Skip to main content
Log in

The Politics of Bureaucracy and the failure of post-war reconstruction

  • Published:
Public Choice Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Gordon Tullock’s The Politics of Bureaucracy must be considered one of the most important works on bureaucracy ever written. In this paper, I argue that Tullock’s analysis of bureaucracy is as relevant as ever. To support this claim, I focus on U.S.-led reconstruction efforts which attempt to export liberal democracy via military occupation. Bureaucratic organizations play a key role in these reconstruction efforts and as such, Tullock’s analysis is directly relevant. It is argued that Tullock’s study clarifies not just the limits of bureaucratic activity, but also the importance of spontaneous orders for coordinating activities outside those limits and generating the very institutional context in which liberal democracy can evolve and sustain. The main conclusion is that the nature of public bureaucracy constrains the ability of the United States to exogenously impose liberal democratic institutions in foreign countries for the very reasons Tullock emphasized long ago.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bellin, E. (2004–2005). The Iraqi intervention and democracy in comparative perspective. Political Science Quarterly, 119(4), 595–608.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boettke, P. J., & Coyne, C. J. (2006a, forthcoming). Liberalism in the post-9/11 world. Indian Journal of Business and Economics.

  • Chandrasekaran, R. (2006). Who killed Iraq? Foreign Policy, September/October, 36–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coyne, C. (2005). The institutional prerequisites for post-conflict reconstruction. The Review of Austrian Economics, 18(3/4), 325–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coyne, C. (2006). Reconstructing weak and failed states: Insights from Tocqueville. Journal of Social, Political and Economic Studies, 31(2), 143–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, L. (2005). Squandered victory: The American occupation and the bungled effort to bring democracy to Iraq. New York: Times Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobbins, J., McGinn, J. G., Crane, K., Jones, S. G., Lal, R., Rathmell, A., Swanger, R. M., & Timilsina, A. (2003). America’s role in nation-building: From Germany to Iraq. Santa California: RAND.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dower, J. W. (1980). Empire and aftermath: Yoshida Shiqeru and the Japanese empire, 1878 1954. Massachusetts: Harvard Council on East Asian Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dower, J. W. (1999). Embracing defeat: Japan in the wake of World War II. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fukuyama, F. (1995). Trust. New York: Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, A. (2003). A modern history of Japan. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, F. A. (1979). Law, legislation and liberty: Vol. III: The political order of a free people. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

  • von Mises, L. (1944 [1983]). Bureaucracy. Grove City: Libertarian Press, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niskanen, W. N. (1971). Bureaucracy and representative government. Aldine: Atherton.

    Google Scholar 

  • North, D. C. (2005). Understanding the process of economic change. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Packer, G. (2005). The Assassins’ gate. New York: Farrar Straus and Giroux.

    Google Scholar 

  • Payne, J. L. (2006a). Does nation building work? The Independent Review, X(4), 597–608.

    Google Scholar 

  • Payne, J. L. (2006b). Did the United States create democracy in Germany? The Independent Review, XI(2), 209–222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, E. N. (1977). The American occupation of Germany: Retreat to victory. Detroit: Wayne State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, D. L. (2005). Losing Iraq: Inside the postwar reconstruction fiasco. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ricks, T. E. (2006). Fiasco: The American military adventure in Iraq. New York: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowley, C. (2005). Introduction. In C. Rowley (Ed.), The selected works of Gordon Tullock : Vol. 6. Bureaucracy (pp. ix–xvii). Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephens, J., & Ottaway, D. B. (2005). A rebuilding plan full of cracks. The Washington Post, November 20, A01.

  • de Tocqueville, A. (1835/1839) [1969]. Democracy in America. J. P. Mayer (Ed.), translated by G. Lawrence. New York: Doubleday & Company, Inc.

  • Tullock, G. (1965) [2005]. The politics of bureaucracy. In C. Rowley (Ed.), The selected works of Gordon Tullock : Vol. 6. Bureaucracy (pp. 13–235). Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tullock, G. (1992) [2005]. Economic hierrchies, organization and the structure of produtin. In C. Rowley (Ed.), The selected works of Gordon Tullock : Vol. 6. Bureaucracy (pp. 241–416). Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M. (1922). Economy and society. New York: Bedminster Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zakaria, F. (2003). The future of freedom: Illiberal democracy at home and abroad. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zingales, L. (2003). For Iraq, a plan worthy of Zambia. The Washington Post, November 9, B02.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christopher J. Coyne.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Coyne, C.J. The Politics of Bureaucracy and the failure of post-war reconstruction. Public Choice 135, 11–22 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-007-9243-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-007-9243-0

Keywords

JEL

Navigation