Skip to main content
Log in

Hailing a change: comparing taxi and ridehail service quality in Los Angeles

  • Published:
Transportation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

For decades, taxis have provided for-hire vehicle service without significant competition from other modes. But in 2012, ride-hail services such as Uber and Lyft upended the taxi business model by connecting riders to drivers through smartphone applications. Since then, few studies have considered how taxis compare to their new competition or how service quality varies across the two modes. We use data from 1680 ride-hail and taxi trips taken in a Los Angeles audit study to ask: how do service qualities—including trip price, reliability, and accountability—vary across ride-hailing (Uber and Lyft) and taxis? We find that, for the same origin and destination pair, ridehail users pay 40% lower fares and wait about one-quarter of the time compared to taxis. In addition, ride-hailing nearly guaranteed a ride, while about one in five taxi riders were never picked up. We utilize semi-structured interviews of frequent taxi and ride-hail users to examine potential explanations of the stark quantitative differences observed across modes. Findings reveal that, despite technological disruption, travelers continue to prioritize the long-standing tenets of transportation services: affordability, reliability, and accountability. Ride-hailing successfully implemented technologies to deliver on these traveler priorities, while taxis have largely failed to capitalize on new technologies. Findings suggest that taxis will need to do more than lower prices or put more cars on the road if they hope to compete with ride-hailing services, and that both new and old modes should harness technology to deliver on long-standing transportation service goals.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Jarvis Murray (Taxicab and Franchise Administrator, Los Angeles Department of Transportation), in conversation with the author, 2017.

References

  • Albert, G., Mahalel, D.: Congestion tolls and parking fees: a comparison of the potential effect on travel behavior. Transp. Policy 13(6), 496–502 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Austin, D., Zegras, P.: Taxicabs as public transportation in Boston, Massachusetts. Transp. Res. Rec. J. Transp. Res. Board 2277, 65–74 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barron, J.: Where Yellow Cabs Didn’t Go, Green Cabs Were Supposed to Thrive. Then Came Uber. In: The New York Times (2018)

  • Bhat, C.R., Sardesai, R.: The impact of stop-making and travel time reliability on commute mode choice. Transp. Res. Part B Methodol. 40(9), 709–730 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bird: Bird Applauds Santa Monica for Responsive Regulatory Framework for E-Scooters (2018)

  • Brown, A.E.: Ridehail revolution: ridehail travel and equity in Los Angeles. UCLA (2018). Retrieved from https://escholarship.org/uc/item/4r22m57k

  • Brown, A.: Redefining car access: ride-hail travel and use in Los Angeles. J. Am. Plann. Assoc. 85(2), 83–95 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, J.: Uber, Lyft still cheaper than a cab, even after Emanuel’s proposed ride-share fee hike. In: Chicago Tribune (2017)

  • Cab, C.: Why Do Cabdrivers Hate Credit Cards? In: Star Tribune (2014)

  • California Public Utilities Commission: Insurance Requirements for Passenger Carrier Companies. https://www.cpuc.ca.gov/General.aspx?id=2416 (2019). Accessed Nov 2019

  • Cetin, T., Deakin, E.: Regulation of taxis and the rise of ridesharing. Transp. Policy 76, 149–158 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2017.09.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • City of Los Angeles: Taxi Rider’s Bill of Rights. http://www.taxicabsla.org/ (2018) . Accessed June 2018

  • City of Los Angeles: Taxi Services. http://taxicabsla.org/ (2019). Accessed Nov 2019

  • Cooper, J., Mundy, R., Nelson, J.: Taxi!: Urban Economies and the Social and Transport Impacts of the Taxicab. Ashgate Publishing, Ltd., Farnham (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  • Culver City Finance Department: Request for Public Record Dated 10/18/2017 (2017)

  • Curb: The Taxi App. https://gocurb.com/ (2017). Accessed Aug 2017

  • Disney, J.: Customer satisfaction and loyalty: the critical elements of service quality. Total Qual. Manag. 10(4–5), 491–497 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dziekan, K., Kottenhoff, K.: Dynamic at-stop real-time information displays for public transport: effects on customers. Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 41(6), 489–501 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fitzsimmons, E.G.: A Taxi Driver Took His Own Life. His Family Blames Uber’s Influence. In: The New York Times (2018)

