Skip to main content
Log in

Simulation-based dynamic adjustments of prices and subsidies for transportation PPP projects based on stakeholders’ satisfaction

  • Published:
Transportation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstracts

Public–private partnership (PPP) has been well acknowledged by many as an innovative approach to the procurement of public projects. In their long-term concession periods, various uncertain factors lead to the difficulties in implementing the concession contracts. Historical projects have proven that unexpected changes of projects will inevitably result in the adjustment of prices of the private sector and subsidies from the public sector. Therefore, a dynamic price and subsidy adjustment model is desired, to balance the satisfaction of all involved stakeholders (i.e., public sector, private sector, and general public). In the present study, a system dynamics model, which balances the tripartite satisfaction in PPPs, was established. A PPP bridge case study was conducted to demonstrate that the proposed model is applicable and can function for future PPP projects. Model validation, sensitivity analysis, model application, and result analysis were included as well. Further recommendations and conclusions were made to help practitioners to improve the model implementation in transportation PPP projects to increase the likelihood of achieving tripartite satisfaction. This research also sheds light on the price and subsidy adjustments for other types of PPP projects.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Albalate, D., Bel, G.: Regulating concessions of toll motorways: an empirical study on fixed vs. variable term contracts. Transp. Res. A Policy Pract. 43, 219–229 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ali, M., Miyoshi, C., Ushijima, H.: Emergency medical services in Islamabad, Pakistan: a public–private partnership. Public Health 120, 50–57 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  • Black, L.J.: When visuals are boundary objects in system dynamics work. Syst. Dyn. Rev. 29(2), 70–86 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  • Buiten, M.Van., Hartmann, A.: Asset management perspective on the duration of public–private partnership contracts: cost-control trade-off? J. Constr. Eng. Manag. 141, 4014080 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  • Cardona-Valdés, Y., Álvarez, A., Pacheco, J.: Metaheuristic procedure for a bi-objective supply chain design problem with uncertainty. Transp. Res. B Methodol. 60, 66–84 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  • Cascetta, E., Cartenì, A., Pagliara, F., Montanino, M.: A new look at planning and designing transportation systems: a decision-making model based on cognitive rationality, stakeholder engagement and quantitative methods. Transp. Policy 38, 27–39 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, R., Nozick, L.: Integrating congestion pricing and transit investment planning. Transp. Res. A Policy Pract. 89, 124–139 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  • Cruz, C.O., Rui, C.M.: Flexible contracts to cope with uncertainty in public–private partnerships. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 31, 473–483 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  • Decorla-Souza, P., Mayer, J., Jette, A., Buxbaum, J.: Key considerations for states seeking to implement public–private partnerships for new highway capacity. Transp. Res. Rec. J. Transp. Res. Board. 2346, 23–31 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (EU): Guidelines for Successful Public–Private Partnerships (2003)

