Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Peer and Non-Peer Co-Facilitation of a Health and Wellness Intervention for Adults with Serious Mental Illness

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Psychiatric Quarterly Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Peer specialists, or individuals with lived experience of mental health conditions who support the mental health recovery of others, often work side-by-side with traditional providers (non-peers) in the delivery of treatment groups. The present study aimed to examine group participant and peer provider experiences with peer and non-peer group co-facilitation. Data from a randomized controlled trial of Living Well, a peer and non-peer co-facilitated intervention for medical illness management for adults with serious mental illness, were utilized. A subset of Living Well participants (n = 16) and all peer facilitators (n = 3) completed qualitative interviews. Transcripts were coded and analyzed using a general inductive approach and thematic analysis. The complementary perspectives of the facilitators, teamwork between them, skillful group pacing, and peer facilitator self-disclosure contributed to a warm, respectful, and interactive group atmosphere, which created an environment conducive to social learning. Guidelines for successful co-facilitation emerging from this work are described.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Solomon P. Peer support/peer provided services underlying processes, benefits, and critical ingredients. Psychiatr Rehabil J. 2004;27:392–401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Chinman M, George P, Dougherty RH, et al. Peer support services for individuals with serious mental illnesses: assessing the evidence. Psychiatr Serv. 2014;65(4):429–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Davidson L, Bellamy C, Guy K, et al. Peer support among persons with severe mental illnesses: a review of evidence and experience. World Psychiatry. 2012;11:123–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bochicchio L, Stefancic A, Gurdak K, et al. “We’re all in this together”: Peer-specialist contributions to a healthy lifestyle intervention for people with serious mental illness. Adm Policy Ment Health Ment Health Serv Res. 2019;46(3):298–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Dickerson FB, Savage CL, Schweinfurth LA, et al. The use of peer mentors to enhance a smoking cessation intervention for persons with serious mental illnesses. Psychiatr Rehabil J. 2016;39:5–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Druss BG, Singh M, von Esenwein SA, et al. Peer-led self-management of general medical conditions for patients with serious mental illnesses: a randomized trial. Psychiatr Serv. 2012;69:529–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Fortuna KL, DiMilia PR, Lohman MC, et al. Feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary effectiveness of a peer-delivered and technology supported self-management intervention for older adults with serious mental illness. Psychiatry Q. 2018;89:293–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Muralidharan A, Brown CH, Peer JE, et al. Living well: an intervention to improve medical illness self-management among individuals with serious mental illness. Psychiatr Serv. 2018;70:19–25.

  9. Muralidharan A, Niv N, Brown CH, et al. Impact of online weight management with peer coaching on physical activity levels of adults with serious mental illness. Psychiatr Serv. 2018;69:1062–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Young AS, Cohen AN, Goldberg RW. Improving weight in people with serious mental illness: the effectiveness of computerized services with peer coaches. J Gen Intern Med. 2017;32:48–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Salzer MS, Schwenk E, Brusilovskiy E. Certified peer specialist roles and activities: results from a national survey. Psychiatr Serv. 2010;61:520–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Chinman M, Salzer M, O'Brien-Mazza D. National survey on implementation of peer specialists in the VA: implications for training and facilitation. Psychiatr Rehabil J. 2012;35:470–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Yalom ID. The theory and practice of group psychotherapy. 4th ed. New York, NY: Basic Books; 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Lorig, K. Chronic disease self-management program: insights from the eye of the storm. Front Public Health. 2015;2:253.

  15. Thomas DR. A general inductive approach for analyzing qualitative evaluation data. Am J Eval. 2006;27:237–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. QSR International Pty Ltd: NVivo [computer software]. Doncaster. Australia: Victoria; 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Hamilton A. Qualitative methods in rapid turn-around health services research. Health services Research & Development. Available online at. https://www.hsrd.research.va.gov/for_researchers/cyber_seminars/archives/video_archive.cfm?SessionID=780. .

  18. Miles MB, Huberman AM. Qualitative data analysis: an expanded sourcebook. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3:77–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Guest G, Bunce A, Johnson L. How many interviews are enough? Field Methods. 2006;18(1):59–82. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822x05279903.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Availability of Data and Material

Data will not be deposited.

Funding

This research was supported by the VA Health Services Research and Development Service (IIR 11–216; Dr. Goldberg, principal investigator), the VA Rehabilitation Research and Development Service (CDA IK2RX002339, Dr. Muralidharan, principal investigator; CDA IK2RX001836, Dr. Klingaman, principal investigator; and CDA IK2 RX002159, Dr. Hack, principal investigator), and the VISN 5 MIRECC. Dr. Fortuna was funded by a K01 award from the National Institute of Mental Health (K01MH117496).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Dr. Goldberg obtained study funding and oversaw data collection. Drs. Peeples, Hack, Klingaman, and Lucksted worked on data collection. Drs. Muralidharan, Peeples, Fortuna, and Lucksted conceptualized the present study question. Drs. Muralidharan, Peeples, Hack, and Fortuna conducted data analysis. Dr. Muralidharan wrote the first draft of the manuscript and oversaw the writing and editing process. All authors contributed to the writing of the manuscript and approved the final version.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anjana Muralidharan.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of Interest/Competing Interests

The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose. The views expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the position or policy of the VA, the U.S. government, or other affiliated institutions.

Ethics Approval

All study procedures were approved by the appropriate Institutional Review Boards.

Consent to Participate

All participants completed written informed consent.

Consent for Publication

As part of the written informed consent process, participants were informed that data from the study may be published.

Code Availability

N/A

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Muralidharan, A., Peeples, A.D., Hack, S.M. et al. Peer and Non-Peer Co-Facilitation of a Health and Wellness Intervention for Adults with Serious Mental Illness. Psychiatr Q 92, 431–442 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11126-020-09818-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11126-020-09818-2

Keywords

Navigation