Skip to main content
Log in

Changing minds? Not in Congress!

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Public Choice Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper shows a variety of evidence that members of Congress are ideologically consistent. Based upon the roll call voting record, once elected to Congress, members adopt a consistent ideological position and maintain it over time. There may be changing minds, but they are not in Congress.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Cahoon, L.S., Hinich, M.J., Ordeshook, P.C. (1976). A Multidimensional Statistical Procedure for Spatial Analysis. Manuscript. Carnegie-Mellon University.

  • Carmines, E.G., Stimson, J.A. (1989). Issue evolution: Race and the transformation of American politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clausen, A. (1974). How Congressmen decide: A policy focus. New York: St. Martin's Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clinton, J., Jackman, S.D., Rivers, D. (2004). The statistical analysis of roll call data. American Political Science Review, 98, 355–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Converse, P.E. (1964). The nature of belief systems in Mass publics. In D.E. Apter (Ed.), Ideology and discontent. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, G.W., Katz, J.N. (2002). Elbridge Gerry's Salamander: The electoral consequences of the reapportionment revolution. New York: Cambridge.

  • Cox, G.W., Poole, K.T. (2002a). On measuring partisanship in roll call voting: The U.S. House of Representatives, 1877–1999. American Journal of Political Science, 46, 477–489.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cox, G.W., Poole, K.T. (2002b). Measuring Group Differences in Roll Call Voting. Manuscript, University of Houston.

  • DiMaggio, P., Evans, J., Bryson, B. (1996). Have Americans' social attitudes become more polarized? American Journal of Sociology, 102, 690–755.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Enelow, J.M., Hinich, M. (1984). The spatial theory of voting. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, J.H. (2003). Have Americans' attitudes become more polarized? An update. Social Science Quarterly, 84, 71–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fenno, R.F. Jr. (1978). Home style: House Members in their districts. Boston: Little, Brown.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiorina, M.P. (2006). Culture war? The myth of a polarized America. New York: Pearson Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Froman, L.A. Jr. (1971). Differences between the House and Senate. In R. Wolfinger (Ed.), Readings on Congress. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glazer, A., Robbins, M. (1983). Voters and roll call voting: The effect of congressional elections. Political Behavior, 5, 377–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heckman, J.J., Snyder, J.M. (1997). Linear probability models of the demand for attributes with an empirical application to estimating the preferences of legislators. Rand Journal of Economics, 28, 142–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hinich, M.J., Munger, M.J. (1994). Ideology and the theory of political choice. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinich, M.J., Munger, M. (1997). Analytical politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinich, M.J., Pollard, W. (1981). A new approach to the spatial theory of electoral competition. American Journal of Political Science, 25, 323–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffer, E. (1951). The true believer: Thoughts on the nature of mass movements. New York: Harper Row (Perennial Library Edition, 1966, 1989).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackman, S.D. (2000a). Estimation and Inference via Bayesian simulation: An introduction to Markov Chain Monte Carlo. American Journal of Political Science, 44, 375–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackman, S.D. (2000b). Estimation and inference are ‘Missing Data’ problems: Unifying social science statistics via Bayesian simulation. Political Analysis, 8, 307–332.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackman, S.D. (2001). Multidimensional analysis of roll call data via Bayesian simulation: Identification, estimation, inference and model checking. Political Analysis, 9, 227–241.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobson, G.C. (2006). A divider, not a uniter: George W. Bush and the American people. New York: Pearson Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kernell, S. (1973). Is the Senate more liberal than the House? Journal of Politics, 35, 332–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King, D. (1998). Party competition and polarization in American politics. Paper prepared for the 1998 Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association.

  • Krehbiel, K. (1993). Where's the party? British Journal of Political Science, 23(1), 235–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loomis, M. (1995). Constituent influences outside the structure of spatial voting. Doctoral Dissertation, Carnegie-Mellon University.

  • McCarty, N.M., Poole, K.T. (1995). Veto power and legislation: An empirical analysis of executive and legislative bargaining from 1961–1986. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 11, 282–312.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarty, N.M., Poole, K.T., Rosenthal, H. (1997). Income redistribution and the realignment of American politics. Washington, DC: AEI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarty, N.M., Poole, K.T., Rosenthal, H. (2001). The Hunt for party discipline in congress. The American Political Science Review, 95, 673–687.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarty, N.M., Poole, K.T., Rosenthal, H. (2006). Polarized America: The dance of ideology and unequal riches. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nokken, T.P. (2000). Dynamics of congressional loyalty: Party defection and roll call behavior, 1947–1997. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 25, 417–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ordeshook, P.C. (1976). The spatial theory of elections: A review and a critique. In I. Budge, I. Crewe, D. Farlie (Eds.), Party identification and beyond. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poole, K.T. (1990). Least squares metric, unidimensional scaling of multivariate linear models. Psychometrika, 55, 123–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poole, K.T. (1998). Recovering a basic space from a set of issue scales. American Journal of Political Science, 42, 954–993.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poole, K.T. (2000). Non-parametric unfolding of binary choice data. Political Analysis, 8, 211–237.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poole, K.T. (2001). The geometry of multidimensional quadratic utility in models of parliamentary roll call voting. Political Analysis, 9, 211–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poole, K.T. (2005). Spatial models of parliamentary voting. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poole, K.T., Rosenthal, H. (1984). The polarization of American politics. Journal of Politics, 46, 1061–1079.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poole, K.T., Rosenthal, H. (1997). Congress: A political-economic history of roll call voting. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poole, K.T., Rosenthal, H. (2001). D-NOMINATE after 10 years: A comparative update to congress: A political-economic history of roll call voting. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 26, 5–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rothenberg, L.S., Sanders, M.S. (2000). Severing the electoral connection: Shirking in the contemporary congress. American Journal of Political Science, 44, 316–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, J.M. Jr., Groseclose, T. (2000). Estimating party influence in congressional roll-call voting. American Journal of Political Science, 44(2), 193–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stratmann, T. (2000). Congressional voting over legislative careers: Shifting positions and changing constraints. American Political Science Review, 94, 665–676.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weisberg, H.F. (1968). Dimensional analysis of legislative roll calls. Doctoral dissertation, University of Michigan.

  • Wills, G. (1982). The Federalist Papers by Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and John Jay. New York: Bantam Books.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Keith T. Poole.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Poole, K.T. Changing minds? Not in Congress!. Public Choice 131, 435–451 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-006-9124-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-006-9124-y

Keywords

Navigation