Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Model building and estimation strategies for implementing the Balanced Scorecard in Health sector

  • Research Note
  • Published:
Quality & Quantity Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Over last two decades, the concept of the Balanced Scorecard has had broad application by the health sector internationally, including Hospitals systems and national healthcare systems or organizations. However, the lack of literature on causal-effect relationships between different types of dimensions and indicators poses difficulty in conceptualising and implementing a quality evaluation system based on Balanced Scorecard. Methodologically, the most natural context for Balanced Scorecard conceptualization and estimation deals with Structural Equation Models with latent variables. Partial Least Squares Path Modelling has found increased applications, thanks to its ability to handle complex models. However, the lack of a global optimization criterion makes it difficult to evaluate this procedure. The aim of this article is to propose a methodological conceptualization of the Balanced Scorecard in a new context, as the Health sector, using a suitable statistical approach to estimate causal relationships among specified latent dimensions, together with a model building strategy, a necessary step when expert knowledge is too weak to build a robust and well suited model. Specifically, within the Structural Equation Models framework a two-step model building strategy is presented; the first step build the measurement models based on a clustering (around latent variables) technique and the second step build the structural model based on partial correlations and a procedure that selects the best model in terms of predictive power, measured by the mean of the R 2 for the endogenous latent variables. Finally, an application based on administrative archives of Lombardy region (Italy) illustrates the presented methodology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahn H.: Applying the balanced scorecard concept: an experience report. Long Range Plann. 34(4), 441–461 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akkermans H.A., van Oorschot K.E.: Relevance assumed: a case study of balanced scorecard development using system dynamics. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 56(8), 931–941 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amato, S.: A model building strategy for PLS path modeling. In: Proceedings of the PLS’03 International Symposium on PLS and Related Methods, pp. 135–141. Decisia, Lisbon, Portugal (2003)

  • Atkinson A.A., Balakrishnan R., Booth P., Cote J., Groot T., Malmi T., Roberts H., Uliana E., Wu A.: New directions in management accounting research. J. Manag. Account. Res. 9, 79–108 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker G.R., Pink G.H.: A balanced scorecard for Canadian hospitals. Healthc. Manag. Forum 8(4), 7–21 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blumenthal D.: Quality of care-what is it?. N. Engl. J. Med. 335(12), 891–894 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bollen K.A.: Structural Equations with Latent Variables. Wiley, New York (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  • Chin W.W., Todd P.A.: On the use, usefulness, and ease of use of structural equation modelling in MIS research: a note of caution. MIS Quart. 19, 237–246 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chow C.W., Ganulin D., Teknika O., Haddad K., Williamson J.: The balanced scorecard: a potent tool for energizing and focusing healthcare organization management. J. Healthc. Manag. 43(3), 263–280 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  • Coolen, H., de Leeuw, J.: Least squares path analysis with optimal scaling. Paper presented at the Fifth International Symposium of Data Analysis and Informatics, Versailles, France (1987)

  • Cortina J.: What is coefficient Alpha? An examination of theory and applications. J. Appl. Psychol. 78(1), 98–104 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Leeuw J., Young F.W., Takane Y.: Additive structure in qualitative data: an alternating least squares method with optimal scaling features. Psychometrika 41, 471–503 (1976)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Efron B.: The Jackknife, the Bootstrap and Other Resampling Plans. SIAM, Philadelphia (1982)

    Google Scholar 

  • Fornell C., Bookstein F.L.: Two structural equation models in LISREL and PLS applied to consumer exit-voice theory. J. Mark. Res. 19, 440–452 (1982)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garthwaite P.H.: An interpretation of partial last squares. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 89, 122–127 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hackl, P.: Specification analysis of structural equation models. In: Proceedings of the PLS’03 International Symposium on PLS and Related Methods, pp. 127–134. Decisia, Lisbon (2003)

