Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A Note on the Technical and Allocative Efficiency of Local Exchange Carriers in the United States

  • Published:
Quality and Quantity Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The issue explored is whether incentive regulation of local exchange carriers in the United States has resulted in an increase in efficiency. After providing an overview of the nature of incentive regulation, the methodology for measuring the effects of incentive regulation on efficiency is reviewed. This methodology is data envelopment analysis and allows for the measurement of both technical efficiency and allocative efficiency of individual local exchange carriers. The results of empirically implementing the DEA approach indicate that there is little change in technical efficiency. In fact average technical efficiency in 1988 was the same as in 2001. Next, while outputs continued to grow at about their historical rate across LECs, the sizeable increase in the two types of capital increased inputs well above their historical average rates for some LECs leading to short run allocative inefficiency. On average, however, allocative efficiency shows no identifiable trend between 1988 and 2001. Finally, in the aggregate, total economic efficiency does not demonstrate any trend between 1988 and 2001.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • M. Abramovitz (1956) Resource and Output Trends in the United States since 1870 National Bureau of Economic Research New York

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Ali L. Seiford (1993) The mathematical programming approach to efficiency analysis H. Fried C. Lovell S. Schmidt (Eds) The Measurement of Productive Efficiency Oxford University Press, Inc Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • H. Averch L. Johnson (1962) ArticleTitleBehavior of the firm under regulatory constraint American Economic Review 52 1052–1069

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Banker A. Charnes W. Cooper (1984) ArticleTitleSome models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis Management Science 30 1078–1092 Occurrence Handle10.1287/mnsc.30.9.1078

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D. Baron (1991) Information, incentives, and commitment in regulatory mechanisms: regulatory innovation in telecommunications M. Einhorn (Eds) Price Caps and Incentive Regulation in Telecommunications. Kluwer Academic Publishers Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • P. Bauer (1990) ArticleTitleDecomposing TFP growth in the presence of cost inefficiency, non-constant returns to scale, and technological progress Journal of Productivity Analysis 1 287–300 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF00160047

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J. Bernstein D. Sappington (1999) ArticleTitleSetting the X factor in price-cap regulation plans Journal of Regulatory Economics 16 5–25 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1008178112895

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • H. Binswanger (1974) ArticleTitleThe measurement of technical change biases with many factors of production American Economic Review 64 964–976

    Google Scholar 

  • T. Brennan (1989) ArticleTitleRegulating by capping prices Journal of Regulatory Economics 1 133–147 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF00140022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • G. Brock (1994) Telecommunications Policy for the Information Age Harvard University Press Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Brown J. Popkin (1962) ArticleTitleA measure of technical change and returns to scale Review of Economics and Statistics 44 402–411 Occurrence Handle10.2307/1926657

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • L. Cabral M. Riordan (1989) ArticleTitleIncentives for cost reduction under price cap regulation Journal of Regulatory Economics 1 26–42 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF00140019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • A. Charnes W. Cooper E. Rhodes (1978) ArticleTitleMeasuring the efficiency of decision making units European Journal of Operational Research 2 429–444 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0377-2217(78)90138-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coelli T. (1996). A Guide to DEAP Version 2.1: A Data Envelopment Analysis (Computer) Program. Department of Econometrics, University of New England, Armidale, NSW, Australia.

  • Council of Economic Advisors. (2002). Economic Report of the President. Washinton, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

  • P. David T. Klundert Particlevan de (1965) ArticleTitleBiased efficiency growth and capital-labor substitution in the U.S., 1899–1969 American Economic Review 55 357–394

    Google Scholar 

  • G. Debreu (1951) ArticleTitleThe coefficient of resource utilization Econometrica 19 273–292

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Fare S. Grosskopf C. Lovell (1994) Production Frontiers Cambridge University Press Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Farrell (1957) ArticleTitleThe measurement of productive efficiency Journal of the Royal Statistical Society 120 253–281

    Google Scholar 

  • Federal Communications Commission. (various years). Statistics of Communications Common Carriers, Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

  • R. Goldsmith (1951) A Perpetual Inventory of National Wealth National Bureau of Economic Research New York

    Google Scholar 

  • C. Hammond G. Johnes T. Robinson (2000) Technical Efficiency under Alternative Regulatory Regimes: Evidence from the Inter-War British Gas Industry Manchester School of Business Manchester

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Isaac (1991) ArticleTitlePrice cap regulation: a case study of some pitfalls of implementation Journal of Regulatory Economics 3 193–210 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF00140958

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D. Jorgenson Z. Griliches (1967) ArticleTitleThe explanation of productivity change Review of Economic and Statistics 34 249–283

    Google Scholar 

  • T. Koopmans (1951) An analysis of production as an efficient combination of activities T. Koopmans (Eds) Activity Analysis of Production and Allocation Wiley Inc New York

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Kridel D. Sappington D. Weisman (1996) ArticleTitleThe effects of incentive regulation in the telecommunications industry: a survey Journal of Regulatory Economics 9 269–306 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF00133477

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J. Laffont J. Tirole (2000) Competition in Telecommunications The MIT Press Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • H. Leibenstein S. Maital (1992) ArticleTitleEmpirical estimation and partitioning of X-inefficiency: a data-envelopment approach American Economic Review 82 428–433

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Littlechild (1983) Regulation of British Telecom’s Profitability Department of Industry London

    Google Scholar 

  • C. Lovell (1993) Production frontiers and productive efficiency H. Fried C. Lovell S. Schmidt (Eds) The Measurement of Productive Efficiency Oxford University Press, Inc Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Majumdar (1995) ArticleTitleX-efficiency in emerging competitive markets: the case of U.S. telecommunications Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 26 129–144 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0167-2681(94)00065-M

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • S. Majumdar (1997) ArticleTitleIncentive regulation and productive efficiency in the U.S. telecommunications industry Journal of Business 70 547–576 Occurrence Handle10.1086/209731

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • S. Majumdar (2000) ArticleTitleWith a little help from my friends? cross-subsidy and installed-base quality in the U.S. telecommunications industry International Journal of Industrial Organization 18 445–470 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0167-7187(98)00025-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • B. Mitchell I. Vogelsang (1991) Telecommunications Pricing: Theory and Practice Cambridge University Press Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • H. Newton (2002) Newton’s Telecom Dictionary Miller Freeman, Inc New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Nishimizu J. Page (1982) ArticleTitleTotal factor productivity growth, technological progress and technical efficiency change: dimensions of productivity change in yugoslavia, 1965–1978 Economic Journal 92 920–936

    Google Scholar 

  • E. Noam (1991) The quality of regulation in regulating quality M. Einhorn (Eds) Price Caps and Incentive Regulation in Telecommunications. Kluwer Academic Publishers Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Ohta (1974) ArticleTitleA note on the duality between production and cost functions: rate of return to scale and rate of technological progress Economic Studies Quarterly 25 63–65

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Resende (2000) ArticleTitleRegulatory regimes and efficiency in US local telephony Oxford Economic Papers 52 47–470 Occurrence Handle10.1093/oep/52.3.447

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D. Sappington (1980) ArticleTitleStrategic firm behavior under a dynamic regulatory adjustment process The Bell Journal of Economics, 11 360–372 Occurrence Handle10.2307/3003421

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • L. Seiford R. Thrall (1990) ArticleTitleRecent developments in DEA: the mathematical programming approach to frontier analysis Journal of Econometrics 46 7–38 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0304-4076(90)90045-U

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R. Sherman (1985) ArticleTitleThe averch and johnson analysis of public utility regulation twenty years later Review of Industrial Organization 2 178–193 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF02354220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R. Sherman (1992) ArticleTitleCapital waste in the rate-of-return regulated firm Journal of Regulatory Economics 4 197–204 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF00157165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R. Shin J. Ying (1993) ArticleTitleCostly gains to breaking up: LECs and the baby bells Review of Economics and Statistics 98 357–361

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Solow (1956) ArticleTitleTechnical change and the aggregate production function Review of Economics and Statistics 39 312–320 Occurrence Handle10.2307/1926047

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • T. Tardiff W. Taylor (1993) Telephone Company Performance Under Alternative Forms of Regulation National Economic Research Associates New York

    Google Scholar 

  • L. Taylor (1994) Telecommunications Demand in Theory and Practice. Dordrecht. Kluwer Academic Publishers The Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  • Telecommunications Industry Association. (2002). 2002 Multimedia Telecommunications Market Review and Forecast. Arlington, VA: MMMTA Market Research.

  • N. Uri (2000) ArticleTitlePrice caps and the error in the X-factor calculation Information Economics and Policy 12 329–339 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0167-6245(00)00009-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • N. Uri F. Setzer (2003) ArticleTitleRegulating Local Exchange Carriers European Journal of Law and Economics 14 113–128

    Google Scholar 

  • I. Vogelsang (1988) Price-cap regulation of telecommunications services: a long-run approach M. Crew (Eds) Deregulation and Diversification of Utilities Kluwer Academic Publishers Dordrecht, The Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  • I. Vogelsang (1991) A non-bayesian incentive mechanism using two-part tariffs M. Einhorn (Eds) Price Caps and Incentive Regulation in Telecommunications. Kluwer Academic Publishers Boston

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Professional Studies, Trinity University, Washington, DC, 20017, U.S.A

    Noel D. Uri

Authors
  1. Noel D. Uri
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Noel D. Uri.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Uri, N.D. A Note on the Technical and Allocative Efficiency of Local Exchange Carriers in the United States. Qual Quant 40, 383–406 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-005-1046-0

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-005-1046-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation