Abstract
To test the assumption embedded in state-of-the-art, community assessment and decision-making regarding prevention of underage drinking: that there is minimal variation in the way that risk and protective factors (RPF) are associated with underage drinking across communities. Three large datasets provided the same measures of adolescent alcohol use and RPFs. Multilevel ordered-logistic regression models were carried out separately for each dataset and separately for males and females in 8th and 10th grades, testing random slopes for each RPF index. Predicted school-level coefficients were derived from these models, representing the association between RPFs and alcohol use. The variation in associations between RPFs and alcohol use across schools was greatest for antisocial peer risk and community protection; the lowest variation across schools was found for family cohesion and individual antisocial behavior. Ranges in predicted coefficients indicate large differences across schools for many RPFs. Bivariate correlations indicated that school-level associations vary across RPFs in expected directions. Policy makers should recognize that the magnitude of associations between RPFs and adolescent alcohol use vary considerably across communities, and that such variability is greater for certain RPFs than others. These findings have implications for policies regarding how prevention resources are targeted within and across communities.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Agresti, A. (2002). Categorical data analysis (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley.
Allison, K. W., Crawford, I., Leone, P. E., Trickett, E., Perez-Febles, A., & Burton, L. M. (1999). Adolescent substance use: Preliminary examinations of school and neighborhood context. American Journal of Community Psychology, 27, 111–141.
Andreas, J. B., & Watson, M. (2010). Etiology of adolescent substance use: Neighborhood effects on initiation. European Psychiatry, 25, 427.
Arthur, M. W., Hawkins, J. D., Pollard, J. A., Catalano, R. F., & Baglinoi, A. J., Jr. (2002). Measuring risk and protective factors for substance use, delinquency, and other adolescent problem behaviors: The Communities That Care Youth Survey. Evaluation Review, 26, 575–601.
Beyers, J. M., Loeber, R., Wikström, P.-O. H., & Stouthamer-Loeber, M. (2001). What predicts adolescent violence in better-off neighborhoods? Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 29, 369–381.
Biglan, A., Ary, D., & Wagenaar, A. C. (2000). The value of interrupted time-series experiments for community intervention research. Prevention Science, 1, 31–49.
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1986). Ecology of the family as a context for human development: Research perspectives. Developmental Psychology, 22, 723–742.
Brooks-Gunn, J., Duncan, G., & Aber, J. L. (1997). Neighborhood poverty I: Context and consequences for children. New York: Russell Sage.
Chuang, Y.-C., Ennett, S. T., Bauman, K. E., & Foshee, V. A. (2009). Relationships of adolescents’ perceptions of parental and peer behaviors with cigarette and alcohol use in different neighborhood contexts. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 38, 1388–1398.
Cleveland, M. J., Feinberg, M. E., & Greenberg, M. T. (2010). Protective families in high-and low-risk environments: Implications for adolescent substance use. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 39, 114–126.
Ennett, S. T., & Haws, S. (2010). The school context of adolescent substance use. In L. M. Scheier (Ed.), Handbook of drug use etiology: Theory, methods, and empirical findings (pp. 443–459). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Ennett, S. T., Flewelling, R. L., Lindrooth, R. C., & Norton, E. C. (1997). School and neighborhood characteristics associated with school rates of alcohol, cigarette, and marijuana use. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 38, 55–71.
Ennett, S. T., Foshee, V. A., Bauman, K. E., Hussong, A., Cai, L., Luz, H., et al. (2008). The social ecology of adolescent alcohol misuse. Child Development, 79, 1777–1791.
Fagan, A. A., Van Horn, M. L., Hawkins, J. D., & Arthur, J. D. (2007). Using community and family risk and protective factors for community-based prevention planning. Journal of Community Psychology, 35, 535–555.
Feinberg, M. E. (2012). Community epidemiology of risk and adolescent substance use: Practical questions for enhancing prevention. American Journal of Public Health, 102(3), 457–468.
Feinberg, M. E., Greenberg, M. T., Osgood, D. W., Anderson, A., & Babinski, L. (2002). The effects of training community leaders in prevention science: Communities That Care in Pennsylvania. Evaluation and Program Planning, 25, 245–259.
Feinberg, M. E., Greenberg, M. T., & Osgood, D. W. (2004a). Readiness, functioning, and perceived effectiveness of community prevention coalitions: A study of Communities That Care. American Journal of Community Psychology, 33, 163–176.
Feinberg, M. E., Greenberg, M. T., & Osgood, D. W. (2004b). Technical assistance in prevention programs: Correlates of perceived need in Communities That Care. Evaluation and Program Planning, 27, 263–274.
Feinberg, M. E., Greenberg, M. T., Osgood, D. W., Sartorius, J., & Bontempo, D. (2007a). Effects of the Communities That Care model in Pennsylvania on youth risk and problem behaviors. Prevention Science, 8, 261–270.
Feinberg, M. E., Ridenour, T. A., & Greenberg, M. T. (2007b). Aggregating indices of risk and protection for adolescent behavior problems: The Communities That Care Youth Survey. Journal of Adolescent Health, 40, 516–537.
