Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Racial Habitus, Moral Conflict, and White Moral Hegemony Within Interracial Evangelical Organizations

  • Published:
Qualitative Sociology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Re-conceptualizing habitus as a complex of inculcated moral dispositions that—particularly within the racialized social system of the United States—are racially-constituted, this article proposes a framework through which racial conflict and structural/cultural domination within interracial religious organizations, and perhaps other volunteer organizations, may be analyzed. Drawing upon qualitative data from a study of fundraising experiences within interracial evangelical organizations, I demonstrate, first, that racial conflicts within these organizations are best framed as disputes over moral standards arising out of divergent, racially-constituted, moral dispositions, and second, that these conflicts are worked out via the institutionalization and instilment of white cultural norms, ultimately resulting in the hegemony of white moral standards within the organizations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Aristotle argued that moral standards become embodied within individuals as a disposition or hexis developed through habitual “virtuous” practice (according to Aristotle’s standards of virtue). This habituated moral disposition in turn serves to influence actors to will and act “virtuously.”

  2. Although the majority of respondents in this study worked for domestic collegiate ministries, the term “collegiate ministry” is too narrow as a significant minority of respondents worked overseas and/or with adults or children.

  3. Although the interactionist tradition has attended somewhat to the constituting role of structure (Maines 1977), some argue that this has been at most a subsidiary focus or that the perspective has given inadequate attention to the centrality of domination in group life (Athens 2009; Musolf 1992).

  4. By describing habitus as “racially-constituted” I mean that they were produced by the structural and cultural conditions associated with an actor’s location within the racialized social system of the United States.

  5. Although this definition could aptly describe a racial habitus more generally, Bonilla-Silva limits his application of a racial habitus concept to whites. Brekhus et al. (2010) point out that the white habitus concept coincides with Bonilla-Silva’s (2003) color-blind racism framework, which emphasizes the tacit and pre-reflexive nature of whites’ racialized dispositions over and against the more salient racial identities of racial minorities.

  6. Although the responses of multiracial respondents (N = 13) were analyzed in comparison with other racial groups, their responses are not discussed in the analysis as the heterogeneity of their racial combinations, identities, and networks makes their responses problematic to interpret.

References

  • Athens, Lonnie. 2009. The roots of “radical interactionism”. Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior 39(4): 387–414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker, Penny Edgell. 1999. Congregations in conflict: Cultural models of local religious life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Blumer, Herbert. 1986. Symbolic interactionism: Perspective and method. Berkeley: California University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonilla-Silva, Eduardo. 2003. Racism without racists: Color-blind racism and the persistence of racial inequality in the United States. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonilla-Silva, Eduardo, and David G. Embrick. 2007. “Every place has a ghetto”: The significance of whites social and residential segregation. Symbolic Interaction 30(3): 323–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonilla-Silva, Eduardo, Carla Goar, and David G. Embrick. 2006. When whites flock together: A social psychology of white habitus. Critical Sociology 32: 229–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, Pierre. 1984. Distinction: A social critique of the judgment of taste. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, Pierre. 1990. The logic of practice. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourgois, Philippe, and Jeff Schonberg. 2007. Intimate apartheid: Ethnic dimensions of habitus among homeless heroin injectors. Ethnography 8(1): 7–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brekhus, Wayne H., David L. Brunsma, Todd Platts, and Priya Dua. 2010. On the contributions of cognitive sociology to the sociological study of race. Sociology Compass 4(1): 61–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brubaker, Rogers, Mara Loveman, and Peter Stamatov. 2004. Ethnicity as cognition. Theory and Society 33: 31–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Carolyn. 2006. From filial piety to religious piety: Evangelical Christianity reconstructing Taiwanese immigrant families in the United States. International Migration Review 40(3): 573–602.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, Korie L. 2008. The elusive dream: The power of race in interracial churches. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, Korie L. 2009. Race, religion, and worship: Are contemporary African-American worship practices distinct? Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 48(1): 30–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emerson, Michael O. 2006. People of the dream: Multiracial congregations in the United States. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emerson, Michael O., and Christian Smith. 2000. Divided by faith: Evangelical religion and the problem of race in America. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, Erving. 1963. The presentation of self in everyday life. Garden City: Anchor Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gramsci, Antonio. 1971. Selections from the Prison notebooks. London: Lawrence and Wishart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horvat, Erin M., and Anthony L. Antonio. 1999. “Hey, those shoes are out of uniform”: African American girls in an elite high school and the importance of habitus. Anthropology and Education Quarterly 30(3): 317–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ignatow, Gabriel. 2009. Why the sociology of morality needs Bourdieu’s habitus. Sociological Inquiry 79(1): 98–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ignatow, Gabriel. 2010. Culture and embodied cognition: Moral discourses in internet support groups for overeaters. Social Forces 88(2): 643–670.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lamont, Michele. 1992. Money, morals, & manners: The culture of the American and French upper-middle class. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacLeod, Jay. 2009. Ain’t no makin’ it: Aspirations and attainment in a low-income neighborhood, 3rd ed. Boulder: Westview.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maines, David R. 1977. Social organization and social structure in symbolic interactionist thought. Annual Review of Sociology 3: 235–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marx, Karl, and Frederick Engels. 1848/2002. The communist manifesto. Penguin Edition. London: Penguin Books.

  • McGlathery, Marla F., and Traci Griffin. 2007. “Becoming conservative, becoming White?”: Black evangelicals and the parachurch movement. In This side of heaven: Race, ethnicity, and Christian faith, ed. Robert Priest and Alvaro Nieves, 145–161. New York: Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Musolf, Gill R. 1992. Structure, institutions, power, and ideology: New directions within symbolic interactionism. The Sociological Quarterly 33(2): 171–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Omi, Michael, and Howard Winant. 1994. Racial formation in the United States, 2nd ed. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sallaz, Jeffrey J. 2010. Talking race, marketing culture: The racial habitus in and out of apartheid. Social Problems 57(2): 294–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sayer, Andrew. 2005. The moral significance of class. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

First and foremost, I am extremely grateful to the EOM workers who took the time to participate in this study. Thanks also go to George Yancey, Barnaby Riedel, Gabriel Ignatow, David Smilde, Rebecca Hanson, and the three anonymous reviewers for their helpful recommendations at various stages of this project. Lastly, thanks go to Jill Perry for her patience and support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Samuel L. Perry.

Appendix

Appendix

Table 1 Percentage of support coming from someone of another race on race

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Perry, S.L. Racial Habitus, Moral Conflict, and White Moral Hegemony Within Interracial Evangelical Organizations. Qual Sociol 35, 89–108 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11133-011-9215-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11133-011-9215-z

Keywords

Navigation