Abstract
The increasing length of time that students take to attain the doctorate (TTD) is of concern in higher education. Separate focus groups with students and eight faculty members were used to investigate factors perceived to influence TTD in Education. The percentage of participants citing a theme (theme frequency) and the percentage of statements referring to a particular theme (theme intensity) were used to describe the strength of the associations found. Analysis of students and faculty responses suggests that structure, defined as the nature and arrangement of program tasks and resources, is strongly associated with TTD whereas communication, the way program expectations and requirements are communicated, has a moderate association. Students’ responses indicate that the nature of the dissertation committee formed (committee) and the desire to work and attain goals despite obstacles encountered (motivation) are each strongly associated with TTD whereas faculty responses indicate these associations are moderate and minimal, respectively. Faculty responses indicate that the amount and quality of academic preparation received (preparation), and the nature of academic guidance, mentoring and supervision received (advising) have at least a moderate association with TTD whereas students’ responses suggest the association is at most moderate. Whereas faculty comments suggest that whether a student enrolls part-time or full-time (enrollment) is moderately associated with TTD, enrollment did not emerge as a factor among students. Recommendations for practice and further research are provided.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Baldwin A.L.: Personal structure analysis: a statistical method for investigating the single personality. J. Abnorm. Soc. Psychol. 37, 163–183 (1942)
Bauer, E.R.: An examination of the effect of departmental factors on student completion of doctoral requirements. PhD Dissertation, University of Massachusetts, United States. ProQuest Digital Dissertations database (Publication No. AAT 3133568). Accessed August 30, 2007 (2004)
Bowen G.W., Rudenstine N.L.: In Pursuit of the Ph.D. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ (1992)
Cabrera A.F., Nora A., Castaneda M.B.: College persistence: structural equations modeling test of an integrated model of student retention. J. High. Educ. 64, 123–139 (1993)
Constas M.A.: Qualitative data analysis as a public event: the documentation of category development procedures. Am. Educ. Res. J. 29, 253–266 (1992)
Ferrer de Valero Y.F.: Departmental factors affecting time-to-degree and completion rates of doctoral students at one land-grant research institution. J. High. Educ. 72(3), 341–367 (2001)
Girves J.E., Wemmerus V.: Developing models of graduate degree progress. J. High. Educ. 59(2), 163–189 (1988)
Golde C.M.: Should I stay or should I go? Students’ descriptions of the doctoral attrition process. Rev. High. Educ 23(2), 199–227 (2000)
Green, K.E.: Academic procrastination and perfectionism: a comparison of graduates and ABDs. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA, April 1995
Guba E.G., Lincoln Y.S.: Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In: Denzin, N.K, Lincoln, Y.S. (eds) Handbook of Qualitative Research, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA (1994)
Hoffer, T.B., Hess, M.D., Welch, V., Williams, K.: Doctorate Recipients from United States Universities: Summary Report 2006. National Opinion Research Center, Chicago (2007)
Kittell-Limerick, P.: Perceived barriers to completion of the academic doctorate: a Delphi study. PhD Dissertations, Texas A&M University, TX (2005)
Lenz, K.: Factors affecting the completion of the doctoral dissertation for nontraditional aged women. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA, April 1995
Maher M.A., Ford M.E., Thompson C.M.: Degree progress of women doctoral students: factors that constrain, facilitate, and differentiate. Rev. High. Educ. 27(3), 385–408 (2004)
McFarland, R.T., Caplow, J.H.: Faculty perspectives of doctoral persistence within arts and science disciplines. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association for the Study of Higher Education, Orlando, FL, November 1995
Miles M.B., Huberman A.M.: Qualitative data analysis 2nd edn. Sage, Thousand Oaks (1994)
National Science Foundation.: Summary of workshops on graduate student attrition. National Science Foundation: Division of Science Resources Studies. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED427966) (1998)
Onwuegbuzie A.J., Teddlie C.: A framework for analyzing data in mixed methods. In: Tashakkori, A., Teddlie, C. (eds) Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social and Behavioral Research, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA (2003)
Sandler M.E.: Career decision-making self-efficacy, perceived stress, and integrated model of student persistence: a structural model of finances, attitudes, behavior, and career development. Res. High. Educ. 41, 537–580 (2000)
Seagram B.C., Gould J., Pyke S.W.: An investigation of gender and other variables on time to completion of doctoral degree. Res. High. Educ. 39, 319–335 (1998)
Stolzenberg, E.B.: The dynamics of the doctoral student-faculty advising relationship: a study across academic fields. PhD Dissertation, University of California, United States (2006)
Stiles, J.E.M.: The hazard of success: A longitudinal study of time-to-degree among doctoral students using discrete-time survival analysis. PhD Dissertation, Harvard University, United States (2003)
Strayhorn, T.L.: More than money matters: an integrated model of graduate student persistence. PhD Dissertation, Virginia Tech, United States (2005)
Tinto V.: Leaving College: Rethinking the Causes and Cures of Student Attrition. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1993)
Yin R.: Case Study Research: Design and Methods. Sage, Thousand Oaks (2003)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wao, H.O., Dedrick, R.F. & Ferron, J.M. Quantitizing text: using theme frequency and theme intensity to describe factors influencing time-to-doctorate. Qual Quant 45, 923–934 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-010-9404-y
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-010-9404-y