Abstract
A significant correlation between integrated time series does not necessarily imply a meaningful relation. The relation can also be meaningless, i.e. spurious. Cointegration is sometimes illustrated by the metaphor of ‘a drunk and her dog’. The relation between integrated processes is meaningful, if they are cointegrated. To prevent spurious correlations, integrated series are usually transformed. This implies a loss of information. In case of cointegration, these transformations are no longer necessary. Moreover, it can be shown that cointegration tests are instruments to detect spurious correlations between integrated time series. This paper compares the Dickey–Fuller and the Johansen cointegration test. By means of Monte Carlo simulations, we found that these cointegration tests are a much more accurate alternative for the identification of spurious relations compared to the rather imprecise method of utilizing the R 2-and DW-statistics recommended by some authors. Furthermore, we demonstrate that cointegration techniques are precise methods of distinguishing between spurious and meaningful relations even if the dependency between the processes is very low. Using these tests, the researcher is not in danger of either neglecting a small but meaningful relation or regarding a relation as meaningful which is actually spurious.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Banerjee, A., Dolado, J.J., Galbraith, J.W., Hendry, D.F.: Co-integration, Error-Correction, and the Econometric Analysis of Non-stationary Data. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1993)
Ben-Zeev, T., Star, J.R.: Spurious correlations in mathematical thinking. Cogn. Instruct. 19, 253–275 (2001)
Box, G.E.P., Jenkins, G.M.: Time-Series Analysis: Forecasting and Control. Holden-Day, San Francisco (1976)
Bremmer, D., Kesselring, R.: Divorce and female labor force participation: evidence from time-series data and cointegration. Atl. Econ. J. 32, 175–190 (2004)
Brosig, B., Brähler, E.: Skin-mind-immune system: a vector-time series model. Z. Klin. Psychol. Psychiatr. Psychother. 49, 279–296 (2001)
Carey, R.J., DePalma, G., Damianopoulos, E.: Response to novelty as a predictor of cocaine sensitization and conditioning in rats: a correlational analysis. Psychopharmacology 168, 245–252 (2003)
Darrat, A.F., Al-Yousif, Y.K.: On the long-run relationship between population and economic growth: some time series evidence for developing countries. East. Econ. J. 25, 301–306 (1999)
De Jong, R.M.: Logarithmic spurious regressions. Econ. Lett. 81, 13–21 (2003)
Delignières, D., Fortes, M., Ninot, G.: The fractal dynamics of self-esteem and physical self. Nonlinear Dynamics Psychol. Life Sci. 8, 479–510 (2004)
Dickey, D.A.: Estimation and testing of nonstationary time series. Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis, Iowa State University, Ames (1976)
Dickey, D.A., Fuller, W.A.: Distribution of estimators for autoregressive time series with a unit root. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 74, 427–431 (1979)
Dickey, D.A., Fuller, W.A.: Likelihood ratio statistics for autoregressive time series with a unit root. Econometrica 49, 1057–1072 (1981)
Dickey, D.A., Hasza, D.P., Fuller, W.A.: Testing for unit roots in seasonal time series. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 79, 355–367 (1984)
Engle, R.F., Granger, C.W.J.: Co-integration and error correction: representation, estimation and testing. Econometrica 55, 251–276 (1987)
Engle, R.F., Granger, C.W.J. (eds.): Long-Run Economic Relationships. Readings in Cointegration. Oxford University Press, New York (1991)
Fahrenberg, J., Myrtek, M., Pawlik, K., Perrez, M.: Ambulatory assessment—capturing behavior in daily life. A behavioral science approach to psychology. Psychol. Rundsch. 58, 12–24 (2007)
Farrell, S., Wagenmakers, E.-J., Ratcliff, R.: 1/f noise in human cognition: is it ubiquitous, and what does it mean?. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 13, 737–741 (2006)