  • Giese, J.L., Cote, J.A.: Defining consumer satisfaction. Acad. Mark. Sci. Rev. 2000, 1–27 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hassan, A., Abdelghany, K., Semple, J.: Dynamic road pricing for revenue maximization. Transp. Res. Rec. J. Transp. Res. Board. 2345, 100–108 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ho, S.P., Levitt, R.E., Tsui, C.W., Hsu, Y.: Opportunism-focused transaction cost analysis of public–private partnerships. J. Manag. Eng. 31, 4015007 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodge, G., Boulot, E., Duffield, C., Greve, C.: After the ribbon cutting: governing PPPs in the medium to long term*. Aust. J. Public Adm. 76, 330–351 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  • Iossa, E., Martimort, D.: The simple microeconomics of public–private partnerships. J. Public Econ. Theory 17, 4–48 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  • Juan, Z., Luo, Q., Zhongning, F.U., Jia, H.: Equity effects of congestion pricing on urban road resources allocation. J. Transp. Syst. Eng. Inf. Technol. 8, 74–79 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ke, Y., Liu, X., Wang, S.: Equitable financial evaluation method for public–private partnership projects. Tsinghua Sci. Technol. 13, 702–707 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  • Khanzadi, M., Nasirzadeh, F., Alipour, M.: Integrating system dynamics and fuzzy logic modeling to determine concession period in BOT projects. Autom. Constr. 22, 368–376 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kweun, J.Y., Wheeler, P.K., Gifford, J.L.: Evaluating highway public-private partnerships: Evidence from US value for money studies. Transp. Policy 62, 12–20 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, Z., Hensher, D.A.: Toll roads in Australia: an overview of characteristics and accuracy of demand forecasts. Transp. Rev. 30(5), 541–569 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, B., Akintoye, A., Hardcastle, C.: Critical success factors for PPP/PFI projects in the UK construction industry. Constr. Manag. Econ. 23, 459–471 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindsey, R., Palma, A.De.: Cost recovery from congestion tolls with long-run uncertainty. Econ. Transp. 3, 119–132 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, J., Love, P.E., Davis, P.R., Smith, J., Regan, M.: Conceptual framework for the performance measurement of public–private partnerships. J. Infrastruct. Syst. 21, 04014023 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, T., Wang, Y., Wilkinson, S.: Identifying critical factors affecting the effectiveness and efficiency of tendering processes in public–private partnerships (PPPs): a comparative analysis of Australia and China. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 34, 701–716 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2016.01.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martins, J., Rui, C.M., Cruz, C.O.: Maximizing the value for money of PPP arrangements through flexibility: an application to airports. J. Air Transp. Manag. 39, 72–80 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  • Martins, J., Marques, R.C., Cruz, C.O.: Real options in infrastructure: revisiting the literature. J. Infrastruct. Syst. 21, 04014026 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  • Medda, F.: A game theory approach for the allocation of risks in transport public private partnerships. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 25, 213–218 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  • Morallos, D., Amekudzi, A., Ross, C., Meyer, M.: Value for money analysis in U.S. transportation public–private partnerships. Transp. Res. Rec. J. Transp. Res. Board. 2115, 27–36 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  • Nabavi, E., Daniell, K.A., Najafi, H.: Boundary matters: the potential of system dynamics to support sustainability? J. Clean. Prod. 140, 312–323 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  • Niu, B., Zhang, J.: Price, capacity and concession period decisions of Pareto-efficient BOT contracts with demand uncertainty. Transp. Res. E Logist. Transp. Rev. 53, 1–14 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  • Renda, A., Schrefler, L.: Public–Private Partnerships National Experiences in the European Union (European Parliament) (2006)

