Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A Latent Class Application to the Multidimensional Measurement of Poverty

  • Published:
Quality and Quantity Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The paper presents the multidimensional measurement as a transparent and easy-to-interpret method to measure poverty, where poverty is measured with a set of direct and indirect poverty indicators side-by-side. Multidimensional measurement is formalised and compared to the traditional, one-dimensional measurement. This formalisation is based on the idea about a set of indicators that are measuring different manifestations of the same latent variable. The Latent Class Model (LCM) is proposed as a method to select a valid and reliable set of poverty indicators for multidimensional measurement. The LCM is used to test if these different poverty indicators really measure the same latent referent – an assumption on which the multidimensional measurement is based. Before this method presented here, constructing and selecting indicators for the multidimensional measurement of poverty has relied practically on theory and substance only. Naturally, the method presented here can be used generally for studying and developing multidimensional measurements.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • P. Alcock (1993) Understanding Poverty MacMillan London

    Google Scholar 

  • A. B. Atkinson (1998) Poverty in Europe Blackwell Publishers Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • T. Atkinson B. Cantillon E. Marlier B. Nolan (2002) Social Indicators–The EU and Social Inclusion Oxford University Press Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • K. A. Bollen (1989) Structural Equations with Latent Variables Wiley New York

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Breen J. Jonsson (1997) How reliable are studies of social mobility? An investigation into the consequences of unreliability in measures of social class. In: Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, Vol. 15 JAI Press Greenwich, CT 91–112

    Google Scholar 

  • L. J. Cronbach G. C. Gleser H. Nanda N. Rajaratnam (1972) The Dependability of Behavioral Measurements: Theory of Generalizability for Scores and Profiles Wiley New York

    Google Scholar 

  • A.P. Dempster N. M. Laird D. B. Rubin (1977) ArticleTitleMaximum Likelihood from Incomplete Data via the EM Algorith Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 39 1–38

    Google Scholar 

  • E. Ghiselli J. P. Campbell S. Zedeck (1981) Measurement Theory for the Behavioural Sciences Freeman and Company San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • S. E. Embretson S. L. Hersberger (Eds) (1999) The New Rules of Measurement. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates What Every Psychologist and Educator Should Know. Mahwah

    Google Scholar 

  • InstitutionalAuthorNameEurostat (1999) ECHP Data Quality 108/99 European Commission Luxembourg

    Google Scholar 

  • L. A. Goodman (1978) Analyzing Qualitative/Categorical Data Abt Books Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • T. Heinen (1996) Latent Class and Discrete Latent Trait Models: Similarities and Differences Saga London

    Google Scholar 

  • O. Kangas V. M. Ritakallio (1998) Different methods–different results? Approaches to␣Multidimensional Poverty H.-J. Andre β (Eds) Empirical Poverty Research in Comparative Perspective Ashgate Aldershot 167–203

    Google Scholar 

  • P. F. Lazarsfeld N. W. Henry (1968) Latent structure analysis Houghton Mifflin Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcoulides, G. A. (1999). Generalizability Theory: Picking Up Where the Rasch IRT Model Leaves off? In S. E. Embretson & S. L. Hersberger (ed.) (1999).

  • A. L. McCutcheon (1987) Latent Class Analysis. Sage University Paper series on Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences Sage Beverly Hills

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Muffels J. Berghman H. Dirven (1992) ArticleTitleA multimethod approach to monitor the evaluation of poverty Journal of European Social Policy 2 193–213

    Google Scholar 

  • B. Nolan C. T. Whelan (1996) Resources, deprivation and poverty Clarendon Press Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Ringen (1985) ArticleTitleToward a Third Stage in the Measurement of Poverty Acta Sociologica 28 99–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Standards for educational and psychological testing (1994). Washington, DC. American Psychological Association.

  • A. Sen (1992) Inequality Re-examined Oxford University Press Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • P. Townsend (1979) Poverty in United Kingdom Penguin Books Ltd Middlesex

    Google Scholar 

  • J. K. Vermunt (1997) LEM: A General Program for the Analysis of Categorical Data Tilburg University The Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. National Research and Development Centre for Welfare and Health (STAKES) , Helsinki, P.O. Box 220, Fin-00531, Finland

    Pasi Moisio

Authors
  1. Pasi Moisio
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pasi Moisio.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Moisio, P. A Latent Class Application to the Multidimensional Measurement of Poverty. Qual Quant 38, 703–717 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-004-5940-7

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-004-5940-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation