Skip to main content
Log in

Case study of combinatorial imaging: What protocol and what chlorophyll fluorescence image to use when visualizing infection of Arabidopsis thaliana by Pseudomonas syringae?

  • Emerging Techniques
  • Published:
Photosynthesis Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Localized infection of a plant can be mapped by a sequence of images capturing chlorophyll fluorescence transients in actinic light. Choice of the actinic light protocol co-determines fluorescence contrast between infected leaf segment and surrounding healthy tissue. Frequently, biology cannot predict with which irradiance protocol, in which fluorescence image of the sequence, and in which segment of the image there will be the highest contrast between the healthy and infected tissue. Here, we introduce a new technique that can be applied to identify the combination of chlorophyll fluorescence images yielding the highest contrast. The sets of the most contrasting images vary throughout the progress of the infection. Such specific image sets, stress-revealing fluorescence signatures, can be found for the initial and late phases of the infection. Using these signatures, images can be divided into segments that show tissue in different infection phases. We demonstrate the capacity of the algorithm in an investigation of infection of the model plant Arabidopsis thaliana by the bacterium Pseudomonas syringae. We show that the highest contrast is found with transients elicited by fluctuating, harmonically modulated irradiance with long periods.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Although not used in plant physiology, the F 0/F V parameter measured at 692 nm and at −196°C was introduced by Kitajima and Butler (1975) to estimate energy transport from Photosystem II to Photosystem I.

  2. Note that this procedure served only to evaluate the classification performance of a particular image set and not to classify leaf segments.

Abbreviations

A j :

Amplitude of the fundamental harmonic component of the fluorescence transient (j = 0), of the first upper harmonic component (j = 1), and of the second upper harmonic component (j = 2)

C 0 :

Set of pixels with transients of fluorescence from healthy tissue

C 1 :

Set of pixels from healthy tissue after advanced image segmentation

D ab :

Euklidian distance of fluorescence signals in pixels a and b

F a j :

Fluorescence signal in image j, pixel a

F 0 :

Fluorescence emission of a dark-adapted plant

F 0 :

Fluorescence emission of a light adapted plant measured with the primary acceptor Q A oxidized

F M :

Fluorescence emission of a dark-adapted plant

F M(j)′:

Maximum fluorescence emission of a light adapted plant measured during a strong pulse of light(j is the index of the pulse)

F S :

steady-state fluorescence emission

F V = F M − F 0 :

Variable fluorescence measured in dark-adapted plant

F V/F M :

Maximum fluorescence yield of PSII

F p :

Fluorescence in the peak

I 0 :

Set of pixels and fluorescence transients from the half of the leaf that is inoculated with the bacteria

I 1 :

Sub-set of I 0 obtained by elimination of pixels that although from the inoculated leaf do not exhibit symptoms of an infection

k-NN:

k-nearest neighbor classifier

M :

number of erroneous classifications

N :

number of correct classifications

NPQ = (F M − F M(3) )/F M(3) ):

Non-photochemical quenching

P :

Performance of the classifier P = (− M)/(N + M)

PSII:

Photosystem II

Q A , Q B :

Primary and secondary quinone acceptors of PSII

Rfd = (F P − F S)/F S :

Fluorescence decline ratio

SFFS:

Sequentional forward floating search

T :

Period of harmonically modulated actinic light

ΦPSII = (F M(3)  − F S)/F M(3) :

Quantum yield of PSII electron transport measured during the third saturating flash of light

ϕ j :

Phase of the fundamental harmonic component of the fluorescence transient (j = 0), of the first upper harmonic component (j = 1), and of the second upper harmonic component (j = 2)

References

  • Balachandran S, Osmond CB, Daley PF (1994) Diagnosis of the earliest strain-specific interactions between tobacco mosaic-virus and chloroplasts of tobacco-leaves in-vivo by means of chlorophyll fluorescence imaging. Plant Physiol 104(3):1059–1065

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Berger S, Benediktyová Z, Matouš K, Bonfig K, Mueller MJ, Nedbal L, Roitsch T (2006) Visualization of dynamics of plant–pathogen interaction by novel combination of chlorophyll fluorescence imaging and statistical analysis: differential effects of virulent and avirulent strains of P. syringae and of oxylipins on A. thaliana. J Exp Bot. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erl208

  • Chaerle L, Hagenbeek D, De Bruyne E et al (2004) Thermal and chlorophyll-fluorescence imaging distinguish plant–-pathogen interactions at an early stage. Plant Cell Physiol 45(7):887–896