  • Ge, Y., Knittel, C.R., MacKenzie, D., Zoepf, S.: Racial and Gender Discrimination in Transportation Network Companies. National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge (2016)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, J.V., Krueger, A.B.: An analysis of the labor market for Uber’s driver-partners in the United States. ILR Rev. 71(3), 705–732 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harding, S., Kandlikar, M., Gulati, S.: Taxi apps, regulation, and the market for taxi journeys. Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 88, 15–25 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, R., MacKenzie, D.: Transportation network company wait times in Greater Seattle, and relationship to socioeconomic indicators. J. Transp. Geogr. 56, 36–44 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, S.J., Puentes, R.: Taxing New Mobility Services: What’s Right? What’s Next?. Eno Center for Transportation, Washington (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  • King, D.A., Peters, J.R., Daus, M.W.: Taxicabs for improved urban mobility: are we missing an opportunity? (2012)

  • Lien, T.: Bird’s scooters have flooded the streets of major cities. But can the start-up control misbehaving riders? In: Los Angeles Times (2018)

  • Los Angeles Department of Transportation: Ordinance No. 181422 Independent Taxi Owners’ Association Franchise Agreement (2010)

  • Los Angeles Department of Transportation: Los Angeles Taxicab Review and Performance Report (2014–2015 Annual Review) (2017a)

  • Los Angeles Department of Transportation: Service Data Summary, March (2017b)

  • Lyft: Driver and Passenger Ratings. https://help.lyft.com/hc/en-us/articles/115013079948-Driver-and-passenger-ratings (2018). Accessed Jan 2018

  • Lyft: Pricing When It’s Busy. https://help.lyft.com/hc/en-us/articles/115012926227-Pricing-when-it-s-busy (2019). Accessed Nov 2019

  • McCarthy, N.: Fare Deal? How the Hourly Earnings of Uber and Taxi Drivers Measure Up. In: Forbes (2016)

  • McGrath, L., Sanders, A.: Ride sharing: 10 years of freedom in personal transportation. In: Star Tribune (2016)

  • National Academies of Sciences Engineering and Medicine: Between Public and Private Mobility: Examining the Rise of Technology-Enabled Transportation Services. Washington, DC (2016)

  • Nelson, L.J.: Long Beach’s answer to Uber and Lyft: Cheaper taxi fares. In: Los Angeles Times (2015)

  • Nelson, L.J.: Uber and Lyft have devastated L.A.’s taxi industry, city records show. In: Los Angeles Times (2016)

  • Nelson Nygaard: City of Boston Taxi Consultant Report (2013)

  • NHTS: 2017 National Household Travel Survey. In: FHA, U.S.D.o.T. (ed.) (2017)

  • O’Connell, L.: Program accountability as an emergent property: the role of stakeholders in a program’s field. Public Adm. Rev. 65(1), 85–93 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ongweso, E.: We’re All Killing Uber Just By Using It. In: Vice (2019)

  • Rayle, L., Dai, D., Chan, N., Cervero, R., Shaheen, S.: Just a better taxi? A survey-based comparison of taxis, transit, and ridesourcing services in San Francisco. Transp. Policy 45, 168–178 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ridester: Ridester’s 2018 Independent Driver Earnings Survey. https://www.ridester.com/2018-survey/ (2019)

  • Sam Schwartz Engineering: LADOT Taxi and For-Hire Vehicle Study (2019)

  • San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency: Taxi User Surveys: Best Practices Studies of Taxi Regulation (2013)

  • Schaller, B.: Entry controls in taxi regulation: implications of US and Canadian experience for taxi regulation and deregulation. Transp. Policy 14(6), 490–506 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schaller, B.: Special Report 319: Between Public and Private Mobility Examining the Rise of Technology-Enabled Transportation Services: Taxi, Sedan, and Limousine Industries and Regulations. Transportation Research Board, Washington (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaller, B.: Unfinished Business: A Blueprint for Uber, Lyft and Taxi Regulation (2016)

  • Schaller, B.: Unsustainable? The Growth of App-Based Ride Services and Traffic, Travel and the Future of New York City. Schaller Consulting, New York City (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheiber, N.: Debate Over Uber and Lyft Drivers’ Rights in California Has Split Labor. In: The New York Times (2019)

  • Schmitt, A.: Taking Stock of Dockless Bike-Share in Seattle. In: StreetsBlog USA (2018)

  • Silverstein, S.: These Animated Charts Tell You Everything About Uber Prices In 21 Cities. In: Business Insider (2014)

  • Sisson, P.: Can Uber and Lyft ever be profitable? In: Curbed (2019)

  • Smart, R., Rowe, B., Hawken, A., Kleiman, M., Mladenovic, N., Gehred, P., Manning, C.: Faster and Cheaper: How Ride-Sourcing Fills a Gap in Low-Income Los Angeles Neighborhoods. In: BOTEC Analysis Corporation, vol. 17. p. 2015 (2015)

