Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Perceptions of Coercion in the Community: A Qualitative Study of Patients in a Danish Assertive Community Treatment Team

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Psychiatric Quarterly Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Assertive community treatment (ACT) has been claimed to be paternalistic and coercive, yet little is known about how patients experience the assertive aspects of ACT. To explore views on—and perceptions of—coercion of patients in Danish assertive community teams. In-depth interviews were conducted with six purposefully selected patients and analysed using thematic analysis. Patients reported lack of influence on treatment process and a poor alliance with case-mangers, not being recognised as an autonomous person, and experiences of staff crossing the line and intruding privacy, as most central to perceptions of coercion. A collaborative and mutually trusting relationship, commitment, persistence and availability of staff, and recognition of the need for social support and help with everyday activities, were most important for counteracting such experiences. Perceptions of coercion were not emphasised in patients’ account of their engagement with ACT, and generally only related to patients’ initial contact with ACT staff. The study suggests that developing mental health practices that enhance the formation of a therapeutic relationship with patients will minimize circumstances that induce perceptions of coercion. ACT, with its engaged and committed staff with sufficient time, focusing on social and practical issues, is successful in facilitating such a contact, as experienced by patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Stein LI, Test MA: Alternative to mental hospital treatment. I. Conceptual model, treatment program, and clinical evaluation. Archives of General Psychiatry 37:392–397, 1980.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Appelbaum PS, Le MS: Techniques used by ACT teams to encourage adherence: patient and staff perceptions. Community Mental Health Journal 44(6):459–464, 2008.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Monahan J, Redlich AD, Swanson J, et al.: Use of leverage to improve adherence to psychiatric treatment in the community. Psychiatric Services 56:37–44, 2005.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Stovall J: Is ACT ethical care? Harvard Review of Psychiatry 9:139–143, 2001.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Szmukler G: Ethics in community psychiatry. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry 33:328–338, 1999.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Williamson T: Ethics of assertive outreach (ACT teams). Current Opinion in Psychiatry 15:543–547, 2002.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Watts J, Priebe S: A phenomenological account of users’ experiences of ACT. Bioethics 16:439–454, 2002.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Braun V, Clarke V: Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology 3(2):77–101, 2006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Boyatzis R: Transforming qualitative information: thematic analysis and code development. Thousand Oaks, CA, Sage Publications Inc., 1998.

  10. Priebe S, Watts J, Chase M, et al.: Processes of disengagement and engagement in assertive outreach patients: qualitative study. British Journal of Psychiatry 187:438–443, 2005.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Leiphart LR, Barnes MG: The client experience of ACT: a qualitative study. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal 28:395–397, 2005.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Gilburt H, Rose D, Slade M: The importance of relationships in mental health care: a qualitative study of service users’ experiences of psychiatric hospital admission in the UK. BMC Health Services Research 8:92, 2008.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Krupa T, Eastabrook S, Hern L, et al.: How do people who receive ACT experience this service? Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal 29:18–24, 2005.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Chinman M, Allende M, Bailey P, et al.: Therapeutic agents of ACT. Psychiatric Quarterly 70:137–162, 1999.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Leach MJ: Rapport: a key to treatment success. Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice 11:262–265, 2005.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marie Høgh Thøgersen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Thøgersen, M.H., Morthorst, B. & Nordentoft, M. Perceptions of Coercion in the Community: A Qualitative Study of Patients in a Danish Assertive Community Treatment Team. Psychiatr Q 81, 35–47 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11126-009-9115-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11126-009-9115-5

Keywords

Navigation