Fiedler, K., Walther, E., Freytag, P., Stryczek, E.: Playing mating games in foreign cultures: a conceptual framework and an experimental paradigm for inductive trivariate inference. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 38, 14–30 (2002)
Fortes, M., Ninot, G., Delignières, D.: The dynamics of self-esteem and physical self: between preservation and adaptation. Qual. Quant. 38, 735–751 (2004)
Gilden, D.L.: Fluctuations in the time required for elementary decisions. Psychol. Sci. 8, 296–301 (1997)
Gilden, D.L.: Cognitive emissions of 1/f noises. Psychol. Rev. 108, 33–56 (2001)
Gilden, D.L., Thornton, T., Mallon, M.W.: 1/f noise in human cognition. Science 267, 1837–1839 (1995)
Glass, G.V., Willson, V.L., Gottman, J.M.: Design and Analysis of Time-Series Experiments. Colorado Associated University Press, Boulder (1975)
Gottman, J.M.: Time-Series Analysis. A Comprehensive Introduction for Social Scientists. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1981)
Gottschalk, A., Bauer, M.S., Whybrow, P.C.: Evidence of chaotic mood variation in bipolar disorder. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 52, 947–959 (1995)
Granger, C.W.J.: Some properties of time series data and their use in econometric model specification. J.~Econom. 16, 121–130 (1981)
Granger, C.W.J.: Developments in the study of cointegrated economic variables. Oxf. Bull. Econ. Stat. 48, 213–228 (1986)
Granger, C.W.J.: Causality, cointegration and control. J. Econ. Dyn. Control 12, 551–559 (1988)
Granger, C.W.J., Lee, T.W.: Multicointegration. In: Fomby, Th.B., Rhodes, G.F.(eds) Co-integration, Spurious Regressions, and Unit-Roots: Advances in Econometrics, vol. 8, pp. 71–84. JAI Press, Greenwich (1990)
Granger, C.W.J., Newbold, P.: Spurious regression in econometrics. J. Econom. 2, 111–120 (1974)
Haig, B.D.: What is a spurious correlation?. Underst. Stat. 2, 125–132 (2003)
Haldrup, N.: The asymptotics of single-equation cointegration regressions with I(1) and I(2) variables. J.~Econom. 63, 153–181 (1994)
Hamilton, J.D.: Time Series Analysis. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1994)
Harré, R., Madden, E.H.: Causal Powers. Basil Blackwell, Oxford (1975)
Harris, R., Sollis, R.: Applied Time Series Modelling and Forecasting. Wiley, Chichester (2003)
Hendry, D.F.: Econometric modelling with cointegrated variables: an overview. Oxf. Bull. Econ. Stat. 48, 201–212 (1986)
Hitiris, T.: Health care expenditure and integration in the countries of the European Union. Appl. Econ. Lett. 29, 1–6 (1997)
Johansen, S.: Statistical analysis of cointegration vectors. J. Econ. Dyn. Control 12, 231–254 (1988)
Johansen, S.: Estimation and hypothesis testing of cointegration vectors in Gaussian vector autoregressive models. Econometrica 59, 1551–1580 (1991)
Johansen, S.: Likelihood-Based Inference in Cointegrated Vector Autoregressive Models. Oxford University Press, New York (1995)
Johansen, S., Juselius, K.: Maximum likelihood estimation and inference on cointegration—with applications to the demand for money. Oxf. Bull. Econ. Stat. 52, 169–210 (1990)
Kendall, M.G., Buckland, W.R.: A Dictionary of Statistical Terms. Longman, London (1982)
Kumar, T.K.: Cointegration and error correction models: a historical and methodological perspective. J. Quant. Econ. 11, 143–154 (1995)
Lasswell, H.D.: Changes in an experimental subject during a short series of psychoanalytical interviews. Imago 23, 375–380 (1937)
Lin, Z., Brannigan, A.: Advances in the analysis of non-stationary time series: an illustration of cointegration and error correction methods in research on crime and immigration. Qual. Quant.: Int. J. Methodol. 37, 151–168 (2003)
Luiz, J.-M.: Temporal association, the dynamics of crime, and their economic determinants: a time series econometric model of South Africa. Soc. Indic. Res. 53, 33–61 (2001)
Lütkepohl, H.: Introduction to Multiple Time Series Analysis. Springer, New York (1991)
Maddala, G., Kim, I.-M.: Unit Roots, Cointegration and Structural Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1998)
Marmol, F., Velasco, C.: Consistent testing of cointegrating relationships. Econometrica 72, 1809–1844 (2004)
McNown, R.: A cointegration model of age-specific fertility and female labor supply in the United States. South. Econ. J. 70, 344–358 (2003)