  • Healthcare Directorate of Lombardy Region: Triennial Program for the Implementation of an Evaluation System and Management of Health Structures. Lombardy Region press, Milan (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hulland J.: Use of partial least squares (PLS) in strategic management research: a review of four recent studies. Strateg. Manage. J. 20(1), 195–204 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hwang H., Takane Y.: Structural equation modeling by extended redundancy analysis. In: Nishisato, S., Baba, Y., Bozdogan, H., Kanefuji, K. (eds) Measurement and Multivariate Analysis., pp. 115–124. Springer, Tokio (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hwang H., Takane Y.: Generalized structured component analysis. Psychometrika 69, 81–99 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inamdar N., Kaplan R.S., Bower M.: Applying the balanced scorecard in healthcare provider organizations. J. Healthc. Manag. 47, 179–195 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ittner C.D., Larcker D.F.: Innovations in performance measurement: trends and research implications. J. Manag. Account. Res. 10, 205–238 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  • Jakobowicz E., Derquenne C.: A modified PLS path modeling algorithm handling reflective categorical variables and a new model building strategy. Comput. Stat. Data Anal. 51, 3666–3678 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson M., Gustafsson A., Andreassen T., Lervik L., Cha J.: The evolution and future of national customer satisfaction index models. J. Econ. Psychol. 22, 217–245 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joreskog K.G.: A general method for analysis of covariance structures. Biometrika 57, 409–426 (1970)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kanji G.K., Sá P.M.E.: Kanji’s business scorecard. Total Qual. Manag. 13(19), 13–27 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan R.S., Norton D.P.: The balanced scorecard. The measures that drive performance. Harv. Bus. Rev. 70(1), 171–179 (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan R.S., Norton D.P.: The Balanced Scorecard: Translating Strategy into Action. Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan R.S., Norton D.P.: The Strategy-Focused Organization: How Balanced Scorecard Companies Thrive in the new Business Environment. Harvard Business School Press, Boston (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  • Lauro N.C.: Valutazione dell’impatto delle politiche. Realizzazione di un sistema pilota in ambito sanitario. IReR publication A023, Milano (2007)

  • McDonald R.E.: Path analysis with composite vaxiables. Multiv. Behav. Res. 31, 239–270 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meredith W., Millsap R.E.: On component analysis. Psvchometrika 50, 495–507 (1985)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morard, B., Stancu, A.: Structural equation modeling in a rationalization tentative of balanced scorecard. Cah.Rech.09, Université de Genève, Genève (2005)

  • Northcott D., France N.: The balanced scorecard in New Zealand health sector performance management: dissemination to diffusion. Aust. Account. Rev. 15(37), 34–46 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Øvretveit J., Gustafson D.: Using research to inform quality programmes. Br. Med. J. 326(5), 759–761 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pink G.H., McKillop I., Schraa E.G., Preyra C., Montgomery C., Baker G.R.: Creating a balanced scorecard for a hospital system. J. Health Care Finance 27(3), 1–20 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  • Reinsel G.C., Velu R.P.: Multivariate Reduced-Rank Regression. Springer-Verlag, New York (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  • SAS.: SAS/STAT, User’s Guide, Version 8. SAS Institute Inc. Cary, North Carolina (1999)

  • Schonemann P., Steiger J.: Regression component analysis. Br. J. Math. Stat. Psych. 29, 175–189 (1976)

    Google Scholar 

  • Takane Y., Kiers H., de Leeuw J.: Component analysis with different sets of constraints on different dimensions. Psychometrika 60, 259–280 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tenenhaus M., Vinzi V., Chatelin Y.M., Lauro C.: Partial least squares. Comput. Stat. Data Anal. 48(1), 159–205 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Velu R.P.: Reduced rank models with two sets of regressors. Appl. Stat. 40, 159–170 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vigneau E., Qannari E.: Clustering of variables around latent components. J. Stat. Simul. Comput. 32(4), 1131–1150 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vittadini G.: Indeterminacy problems in the LISREL model. Multivar. Behav. Res. 24(4), 397–414 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wold H.: Soft modelling: the basic design and some extensions. In: Jöreskog, K., Wold, H. (eds) Systems Under Indirect Observation: Causality, Structure, Prediction, pp. 1–54. North Holland, Amsterdam (1982)

    Google Scholar 

  • Zelman W.N., Blazer D., Gower J.M., Bumgarner P.O., Cancilla L.M.: Issues for academic health centers to consider before implementing a balanced-scorecard effort. Acad. Med. 74(12), 1269–1277 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zelman W.N., Pink G.H., Matthias C.B.: Use of the balanced scorecard in health care. J. Health Care Finance 29(4), 1–16 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Crisp and Department of Quantitative Methods for Business Economic Sciences, Faculty of Statistics, University of Milan-Bicocca, Viale Sarca 202, 20126, Milan, Italy

    Pietro Giorgio Lovaglio

Authors
  1. Pietro Giorgio Lovaglio
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pietro Giorgio Lovaglio.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lovaglio, P.G. Model building and estimation strategies for implementing the Balanced Scorecard in Health sector. Qual Quant 45, 199–212 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-010-9364-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-010-9364-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation