Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Psychosocial Mediators of a School-Based Tobacco Prevention Program in India: Results from the First Year of Project MYTRI

  • Published:
Prevention Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Each day in India, an estimated 5,500 youth initiate tobacco use, contributing to predictions that by 2020, tobacco will account for 13% of all deaths in India. Project MYTRI (Mobilizing Youth for Tobacco-Related Initiatives in India) is a multi-component school-based intervention designed to prevent and reduce tobacco use among adolescents in Delhi and Chennai, India. The intervention was implemented over the 2004–2006 school years and involved 6th and 8th grade students in 32 classrooms. Students participated in peer-led classroom activities involving games, competitions, and other activities intended to target a number of psychosocial risk factors believed to prevent tobacco use among urban Indian youth. To more fully understand how Project MYTRI influenced students’ intentions to smoke or chew tobacco, the current study used mediation analysis to investigate whether Project MYTRI altered the psychosocial risk factors as intended, and whether the changes in psychosocial risk factors were, in turn, responsible for altering students’ tobacco-use intentions. Multi-level mediation models were estimated using student data from baseline and 1-year follow-up surveys. Results indicated that the psychosocial risk factors Knowledge of Health Effects, Normative Beliefs, Reasons to Use Tobacco, and Perceived Prevalence were significant mediators between the intervention activities and students’ tobacco use intentions. Evidence of inconsistent mediation was observed for the Perceived Prevalence factor. These findings, combined with those from qualitative research and the second-year student data, will help to illuminate the impact of Project MYTRI on participating youth.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bandura, A. (1998). Health promotion from the perspective of social cognitive theory. Psychology & Health, 13, 623–649. doi:10.1080/08870449808407422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 1–26. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.1.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (2004). Health promotion by social cognitive means. Health Education & Behavior, 31, 143–164. doi:10.1177/1090198104263660.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1182. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Botvin, G. J., Dusenbury, L., Baker, E., James-Ortiz, S., Botvin, E. M., & Kerner, J. (1992). Smoking prevention among urban minority youth: Assessing effects on outcome and mediating variables. Health Psychology, 11, 290–299. doi:10.1037/0278-6133.11.5.290.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Baranowski, T., Perry, C. L., & Parcel, G. S. (1996). How individuals, environments and health behavior interact: Social cognitive theory. In K. Glanz, F. M. Lewis & B. Rimer (Eds.), Health behavior and health education: Theory, research & practice (2nd ed., pp. 246–279). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Botvin, G. J., Griffin, K. W., Diaz, T., Miller, N., & Ifill-Williams, M. (1999). Smoking initiation and escalation in early adolescent girls: One-year follow-up of a school-based prevention intervention for minority youth. Journal of the American Medical Women’s Association, 54, 139–143, 152.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, H. (1990). Theory-driven evaluations. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cuijpers, P. (2002). Effective ingredients of school-based drug prevention programs. A systematic review. Addictive Behaviors, 27, 1009–1023. doi:10.1016/S0306-4603(02)00295-2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson, S. I., Graham, J. W., & Hansen, W. B. (1994). Testing the generalizability of intervening mechanism theories: Understanding the effects of adolescent drug use prevention interventions. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 17, 195–216. doi:10.1007/BF01858105.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson, S. I., Graham, J. W., Piccinin, A. M., & Hansen, W. B. (1995). Resistance-skills training and onset of alcohol use: Evidence for beneficial and potentially harmful effects in public schools and in private Catholic schools. Health Psychology, 14, 291–300. doi:10.1037/0278-6133.14.4.291.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dobbins, M., Decorby, K., Manske, S., & Goldblatt, E. (2008). Effective practices for school-based tobacco use prevention. Preventive Medicine, 46, 289–297.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Global Youth Tobacco Survey Collaborating Group. (2002). Tobacco use among youth: A cross country comparison. Tobacco Control, 11, 252–270. doi:10.1136/tc.11.3.252.

  • Hansen, W. B., & Graham, J. W. (1991). Preventing alcohol, marijuana, and cigarette use among adolescents: Peer pressure resistance training versus establishing conservative norms. Preventive Medicine, 20, 414–430. doi:10.1016/0091-7435(91)90039-7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, W. B., & McNeal Jr., R. B. (1997). How D.A.R.E. works: An examination of program effects on mediating variables. Health Education & Behavior, 24, 165–176. doi:10.1177/109019819702400205.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hahn, G., Charlin, V. L., Sussman, S., Dent, C. W., Manzi, J., Stacy, A. W., et al. (1990). Adolescents’ first and most recent use situations of smokeless tobacco and cigarettes: Similarities and differences. Addictive Behaviors, 15, 439–448. doi:10.1016/0306-4603(90)90030-2.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Judd, C. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1981). Process analysis: Estimating mediation in treatment evaluations. Evaluation Review, 5, 602–619. doi:10.1177/0193841X8100500502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Komro, K. A., Perry, C. L., Williams, C. L., Stigler, M. H., Farbakhsh, K., & Veblen-Mortenson, S. (2001). How did Project Northland reduce alcohol use among young adolescents? Analysis of mediating variables. Health Education Research, 16, 59–70. doi:10.1093/her/16.1.59..

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Littell, R. C., Milliken, G. A., Stroup, W. W., & Wolfinger, R. D. (1996). SAS system for mixed models. Cary, NC: SAS Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacKinnon, D. P. (2008). Introduction to statistical mediation analysis. Mahway, NJ: Erlbaum.

