Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Lessons Learned in Implementing Evidence-Based Practices: Implications for Psychiatric Administrators

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Psychiatric Quarterly Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Factors related to the dissemination and implementation of evidence-based practices (EBPs) are discussed. Extensive effort is required to successfully implement and sustain EBPs that improve clinical outcomes. There is a rapid rate of discovery of new EBPs. Examples of large-scale implementations of EBPs in mental health are described with emphasis on the factors thought critical for success. The need for designing systems which can cost-effectively implement new EBPs is highlighted. Finally, the implications for psychiatric administrators are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Fixsen DL, Naoom SF, Blase KA, et al: Implementation Research: A Synthesis of the Literature. Tampa, FL: University of South Florida, Louis de la Parte Florida Mental Health Institute, the National Implementation Research Network, 2005.

  2. Grimshaw JM, Thomas RE, MacLennan G, et al: Effectiveness and efficiency of guideline dissemination and implementation strategies. Health Technology Assessment 8(6):2004.

  3. American Psychiatric Association. Practice Guidelines. http://www.psych.org/psych_pract/treatg/pg/prac_ guide.cfm., 2005.

  4. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) . National Guidelines Clearinghouse. http://www. guideline.gov/. 2005.

  5. SAMHSA's National Mental Health Information Center. About Evidence-based Practices: Shaping Mental Health Services Toward Recovery. http://www.mentalhealth.samhsa.gov/cmhs/communitysupport/ toolkits/about.asp. 2005.

  6. Sweet M: Development of strategies to encourage adoption of best evidence into practice in Australia: workshop overview. Medical Journal of Australia 180(15):S45–S47, 2004.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Rawlins M: In pursuit of quality: The National Institute for Clinical Excellence. Lancet 353(9158):1079–1082, 1999.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare. Future Goals and Objectives: 2005 to 2010 Measure Expansion and Data Use. http://www.jcaho.org/pms/reference+materials/future+goals+and+ objectives.htm. 2005.

  9. Birkel RC, Hall LL, Lane T, et al: Consumers and families as partners in implementing evidence-based practice. Psychiatr Clin North Am 26(4):867–881, 2003.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. O’Connor PJ: Adding value to evidence-based clinical guidelines. JAMA 294(6):741–743, 2005.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Felch WC: Bridging the gap between research and practice. The role of continuing medical education. JAMA 277(2):155–156, 1997.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group: Evidence-based medicine: A new approach to teaching the practice of medicine. JAMA 268(17):2420–2425, 1992.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Hatala R, Guyatt G: Evaluating the teaching of evidence-based medicine. JAMA 288(9):1110–1112, 2002.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Demaerschalk BM: Literature-searching strategies to improve the application of evidence-based clinical practice principles to stroke care. Mayo Clin Proc 79(10):1321–1329, 2004.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Mulrow CD: Systematic Reviews: Rationale for systematic reviews. British Medical Journal 309:597–599, 1994.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Davis DA, Ciurea I, Flanagan TM, Perrier L: Solving the information overload problem: A letter from Canada. Medical Journal of Australia 180:S68–S71, 2004.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Davis DA, Thomson MA, Oxman AD, Haynes RB: Changing Physician Performance. A systematic review of the effect of continuing medical education strategies. JAMA 274(9):700–705, 1995.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Brown JB, Shye D, McFarland BH, et al: Controlled trials of CQI and academic detailing to implement a clinical practice guideline for depression. Jt Comm J Qual Improv 26(1):39–54, 2000.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Oxman AD, Thomson MA, Davis DA, Haynes RB: No magic bullets: A systematic review of 102 trials of interventions to improve professional practice. CMAJ 153(10):1423–1431, 1995.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Gilbody S, Whitty, P: for the NHS Centre for Reviews and Dissemination. Improving the recognition and management of depression in primary care. Effective Health Care 7(5):1–12, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Davis D, O’Brien MA, Freemantle N, et al: Impact of formal continuing medical education: Do conferences, workshops, rounds, and other traditional continuing education activities change physician behavior or health care outcomes? JAMA 282(9):867–874, 1999.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Foy R, MacLennan G, Grimshaw J, et al: Attributes of clinical recommendations that influence change in practice following audit and feedback. J Clin Epidemiol 55(7):717–722, 2002.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Lomas J: Words without action? The production, dissemination, and impact of consensus recommendations. Annu Rev Public Health 12:41–65, 1991.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Cabana MD, Rand CS, Powe NR, et al: Why don't physicians follow clinical practice guidelines? A framework for improvement. JAMA 282(15):1458–1465, 1999.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Kosecoff J, Kanouse DE, Rogers WH, et al: Effects of the National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Program on physician practice. JAMA 258(19):2708–2713, 1987.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Lomas J, Anderson GM, Domnick-Pierre K, et al: Do practice guidelines guide practice? The effect of a consensus statement on the practice of physicians. N Engl J Med 321(19): 1306–1311, 1989.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Foy R, Penney GC, Grimshaw JM, et al: A randomised controlled trial of a tailored multifaceted strategy to promote implementation of a clinical guideline on induced abortion care. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 111(7):726–733, 2004.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Eccles MP, Grimshaw JM: Selecting, presenting, and delivering clinical guidelines: Are there any ``magic bullets''? Medical Journal of Australia 180:S52–S54, 2004.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Blase KA: Implementation: What research and experience can tell us. Paper presented at the Conference on Change Management in Mental Health Systems: Key for Implementing Evidence-Based Systems. Albuquerque, NM. 2005.

