Abstract
Motivational interviewing (MI) is a therapeutic style in which a provider elicits client motivation and helps strengthen commitment to change (Miller and Rollnick 2002). The original Family Check-Up (FCU; Dishion and Stormshak 2007)—and the adapted version for improving health behaviors in primary care, the Family Check-Up 4 Health (FCU4Health; Smith et al. 2018a)—are brief, assessment-driven, and family-centered preventive interventions that use MI to improve parent engagement in services to improve parenting and prevent negative child outcomes. This study examines the role of MI in the Raising Healthy Children project, a randomized trial to test the effectiveness of the FCU4Health for the prevention of obesity in pediatric primary care, with data from the 141 families assigned to receive the FCU4Health. Families were eligible for the study if the child was between 5.5 and 12 years of age at the time of identification and had a BMI ≥ 85th percentile for age and gender at the most recent visit to their primary care provider. MI skills at the first session predicted caregiver in-session active engagement, attendance at follow-up parenting sessions, and improvements in motivation to address child health and behavior goals. Baseline characteristics of the family (i.e., child health diagnosis, caregiver baseline depression, motivation, and Spanish language preference) had differential associations with responsiveness and MI skills. This study has implications for program development, provider training, and fidelity monitoring.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alegría, M., Canino, G., Ríos, R., Vera, M., Calderón, J., Rusch, D., & Ortega, A. N. (2002). Mental health care for Latinos: inequalities in use of specialty mental health services among Latinos, African Americans, and Non-Latino Whites. Psychiatric Services, 53(12), 1547–1555.
Añez, L. M., Silva, M. A., Paris, M., & Bedregal, L. E. (2008). Engaging Latinos through the integration of cultural values and motivational interviewing principles. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 39(2), 153–159.
Baker, C. N., Arnold, D. H., & Meagher, S. (2011). Enrollment and attendance in a parent training prevention program for conduct problems. Prevention Science, 12(2), 126–138.
Baydar, N., Reid, M. J., & Webster-Stratton, C. (2003). The role of mental health factors and program engagement in the effectiveness of a preventive parenting program for Head Start mothers. Child Development, 74(5), 1433–1453.
Berkel, C., Mauricio, A. M., Sandler, I. N., Wolchik, S. A., Gallo, C. G., & Brown, C. H. (2018). The cascading effects of multiple dimensions of implementation on program outcomes: a test of a theoretical model. Prevention Science, 19(6), 782–794.
Berkel, C., Mauricio, A. M., Schoenfelder, E., & Sandler, I. N. (2011). Putting the pieces together: an integrated model of program implementation. Prevention Science, 12(1), 23–33.
Berkel, C., Rudo-Stern, J., Abraczinskas, M., Wilson, C., Lokey, F., Flanigan, E., Villamar, J. A., Dishion, T. J., & Smith, J. D. (2020). Translating evidence-based parenting programs for primary care: Stakeholder recommendations for sustainable implementation. Journal of Community Psychology, 48(4), 1178–1193. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcop.22317.
Brennan, L. M., Shelleby, E. C., Shaw, D. S., Gardner, F., Dishion, T. J., & Wilson, M. (2013). Indirect effects of the family check-up on school-age academic achievement through improvements in parenting in early childhood. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(3), 762–773.
Brewis, A. A. (2014). Stigma and the perpetuation of obesity. Social Science & Medicine, 118, 152–158.
Caruthers, A. S., Van Ryzin, M. J., & Dishion, T. J. (2014). Preventing high-risk sexual behavior in early adulthood with family interventions in adolescence: outcomes and developmental processes. Prevention Science, 15(1), S59–S69.
Chiapa, A., Smith, J. D., Kim, H., Dishion, T. J., Shaw, D. S., & Wilson, M. N. (2015). The trajectory of fidelity in a multiyear trial of the Family Check-Up predicts change in child problem behavior. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 83(5), 1006–1011.
DiClemente, C. C., Corno, C. M., Graydon, M. M., Wiprovnick, A. E., & Knoblach, D. J. (2017). Motivational interviewing, enhancement, and brief interventions over the last decade: a review of reviews of efficacy and effectiveness. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 31(8), 862–887.
Dillman Carpentier, F., Mauricio, A. M., Gonzales, N. A., Millsap, R. E., Meza, C. M., Dumka, L. E., Germán, M., & Genalo, M. T. (2007). Engaging Mexican origin families in a school-based preventive intervention. Journal of Primary Prevention, 28(6), 521–546.
Dishion, T. J., Nelson, S. E., & Kavanagh, K. A. (2003). The Family Check-Up with high-risk young adolescents: Preventing early-onset substance use by parent monitoring. Behavior Therapy, 34(4), 553–571.
Dishion, T. J., Shaw, D., Connell, A., Gardner, F., Weaver, C., & Wilson, M. (2008). The Family Check-Up with high-risk indigent families: Preventing problem behavior by increasing parents’ positive behavior support in early childhood. Child Development, 79(5), 1395–1414.
