastore F.: Relational goods, monitoring and non-pecuniary compensations in the nonprofit sector: the case of the Italian social services. Ann. Pub. Coop. Econ. 78(1), 57–86 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oswald A.: Happiness and economic performance. Econ. J. 107, 1815–1831 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rasch, G.: Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment tests. The Danish Institute of Educational Research, Copenhagen (1960) (Expanded edition, 1980. University of Chicago Press)

  • Rousseau D.M.: Psychological Contracts in Organizations: Understanding Written and Unwritten Agreements. Sage, Thousand Oaks (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubin D.B.: Multiple Imputation for Nonresponse in Surveys. Wiley, New York (1987)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Schleicher D.J., Watt J.D., Greguras G.J.: Reexamining the job satisfaction-performance relationship: the complexity of attitudes. J. Appl. Psychol. 89(1), 165–177 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seashore S.E.: Job satisfaction as an indicator of the quality of employment. Soc. Indic. Res. 1(2), 135–168 (1974)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Senik C.: Income and well-being: what can we learn from subjective data?. J. Econ. Surv. 19(1), 43–63 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siebern-Thomas F.: Job quality in European labour markets. In: Bazen, S., Lucifora, C., Salverda, W. (eds) Job Quality and Employer Behaviour, Palgrave McMillan, New York (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  • Skott P.: Fairness as a source of hysteresis in employment and relative wages. J. Econ. Behav. Organ. 57, 305–331 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spector P.E.: Summated Rating Scale Construction—An Introduction. Sage Publications, London (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  • Spector P.E.: Job Satisfaction. Sage Publications, London (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  • Stride C., Wall T.D., Catley N.: Measures of Job Satisfaction, Organizational Commitment, Mental Health and Job-related Well-being. A Benchmarking Manual, 2nd edn. Wiley, Chichester (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas A.: The rise of social cooperatives in Italy. Voluntas 15(3), 243–263 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tortia E.C.: Worker Well-Being and perceived fairness: survey-based findings from Italy. J. Soc. Econ. 37, 2080–2094 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tyron W.W.: Evaluating statistical difference, equivalence, and indeterminacy using inferential confidence intervals: an integrated alternative method of conducting null hypothesis statistical test. Psychol. Methods 6(4), 371–386 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Praag B.M.S., Frijters P., Ferrer-i-Carbonell A.: The anatomy of subjective well-being. J. Econ. Behav. Organ. 51, 29–49 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Praag B.M.S., Ferrer-i-Carbonell A.: Happiness Quantified. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2004)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Vermeylen, G.: Quality of work and employment in the European working condition survey. European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions. UNECE/ILO/Eurostat Seminar on the Quality of Work, Ginevra (2005)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maurizio Carpita.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Carpita, M., Golia, S. Measuring the quality of work: the case of the Italian social cooperatives. Qual Quant 46, 1659–1685 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-011-9515-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-011-9515-0

Keywords

Navigation