Meiser, Th.: Contingency learning and biased group impressions. In: Fiedler, K., Juslin, P.(eds) Information Sampling and Adaptive Cognition, pp. 183–209. Cambridge University Press, New York (2006)
Meiser, Th., Hewstone, M.: Illusory and spurious correlations: distinct phenomena or joint outcomes of exemplar-based category learning?. Eur. J. Soc. Psychol. 36, 315–336 (2006)
Murray, M.P.: A drunk and her dog: an illustration of cointegration and error correction. Am. Stat. 48, 37–39 (1994)
Nelson, C.R., Kang, H.: Pitfalls in the use of time as an explanatory variable in regression. J. Bus. Econ. Stat. 2, 73–82 (1984)
Ninot, G., Fortes, M., Delignières, D.: A psychometric tool for the assessment of the dynamics of the physical self. Eur. Rev. Appl. Psychol. 51, 205–216 (2001)
Ninot, G., Fortes, M., Delignières, D.: The dynamics of self-esteem in adults over a six-month period: an exploratory study. J. Psychol. 139, 315–330 (2005)
Pearson, K.: Mathematical contributions to the theory of evolution: on a form of spurious correlation which may arise when indices are used in the measurement of organs. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. 60, 489–498 (1897)
Peatman, J.G.: Hazards and fallacies of statistical method in psychological measurement. Psychol. Rec. 22, 365–390 (1937)
Peterson, B.S., Leckman, J.F.: The temporal dynamics of the tics in Gilles de la Tourette syndrome. Biol. Psychiatry 44, 1337–1348 (1998)
Phillips, P.C.B.: Understanding spurious regression in econometrics. J. Econom. 33, 311–340 (1986)
Phillips, P.C.B.: The ET interview: Professor Clive Granger. Econom. Theory 13, 253–303 (1997)
Prather, J.E.: Spurious correlation. In: Encyclopedia of Statistical Science, vol. 8, pp. 613-614. Wiley, New York (1988)
Quertemont, E., Brabant, C., Tirelli, E.: Response to novelty as a predictor for drug effects: the pitfalls of some correlational studies. Psychopharmacology 173, 221–224 (2004)
Rinne, H., Specht, K.: Zeitreihen—Statistische Modellierung, Schätzung und Prognose. Vahlen, München (2002)
Roberts, J.: Spurious regression problems in the determinants of health care expenditure: a comment on Hitiris (1997). Appl. Econ. Lett. 7, 279–283 (2000)
SAS/ETS, Software: Changes and Enhancements, Release 8.2. SAS Institute Inc, Cary (2001)
Simon, H.: Spurious correlation: a causal interpretation. In: Blalock, H.M.(eds) Causal Models in the Social Sciences, pp. 7–21. Aldine, New York (1985)
Stier, W.: Methoden der Zeitreihenanalyse. Springer, Berlin (2001)
Stroe-Kunold, E., Werner, J.: Are psychological processes cointegrated? Present role und future perspectives of cointegration methodology in psychological research Psychool. Rundsch 58, 225–237 (2007)
Stroe-Kunold, E., Werner, J.: Modeling Human Dynamics by Means of Cointegration Methodology (in press)
Van Orden, G.C., Holden, J.G., Turvey, M.T.: Self-organization of cognitive performance. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 132, 331–350 (2003)
Velicer, W.F., Fava, J.L.: Time series analysis. In: Schinka, J., Velicer, W.F.(eds) Research Methods in Psychology—Handbook of Psychology, vol. 2, pp. 581–606. Wiley, New York (2003)
Werner, J.: Lineare Statistik—Allgemeines Lineares Modell. Weinheim, BELTZ (1997)
Werner, J. (ed.): Zeitreihenanalysen mit Beispielen aus der Psychologie. Logos, Berlin (2005)
Wherry, R.: A new shrinkage formula for predicting the shrinkage of the coefficient of multiple correlation. Ann. Math. Stat. 2, 440–457 (1931)
Witt, R., Witte, A.: Crime, prison, and female labor supply. J. Quant. Crimonol. 16, 69–85 (2000)
Yule, G.U.: Why do we sometimes get nonsense-correlations between time-series? J. R. Stat. Soc. 89, 1–64 (1926)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Stroe-Kunold, E., Werner, J. A drunk and her dog: a spurious relation? Cointegration tests as instruments to detect spurious correlations between integrated time series. Qual Quant 43, 913–940 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-008-9168-9
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-008-9168-9