Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Experimental designs for estimating plateau-type production functions and economically optimal input levels

  • Published:
Journal of Productivity Analysis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Estimation of nitrogen response functions has a long history and yet there is still considerable uncertainty about how much nitrogen to apply to agricultural crops. Nitrogen recommendations are usually based on estimation of agronomic production functions that typically use data from designed experiments. Nitrogen experiments, for example, often use equally spaced levels of nitrogen. Past agronomic research is mostly supportive of plateau-type functional forms. The question addressed is if one is willing to accept a specific plateau-type functional form as the true model, what experimental design is the best to use for estimating the production function? The objective is to minimize the variance of the estimated expected profit maximizing level of input. Of particular interest is how well does the commonly used equally-spaced design perform in comparison to the optimal design. Mixed effects models for winter wheat (Triticum aestivium L.) yield are estimated for both Mitscherlich and linear plateau functions. With three design points, one should be high enough to be on the plateau and one should be at zero. The choice of the middle design point makes little difference over a wide range of values. The optimal middle design point is lower for the Mitscherlich functional form than it is for the plateau function. Equally spaced designs with more design points have a similar precision and thus the loss from using a nonoptimal experimental design is small.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. In order for all three parameters to be identified, one design point must be on the plateau and the other two design points must be on the linear response. The variance of the parameter estimates is minimized by selecting the two design points on the linear response to be as far apart as possible.

References

  • Ackello-Ogutu C, Paris Q, Williams WA (1985) Testing a von Liebig crop response function against polynomial specifications. Am J Agr Econ 67:873–880

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson A (1996) The usefulness of optimum experimental designs. J R Stat Soc Series B 58:59–76

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson AC, Hines LM (1996) Design for nonlinear and generalized linear models. In: Ghosh R, Rao RE (eds) Handbook of statistics 13. Elsevier, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Bäckman ST, Vermeulen S, Taavitsainen VM (1997) Long-term fertilizer field trials: comparison of three mathematical response models. Agri Food Sci Finl 6:151–160

    Google Scholar 

  • Baule B (1937) Mitscherlich’s Gesets der physiologischen Beziechungen. Landw Jahrb 51:363–385

    Google Scholar 

  • Berck P, Helfand G (1990) Reconciling the von Liebig and differentiable crop production functions. Am J Agri Econ 72:985–996

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bornstedt GW, Goldberger AS (1969) On the exact covariance of products of random variables. J Am Stat Assoc 64:1439–1442

    Google Scholar 

  • Cate RB Jr, Nelson LA (1971) A simple statistical procedure for partitioning soil test correlation data into two classes. Soil Sci Soc Am Proc 35:858–860

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cerrato MD, Blackmer AM (1990) Comparison of models for describing corn yield response to nitrogen fertilizer. Agron J 82:138–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Department of Plant and Soil Sciences (2009) Experiment 502: wheat grain yield response to nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium fertilization, Lahoma OK. Oklahoma State University. Available at http://nue.okstate.edu/Long_Term_Experiments/E502.htm

  • Dette H, Pepelyshev A, Wong WK (2010) Optimal experimental designs for detecting hormesis. Working paper, Department of Biostatistics, University of California at Los Angeles, Available at http://www.ruhr-uni-bochum.de/imperia/md/content/mathematik3/publications/dpwhormetic12r-1.pdf

  • Fisher RA (1935) Design of experiments. Oliver and Boyd, Edinburgh

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank MD, Beattie BR, Embleton ME (1990) A comparison of alternative crop response models. Am J Agri Econ 54:1–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Genz A (2004) Numerical computation of rectangular bivariate and trivariate normal and t probabilities. Stat Comput 14:251–260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grimm SS, Paris Q, Williams WA (1987) A von Liebig model for water and nitrogen crop response. Western J Agri Econ 12:182–192

    Google Scholar 

  • Harri A, Erdem C, Coble KH, Knight TO (2009) Crop yield distributions: a reconciliation of previous research and statistical tests for normality. Rev Agri Econ 31:163–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heady EO, Dillon JL (1961) Agricultural production functions. Iowa State University Press, Ames

    Google Scholar 

  • Heady EO, Pesek J (1954) A fertilizer production surface with specification of economic optima for corn grown on calcareous Ida silt loam. J Farm Econ 36:466–482

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hennessy DA (2009) Crop yield skewness under the law of the minimum technology. Am J Agri Econ 91:197–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hossain I, Epplin FM, Horn GW, Krenzer EG Jr (2004) Wheat production and management practices used by Oklahoma grain and livestock producers. Oklahoma Agricultural Experiment Station Bulletin B-818.

