Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Reciprocal Relations between Coalition Functioning and the Provision of Implementation Support

  • Published:
Prevention Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Community coalitions have been promoted as a strategy to help overcome challenges to the dissemination and implementation of evidence-based prevention programs. This paper explores the characteristics of coalitions that enable the provision of implementation support for prevention programs in general and for the implementation of evidence-based prevention programs with fidelity. Longitudinal cross-lagged panel models were used to study 74 Communities That Care (CTC) coalitions in Pennsylvania. These analyses provide evidence of a unidirectional influence of coalition functioning on the provision of implementation support. Coalition member knowledge of the CTC model best predicted the coalition’s provision of support for evidence-based program implementation with fidelity. Implications for developing and testing innovative methods for delivering training and technical assistance to enhance coalition member knowledge are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arthur, M. W., Hawkins, D. J., Catalano, R. F., & Olson, J. J. (1998). Diffusion project: Fall 1998 community key informant interview. Seattle: University of Washington, Social Development Research Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, L. D., Feinberg, M. E., & Greenberg, M. T. (2010). Determinants of community coalition ability to support evidence-based programs. Prevention Science, 11, 287–297. doi:10.1007/s11121-010-0173-6.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, L. D., Feinberg, M. E., & Greenberg, M. T. (2012). Measuring coalition functioning: Refining constructs through factor analysis. Health Education & Behavior, 39, 486–497. doi:10.1177/1090198111419655.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, E. C., Hawkins, J. D., Rhew, I. C., Shapiro, V. B., Abbott, R. D., Oesterle, S., et al. (2013). Prevention system mediation of Communities That Care effects on youth outcomes. Prevention Science, Online First.. doi:10.1007/s11121-013-0413-7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buller, D. B., Young, W. F., Bettinghaus, E. P., Borland, R., Walther, J. B., Helme, D., et al. (2011). Continued benefits of a technical assistance web site to local tobacco control coalitions during a state budget shortfall. Journal of Public Health Management and Practice, 17(2), E10–E19. doi:10.1097/PHH.0b013e3181df7f6c.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Butterfoss, F. D. (2007). Coalitions and partnerships in community health. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butterfoss, F. D., & Kegler, M. (2002). Toward a comprehensive understanding of community coalitions: Moving from practice to theory. In R. J. DiClemente, R. A. Crosby, & M. Kegler (Eds.), Emerging theories in health promotion practice and research: Strategies for improving health (pp. 157–193). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butterfoss, F. D., Goodman, R. M., & Wandersman, A. (1993). Community coalitions for prevention and health promotion. Health Education Research, 8, 315–330.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Durlak, J. A., & DuPre, E. P. (2008). Implementation matters: A review of research on the influence of implementation on program outcomes and the factors affecting implementation. American Journal of Community Psychology, 41, 327–350.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fagan, A. A., Hanson, K., Hawkins, J. D., & Arthur, M. W. (2008). Bridging science to practice: Achieving prevention program implementation fidelity in the Community Youth Development Study. American Journal of Community Psychology, 41, 235–249.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Feinberg, M. E., Greenberg, M. T., Osgood, D. W., Anderson, A., & Babinski, L. (2002). The effects of training community leaders in prevention science: Communities That Care in Pennsylvania. Evaluation and Program Planning, 25, 245–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feinberg, M. E., Bontempo, D., & Greenberg, M. T. (2008a). Predictors and level of sustainability of community prevention coalitions. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 34, 495–501.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Feinberg, M. E., Gomez, B., Puddy, R. W., & Greenberg, M. T. (2008b). Evaluation and community prevention coalitions: Validation of an integrated web-based/technical assistance consultant model. Health Education and Behavior, 35, 9–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Feinberg, M. E., Ridenour, T. A., & Greenberg, M. T. (2008c). The longitudinal effect of technical assistance dosage on the functioning of Communities That Care prevention boards in Pennsylvania. Journal of Primary Prevention, 29, 145–165.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Feinberg, M. E., Jones, D., Greenberg, M. T., Osgood, D. W., & Bontempo, D. (2010). Effects of the Communities That Care model in Pennsylvania on change in adolescent risk and problem behaviors. Prevention Science, 11, 163–171.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Finkel, S. E. (1995). Causal analysis with panel data. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fixsen, D. L., Naoom, S. F., Blase, K. A., Friedman, R. M., & Wallace, F. (2005). Implementation research: A synthesis of the literature. Tampa, FL: University of South Florida.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flewelling, R. L., Austin, D., Hale, K., LaPlante, M., Liebig, M., Piasecki, L., et al. (2005). Implementing research-based substance abuse prevention in communities: Effects of a coalition-based prevention initiative in Vermont. Journal of Community Psychology, 33, 333–353. doi:10.1002/jcop.20052.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foster-Fishman, P. G., Berkowitz, S. L., Lounsbury, D. W., Jacobson, S., & Allen, N. A. (2001). Building collaborative capacity in community coalitions: A review and integrative framework. American Journal of Community Psychology, 29, 241–261.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gomez, B., Greenberg, M. T., & Feinberg, M. E. (2005). Sustainability of community coalitions: An evaluation of communities that care. Prevention Science, 6, 199–202.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, M. T., Feinberg, M. E., Meyer-Chilenski, S., Spoth, R. L., & Redmond, C. (2007). Community and team member factors that influence the early phase functioning of community prevention teams: The PROSPER project. Journal of Primary Prevention, 28, 485–504.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Haggerty, K. P., Skinner, M. L., MacKenzie, E. P., & Catalano, R. F. (2007). A randomized trial of Parents Who Care: Effects on key outcomes at 24-month follow-up. Prevention Science, 8, 249–260. doi:10.1007/s11121-007-0077-2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hallfors, D., Hyunsan, C., Livert, D., & Kadushin, C. (2002). Fighting back against substance abuse: Are community coalitions winning? American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 23, 237–245.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hardy, K. V., Moore, M., Rose, D., Bennett, R., Jackson‐Lane, C., Gause, M., et al. (2011). Filling the implementation gap: A community–academic partnership approach to early intervention in psychosis. Early Intervention in Psychiatry, 5, 366–374. doi:10.1111/j.1751-7893.2011.00310.x.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins, J. D., Catalano, R. F., & Arthur, M. W. (2002). Promoting science-based prevention in communities. Addictive Behaviors, 27, 951–976.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins, J. D., Oesterle, S., Brown, E. C., Monahan, K. C., Abbott, R. D., Arthur, M. W., et al. (2012). Sustained decreases in risk exposure and youth problem behaviors after installation of the Communities That Care prevention system in a randomized trial. Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine, 166, 141–148. doi:10.1001/archpediatrics.2011.183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, K., Hays, C., Center, H., & Daley, C. (2004). Building capacity and sustainable prevention innovations: A sustainability planning model. Evaluation and Program Planning, 27, 135–149. doi:10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2004.01.002.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, K. M., Wickstrom, K. F., & Friman, P. C. (1997). The effects of observational feedback on treatment integrity in school-based behavioral consultation. School Psychology Quarterly, 12, 316–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kegler, M. C., & Swan, D. W. (2011). An initial attempt at operationalizing and testing the community coalition action theory. Health Education & Behavior, 38, 261–270. doi:10.1177/1090198110372875.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kegler, M. C., Steckler, A., McLeroy, K., & Malek, S. H. (1998). Factors that contribute to effective community health promotion coalitions: A study of ten Project ASSIST coalitions in North Carolina. Health Education and Behavior, 25, 338–353.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lasker, R. D., & Weiss, E. S. (2000). An overview of the purpose, content, and psychometric properties of the Questionnaire for Individual Partners. New York: Center for the Advancement of Collaborative Strategies in Health.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lasker, R. D., & Weiss, E. S. (2003). Broadening participation in community problem solving: A multidisciplinary model to support collaborative practice and research. Journal of Urban Health, 80, 14–47.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Moos, R. H. (2002). Group environment scale manual: Development, applications, research (3rd ed.). Menlo Park, CA: Mind Garden.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Center for Educational Statistics. (2012). Poverty status of families by school district 2005 to 2009. Retreived from: http://nces.ed.gov/surveys/sdds/acs09/acsdownload.aspx.

