Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

“You Fold Like a Little Girl:” (Hetero)Gender Framing and Competitive Strategies of Men and Women in No Limit Texas Hold Em Poker Games

  • Published:
Qualitative Sociology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The formal rules, structure and practice of most sports in contemporary society prohibit men and women from competing on a “level playing field” and diminish women’s ability to launch a legitimate challenge to the masculine superiority embedded in sports competition. This study examines a relatively unique case—No Limit Texas Hold Em poker games in which men and women compete directly against one another under the same rules—to explore how the conditions under which men and women compete enable or impede the development of more gender egalitarian interactions and ideological frameworks. Drawing on ethnographic data, this examination reveals that, even in a more gender-neutral context, men and women learn to use heterogender frames to conceptualize poker. In doing so, they develop competitive strategies and interactions that predominately fit into, rather than subvert, gender hierarchy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bartky, Sandra. 1990. Femininity and domination: Studies in the phenomenology of oppression. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benedict, Jeffrey, and Alan Klein. 1997. Arrest and conviction rates for athletes accused of sexual assault. Sociology of Sport Journal 14: 86–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolin, Anne. 1992. Flex appeal, food, and fat: Competitive bodybuilding, gender, and diet. Play and Culture 5: 378–400.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brackenridge, Celia. 1997. “He owned me basically:” Women’s experience of sexual abuse in sports. International Review for the Sociology of Sport 32: 115–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bryant, Anthony, and Kathy Charmaz. 2007. Grounded theory in historical perspective: An epistemological account. In The SAGE handbook of grounded theory, ed. Bryant Anthony and Charmaz Kathy, 31–57. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryson, Lois. 1987. Sport and the maintenance of masculine hegemony. Women’s Studies International Forum 10: 349–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Connell, R.W. 1995. Masculinities. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunning, Eric. 1986. Sport as a male preserve: Notes on the social sources of masculine identity and its transformations. Theory, Culture & Society 3: 79–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dworkin, Shari, and Michael Messner. 1999. Just do…what? Sports, bodies, gender. In Gender and sport: A reader, ed. Sheila Scraton and Anne Flintoff, 341–364. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eitzen, Stanley. 2009. Sport and gender. In Sport in contemporary society, ed. Stanley Eitzen, 313–337. Boulder: Paradigm Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eitzen, Stanley, and Maxine Baca Zinn. 1989. The de-athleticization of women: The naming and gender marking of collegiate sport teams. Sociology of Sport Journal 362–370.

  • Eveslage, Scott, and Kevin Delaney. 1998. Talkin’ trash at Hardwick High: A case study of insult talk on a boys’ basketball team. International Review for the Sociology of Sport 33: 239–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ezzell, Matthew. 2009. “Barbie dolls” on the pitch: Identity work, defensive othering, and inequality in women’s rugby. Social Problems 56: 111–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gagne, Patricia, and Deanna McGaughey. 2010. Designing women: Cultural hegemony and the exercise of power among women who have undergone elective mammoplasty. In The politics of women’s bodies: Sexuality, appearance, and behavior, ed. Rose Weitz, 192–213. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guthrie, Sharon, and Shirley Castelnuovo. 1992. Elite women bodybuilders: Models of resistance or compliance? Play & Culture 5: 401–408.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hargreaves, Jennifer. 1994. Sporting females: Critical issues in the history and sociology of women’s sports. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henry, Jacques, and Howard Comeaux. 1999. Gender egalitarianism in coed sport: A case study of American soccer. International Review for the Sociology of Sport 34: 277–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hesse-Biber, Sharlene. 2007. The cult of thinness. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hesse-Biber, Sharlene, and Patricia Leavy. 2011. The practice of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heywood, Leslie. 1998. Bodymakers: A cultural anatomy of women’s body building. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeffreys, Sheila. 2005. Beauty and misogyny: Harmful cultural practices in the West. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleinman, Sherryl, Matthew Ezzell, and Corey Frost. 2009. Reclaiming critical analysis: The social harms of “bitch”. Sociological Analysis 3: 47–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorber, Judith. 1994. Paradoxes of gender. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loy, John. 1995. The dark side of Agon: Fratriarches, performative masculinities, sport involvement, and the phenomenon of gang rape. In International sociology of sport: Contemporary issues, ed. Bette Karl Heinrich and Rutten Alfred, 263–281. Stuttgart: Verlag SN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Messner, Michael. 2002. Taking the field: Women, men and sports. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Messner, Michael. 2005. Still a man’s world? Studying masculinities and sport. In Handbook of studies on men & masculinities, ed. Michael Kimmel, Jeff Hearn, and R.W. Connell, 313–325. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Messner, Michael. 2009. The Meaning of success: The athletic experience and the development of male identity. In Sport in contemporary society, ed. Stanley Eitzen, 323–337. Boulder: Paradigm Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Messner, Michael. 2007. Out of play: Critical essays on gender and sport. SUNY: State University of New York Press.

