Skip to main content
Log in

Nutritional and Antinutritional Characteristics of Seven South Indian Wild Legumes

  • Published:
Plant Foods for Human Nutrition Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Seeds from seven species of wild legumes of the South India were analyzed for proximate composition, mineral profiles, amino acid profiles of total seed protein, in vitro protein digestibility, and certain antinutritional factors to assess their potential as alternative sources of protein crops. The major findings of the study were as follows: crude protein ranged from 20.3 to 35.0%, crude lipid 3.1–9.6%, crude fiber 5.9–12.1%, ash 2.7–5.1%, and carbohydrates 49.2–61.8%. Minerals viz., sodium, potassium, calcium, magnesium, phosphorus, iron, copper, zinc, and manganese occurred in the range 42.9–135.9, 556.2–1639.5, 304.5–572.2, 174.9–686.7, 98.4–947.8, 3.6–16.4, 0.2–1.2, 2.0–30.0, and 1.0–3.9 mg/100 g seed flour, respectively. Profiles of amino acids of total seed proteins detected in the present study revealed that levels of valine, phenylalanine, tyrosine, isoleucine, and histidine of all the seven wild legume seed samples, threonine of Canavalia ensiformis and C. gladiata, leucine of Mucuna pruriens var. pruriens, and lysine of Cassia floribunda and C. obtusifolia were found to be higher than FAO/WHO (1991) requirement pattern. The in vitro protein digestibility of the legumes under study ranged from 63.39 to 83.32%. Antinutritional factors such as total free phenolics ranged from 0.41 to 5.96%, tannins from 0.04 to 0.60%, L-DOPA from 1.34 to 8.37% and trypsin inhibitor activity from 13.48 to 65.43 TIU/mg protein. The detected antinutritional factors probably have little nutritional significance if the seeds are properly processed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. FAO (1980) State of Food and Agriculture. Rome, Italy: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.

  2. Pelletier DL, Frongillo EA Jr, Schroeder DG, Habicht JP (1995) The effect of malnutrition on child mortality in developing countries. Bull World Health Organ 3: 443–448.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ali M (1997) Pulses of nutritional food security. Indian Farm 47: 31–37.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Balogun AM, Fetuga BL (1986) Chemical composition of some under-exploited leguminous crop seeds in Nigeria. J Agric Food Chem 34: 189–192.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ravindran V, Ravindran G (1988) Nutritional and anti-nutritional characteristics of Mucuna utilis) bean seeds. J Sci Food Agric 46: 71–79.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Siddhuraju P, Vijayakumari K, Janardhanan K (1996) Chemical composition and protein quality of the little-known legume, velvet bean (Mucuna pruriens (L.) DC.). J Agric Food Chem 44: 2636–2641.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Carnovale E, Lugaro E, Marconi E (1991) Protein quality and antinutritional factors in wild and cultivated species of Vigna spp. Plant Foods Hum Nutr 41: 11–20.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Mary Josephine R, Janardhanan K (1992) Studies on chemical 2 composition and antinutritional factors in three germplasm seed materials of the tribal pulse, Mucuna pruriens (L.) DC. Food Chem 43: 13–18.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Sudhir K, Vijayaluxmi A, Kumar S, Agarwal V (1994) Note on identity of two closely related species of Canavalia DC. (Papilionaceae). J Econ Taxon Bot 18: 275–277.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Wilmot-Dear CM (1987) A revision of Mucuna (Leguminosae – Phaseoleae) in the Indian sub-continent and Burma. Kew Bull 42: 23–46.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Singh V, Premanath RK (1992) Some useful Cassias in India. J Econ Taxon Bot 10: 29–54.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Humphries EC (1956) Mineral components and ash analysis. In Paech K, Tracey MV (eds), Modern Methods of Plant Analysis, Vol. 1. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, pp 468–502.

    Google Scholar 

  13. AOAC (1970) Official Methods of Analysis, 11th edn. Washington, DC: Association of Official Analytical Chemists.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Muller HG, Tobin G (1980) Nutrition and Food Processing. London: Croom Helm.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Issac RA, Johnson WC (1975) Collaborative study of wet and dry ashing techniques for the elemental analysis of plant tissue by Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometer. J AOAC 58: 436–440.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Dickman SR, Bray RH (1940) Colorimetric determination of phosphate. Ind Eng Chem Ed 12: 665–668.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Basha SMM, Cherry JP, Young CT (1976) Changes in free amino acids, carbohydrates and proteins of maturing seeds from various peas (Arachis hypogaea) cultivars. Cereal Chem 53: 583–597.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Lowry OH, Rosebrough NJ, Farr AL, Randall RJ (1951) Protein measurement with the folin-phenol reagent. J Biol Chem 193: 265–275.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. FAO/WHO (1991) Protein Quality Evaluation. Rome, Italy: Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations, p 66.