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chaerle L, Van der Straeten D (2001) Seeing is believing: imaging techniques to monitor plant health. Biochim. Biophys. Acta-Gene Struct. Expression 1519(3):153–166

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Codrea CM, Aittokallio T, Keranen M et al (2003) Feature learning with a genetic algorithm for fluorescence fingerprinting of plant species. Pattern Recognit. Lett. 24(15):2663–2673

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fukunaga K (1990) Introduction to statistical pattern recognition. Academic Press, San Diego

    Google Scholar 

  • Govindjee (1995) 63 years since Kautsky - chlorophyll-a fluorescence. Austr J Plant Physiol 22(4):711

    Google Scholar 

  • Horton P, Ruban AV (1992) Regulation of photosystem-II. Photosynth Res 34(3):375–385

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kitajima M, Butler WL (1975) Excitation spectra for photosystem I and photosystem II in chloroplasts and the spectral characteristics of the distributions of quanta between the two photosystems. Biochim. Biophys.Acta 408(3):297–305

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lichtenthaler HK, Babani F (2000) Detection of photosynthetic activity and water stress by imaging the red chlorophyll fluorescence. Plant Physiol Biochem 38(11):889–895

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lichtenthaler HK, Miehe JA (1997) Fluorescence imaging as a diagnostic tool for plant stress. Trends Plant Sci 2(8):316–320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mallick N, Mohn FH (2003) Use of chlorophyll fluorescence in metal-stress research: a case study with the green microalga Scenedesmus. Ecotox Environ Safe 55(1):64–69

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer S, Saccardy-Adji K, Rizza F et al (2001) Inhibition of photosynthesis by Colletotrichum lindemuthianum in bean leaves determined by chlorophyll fluorescence imaging. Plant Cell Environ 24(9):947–955

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nedbal L, Březina V (2002) Complex metabolic oscillations in plants forced by harmonic irradiance. Biophys J 83(4):2180–2189

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nedbal L, Březina V, Adamec F et al (2003) Negative feedback regulation is responsible for the non-linear modulation of photosynthetic activity in plants dynamic light and cyanobacteria exposed to a environment. Biochim Biophys Acta-Bioenerg 1607(1):5–17

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nedbal L, Soukupová J, Kaftan D et al (2000a) Kinetic imaging of chlorophyll fluorescence using modulated light. Photosynth Res 66(1-2):3–12

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nedbal L, Soukupová J, Whitmarsh J et al (2000b) Postharvest imaging of chlorophyll fluorescence from lemons can be used to predict fruit quality. Photosynthetica 38(4):571–579

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nedbal L, Whitmarsh J (2004) Chlorophyll fluorescence imaging of leaves and fruits. In: Papageorgiu G, Govindjee (eds) Chlorophyll a fluorescence: a signature of photosynthesis. Springer, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Pudil P, Novovicová J, Kittler J (1994) Floating search methods in feature-selection. Pattern Recognit Lett 15(11):1119–1125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schreiber U, Schliwa U, Bilger W (1986) Continuous recording of photochemical and nonphotochemical chlorophyll fluorescence quenching with a new type of modulation fluorometer. Photosynth Res 10(1–2):51–62

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Siedlecki W, Sklansky J (1989) A note on genetic algorithms for large-scale feature-selection. Pattern Recognit Lett 10(5):335–347

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tyystjärvi E, Koski A, Keranen M et al (1999) The Kautsky curve is a built-in barcode. Biophys J 77(2):1159–1167

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

This work was supported in part by the Czech Ministry of Education, Sports and Youth under the Grant MSM6007665808, by the Czech Academy of Sciences Grant AV0Z60870520, by the Grant Agency of the Czech Republic GACR 206/05/0894 and by the cooperative grants DAAD/CAS D28-CZ31/04-05(TR) and the SFB 567 (SB). Authors thank Dr. Somol of the Institute of Information Theory and Automation of the Czech Academy of Sciences for reading the manuscript. Technical assistance of Ms. Sigrid Lux from Julius-von-Sachs-Institute of Biosciences, was essential for performing the biological experiments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ladislav Nedbal.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Matouš, K., Benediktyová, Z., Berger, S. et al. Case study of combinatorial imaging: What protocol and what chlorophyll fluorescence image to use when visualizing infection of Arabidopsis thaliana by Pseudomonas syringae?. Photosynth Res 90, 243–253 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11120-006-9120-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11120-006-9120-6

Keywords

Navigation