  30. Haynes B, Haines A: Barriers and bridges to evidence-based clinical practice, in Getting Research Findings into Practice, 2nd. Edited by Haines A, Donald A. London: BMJ Books, 115–122, 2002.

  31. Haines A, Donald A: Introduction. in Getting Research Findings into Practice, 2nd, Edited by Haines A, Donald A. London: BMJ Books, 1–18, 2002.

  32. Dulcan MK: Practitioner perspectives on evidence-based practice. Child Adolesc Psychiatr Clin N Am 14(2):225–240, 2005.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Aarons GA: Measuring provider attitudes toward evidence-based practice: Consideration of organizational context and individual differences. Child Adolesc Psychiatr Clin N Am 14(2):255–271, 2005.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Corrigan PW, Steiner L, McCracken SG, et al: Strategies for disseminating evidence-based practices to staff who treat people with serious mental illness. Psychiatr Serv 52(12):1598–1606, 2001.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Bartels SJ, Dums AR, Oxman TE, et al: Evidence-based practices in geriatric mental health care. Psychiatr Serv 53(11):1419–1431, 2002.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Haines A, Kuruvilla S, Borchert M: Bridging the implementation gap between knowledge and action for health. Bull World Health Organ 82(10):724–731, 2004.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Grol R, Wensing M: What drives change? Barriers to and incentives for achieving evidence-based practice. Med J Aust 180(6 Suppl):S57–S60, 2004.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Peterson ED. Optimizing the science of quality improvement. JAMA 294(3):369–371, 2005.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Cannon DS, Allen SN: A comparison of the effects of computer and manual reminders on compliance with a mental health clinical practice guideline. J Am Med Inform Assoc 7(2):196–203, 2000.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Hunt DL, Haynes RB, Hanna SE, Smith K: Effects of computer-based clinical decision support systems on physician performance and patient outcomes: A systematic review. JAMA 280(15):1339–1346, 1998.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Johnston ME, Langton KB, Haynes RB, Mathieu A: Effects of computer-based clinical decision support systems on clinician performance and patient outcome. A critical appraisal of research. Ann Intern Med 120(2):135–142, 1994.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Mehta RH, Montoye CK, Gallogly M, et al: Improving quality of care for acute myocardial infarction: The Guidelines Applied in Practice (GAP) Initiative. JAMA 287(10):1269–1276, 2002.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Funk M, Wutzke S, Kaner E, et al: A multicountry controlled trial of strategies to promote dissemination and implementation of brief alcohol intervention in primary health care: Findings of a World Health Organization collaborative study. J Stud Alcohol 66(3):379–388, 2005.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Rich MW: From clinical trials to clinical practice: Bridging the GAP. JAMA 287(10):1321–1323, 2002.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Daleiden EL, Chorpita BF: From data to wisdom: Quality improvement strategies supporting large-scale implementation of evidence-based services. Child Adolesc Psychiatr Clin N Am 14(2):329–349, 2005.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Wampold BE: Not a scintilla of evidence to support empirically supported treatments as more effective than other treatments. in Evidence-based practices in mental health: Debate and dialogue on the fundamental practices. Edited by Norcross JC, Beutler LE, Levant RF. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, 299–308, 2006.

  47. Crismon ML, Trivedi M, Pigott TA, et al: The Texas Medication Algorithm Project: report of the Texas Consensus Conference Panel on Medication Treatment of Major Depressive Disorder. J Clin Psychiatry 60(3):142–156, 1999.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Trivedi MH, Rush AJ, Crismon ML, et al: Clinical results for patients with major depressive disorder in the Texas Medication Algorithm Project. Arch Gen Psychiatry 61(7):669–680, 2004.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Miranda J, Duan N, Sherbourne C, et al: Improving care for minorities: Can quality improvement interventions improve care and outcomes for depressed minorities? Results of a randomized, controlled trial. Health Serv Res 38(2):613–630, 2003.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Mulsant BH, Alexopoulos GS, Reynolds CF, 3rd, et al: Pharmacological treatment of depression in older primary care patients: The PROSPECT algorithm. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 16(6):585–592, 2001.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Alexopoulos GS, Katz IR, Bruce ML, et al: Remission in depressed geriatric primary care patients: A report from the PROSPECT study. Am J Psychiatry 162(4):718–724, 2005.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Lin EH, Katon WJ, Von Simon GE, et al: Achieving guidelines for the treatment of depression in primary care: Is physician education enough? Med Care 35(8):831–842, 1997.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Lieberman JA, Stroup TS, McEvoy JP, et al: Effectiveness of antipsychotic drugs in patients with chronic schizophrenia. N Engl J Med 353(12):1209–1223, 2005.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Stalonas PM, Perri MG, Kerzner AB: Do behavioral treatments of obesity last? A five-year follow-up investigation. Addict Behav 9(2):175–183, 1984.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Cockburn J: Adoption of evidence into practice: Can change be sustainable? Med J Aust 180(6 Suppl):S66–S67, 2004.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Bond GR, Drake RE, Mueser KT, Latimer E: Assertive community treatment for people with severe mental illness: Critical ingredients and impact on consumers. Disease Management and Health Outcomes. 9(3):141–159, 2001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Phillips SD, Burns BJ, Edgar ER, et al: Moving assertive community treatment into standard practice. Psychiatr Serv 52(6):771–779, 2001.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Bond GR, Salyers MP: Prediction of outcome from the Dartmouth assertive community treatment fidelity scale. CNS Spectr 9(12):937–942, 2004.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Latimer EA: Economic impacts of assertive community treatment: A review of the literature. Can J Psychiatry 44(5):443–454, 1999.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. National Association of State Mental Health Program Directors (NASMHPD) Research Institute. State Mental Health Agency Profiling System: 2004; Evidence-Based Practices. 2005: http://www.nri-inc.org/Profiles/Report.cfm.

  61. Bond GR: Supported employment: Evidence for an evidence-based practice. Psychiatr Rehabil J 27(4):345–359, 2004.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Latimer EA: Economic impacts of supported employment for persons with severe mental illness. Can J Psychiatry 46 (6):496–505, 2001.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. Bond GR, Becker DR, Drake RE, Rapp CA, Meisler N, Lehman AF, et al: Implementing supported employment as an evidence-based practice. Psychiatr Serv 52(3):313–322, 2001.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. Henggeler SW, Schoenwald SK, Borduin CM, et al: Multisystemic Treatment of Antisocial Behavior in Children and Adolescents. New York, Guilford Press, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  65. Aos S, Phipps P, Barnoski R, Lieb R. The Comparative Benefits and Costs of Programs to Reduce Crime: Version 4.0. Washington State Institute for Public Policy. 2001: http://www.wsipp. wa.gov/rptfiles/costbenefit.pdf.

  66. Clark PA: Medicaid Funding for Evidence-Based Practices in Mental Health. Paper presented at the Conference on Change Management in Mental Health Systems: Key for Implementing Evidence-Based Systems. Albuquerque, NM; 2005, June.

  67. Saeed SA, Rausch C: Translating Knowledge into Practice: Implementing Evidence-Based Practices and a Case Study of Medication Algorithm Implementation. Psychiatrist Administrator 5(1):3–8, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  68. Fishbein M: Developing effective behavior change interventions: Some lessons learned from behavioral research. NIDA Res Monogr 155:246–261, 1995.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  69. Toprac MG, Rush AJ, Conner TM, et al: The Texas Medication Algorithm Project Patient and Family Education Program: A consumer-guided initiative. J Clin Psychiatry 61(7):477–486, 2000.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  70. Mellman TA, Miller AL, Weissman EM, et al: Evidence-based pharmacologic treatment for people with severe mental illness: A focus on guidelines and algorithms. Psychiatr Serv 52(5), 619–625, 2001.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  71. Saeed SA: Evidence-Based Psychopharmacotherapy: Medication Guidelines and Algorithms. in The Evidence-Based Practice: Methods, Models, and Tools for Mental Health Professionals. Edited by Stout SE, Hayes RA. New Jersey, John Wiley & Sons, 85–108, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Richard M. Bloch Ph.D..

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bloch, R.M., Saeed, S.A., Rivard, J.C. et al. Lessons Learned in Implementing Evidence-Based Practices: Implications for Psychiatric Administrators. Psychiatr Q 77, 309–318 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11126-006-9016-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11126-006-9016-9

Keywords

Navigation