Feinberg, M. E., Bontempo, D. E., & Greenberg, M. T. (2008). Predictors and level of sustainability of community prevention coalitions. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 34, 495–501.
Feinberg, M. E., Jones, D., Greenberg, M. T., Osgood, W., & Bontempo, D. (2010). Effects of the Communities That Care model in Pennsylvania on change in youth risk and problem behaviors. Prevention Science, 11, 163–171.
Foshee, V. A., Ennett, S. T., Bauman, K. E., Granger, D. A., Benefield, T., Suchindran, C., et al. (2009). A test of biosocial models of adolescent cigarette and alcohol involvement. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 27, 4–39.
Gardner, M., Barajas, R. G., & Brooks-Gunn, J. (2010). Neighborhood influences on substance use etiology. In L. M. Scheier (Ed.), Handbook of drug use etiology: Theory, methods, and empirical findings (pp. 423–441). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Glaser, R. R., Van Horn, M. L., Arthur, M. W., Hawkins, J. D., & Catalano, R. F. (2005). Measurement properties of the Communities That Care youth survey across demographic groups. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 21, 73–102.
Hawkins, J. D., & Catalano, R. F., Jr. (1992). Communities That Care: Action for drug abuse prevention. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Hawkins, J. D., Van Horn, M. L., & Arthur, M. W. (2004). Community variation in risk and protective factors and substance use outcomes. Prevention Science, 5, 213–220.
Hawkins, J. D., Brown, E. C., Oesterle, S., Arthur, M. W., Abbott, R. D., & Catalano, R. F. (2007). Early effects of Communities That Care on targeted risks and initiation of delinquent behavior and substance use. Journal of Adolescent Health, 43, 15–22
Hogan, D., & Kitagawa, E. (1985). The impact of social status, family structure, and neighborhood on the fertility of Black adolescents. The American Journal of Sociology, 19, 825–855.
Holder, H. D., Gruenewald, P. J., Ponicki, W. R., Treno, A. J., Grube, J. W., & Saltz, R. F. (2000). Effect of community-based interventions on high-risk drinking and alcohol related injuries. Journal of the American Medical Association, 284, 2341–2347.
Kumar, R., O’Malley, P. M., Johnston, L. D., Schulenberg, J. E., & Bachman, J. G. (2002). Effects of school-level norms on student substance use. Prevention Science, 3, 105–123.
Lee, R. E. C. C. (2002). Neighborhood context and youth cardiovascular health behaviors. American Journal of Public Health, 92, 428–436.
Leventhal, T., & Brooks-Gunn, J. (2000). The neighborhoods they live in: Effects of neighborhood residence on child and adolescent outcomes. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 309–337.
Newcomb, M. D., & Felix-Ortiz, M. (1992). Multiple protective and risk factors for drug use and abuse: Cross-sectional and prospective findings. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 280–296.
Novak, S. P., Reardon, S. F., Raudenbush, S. W., & Buka, S. L. (2006). Retail tobacco outlet density and youth cigarette smoking: A propensity-modeling approach. American Journal of Public Health, 96, 670–676.
Pickett, K. E. (2001). Multilevel analyses of neighbourhood socioeconomic context and health outcomes: A critical review. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 55, 111–122.
Ridenour, T., & Feinberg, M. E. (2007). Using correlational analyses to improve prevention strategies based on survey data from youth. Evaluation and Program Planning, 30, 36–44.
Sampson, R. J., Morenoff, J. D., & Gannon-Rowley, T. (2002a). Assessing neighborhood effects: Social processes and new directions in research. Annual Review of Sociology, 28, 443–478.
Sampson, R. J., Squires, G. D., & Zhou, M. (2002b). How neighborhoods matter: The value of investing at the local level. Washington, DC: American Sociological Association.
Swaim, R. C. (2003). Individual and school level effects of perceived harm, perceived availability and community size on marijuana use among 12th-grade students: A random effects model. Prevention Science, 4, 89–98.
U.S. Department of Education. (2010). Public elementary/secondary school universe survey data:1986—Present. Retrieved October 18, 2011, from http://nces.ed.gov/ccd/pubschuniv.asp.
Wagenaar, A. C. (2000). Communities Mobilizing for Change on Alcohol (CMCA): Effects of a randomized trial on arrests and traffic crashes. Addiction, 95, 209–217.
Wilson, W. J. (1987). The truly disadvantaged: The inner city, the underclass, and public policy. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Acknowledgements
This study was funded by a grant from the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (1R21AA018309-01), Mark E. Feinberg, principal investigator. We thank Jennifer Frank for assistance in processing new data for the revision.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
ESM 1
(DOCX 38 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Feinberg, M.E., Jones, D.E., Cleveland, M.J. et al. The Community Epidemiology of Underage Drinking: Variation Across Communities in Relations of Risk to Alcohol Use. Prev Sci 13, 551–561 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-012-0281-6
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-012-0281-6