Skip to main content
Log in

Correcting mistakes: cognitive dissonance and political attitudes in Sweden and the United States

  • Published:
Public Choice Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Cognitive dissonance theory predicts that the act of voting makes people more positive toward the party or candidate they have voted for. Following Mullainathan and Washington (Am. Econ. J. Appl. Econ. 1:86–111, 2009), I test this prediction by using exogenous variation in turnout provided by the voting age restriction. I improve on previous studies by investigating political attitudes, measured just before elections, when they are highly predictive of voting. In contrast to earlier studies I find no effect of voting on political attitudes. This result holds for both Sweden and the United States.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akerlof, G. A. (1989). The economics of illusion. Economics and Politics, 1, 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akerlof, G. A., & Dickens, W. T. (1982). The economic consequences of cognitive dissonance. American Economic Review, 72, 307–319.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alford, J. R., Funk, C. L., & Hibbing, J. R. (2005). Are political orientations genetically transmitted? American Political Science Review, 99, 153–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, C., Mendes, S., & Tverdova, Y. (2004). Endogenous economic voting: evidence from the 1997 British election. Electoral Studies, 23, 683–708.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aronson, E. (1968). Dissonance theory: progress and problems. In R. P. Abelson, E. Aronson, W. J. McGuire, T. M. Newcomb, M. J. Rosenberg, & P. H. Tannenbaum (Eds.), Theories of cognitive consistency: a sourcebook (pp. 5–27). Chicago: Rand McNally.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aronson, E. (1992). The return of the repressed: dissonance theory makes a comeback. Psychological Inquiry, 3, 303–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beasley, R., & Joslyn, M. (2001). Cognitive dissonance and post-decision attitude change in six presidential elections. Political Psychology, 22, 521–540.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boeri, T., & Tabellini, G. (2010, in press). Does information increase political support for pension reform? Public Choice. doi:10.1007/s11127-010-9706-6.

  • Brennan, G., & Lomasky, L. (1993). Democracy and decision—the pure theory of electoral preferences. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Caplan, B. (2001). Rational ignorance versus rational irrationality. Kykols, 54, 3–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caplan, B. (2002). Systematically biased beliefs about economics: robust evidence of content-dependent judgmental anomalies from the Survey of Americans and Economists on the Economy. Economic Journal, 112, 1–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caplan, B. (2006). How do voters form positive economic beliefs? Evidence from the Survey of Americans and Economists on the Economy. Public Choice, 128, 367–381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, K., & Risen, J. (2010). How choice affects and reflects preferences: revisiting the free-choice paradigm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99, 573–594.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Congelton, R. (2001). Rational ignorance, rational voter expectations, and public policy: a discrete informational foundation for fiscal illusion. Public Choice, 107, 35–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, J. (1980). Reducing fears and increasing assertiveness: the role of dissonance reduction. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 16, 354–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, J. (2007). Cognitive dissonance: fifty years of a classic theory. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, J., & Fazio, R. H. (1984). A new look at dissonance theory. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental psychology (Vol. 17, pp. 229–264). Orlando: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Della Vigna, S., & Kaplan, E. (2007). The fox news effect: media bias and voting. Quarterly Journal of Economic, 122, 1187–1234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Downs, A. (1957). An economic theory of democracy. Boston: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Egan, L. C., Santos, L. R., & Bloom, P. (2007). The origins of cognitive dissonance: evidence from children and monkeys. Psychological Science, 18, 978–983.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Festinger, L., Riecken, H. W., & Schachter, S. (1964). When prophecy fails: a social and psychological study of a modern group that predicted the destruction of the world. New York: Harper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerber, A. S., Karlan, D., & Bergan, D. (2009). Does the media matter? A field experiment measuring the effect of newspapers on voting behavior and political opinions. American Economic Journal—Applied Economics, 1, 35–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harmon-Jones, E., & Mills, J. (Eds.) (1999). Cognitive dissonance: progress on a pivotal theory in social psychology. Washington: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmberg, S., & Oscarsson, H. (2004). Väljare. In Svenskt väljarbeteende under 50 år. Stockholm: Nordstedts Juridik AB.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jordahl, H. (2006). An economic analysis of voting in Sweden. Public Choice, 127, 251–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Konow, J. (2000). Fair shares: accountability and cognitive dissonance in allocation decisions. American Economic Review, 90, 1072–1091.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis-Beck, M. S. (2006). Does economics still matter? Econometrics and the vote. Journal of Politics, 68, 208–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Masters, J. (2005). A midwestern response to the events of September 11, 2001. Journal of Loss and Trauma, 10, 369–381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mullainathan, S., & Washington, E. (2009). Sticking with your vote: cognitive dissonance and political attitudes. American Economic Journal—Applied Economics, 1, 86–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Östling, R. (2009). Economic influences on moral values. The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis and Policy, 9, Advances, Article 2.

  • Rabin, M. (1994). Cognitive dissonance and social change. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 23, 177–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stone, J., Aronson, E., Crain, A. L., Winslow, M. P., & Fried, C. B. (1994). Inducing hypocrisy as a means of encouraging young adults to use condoms. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20, 116–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mikael Elinder.

Electronic Supplementary Material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

11127_2011_9791_MOESM1_ESM.pdf

Supplementary material to: “Correcting mistakes: Cognitive dissonance and political attitudes in Sweden and the United States” (PDF 94 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Elinder, M. Correcting mistakes: cognitive dissonance and political attitudes in Sweden and the United States. Public Choice 153, 235–249 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-011-9791-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-011-9791-1

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation