Skip to main content
Log in

The Effectiveness of KEEP for Families of Children with Developmental Delays: Integrating FIND Video Coaching into Parent Management Training—Oregon Model: a Randomized Trial

  • Published:
Prevention Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Children with developmental delays or disabilities (DD) are at risk for self-regulation difficulties and behaviour problems compared to typically developing children. Intervening early is crucial to prevent long-term adjustment challenges across home and school contexts. Parenting has been identified as a malleable target of intervention for improving children’s adaptive functioning across behavioural, emotional and cognitive domains. Although parent management training (PMT) is an identified best-practice, key questions remain about the critical components of interventions and how novel approaches like video feedback may offer additional benefits. Using a pre-test-post-test one group and superiority design, we evaluated the efficacy of two models of the Keeping Parents Trained and Supported (KEEP) preschool program with parent-only components among 175 families with children diagnosed or at-risk for DD. KEEP-P included core PMT (Oregon Model) methods and KEEP-V integrated KEEP with Filming Interactions to Nurture Development video coaching methods for enhancing developmentally supportive interactions. Intervention outcomes on children’s behaviour problems and executive functioning, parenting stress and parent–child relationship quality were compared between groups. Both groups demonstrated significant reductions over time in child behavioural problems, developmental problems and parenting stress. Significant improvements were observed in children’s executive functioning, parents’ sense of competence and mindfulness in parenting. Group differences were observed in parent’s sense of competence, with individuals receiving KEEP-P displaying greater increases over time. Higher intervention dosage predicted a greater reduction in stressful child behaviours and greater improvements in children’s inhibitory control.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abidin, R. R. (1995). Parenting Stress Index (PSI) manual (3rd ed.). Pediatric Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Achenbach, T.M., & Edelbrock, C.S. (1983). Manual for the child: Behavior Checklist and Revised Child Behavior Profile.

  • Allan, N. P., Hume, L. E., Allan, D. M., Farrington, A. L., & Lonigan, C. J. (2014). Relations between inhibitory control and the development of academic skills in preschool and kindergarten: A meta-analysis. Developmental Psychology, 50, 2368–2379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baker, B. L., Mcintyre, L. L., Blacher, J., Crnic, K., Edelbrock, C., & Low, C. (2003). Pre-school children with and without developmental delay: Behaviour problems and parenting stress over time. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 47, 217–23.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Baker, B. L., Blacher, J., Crnic, K. A., & Edelbrock, C. (2002). Behavior problems and parenting stress in families of three-year-old children with and without developmental delays. 107(6), 433–444.

  • Bandura, A. (1971). Social learning theory. In General Learning Press.

  • Bauer, D. M., Wolf, M. M., & Risley, T. R. (1969). Some current dimensions of applied behaviour analysis. Journal of Applied Behaviour Analysis, 1, 91–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyce, W. T., Jensen, E. W., James, S. A., & Peacock, J. L. (1983). The familiy routines inventory: Theoretical originas. Social Science & Medicine, 17, 193–20.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Button, K. S., Bal, L., Clark, A., et al. (2016). Preventing the ends from justifying the means: Withholding results to address publication bias in peer-review. BMC Psychol, 4, 59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, D., & Stanley, J. (1963). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. Rand-McNally.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlson, S., Mandell, D., & Williams, L. (2004). Executive function and theory of mind: Stability and prediction from ages 2 to 3. Developmental Psychology., 40, 1105–1122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Center on the Developing Child. (2015). Filming interactions to nurture development. Retrieved from https://developingchild.harvard.edu/innovation-application/innovation-in-action/find

  • Chamberlain, P., Price, J., Leve, L. D., Laurent, H., Landsverk, J., & Reid, J. (2008). Prevention of behaviour problems for in foster care: Outcomes and mediation effects. Prevention Science, 9, 17–27. https://doi.org/1.1038/jid.2014.371

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Chamberlain, P., & Reid, J. B. (1987). Parent observation and report of child symptoms. Behavioral Assessment, 9, 97–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, L. G. (2007). Assessment of mindful parenting among parents of early adolescents: Development and validation of the interpersonal mindfulness in parenting scale. Unpublished dissertation. The Pennsylvania State University, USA.

  • Fay-stammbach, T., Hawes, D. J., & Meredith, P. (2014). Parenting Influences on Executive Function in Early Childhood: A Review., 8, 258–264. https://doi.org/1.1111/cdep.12095

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, P. A., & Chamberlain, P. (2000). Multidimensional treatment foster care: A program for intensive parenting, family support, and skill building. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 8, 155–164. https://doi.org/1.1177/106342660000800303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, P. A., Frenkel, T. I., Noll, L. K., Berry, M., & Yockelson, M. (2016). Promoting healthy child development via a two-generation translational neuroscience framework: The filming interactions to nurture development video coaching program. Child Dev. Perspect., 10, 251–256. https://doi.org/1.1111/cdep.12195

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Fukkink, R. G. (2008). Video feedback in widescreen: A meta-analysis of family programs. Clinical Psychology Review, 28, 904–916. https://doi.org/1.1016/j.cpr.2008.01.003

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gerstein, E. D., Pedersen, A., & Blacher, J. (2011). Developmental risk and young children’s regulatory strategies: Predicting behavior problems at age five. 351–364.