  • O’Malley, A. J., Landon, B. E., & Guadagnoli, E. (2007). Analyzing multiple informant data from an evaluation of the Health Disparities Collaboratives. Health Services Research, 42, 146–164. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6773.2006.00597.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Perkins, D. F., Feinberg, M. E., Greenberg, M. T., Johnson, L. E., Chilenski, S. M., Mincemoyer, C. C., et al. (2011). Team factors that predict to sustainability indicators for community-based prevention teams. Evaluation and Program Planning, 34, 283–291. doi:10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2010.10.003.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rhew, I. C., Brown, E. C., Hawkins, J. D., & Briney, J. S. (2013). Sustained effects of Communities That Care on prevention service system transformation. American Journal of Public Health, 103, 529–535.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rhoades, B. L., Bumbarger, B. K., & Moore, J. E. (2012). The role of a state-level prevention support system in promoting high-quality implementation and sustainability of evidence-based programs. American Journal of Community Psychology, 50, 386–401. doi:10.1007/s10464-012-9502-1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Riggs, N. R., Nakawatase, M., & Pentz, M. A. (2008). Promoting community coalition functioning: Effects of Project STEP. Prevention Science, 9, 63–72. doi:10.1007/s11121-008-0088-7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Roussos, S. T., & Fawcett, S. B. (2000). A review of collaborative partnerships as a strategy for improving community health. Annual Review of Public Health, 21, 369–402.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, V. B., Oesterle, S., Abbott, R. D., Arthur, M. W., & Hawkins, J. D. (2013). Measuring dimensions of coalition functioning for effective and participatory community practice. Social Work Research. doi:10.1093/swr/svt028.