  • MacKinnon, D. P., & Dwyer, J. H. (1993). Estimating mediated effects in prevention studies. Evaluation Review, 17, 144–158. doi:0.1177/0193841X9301700202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacKinnon, D. P., & Lockwood, C. M. (2003). Advances in statistical methods for substance abuse prevention research. Prevention Science, 4, 155–171. doi:10.1023/A:1024649822872.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • MacKinnon, D. P., Johnson, C. A., Pentz, M. A., Dwyer, J. H., Hansen, W. B., Flay, B. R., et al. (1991). Mediating mechanisms in a school-based drug prevention program: First-year effects of the Midwestern Prevention Project. Health Psychology, 10, 164–172. doi:10.1037/0278-6133.10.3.164.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • MacKinnon, D. P., Krull, J. L., & Lockwood, C. M. (2000). Equivalence of the mediation, confounding and suppression effect. Prevention Science, 1, 173–181. doi:10.1023/A:1026595011371.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • MacKinnon, D. P., Lockwood, C. M., Hoffman, J. M., West, S. G., & Sheets, V. (2002a). A comparison of methods to test mediation and other intervening variable effects. Psychological Methods, 7, 83–104. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.7.1.83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • MacKinnon, D. P., Taborga, M. P., & Morgan-Lopez, A. A. (2002b). Mediation designs for tobacco prevention research. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 68, S69–S83. doi:10.1016/S0376-8716(02)00216-8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mishra, A., Arora, M., Stigler, M. H., Komro, K. A., Lytle, L. A., Reddy, K. S., et al. (2005). Indian youth speak about tobacco: Results of focus group discussions with school students. Health Education & Behavior, 32, 363–379. doi:10.1177/1090198104272332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orlando, M., Ellickson, P. L., McCaffrey, D. F., & Longshore, D. L. (2005). Mediation analysis of a school-based drug prevention program: Effects of Project ALERT. Prevention Science, 6, 35–46. doi:10.1007/s11121-005-1251-z.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Perry, C. L., Kelder, S. H., Murray, D. M., & Klepp, K. I. (1992). Communitywide smoking prevention: Long-term outcomes of the Minnesota Heart Health Program and the Class of 1989 Study. American Journal of Public Health, 82, 1210–1216.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Perry, C. L., Williams, C. L., Komro, K. A., Veblen-Mortenson, S., Stigler, M. H., Munson, K. A., et al. (2002). Project Northland: Long-term outcomes of community action to reduce adolescent alcohol use. Health Education Research, 17, 117–132. doi:10.1093/her/17.1.117.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Perry, C. L., Komro, K. A., Veblen-Mortenson, S., Bosma, L. M., Farbakhsh, K., Munson, K. A., et al. (2003). A randomized controlled trial of the middle and junior high school D.A.R.E. and D.A.R.E. Plus programs. Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine, 157, 178–184. doi:10.1001/archpedi.157.8.828.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perry, C. L., Stigler, M. H., Arora, M., & Reddy, K. S. (2006). Prevention in translation: Tobacco use prevention in India. Health Promotion Practice, 9, 378–386.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reddy, K. S., & Gupta, P. C.(2004). Report on Tobacco Control in India. New Delhi: Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India.

  • Reddy, K. S., Arora, M., Perry, C. L., Nair, B., Kohli, A., Lytle, L. A., et al. (2002). Tobacco and alcohol use outcomes of a school-based intervention in New Delhi. American Journal of Health Behavior, 26, 173–181.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Reddy, K. S., Perry, C. L., Stigler, M. H., & Arora, M. (2006). Differences in tobacco use among young people in urban India by sex, socioeconomic status, age, and school grade: Assessment of baseline survey data. Lancet, 367, 589–594. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68225-1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stigler, M. H., Perry, C. L., Arora, M., & Reddy, K. S. (2006). Why are urban Indian 6th graders using more tobacco than 8th graders? Findings from Project MYTRI. Tobacco Control, 15, i54–i60. doi:10.1136/tc.2005.014480.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stigler, M. H., Perry, C. L., Arora, M., Shrivastav, R., Mathur, C., & Reddy, K. S. (2007). Intermediate outcomes from Project MYTRI: Mobilizing youth for tobacco-related initiatives in India. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, 16, 1050–1056. doi:10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-06-0929.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tobler, N. S. (1986). Meta-analysis of 143 adolescent drug prevention programs: Quantitative outcome results of program participants compared to a control or comparison group. Journal of Drug Issues, 16, 537–567.

    Google Scholar 

  • The World Bank.(1999). Curbing the epidemic: Governments and the economics of tobacco control. Washington, D. C.

  • US Department of Health and Human Services.(1994). Preventing tobacco use among young people: A report of the Surgeon General. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Office on Smoking and Health.

  • Wynn, S. R., Schulenberg, J., Maggs, J. L., & Zucker, R. A. (2000). Preventing alcohol misuse: The impact of refusal skills and norms. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 14, 36–47. doi:10.1037/0893-164X.14.1.36.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Warren, C. W., Jones, N. R., Peruga, A., Chauvin, J., Baptiste, J., Costa de Silva, V., et al. (2008). Global Youth Tobacco Surveillance, 2000–2007. MMWR Surveillance Summaries. Morbidity and mortality weekly report, 57, 1–28.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sheri Lewis Bate.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bate, S.L., Stigler, M.H., Thompson, M.S. et al. Psychosocial Mediators of a School-Based Tobacco Prevention Program in India: Results from the First Year of Project MYTRI. Prev Sci 10, 116–128 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-008-0113-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-008-0113-x

Keywords

Navigation