Dishion, T. J., Smith, J. D., Knutson, N., Brauer, L., Gill, A., & Risso, J. (2014). Family Check-Up: COACH ratings manual. Version 2. Unpublished coding manual. Available from the Child and Family Center, 6217 University of Oregon, Eugene, OR 97403.
Dishion, T. J., & Stormshak, E. A. (2007). Interventions with children and adolescents intervening in children’s lives: an ecological, family-centered approach to mental health care (pp. 141–61, Chapter x, 319 Pages). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Dishion, T. J., Stormshak, E. A., & Kavanagh, K. (2011). Everyday parenting: a professional’s guide to building family management skills. Champaign, IL: Research Press.
Downey, G., & Coyne, J. C. (1990). Children of depressed parents: an integrative review. Psychological Bulletin, 108(1), 50–76.
Durlak, J., & DuPre, E. (2008). Implementation matters: a review of research on the influence of implementation on program outcomes and the factors affecting implementation. American Journal of Community Psychology, 41(3–4), 327–350.
Enders, C. K., & Bandalos, D. L. (2001). The relative performance of full information maximum likelihood estimation for missing data in structural equation models. Structural Equation Modeling, 8(3), 430–457. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15328007sem0803_5.
Farnesi, B.-C., Perez, A., Holt, N. L., Morrison, K. M., Gokiert, R., Legault, L., Chanoine, J.-P., Sharma, A. M., & Ball, G. D. C. (2019). Continued attendance for paediatric weight management: a multicentre, qualitative study of parents’ reasons and facilitators. Clinical Obesity, 0, 0, e12304.
Fosco, G. M., Van Ryzin, M., Stormshak, E. A., & Dishion, T. J. (2014). Putting theory to the test: examining family context, caregiver motivation, and conflict in the Family Check-Up model. Development and Psychopathology, 26(2), 305–318.
Hu, L.-t., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1–55.
Kimber, M., Barac, R., & Barwick, M. (2017). Monitoring fidelity to an evidence-based treatment: practitioner perspectives. Clinical Social Work Journal.
Knight, G. P., Berkel, C., Carlo, G., & Basilio, C. (2011). The socialization of culturally related values and the mental health outcomes of Latino youth. In N. J. Cabrera & F. A. Villarruel (Eds.), Latina and Latino children’s mental health: prevention and treatment (pp. 109–131). Westport, CT: Praeger Press.
Kohn, R., Saxena, S., Levav, I., & Saraceno, B. (2004). The treatment gap in mental health care. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 82(11), 858–866.
Kwan, B. M., & Nease, D. E., Jr. (2013). The state of the evidence for integrated behavioral health in primary care. In M. R. Talen & A. Burke Valeras (Eds.), Integrated behavioral health in primary care: evaluating the evidence, identifying the essentials (pp. 65-98, Chapter xxiii, 354 Pages). New York, NY: Springer Science + Business Media.
Livingston, J. D., Milne, T., Fang, M. L., & Amari, E. (2012). The effectiveness of interventions for reducing stigma related to substance use disorders: a systematic review. Addiction, 107(1), 39–50.
Mauricio, A. M., Gonzales, N. A., & Sandler, I. N. (2018). Preventive parenting interventions: advancing conceptualizations of participation and enhancing reach. Prevention Science, 19(5), 603–608.
Miller, W. R., & Rollnick, S. (2002). Motivational interviewing: preparing people for change (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford Press.
Miller, W. R., & Rollnick, S. (2009). Ten things that motivational interviewing is not. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 37(2), 129–140.
Miller, W. R., Sovereign, R. G., & Krege, B. (1988). Motivational interviewing with problem drinkers: II. The Drinker’s Check-up as a preventive intervention. Behavioural Psychotherapy, 16(4), 251–268.
Miller, W. R., Zweben, A., DiClemente, C. C., & Rychtarik, R. (1992). Motivational enhancement therapy manual. (DHHS Publication No. ADM 92–1894). Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.
Moreno, J. P., Kelley, M. L., Landry, D. N., Paasch, V., Terlecki, M. A., Johnston, C. A., & Foreyt, J. P. (2011). Development and validation of the Family Health Behavior Scale. International Journal of Pediatric Obesity, 6, 2 Part 2, e480–e6.
Muthén, B. O., & Muthén, L. K. (2018). Mplus, Version 8.1. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
O'Connell, M. E., Boat, T., & Warner, K. E. (Eds.). (2009). Preventing mental, emotional, and behavioral disorders among young people: progress and possibilities. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press.
Pakpour, A. H., Gellert, P., Dombrowski, S. U., & Fridlund, B. (2015). Motivational interviewing with parents for obesity: an RCT. Pediatrics, 135(3), e644–ee52.
Prochaska, J. O., & DiClemente, R. J. (1983). Towards an integrative model of change. Journal of Consulting & Clinical Psychology, 51, 390–395.