  • Taylor, B.D., Fink, C.N.: The Factors Influencing Transit Ridership: A Review and Analysis of the Ridership Literature. University of California Transportation Center, Los Angeles (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Census Bureau: Decennial Census (2000)

  • U.S. Census Bureau: Quick Facts: Los Angeles County, California (2016)

  • Uber: Is Uber Safe? https://help.uber.com/h/b30b3f2c-126b-433c-9e3f-9277474c5c41 (2018). Accessed Jan 2018

  • Uber: How surge pricing works. https://www.uber.com/us/en/drive/partner-app/how-surge-works/ (2019). Accessed Nov 2019

  • Van Doorn, J., Lemon, K.N., Mittal, V., Nass, S., Pick, D., Pirner, P., Verhoef, P.C.: Customer engagement behavior: theoretical foundations and research directions. J. Serv. Res. 13(3), 253–266 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Voss, C.A., Roth, A.V., Rosenzweig, E.D., Blackmon, K., Chase, R.B.: A tale of two countries’ conservatism, service quality, and feedback on customer satisfaction. J. Serv. Res. 6(3), 212–230 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watkins, K.E., Ferris, B., Borning, A., Rutherford, G.S., Layton, D.: Where Is My Bus? Impact of mobile real-time information on the perceived and actual wait time of transit riders. Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 45(8), 839–848 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wyman, K.M.: Taxi regulation in the age of Uber. NYU J. Legis. Public Policy 20, 1 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  • Yavuz, N., Welch, E.W.: Addressing fear of crime in public space: gender differences in reaction to safety measures in train transit. Urban Stud. 47(12), 2491–2515 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yoh, A., Iseki, H., Smart, M., Taylor, B.: Hate to wait: effects of wait time on public transit travelers’ perceptions. Transp. Res. Rec. J. Transp. Res. Board 2216, 116–124 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeitlin, M.: How Austin’s failed attempt to regulate Uber and Lyft foreshadowed today’s ride-hailing controversies. In: Vox (2019)

Download references

Funding

Funding was provided by UCLA Institute of Transportation Studies.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

AB research design, data collection and analysis, literature review, manuscript writing and editing. WLV data processing and analysis, manuscript editing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anne Brown.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendices

Appendix 1: Data collection methodology and instrument

Data collection for each ride-hail trip included the ten steps shown below:

figure a

The data collection methods were broadly similar for taxi trips. The ten data collection steps taken for each taxi trip are shown below:

figure b

Following each trip, research assistants input data into the following data collection instrument. The data collection instrument branched as dictated by trip characteristics such as if a trip was cancelled or not.

figure c

Appendix 2: Interview guides

Each interviewee was invited to participate in a follow-up interview after the completion of a 3-month fieldwork project in which each individual completed between 47 and 247 Uber, Lyft, and taxi trips. Each participant was interviewed separately. Interviews lasted for about 30 min and participants were compensated with a $25 gift card upon completion. Interviews focused on questions about experiences riding and perceptions of each Lyft, Uber, and taxis. Because we were interested in understanding what issues were important to riders, the questions were purposefully designed as open-ended and general to allow interviewees ample leeway to explore topics that they felt strongly about.

Interview guide

The below questions provided guidance in the semi-structured interviews conducted for this research.

  1. 1.

    Did you have any expectations of taxi service prior to your first ride?

  2. 2.

    How did/didn’t taxis conform to your expectations (i.e., what happened that you expected and what happened that surprised you?)

  3. 3.

    Pre-trip, what were your perceptions of:

    1. a.

      Dispatcher interaction

    2. b.

      Ease of finding driver at site/driver pickup

    3. c.

      Reliability

  4. 4.

    On the ride (in the vehicle), what were your perceptions of:

    1. a.

      Safety

    2. b.

      Cleanliness/quality of the vehicles

    3. c.

      Driver attitude/interactions

    4. d.

      Route

  5. 5.

    After the trip ended, what were your perceptions of:

    1. a.

      Payment process

    2. b.

      Trip cost

  6. 6.

    Of the discussed topics, what element(s) of ride-hail service is/are most important to you and why?

  7. 7.

    Did your experience riding taxis change your perceptions of taxis & if so, how?

  8. 8.

    How do you anticipate using taxis/Uber/Lyft in the future?

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Brown, A., LaValle, W. Hailing a change: comparing taxi and ridehail service quality in Los Angeles. Transportation 48, 1007–1031 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-020-10086-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-020-10086-z

Keywords

Navigation