  • Ruuska, I., Teigland, R.: Ensuring project success through collective competence and creative conflict in public–private partnerships—a case study of Bygga Villa, a Swedish triple helix e-government initiative. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 27, 323–334 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  • Schepper, S.De., Dooms, M., Haezendonck, E.: Stakeholder dynamics and responsibilities in public–private partnerships: a mixed experience. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 32, 1210–1222 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  • Shen, L.Y., Li, H., Li, Q.M.: Alternative concession model for build operate transfer contract projects. J. Constr. Eng. Manag. 131, 211–220 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  • Soliño, A.S., Santos, P.G.De.: Transaction costs in transport public–private partnerships: comparing procurement procedures. Transp. Rev. 30, 389–406 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  • Tan, Z., Yang, H.: The impact of user heterogeneity on road franchising. Transp. Res. E Logist. Transp. Rev. 48, 958–975 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  • Tian, Q., Yang, H., Huang, H.J.: Pareto efficient strategies for regulating public transit operations. Public Transp. 3, 199–212 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  • Tirachini, A., Hensher, D.A., Rose, J.M.: Multimodal pricing and optimal design of urban public transport: the interplay between traffic congestion and bus crowding. Transp. Res. B 61, 33–54 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  • Torchia, M., Calabrò, A., Morner, M.: Public–private partnerships in the health care sector: a systematic review of the literature. Public Manag. Rev. 17, 236–261 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Den Hurk, M., Verhoest, K.: The challenge of using standard contracts in public–private partnerships. Public Manag. Rev. 18, 278–299 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  • Vassallo, J., Ortega, A., Baeza, M.D.L.Á.: Risk allocation in toll highway concessions in spain: lessons from economic recession. Transp. Res. Rec. J. Transp. Res. Board. 2297, 80–87 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  • Verweij, S.: Achieving satisfaction when implementing PPP transportation infrastructure projects: a qualitative comparative analysis of the A15 highway DBFM project. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 33, 189–200 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  • Verweij, S., Gerrits, L.: How satisfaction is achieved in the implementation phase of large transportation infrastructure projects: a qualitative comparative analysis into the A2 tunnel project. Public Work. Manag. Policy 20, 5–28 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Y.: Evolution of public–private partnership models in American toll road development: learning based on public institutions’ risk management ☆. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 33, 684–696 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, H., Zhang, X.: Joint implementation of tradable credit and road pricing in public–private partnership networks considering mixed equilibrium behaviors. Transp. Res. E Logist. Transp. Rev. 94, 158–170 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  • Xiong, W., Yuan, J.F., Li, Q., Skibniewski, M.J.: Performance objective-based dynamic adjustment model to balance the stakeholders’ satisfaction in PPP projects. J. Civ. Eng. Manag. 21, 539–547 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu, Y., Yeung, J.F.Y., Chan, A.P.C., Chan, D.W.M., Wang, S.Q., Ke, Y.: Developing a risk assessment model for PPP projects in China—a fuzzy synthetic evaluation approach. Autom. Constr. 19, 929–943 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu, Y., Sun, C., Skibniewski, M.J., Chan, A.P.C., Yeung, J.F.Y., Cheng, H.: System dynamics (SD)-based concession pricing model for PPP highway projects. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 30(2), 240–251 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  • Yuan, J., Zeng, A.Y., Skibniewski, M.J., Li, Q.: Selection of performance objectives and key performance indicators in public–private partnership projects to achieve value for money. Constr. Manag. Econ. 27, 253–270 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  • Yuan, J., Skibniewski, M.J., Li, Q., Zheng, L.: Performance objectives selection model in public–private partnership projects based on the perspective of stakeholders. J. Manag. Eng. 26, 89–104 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  • Yuan, J., Wang, C., Skibniewski, M.J., Li, Q.: Developing key performance indicators for public-private partnership projects: questionnaire survey and analysis. J. Manag. Eng. 28, 252–264 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, X.: Factor analysis of public clients’ best-value objective in public–privately partnered infrastructure projects. J. Constr. Eng. Manag. 132, 956–965 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, X.: Win–win concession period determination methodology. J. Constr. Eng. Manag. 135, 550–558 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, S., Gao, Y., Feng, Z., Sun, W.: PPP application in infrastructure development in China: institutional analysis and implications. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 33, 497–509 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  • Zou, W., Kumaraswamy, M., Chung, J., Wong, J.: Identifying the critical success factors for relationship management in PPP projects. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 32, 265–274 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors’ special thanks go to all reviewers of the paper and to the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC-71671042 and 71472037); the Program for Outstanding Young Teachers of Southeast University (2242015R30009); and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities for financially supporting this research. Meanwhile, the survey data were generated by authors’ prior work by Yuan et al. (2009) (https://doi.org/10.1080/01446190902748705) and Xiong et al. (2015) (https://doi.org/10.3846/13923730.2014.895409). The simulation data were obtained from the example Dong-Fang toll bridge (Shen et al. 2002) (https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)0733-9364(2002)128:4(326)).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Jingfeng Yuan and Wenjing Ji conceived, designed and performed the model, Jingfeng Yuan, Wenjing Ji, Jiyue Guo analyzed the data, Jingfeng Yuan, Wenjing Ji, Jiyue Guo, and Mirosław J. Skibniewski wrote the paper. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jingfeng Yuan.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Appendix

Appendix

See Table 3.

Table 3 All symbols applied in quantitative model

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yuan, J., Ji, W., Guo, J. et al. Simulation-based dynamic adjustments of prices and subsidies for transportation PPP projects based on stakeholders’ satisfaction. Transportation 46, 2309–2345 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-018-9940-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-018-9940-1

Keywords

Navigation