  20. Hsu HW, Vavak DL, Satterlee LD, Miller GA (1977) A multi-enzyme technique for estimating protein digestibility. J Food Sci 42: 1269–1271.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Bray KR, Thorne WV (1954) Analysis of phenolic compounds. Methods Biochem Anal 1: 27–52.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Burns RR (1971) Methods for estimation of tannins in grain, Sorghum. Agron J 63: 511–512.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Brain KR (1976) Accumulation of L-DOPA in cultures from Mucuna pruriens. Plant Sci Lett 7: 157–161.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Kakade ML, Rackis JJ, McGhee JE, Puski G (1974) Determination of trypsin inhibitor activity of soy products: A collaborative analysis of an improved procedure. Cereal Chem 51: 376–382.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Narasinga Rao BS, Deosthale YG, Pant KC (1989) Nutritive value of Indian foods. Hyderabad, India: Indian Council of Medical Research, National Institute of Nutrition.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Kanwar KC, Kanwar U, Shah S (1997) Friendly fibers. Sci Rep 34: 9–14.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Meiners CR, Derise NL, Lau HC, Crews MG, Ritchey SJ, Murphy EW (1976) The content of nine mineral elements in raw and cooking mature dry legumes. J Agric Food Chem 24: 1126–1130.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Singh U, Eggum BO (1984). Factors affecting the protein quality of pigeon pea (Cajanus cajan L.). Qual Plant – Plant Foods Hum Nutr 34: 273–283.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Kumar S, Kumar S, Singh GK, Bhatia NK, Awasthi CP (1991) Variation in quality traits of pigeon pea (Cajanus cajan L. Mill Sp.) varieties. J Food Sci Technol 28: 173–174.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Kataria A, Chauhan BM, Punia D (1989) Antinutritional and protein digestibility (in vitro) of mungbean as affected by domestic processing and cooking. Food Chem 3: 9–17.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Faki HAE, Venkataraman LV, Desikachar HSR (1984) Effect of processing on the in vitro digestibility of proteins and carbohydrates in some Indian legumes. Qual Plant – Plant Foods Hum Nutr 34: 127–133.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Laurena AC, Den TV, Mendoza EMT (1984) Effects of condensed tannins on the in vitro digestibility of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp). J Agric Food Chem 32: 1045–1048.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Srivastav PP, Das H, Prasad S (1990) Effect of roasting process variables on in vitro protein digestibility of Bengalgram, maize and soybean. Food Chem 35: 31–37.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Attia RS, El-Tabey Shehata AM, Aman ME, Hamza MA (1994) Effect of cooking and decortication on the physical properties, the chemical composition and the nutritive value of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Food Chem 50: 125–131.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Satwadhar PN, Kadam SS, Salunkhe DK (1981) Effects of germination and cooking on polyphenols and in vitro protein digestibility of horse gram and moth bean. Qual Plant – Plant Foods Hum Nutr 31: 71–76.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Deshpande SS, Sathe SK, Salunkhe DK, Cornforth DP (1982) Effects of dehulling on phytic acid, polyphenols and enzyme inhibition of dry beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). J Food Sci 47: 1846–1850.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Acton JC, Breyer L, Satterlee LD (1982) Effect of dietary fibre constituents on the in vitro digestibility of casein. J Food Sci 47: 556–560.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Liener IE (1994) Implications of anti-nutritional components in soybean foods. CRC Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 34: 31–67.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Rani N, Hira CK (1998) Effect of different treatments on chemical constituents of mash beans (Vigna mungo). J Food Sci Technol 35: 540–542.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Rao PU, Deosthale IG (1982) Tannin content of pulses: Varietal differences and effects of germination and cooking. J Sci Food Agric 33: 1013–1016.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Vijayakumari K, Siddhuraju P, Janardhanan K (1996) Effect of different post-harvest treatments on antinutritional factors in seeds of the tribal pulse, Mucuna pruriens (L.) DC. Int J Food Sci Nutr 47: 263–272.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Jebadhas AW (1980) Ethnobotanical Studies on Some Hill Tribes of South India. Ph.D Thesis, Madras University, Madras, India.

  43. Apata DF, Ologhobo AD (1997) Trypsin inhibitor and other anti-nutritional factors in tropical legume seeds. Trop Sci 37: 52–59.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to V. Vadivel.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Vadivel, V., Janardhanan, K. Nutritional and Antinutritional Characteristics of Seven South Indian Wild Legumes. Plant Foods Hum Nutr 60, 69–75 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11130-005-5102-y

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11130-005-5102-y

Keywords

Navigation