  • Messner, Michael, and Donald Sabo. 1994. Sex, violence & power in sports: Rethinking masculinity. Freedom: The Crossing Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, Kathryn. 2003. Women and the knife: Cosmetic surgery and the colonization of women’s bodies. In The politics of women’s bodies: Sexuality, appearance, and behavior, ed. Rose Weitz, 164–183. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ng, Evelyn. 2010. Reality check with bodog poker pro Evelyn Ng. Card Player 23: 57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orenstein, Peggy. 2000. Flux: Women on sex, work, love, kids, and life in a half-changed world. New York: Anchor Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pevey, Carolyn, Christine Williams, and Christopher Ellison. 1996. Male god imagery and female submission: Lessons from a southern Baptist ladies’ bible class. Qualitative Sociology 19: 173–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pierce, Jennifer. 1995. Gender trials: Emotional lives in contemporary law firms. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ridgeway, Cecilia. 2009. Framed before we know it: How gender shapes social relations. Gender and Society 23: 145–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ridgeway, Cecilia, and Shelley Correll. 2004. Unpacking the gender system: A theoretical perspective on gender beliefs and social relations. Gender and Society 18: 510–531.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robidoux, Michael. 2001. Men at play: A working understanding of professional hockey. Quebec: McGill-Queen’s University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schuck, Raymond. 2010. The rhetorical lines of TV’s poker face: Rhetorical constructions of poker as sport. American Behavioral Scientist 53: 1610–1625.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwalbe, Michael, Sandra Godwin, Daphne Holden, Douglas Schrock, Sheila Thompson, and Michelle Wolkomir. 2000. Generic processes in the reproduction of inequality: An interactionist analysis. Social Forces 79: 385–418.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wachs, Faye Linda. 2002. Leveling the playing field: Negotiating gendered rules in coed softball. Journal of Sport & Social Issues 26: 300–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wachs, Faye Linda. 2003. “I was there…”: Gendered limitations, expectations, and strategic assumptions in the world of coed softball. In Athletic intruders: Ethnographic research on women, culture, and exercise, ed. Anne Bolin and Jane Granskog, 177–199. New York: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, David, and Joseph Berger. 1997. Gender and interpersonal task behaviors: status expectation accounts. Sociological Perspectives 40: 1–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White, Philip, Kevin Young, and William McTeer. 1995. Sport, masculinity, and the injured body. In Men’s health and illness: Gender, power, and the body, ed. Donald Sabo and David Gordon, 158–182. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Wilkins, Amy. 2010. “So full of myself as a chick:” Goth women, sexual independence, and gender egalitarianism. Gender and Society 18: 328–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolkomir, Michelle. 2004. “Giving it up to god”: Negotiating femininity in support groups for wives of ex-gay christian men. Gender and Society 18: 735–755.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolkomir, Michelle. 2006. Be not deceived: The sacred and sexual struggles of gay and ex-gay christian men. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, Kevin. 2000. Sport and violence. In Handbook of sport and society, ed. Jay Coakley and Eric Dunning, 382–408. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michelle Wolkomir.

Appendix I: Overview of NLHE and Brief Poker Glossary

Appendix I: Overview of NLHE and Brief Poker Glossary

Game Overview

In NLHE, each player is dealt two cards which are referred to as hole cards. Acting in turn, each player then decides whether to play these cards. If a player decides not to play, s/he folds them by giving them back to the dealer. If a player decides to play, then s/he either calls the big blind—a forced minimum bet—by putting out chips (symbolic money) or raises the bet by putting out more chips. After each player has made a decision about his/her hole cards, the dealer puts three community cards in the center of the table. These cards are known as the flop. Another round of betting occurs. At its completion, the dealer puts a fourth community card, called the turn, in the center of the table. Another round of betting occurs. Finally, the dealer puts a fifth community card, referred to as the river, in the center of the table, and players make final bets. The goal is to win the chips that have been bet either by having the best five card hand combination (two hole cards and any three community cards) or by convincing the other players to fold.

Additional Poker Terms

Bad Beat: A term that is used to refer to when a player loses with a hand that is statistically very unlikely to lose.

Bluff: A form of deception in which a player with a weak hand convinces a player with a stronger hand to fold.

Calling: The action of matching an existing bet.

Needling: The act of making fun of another player, usually in reference to some aspect of that player’s game or a particular action in a hand.

Nuts: The very best poker hand that is possible given any five precise community cards.

Pot: The chips (money) at stake in any given poker hand.

Pre-flop: Any action that occurs before the first three community cards are dealt.

Raising: The action of adding to an existing bet. A raise can be to any amount, though it must at least double the initial bet.

Slow Play or Trapping: A strategy in which a player holds a very strong hand (often the nuts) and behaves as though his/her hand is weak in an effort to try to induce bets from opponents with weaker hands.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wolkomir, M. “You Fold Like a Little Girl:” (Hetero)Gender Framing and Competitive Strategies of Men and Women in No Limit Texas Hold Em Poker Games. Qual Sociol 35, 407–426 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11133-012-9235-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11133-012-9235-3

Keywords

Navigation