Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Validation of the Internet Addiction Test in Students at a Pakistani Medical and Dental School

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Psychiatric Quarterly Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Despite growing concerns over pathological internet usage, studies based on validated psychometric instruments are still lacking in Pakistan. This study aimed to examine the psychometric properties of the Internet Addiction Test (IAT) in a sample of Pakistani students. A total of 522 students of medicine and dentistry completed the questionnaire, which consisted of four sections: (a) demographics, (b) number of hours spent on the Internet per day, (c) English version of the IAT, and (d) the Defense Style Questionnaire-40. Maximum likelihood analysis and principal axis factoring were used to validate the factor structure of the IAT. Convergent and criterion validity were assessed by correlating IAT scores with number of hours spent online and defense styles. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis reflected the goodness of fit of a unidimensional structure of the IAT, with a high alpha coefficient. The IAT had good face and convergent validity and no floor and ceiling effects, and was judged easy to read by participants.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Weinstein A, Lejoyeux M. Internet addiction or excessive internet use. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 2010;36:277–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Young KS. Internet addiction: The emergence of a new clinical disorder. Cyberpsychology & behavior. 1998;1(3):237-44.

  3. Petry NM, O’Brien CP. Internet gaming disorder and the DSM-5. Addiction. 2013;108:1186–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders: DSM-5. Washington, D.C: American Psychiatric Association.

  5. Tao R, Huang X, Wang J, Zhang H, Zhang Y, Li M. Proposed diagnostic criteria for internet addiction. Addiction. 2010;105:556–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Young K. Internet Addicition : diagnosis and treatment considerations. Contemp Psychother. 2009;39:241–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bergmark KH, Bergmark A, Findahl O. Extensive internet involvement-addiction or emerging lifestyle? Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2011;8:4488–501.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Block JJ. Pathological computer use in the USA. International Symposium on the Counseling and Treatment of Youth Internet Addiction. Seoul, Korea, National Youth Commission 2007;433 

  9. Shapira N, Lessig M, Goldsmith T, Szabo S, Lazoritz M, Gold M, et al. Problematic internet use: proposed classification and diagnostic criteria. Depress Anxiety. 2003;17:207–16.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Chen Y-F, Peng S. University students’ internet use and its relationships with academic performance, interpersonal relationships, psychosocial adjustment, and self-evaluation. Cyberpsychol Behav. 2008;11:467–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Gentile DA, Choo H, Liau A, Sim T, Li D, Fung D. Pathological video game use among youths: a two-year longitudinal study. Pediatrics. 2011;127:e319–29.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Ko C-H, Yen J-Y, Chen C-S, Yeh Y-C, Yen C-F. Predictive values of psychiatric symptoms for internet addiction in adolescents: a 2-year prospective study. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2009;163:937.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Leung L. Net-generation attributes and seductive proper- ties of the internet as predictors of online activities and internet addiction. Cyberpsychol Behav. 2004;7:333–48.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Skinner H, Biscope S, Poland B. Quality of internet access: barrier behind internet use statistics. Soc Sci Med. 2003;57:875–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Young KS. Internet addiction: a new clinical phenomenon and its consequences. Am Behav Sci. 2004;48:402–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Young KS. Internet addiction: the emergence of a new clinical disorder. Cyberpsychol Behav. 1998;1:237–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Barke A, Nyenhuis N, Kröner-Herwig B. The German version of the internet addiction test: a validation study. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2012;15:534–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Barrault S, Varescon I. Psychopathologie des joueurs pathologiques en ligne: Une ??tude pr??liminaire. L'Encéphale. 2012;38:156–63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Hawi NS. Arabic validation of the internet addiction test. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2013;16:200–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Lai CM, Mak KK, Watanabe H, Ang RP, Pang JS, Ho RCM. Psychometric properties of the internet addiction test in chinese adolescents. J Pediatr Psychol. 2013;38:794–807.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Karim AKMR, Nigar N. The internet addiction test: assessing its psychometric properties in bangladeshi culture. Asian J Psychiatr. 2014;10:75–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Tsimtsiou Z, Haidich AB, Kokkali S, Dardavesis T, Young KS, Arvanitidou M. Greek version of the internet addiction test: a validation study. Psychiatry Q. 2014;85:187–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Gaskin CJ, Happell B. On exploratory factor analysis: a review of recent evidence, an assessment of current practice, and recommendations for future use. Int J Nurs Stud. 2014;51:511–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Courtney MGR. Determining the number of factors to retain in EFA : using the SPSS R-menu v2. 0 to make more judicious estimations. Pract assessment. Res Eval. 2013;18:1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Mundfrom DJ, Shaw DG, Ke TL. Minimum sample size recommendations for conducting factor analyses. Int J Test. 2005;5:159–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. McHorney C, Ware JJ, Lu J, Sherbourne C. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36): III. Tests of data quality, scaling assumptions, and reliability across diverse patient groups. Med Care. 1994;32:40–66.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Streiner DL, Norman GR, Cairney J. Health measurement scales: a practical guide to their development and use. Oxford University Press, USA; 2015.

  28. Hu L, Bentler PM. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Equ Model Multidiscip J. 1999;6:1–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Flesch R. A new readability yardstick. J Appl Psychol. 1948;32:221–33.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Kline, R.B. Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modelling, Guilford Press, New York, NY. 2005.

  31. Faraci P, Craparo G, Messina R, Severino S. Internet addiction test (IAT): which is the best factorial solution? J Med Internet Res. 2013; doi:10.2196/jmir.2935.

  32. Chong Guan N, Isa SM, Hashim AH, Pillai SK, Harbajan Singh MK. Validity of the Malay version of the internet addiction test: a study on a Group of Medical Students in Malaysia. Asia Pac J Public Health. 2012; doi:10.1177/1010539512447808.

  33. Lee K, Lee HK, Gyeong H, Yu B, Song YM, Kim D.. Reliability and validity of the Korean version of the internet addiction test among college students. Journal of Korean Medical Sciences. 2013;28(5):763-8. doi:10.3346/jkms.2013.28.5.763.

  34. Pontes HM, Patrão IM, Griffiths MD (2014) Portuguese validation of the internet addiction test : an empirical study. 3:107–114.

  35. Jelenchick LA, Becker T, Moreno MA. Assessing the psychometric properties of the internet addiction test (IAT) in US college students. Psychiatry Res. 2012;196:296–301.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Khazaal Y, Billieux J, Thorens G, Khan R, Louati Y, Scarlatti E, et al. French validation of the internet addiction test. Cyberpsychol Behav. 2008;11:703–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Suhr D. Principal component analysis vs. exploratory factor analysis. SUGI 30 Proceedings. 2005. Retrieved August 14 from http://www2.sas.com/proceedings/sugi30/Leadrs30.pdf Wulder M (2007) A practical guide to the use of selected mul

  38. Floros G, Siomos K, Stogiannidou A, Giouzepas I, Garyfallos G. Comorbidity of psychiatric disorders with internet addiction in a clinical sample: the effect of personality, defense style and psychopathology. Addict Behav. 2014;39:1839–45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank K. Shashok (AuthorAID in the Eastern Mediterranean) for improving the use of English in the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ahmed Waqas.

Ethics declarations

Disclosures

The authors do not have any conflict interests to report.

Funding

None

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Waqas, A., Farooq, F., Raza, M. et al. Validation of the Internet Addiction Test in Students at a Pakistani Medical and Dental School. Psychiatr Q 89, 235–247 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11126-017-9528-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11126-017-9528-5

Keywords

Navigation