  • Spoth, R. L., Guyll, M., Lillehoj, C. J., Redmond, C., & Greenberg, M. T. (2007). Prosper study of evidence-based intervention implementation quality by community-university partnerships. Journal of Community Psychology, 35, 981–999.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Spoth, R. L., Greenberg, M. T., & Turrisi, R. (2008). Preventive interventions addressing underage drinking: State of the evidence and steps toward public health impact. Pediatrics, 121, S311–S336.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Spoth, R., Redmond, C., Shin, C., Greenberg, M., Feinberg, M., & Schainker, L. (2013). Longitudinal effects of universal PROSPER community–university partnership delivery system effects on substance misuse through 6 1/2 years past baseline from a cluster randomized controlled intervention trial. Preventive Medicine, 56, 190–196.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stuart, E. A., Marcus, S. M., Horvitz-Lennon, M. V., Gibbons, R. D., Normand, S.-L. T., & Brown, C. H. (2009). Using non-experimental data to estimate treatment effects. Psychiatric Annals, 39, 719–728. doi:10.3928/00485713-20090625-07.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wandersman, A., Duffy, J., Flaspohler, P., Noonan, R., Lubell, K., Stillman, L., et al. (2008). Bridging the gap between prevention research and practice: The interactive systems framework for dissemination and implementation. American Journal of Community Psychology, 37, 171–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wothke, W. (2000). Longitudinal and multi-group modeling with missing data. In T. D. Little, K. U. Schnabel, & J. Baumert (Eds.), Modeling longitudinal and multilevel data: Practical issues, applied approaches, and specific examples. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zakocs, R. C., & Edwards, E. M. (2006). What explains community coalition effectiveness? A review of the literature. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 30, 351–361.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zakocs, R. C., & Guckenburg, S. (2007). What coalition factors foster community capacity? Lessons learned from the fighting back initiative. Health Education & Behavior, 34, 354–375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research is supported by a grant from the National Institute of Drug Abuse (R03DA027942) and the Pennsylvania Commission for Crime and Delinquency (PCCD). Additionally, this article is supported in part by the National Cancer Institute through a Community Networks Program Center grant U54 CA153505. Findings and recommendations herein are not official statements of the NIDA, PCCD, or NCI. The authors acknowledge the enthusiastic support of Michael Pennington, Ruth Williams, Douglas Hoffman, Raymond Moneta, and Clay R. Yeager at PCCD. We are also grateful for the cooperation of the state-funded Communities That Care (CTC) technical assistance providers and the many CTC coalition members in Pennsylvania

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Louis D. Brown.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Brown, L.D., Feinberg, M.E., Shapiro, V.B. et al. Reciprocal Relations between Coalition Functioning and the Provision of Implementation Support. Prev Sci 16, 101–109 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-013-0447-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-013-0447-x

Keywords

Navigation