References
Banzhaf, J. F. III. (1965). Weighted voting doesn’t work: A mathematical analysis. Rutgers Law Review, 19, 317–343.
Brams, S. J., & Davis, M. (March 1974). The 3/2ths rule in presidential campaigning. American Political Science Review, 68, 113–134.
Chamberlain, G., & Rothschild, M. (1981). A note on the probability of casting a decisive vote. Jounrnal of Economic Theory, 25, 152–162.
Cox, G. W. (1997). Making Votes Count: Strategic Coordination in the World’s Electoral Systems. New York and London: Cambridge University Press.
Duverger, M. (1959). Political Parties: Their Organization and Activity in the Modern State. London, Methuen New York: Wiley.
Edwards, G. C. III. (2004). Why the Electoral College is Bad for America. New Haven, Connecticut. Yale University Press.
Feld, S. L., & Grofman, B. (2005). Market Value in Weighted Voting Games. Paper prepared for delivery at the Annual Meeting of the Southern Political Science Association. New Orleans, February 7–9.
Felsenthal, D., & Machover, M. (1998). The Measurement of Voting Power. Theory and Practice, Problems and Paradoxes. Northampton, Massachusetts: Edward Elgar.
Gaines, B. (1999). Duverger’s law and the meaning of Canadian exceptionalism. Comparative Political. Studies, 32(7), 835–861.
Gelman, A., Katz, J., & Bafumi, J. (2004). Standard voting power indexes do not work: An empirical analysis. British Journal of Political Science, 34, 657–674.
Good, I. J., & Meyer, L. S. (1975). Estimating the efficancy of a vote. Behavioral Science, 20, 25–33.
Groseclose, T., & Snyder, J. M. Jr. (1996). Buying supermajorities. American Political Science Review, 90, 303–315.
Groseclose, T., & Snyder, J. M. Jr. (2000). Vote buying, supermajorities, and flooded coalitions. American Political Science Review, 94, 683–684.
Gurk, H. M., & Isbell, J. R. (1959). Simple solutions. In A. W. Tucker & R. D. Luce (eds.), Contributions to the Theory of Games, Volume 4. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, pp. 247–265.
Kimberling, W. C. (2004). The Electoral College. U.S. Federal Election Commission, Office of Election Administration.
Lindner, I., & Machover, M. (2004). L. S. Penrose’s limit theorem: Proof of some special cases. Mathematical Social Sciences, 47(1), 37–49.
Madison, J. (1823). Letter to John Hay, August 23, 1823. In Max Farrand (ed.), The Records of the Federal Convention of 1787 (rev. edition), Vol. 3. New Haven, Connecticut: Yale University Press, 1966, p. 459.
Natapoff, A. (2004). The Electoral College. Presentation to the Colloquium Series of the Institute for Mathematical Behavioral Sciences, University of California, Irvine, October.
Owen, G. (1975). Evaluation of a presidential election game. American Political Science Review, 69, 947–953.
Owen, G. (1995). Game Theory. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Owen, G., & Grofman, B. (1984). To vote or not to vote: The paradox of nonvoting. Public Choice, 42, 311–325.
Shapley, L. S., & Mann, I. (1962). Values of large games, VI: Evaluating the Electoral College exactly. RM-3158-PR. The RAND Corporation, May.
Shaw, D. (2003). A simple game: Uncovering Campaign Effects in the 2000 Presidential Election. Unpublished manuscript, Department of Political Science, University of Texas, Austin, July.
Shugart, M. S., & Carey, J. M. (1992). Presidents and Assemblies: Constitutional Design and Electoral Dynamics. New York; Cambridge University Press.
Snyder, J. (1991). On buying legislatures. Economics and Politics, 3, 93–109.
Tufte, E. (1973). The relationship between seats and votes in two-party systems. The American Political Science Review, 67(2), 540–554.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
The senior author is indebted to helpful conversations over the years with Guillermo Owen about the topics discussed in this paper and to a recent conversation with Alan Natapoff. Errors remaining are solely the responsibility of the authors.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Grofman, B., Feld, S.L. Thinking About the Political Impacts of the Electoral College. Public Choice 123, 1–18 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-005-3210-4
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-005-3210-4