Abstract
Introduction
Despite public opinion and policy interventions, restraint remains a common practice. This is also the case in the Netherlands, where projects aimed to reduce seclusion, have not lead to a decreased use of restraint. Is this lack of effectiveness related to attitudes of the professionals? The aim of this study was to explore the attitudes of professionals working in mental health care toward restraint.
Method
A questionnaire with eight scales was constructed for measuring attitudes of professionals. Scores of 540 professionals were studied, using analysis of variance and cluster analysis and related to several personnel and organizational characteristics.
Results
The more professionals were personally involved in seclusion, the more they believed in it. Three types of professionals were identified: Transformers, Doubters and Maintainers. More than half of the psychiatrists (56%) belonged to the type of maintainers. Nurses were more divided.
Conclusion
Professionals working in clinical settings are not really opposed to restraint. This could explain the limited effects of innovation projects.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Harding T: Human rights law in the field of mental health: a critical review. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica 101(suppl.399):24–30, 2000
Nelstrop L, Chandler-Oatts J, Bingley W, et al.: A systematic review of the safety and effectiveness of restraint and seclusion as interventions for the short-term management of violence in adult psychiatric inpatient settings and emergency departments. Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing 3:8–18, 2006
Pollard R, Yanasak E, Rogers S, et al.: Organizational and unit factors contributing to reduction in the use of seclusion and restraint procedures on an acute psychiatric inpatient unit. Psychiatric Quarterly 78:73–81, 2007
Janssen W, Hutschemaekers G, Lendemeijer B: Dwang cijfermatig in beeld (Numbers of restraints). In: Abma T, Widdershoven G, Lendemeijer B (Eds) Dwang en drang in de psychiatrie (Restraint and coercion in mental health). Utrecht, Lemma, 2005
Poulsen H, Engberg M: Validation of psychiatric patients’ statements on coercive measures. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica 103:60–65, 2001
Bowers L, van der Werf B, Vokkolainen A, et al.: International variation in containment measures for disturbed psychiatric inpatients: A comparative questionnaire survey. International Journal of Nursing Studies 44:357–364, 2007
Nijman H, Palmstierna T, Almvik R, et al.: Fifteen years of research with the Staff Observation Aggression Scale: a review. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica 111:12–21, 2005
Abma T, Widdershoven G, Lendemeijer B (Eds) Dwang en drang in de psychiatrie (Restraint and coercion in mental health). Utrecht, Lemma, 2005
Dutch Health Care Inspectorate: Jaarbericht 2005 (Annual report 2005) Den Haag, Inspectie voor de volksgezondheid, 2006
Keski-Valkama A, Sailas E, Eronen M, et al.: A 15-year national follow-up: legalisation is not enough to reduce the use of seclusion and restraint. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology 42:747–752, 2007
Sailas E, Wahlbeck K: Restraint and seclusion in psychiatric inpatient wards. Current Opinion in Psychiatry 18:555–559, 2005
Meehan T, Bergen H, Fjeldsoe K: Staff and patients perceptions of seclusion: has anything changed? Journal of Advanced Nursing 47:33–38, 2004
Salize H, Dressing H: Coercion, involuntary treatment and quality of mental health care: is there any link? Current Opinion in Psychiatry 18:576–584, 2005
Griffiths L: Does seclusion have a role to play in modern mental health nursing? British Journal of Nursing 10:656–661, 2001
Heyman E: Seclusion. Journal of Psychosocial Nursing 25:9–12, 1987
Fisher W: Restraint and seclusion: a review of the literature. American Journal of Psychiatry 151:1584–1591, 1994
Sailas E, Fenton M: Seclusion and restraint for people with serious mental illness. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 1: doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001163, 2000
Jolliffe I: Principal component analysis, 2nd ed. New York, Springer, 2002
Lind M, Kaltiala-Heino R, Suominen T, et al.: Nurses’ ethical perceptions about coercion. Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing 11:379–385, 2004
Olofsson B, Norberg A: Experiences of coercion in psychiatric care as narrated by patients, nurses and physicians. Journal of Advanced Nursing 33:89–97, 2001
Vuckovich D, Artinian B: Justifying coercion. Nursing Ethics 12:370–380, 2005
Wynaden D, Orb A, McGowan S, et al.: The use of seclusion in the year 2000: what has changed? Collegian 8:19–25, 2001
Lendemeijer B: Seclusion in psychiatry: aspects of decision making. Utrecht, Academic Dissertation Utrecht University, 2000
Olofsson B, Gilje F, Jacobsson L, et al.: Nurses’ narratives about coercion in psychiatric care. Journal of Advanced Nursing 28:45–53, 1998
Huckshorn K: Reducing seclusion and restraint use in US mental health settings: deep change required…©. Stirling, University of Stirling, 2006. http://www.nm.stir.ac.uk/documents/rftl2006-huckshorn1.pdf
Spijker J, de Ruiter G, de Blok H, et al.: De rol van psychiaters bij separeren (The role of psychiatrists toward seclusion). Maandblad geestelijke volksgezondheid 60:1084–1094, 2005
Callaly T, Minas H: Reflections on clinician leadership and management in mental health. Australasian Psychiatry 13:27–32, 2005
Zinkler M, Priebe S: Detention of the mentally ill in Europe—a review. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica 106:3–8, 2002
Stolker J, Hugenholtz G, Heerdink E, et al.: Seclusion and the use of antipsychotics in hospitalized psychiatric patients. Psychology, Crime & Law 11:489–495, 2005
Allen M, Currier G, Hughes D, et al.: Treatment of behavioral emergencies: a summery of the expert consensus guidelines. Journal of Psychiatric Practice 9:16–38, 2003
Citrome L: New treatments for agitation. Psychiatric Quarterly 75:197–213, 2004
Davison S: The management of violence in general psychiatry. Advances in Psychiatric Treatment 11:362–370, 2005
Wynn R: Staff’s attitudes to the use of restraint and seclusion in a Norwegian university psychiatric hospital. Nordic Journal of Psychiatry 57:453–459, 2003
McCue R, Urcuyo L, Lilu Y, et al.: Reducing restraint use in a public psychiatric inpatient service. Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research 31:217–225, 2004
Sullivan A, Bezmen J, Barron C, et al.: Reducing restraints: alternatives to restraint on an inpatient psychiatric service—utilizing safe and effective methods to evaluate and treat the violent patient. Psychiatric Quarterly 76:51–65, 2005
Fisher W: Elements of successful restraint and seclusion reduction programs and their application in a large, urban, state psychiatric hospital. Journal of Psychiatric Practice 9:7–15, 2003
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
van Doeselaar, M., Sleegers, P. & Hutschemaekers, G. Professionals’ Attitudes Toward Reducing Restraint: The Case of Seclusion in The Netherlands. Psychiatr Q 79, 97–109 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11126-007-9063-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11126-007-9063-x