Skip to main content
Log in

Motivation of politicians and long-term policies

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Public Choice Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We analyze the motivation of politicians in democracies when long-term policies are socially desirable. Politicians receive utility from holding office and from the success of their projects. We refer to the two extreme types of politicians as “populists” and “policy success-seekers”. One result is that inefficiencies in the political process are smaller when a politician is of the populist type. When politicians offer incentive contracts, the problem of inefficient decision-making may be solved. The amount of money necessary to induce the incumbent to undertake the socially optimal project decreases with the degree of populism he displays.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baker, G. (1992). Incentive contracts and performance measurement. Journal of Political Economy, 100, 598–614.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barro, R. (1973). The control of politicians: An economic model. Public Choice, 14, 19–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Besley, T. (2004). Paying politicians: Theory and evidence. Journal of the European Economic Association, 2, 193–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Canovan, M. (1981). Populism. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferejohn, J. (1986). Incumbent performance and electoral control. Public Choice, 50, 5–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gersbach, H. (2003). Incentive contracts and elections for politicians and the down-up problem. In M. Sertel & S. Koray (Eds.), Advances in economic design (pp. 65–76). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.

  • Gersbach, H. (2004a). Competition of politicians for incentive contracts and elections. Public Choice, 121, 157–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gersbach, H. (2004b). The Paradox of Competence. CEPR Discussion Paper, 4362.

  • Gersbach, H. (2005). Designing democracy. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gersbach, H., & Liessem, V. (2001). Reelection threshold contracts in politics. CESifo Working Paper, 622.

  • Gersbach, H., & Liessem, V. (2003). Incentive contracts and elections for politicians with multi-task problems. CEPR Discussion Paper, 4074.

  • Gibbons, R. (1998). Incentives in organizations. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 12, 115–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, S., & Hart, O. (1983). An analysis of the principal-agent problem. Econometrica, 51, 7–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hart, O. (1995). Firms, contracts and financial structure. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hibbs, D.J. (1977). Political parties and macroeconomic policy. American Political Science Review, 71, 1467–1497.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holmström, B. (1979). Moral hazard and observability. Bell Journal of Economics, 10, 74–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lazear, E. (2000). Performance pay and productivity. American Economic Review, 90, 1346–1361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Messner, M., & Polborn, M. (2004). Paying politicians. Journal of Public Economics, 88(12), 2423–2445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mirrless, J. (1976). The optimal structure of incentives and authority within an organization. Bell Journal of Economics, 7, 105–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mueller, D. (1989). Public choice II. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller, M. (2006). Motivation of politicians and long-term policies. SSRN, Abstract 918180. Retrieved September 26, 2006, from http://ssrn.com/abstract=918180.

  • Nordhaus, W. (1975). The political business cycle. Review of Economic Studies, 42, 169–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Persson, T., Roland, G., & Tabellini, G. (1997). Separation of powers and political accountability. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112, 1136–1202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Persson, T., & Tabellini, G. (1993). Designing institutions for monetary stability. Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy, 39, 53–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poutvaara, P., & Takalo, T. (2003). Candidate quality. CESifo Working Paper, 1106.

  • Smart, M., & Sturm, D. (2004). Term limits and electoral accountability. CEPR Discussion Paper, 4272.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Markus Müller.

Additional information

JEL Classification: D72, D82

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Müller, M. Motivation of politicians and long-term policies. Public Choice 132, 273–289 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-007-9151-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-007-9151-3

Keywords

Navigation