Puhl, R. M., Peterson, J. L., & Luedicke, J. (2011). Parental perceptions of weight terminology that providers use with youth. Pediatrics, 128, e786–ee93.
Radloff, L. S. (1977). The CES-D scale: a self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Applied Psychological Measurement, 1, 385–401.
Resnicow, K., Baskin, M. L., Rahotep, S. S., Periasamy, S., & Rollnick, S. (2004). Motivational interviewing in health promotion and behavioral medicine. In W. M. Cox & E. Klinger (Eds.), Handbook of motivational counseling: concepts, approaches, and assessment (pp. 457-76, Chapter xxii, 515 Pages): John Wiley & Sons Ltd, New York, NY.
Resnicow, K., McMaster, F., Bocian, A., Harris, D., Zhou, Y., Snetselaar, L., Schwartz, R., Myers, E., Gotlieb, J., Foster, J., Hollinger, D., Smith, K., Woolford, S., Mueller, D., & Wasserman, R. C. (2015). Motivational interviewing and dietary counseling for obesity in primary care: an RCT. Pediatrics, 135(4), 649–657.
Smith, J. D., Berkel, C., Hails, K. A., Dishion, T. J., Shaw, D. S., & Wilson, M. N. (2018c). Predictors of participation in the Family Check-Up program: a randomized trial of yearly services from age 2 to 10 years. Prevention Science, 19, 5 (Special issue on participation in preventive interventions: advancing conceptualization and theoretical models), 652-62.
Smith, J. D., Berkel, C., Jordan, N., Atkins, D. C., Narayanan, S. S., Gallo, C., Grimm, K. J., Dishion, T. J., Mauricio, A. M., Rudo-Stern, J., Meachum, M. K., Winslow, E., & Bruening, M. M. (2018b). An individually tailored family-centered intervention for pediatric obesity in primary care: study protocol of a randomized type II hybrid effectiveness–implementation trial (Raising Healthy Children study). Implementation Science, 13(1), 1–15.
Smith, J. D., Berkel, C., Rudo-Stern, J., Montaño, Z., St. George, S. M., Prado, G., Mauricio, A. M., Chiapa, A., Bruening, M. M., & Dishion, T. J. (2018a). The Family Check-Up 4 Health (FCU4Health): pplying implementation science frameworks to the process of adapting an evidence-based parenting program for prevention of pediatric obesity and excess weight gain in primary care. Frontiers in Public Health, 6(293), 1–17.
Smith, J. D., Dishion, T. J., Brown, K., Ramos, K., Knoble, N. B., Shaw, D. S., & Wilson, M. N. (2016). An experimental study of procedures to enhance ratings of fidelity to an evidence-based family intervention. Prevention Science, 17(1), 62–70.
Smith, J. D., Dishion, T. J., Shaw, D. S., & Wilson, M. N. (2013). Indirect effects of fidelity to the Family Check-Up on changes in parenting and early childhood problem behaviors. Journal of Consulting & Clinical Psychology, 81(6), 962–974.
Smith, J. D., Montaño, Z., Dishion, T. J., Shaw, D. S., & Wilson, M. N. (2015). Preventing weight gain and obesity: indirect effects of a family-based intervention in early childhood. Prevention Science, 16, 408–419.
Smith, J. D., Rudo-Stern, J., Dishion, T. J., Stormshak, E. A., Montag, S., Brown, K., Ramos, K., Shaw, D. S., & Wilson, M. N. (2019). Effectiveness and efficiency of observationally assessing fidelity to a family-centered child intervention: a quasi-experimental study. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, 48(1), 16–28.
Preventive Services Task Force, U. S. (2017). Screening for obesity in children and adolescents: US Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. JAMA, 317(23), 2417–2426.
Van Ryzin, M. J., & Nowicka, P. (2013). Direct and indirect effects of a family-based intervention in early adolescence on parent−youth relationship quality, late adolescent health, and early adult obesity. Journal of Family Psychology, 27(1), 106–116.
Winter, C., & Dishion, T. J. (2007). Parent consultant log. Child and Family Center, University of Oregon. Eugene, OR.
Funding
This study was supported by the National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (U18 DP006255; Berkel and Smith).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
Berkel and Smith co-developed the Family Check-Up 4 Health program with Thomas Dishion, developer of the original Family Check-Up.
Ethical Approval
This trial was designed in accordance with the basic ethical principles of autonomy, beneficence, justice, and non-maleficence and conducted in accordance with the rules of Good Clinical Practice outlined in the most recent Declaration of Helsinki. The project was approved by the Institutional Review Boards of Arizona State University (Protocol 00004530) and Phoenix Children’s Hospital (Protocol 17-001). All other institutions participating in this research provided signed reliance agreements ceding to the IRB of Arizona State University.
Informed Consent
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Berkel, C., Mauricio, A.M., Rudo-Stern, J. et al. Motivational Interviewing and Caregiver Engagement in the Family Check-Up 4 Health. Prev Sci 22, 737–746 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-020-01112-8
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-020-01112-8