  • Gioia, G. A., Isquith, P. K., Kenworthy, L., Barton, R. M., Gioia, G. A., Isquith, P. K., & Barton, R. M. (2002). Profiles of everyday executive function in acquired and developmental disorders and developmental disorders. Child Neuropsychology, 8, 121–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giuliani, N. R., Beauchamp, K. G., Noll, L. K., Fisher, P. A., & Sullivan, R. M. (2019). A Preliminary Study Investigating Maternal Neurocognitive Mechanisms Underlying a Child-Supportive Parenting Intervention., 13, 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graaf, I. De, Speetjens, P., & Tavecchio, L. (2008). Effectiveness of the triple p positive parenting program on behavioral problems in children. 714–735.

  • Haskett, M. E., Ahern, L. S., Ward, C. S., & Allaire, J. C. (2006). Factor structure and validity of the parenting stress index-short form. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 35(2), 302–312. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15374424jccp3502_14

  • Hay, D. F., Pawlby, S., Sharp, D., Schmücker, G., Mills, A., Allen, H., & Kumar, R. (1999). Parentsʼ judgements about young childrenʼs problems: Why mothers and fathers might disagree yet still predict later outcomes. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 40(8), 1249–1258. https://doi.org/10.1111/1469-7610.00541

  • Hughes, C., & Ensor, R. (2005). Executive function and theory of mind in 2 year olds: A family affair? Developmental Neuropsychology, 28, 645–668.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Innocenti, M. S., Roggman, L. A., & Cook, G. A. (2013). Using the PICCOLO with parents of children with a disability. Infant Mental Health Journal, 34, 307–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jonkman, C. S., Schuengel, C., Oosterman, M., Lindeboom, R., Boer, F., & Lindauer, R. J. L. (2017). Effects of multidimensional treatment foster care for preschoolers (MTFC-P) for young foster children with severe behavioral disturbances. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 26, 1491–1503. https://doi.org/1.1007/s10826-017-0661-4

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Mahone, E. M., & Hoffman, J. (2007). Behavior ratings of executive function among preschoolers with ADHD. Clinical Neuropsychologist, 21, 569–586.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merell, K. W. (1994). Prechool and kindergarten behavior scales. In Clinical Psychology Publishing.

  • Mischel, W., Shoda, Y., & Rodriguez, M. (1989). Delay of gratification in children. Science, 244, 933–938.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ohan, J. L., Leung, D. W., & Johnston, C. (2000). The Parenting Sense of Competence scale: Evidence of a stable factor structure and validity. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Scienc. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 32(4), 251–261.

  • Pears, K. C., Kim, H. K., Fisher, P. A., & Yoerger, K. (2016). Increasing pre-kindergarten early literacy skills in children with developmental disabilities and delays. Journal of School Psychology, 57, 15–27. https://doi.org/1.1016/j.jsp.2016.05.004

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pears, K. C., Kim, H. K., Healey, C. V, Yoerger, K., & Fisher, P. A. (2015). Improving child self-regulation and parenting in families of pre-kindergarten children with developmental disabilities and behavioral difficulties. 222–232.

  • Peth-Pierce, R. (2000). A good beginning: Sending America’s children to school with the social and emotional competence they need to succeed. 1–33. Retrieved from http://www.nimh.nih.gov/childhp/fdnconsb.html

  • Price, J. M., Chamberlain, P., Landsverk, J., Reid, J., & Price, J. M. (2009). KEEP foster-parent training intervention: Model description and effectiveness. 233–242.

  • Price, J. M., Roesch, S., & Walsh, N. E. (2015). Effects of the KEEP foster parent intervention on child and sibling behavior problems and parental stress during a randomized implementation trial. 685–695. https://doi.org/1.1007/s11121-014-0532-9

  • Reed, M., Pien, D., & Rothbart, M. (1984). Inhibitory self-control in preschool children. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 30, 131–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, C., Mazzucchelli, T., Taylor, K., & Reid, R. (2003). Early intervention for behaviour problems in young children with developmental disabilities. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 50, 275–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal, R. (1979). The “file drawer problem” and tolerance for null results. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 638–641.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singer, G., Ethridge, B., & Aldana, S. (2007). Primary and secondary effects of parenting and stress management interventions for parents of children with developmental disabilities: A meta-analysis. Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews, 13, 357–369. https://doi.org/1.1002/mrdd.20175

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Skotarczak, L., & Lee, G. K. (2015). Research in developmental disabilities effects of parent management training programs on disruptive behavior for children with a developmental disability: A meta-analysis. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 38, 272–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Squires, J., Bricker, D., & Twombly, E. (2002). Ages and stages questionnaires: Social emotional. Baltimore: Brookes.

  • Stovall, K. C., & Dozier, M. (2000). The development of attachment in new relationships: Single subject analyses for 10 foster infants. Development and Psychopathology, 12, 133–156.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, J. C. (1971). KRISP (Kansas Kefiection-Impulsivity Scale for Preschoolers). University of Kansas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zelazo, P. D. (2006). The Dimensional Change Card Sort (DCCS): A method of assessing executive function in children. Nature Protocols, 1, 297–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

Funding for this work was provided under R01HD075716 from the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health & Human Development.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marlee R. Salisbury.

Ethics declarations

Ethical Approval

All procedures involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Consent to Participate

Informed consent/assent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Disclaimer

The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 18 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Salisbury, M.R., Roos, L.E., Horn, S.R. et al. The Effectiveness of KEEP for Families of Children with Developmental Delays: Integrating FIND Video Coaching into Parent Management Training—Oregon Model: a Randomized Trial. Prev Sci 23, 1029–1040 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-022-01344-w

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-022-01344-w

Keywords

Navigation