  • Kaitibie S, Epplin FM, Brorsen BW, Horn GW, Krenzer EG Jr, Paisley SI (2003) Optimal stocking density for dual-purpose winter wheat production. J Agri Appl Econ 35:29–38

    Google Scholar 

  • Lanzer EA, Paris Q (1981) A new analytical framework for the fertilization problem. Am J Agri Econ 63:93–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liebig J (1840) Organic chemistry in its applications to agriculture and physiology. Bradbury and Evans, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Llewelyn RV, Featherstone AM (1997) A comparison of crop production functions using simulated data for irrigated corn in western Kansas. Agri Syst 54:521–538

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maddala GS, Nelson FD (1974) Maximum likelihood methods of markets in disequilibrium. Econometrics 42:1013–1030

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Makowski D, Lavielle M (2006) Using SAEM to estimate parameters of response to applied fertilizer. J Agri Biol Environ Stat 11:45–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Makowski D, Wallach D (2002) It pays to base parameter estimation on a realistic description of model errors. Agronomie 22:179–189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitscherlich EA (1909) Das gesetz des minimums und das gesetz des abnehmenden bodenertrages. Landw Jahrb 38:537–552

    Google Scholar 

  • Monod H, Makowski D, Sahmoudi M, Wallach D (2002) Optimal experimental designs for estimating models parameters, applied to yield response to nitrogen models. Agronomie 22:229–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paris Q (1992) The von Liebig hypothesis. Am J Agri Econ 74:1019–1028

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perrin RK (1976) The value of information and the value of theoretical models in crop response research. Am J Agri Econ 58:54–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raun W, Solie J, Johnson G, Stone M, Mullen R, Freeman K, Thomason W, Lukina E (2002) Improving nitrogen use efficiency in cereal grain production with optical sensing and variable rate application. Agron J 94:815–820

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Redman JC, Allen SQ (1954) Some interrelationships of economic and agronomic concepts. J Farm Econ 36:453–465

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Retout S, Mentré F, Bruno R (2002) Fisher information matrix for non-linear mixed-effects models: evaluation and application for optimal design of enoxaparin population pharmacokinetics. Stat Med 21:2623–2639

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russell EJ (1926) Plant nutrition and crop production. University of California Press, Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  • Snedecor GW (1934) Analysis of variance and covariance. Collegiate Press Inc., Ames

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Spillman WJ (1923) Applications of the law of diminishing returns to some fertilizer and feed data. J Farm Econ 5:36–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sumelius J (1993) A response analysis of wheat and barley to nitrogen in Finland. Agri Sci Finl 2:465–479

    Google Scholar 

  • Tembo G, Brorsen BW, Epplin FM (2003) Linear response stochastic plateau functions Selected paper Southern Agricultural Economics Association annual meeting, Available at http://ageconsearch.umn.edu/bitstream/35217/1/sp03te01.pdf

  • Tembo G, Brorsen BW, Epplin FM, Tostāo E (2008) Crop input response functions with stochastic plateaus. Am J Agri Econ 90:424–434

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Upton M, Dalton G (1976) Linear production response. J Agri Econ 27:253–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolfinger RD (1993) Laplace’s approximation for nonlinear mixed models. Biometrika 80:791–799

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolfinger RD (1999) Fitting nonlinear mixed models with the new NLMIXED procedure SUGI Proceedings. SAS Institute, Cary

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The research was partially supported by the Oklahoma Agricultural Experiment Station. The views stated herein are those of the authors and are not necessarily those of the Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland or of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to B. Wade Brorsen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Brorsen, B.W., Richter, F.GC. Experimental designs for estimating plateau-type production functions and economically optimal input levels. J Prod Anal 38, 45–52 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11123-010-0204-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11123-010-0204-0

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation