Abstract
In Charlotte, North Carolina less than one half of 1% of commuters ride a bicycle to work despite several decades of public investment in bicycle infrastructure and planning. Like many fast-growing cities of North America, Charlotte’s rapid physical growth in the past half-century has left its residents little option but to navigate the city by car. To date, research on utility cycling has paid relatively little attention to the practice of bicycle commuting in auto-dominated cities. This article uses grounded theory methodology to build a context- and time-sensitive explanation of how individuals adopt and sustain the practice of bicycle commuting in Charlotte. Through interviews with 26 Charlotte-area bicycle commuters—20 men and 6 women, mean age 40.3—, we find that, according to subjects interviewed, initiating and sustaining the practice of bicycle commuting involves the renegotiation of relationships between the cyclist and (1) the bicycle, (2) other local cyclists, (3) urban space, and (4) the workplace. Dynamics in these relationships are overlapping and simultaneous. This time- and context-sensitive explanation broadens the array of policy interventions that complement the infrastructure-centered approach to promoting cycling in Charlotte today. Elected officials, planners, and bicycle advocates stand to benefit by understanding the transition to cycling as a process of social learning that exposes individuals interested in bicycle commuting to less hostile “neighborhood” thoroughfares.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Half the interviews were transcribed by the first author, and the remaining half were transcribed using Rev.com, a well-known and highly-rated transcription service. Transcriptions received from Rev.com were checked for accuracy using existing audio recordings; upon doing so, they were treated with the same legitimacy as were transcripts produced by the researcher/interviewer. Rev.com’s transcription service is rated 4.7/5 according to 3489 reviews on their website, and also received a 9.3/10 rating from Trustpilot.com. Audio files submitted to Rev.com for review included only participants’ first names. Neglecting to address interviewees by surname during the interview process ensured the anonymity of interview subjects.
References
American Community Survey: Means of transportation to work 5-year estimates 2011–2015. United States Bureau of the Census (2015)
Bonham, J., Wilson, A.: Bicycling and the life course: the start-stop-start experiences of women cycling. Int. J. Sustain. Transp. 6(4), 195–213 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1080/15568318.2011.585219
Boyer, R.: Recreational bicycling as a ‘gateway’ to utility bicycling: the case of Charlotte, NC. Int. J. Sustain. Transp. 1, 4 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1080/15568318.2017.1382622
Buehler, R., Dill, J.: Bikeway networks: a review of effects on cycling. Transp. Rev. 36(1), 9–27 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2015.1069908
Buehler, R., Pucher, J.: Cycling to work in 90 large American cities: new evidence on the role of bike paths and lanes. Transportation 39(2), 409–432 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-011-9355-8
Charlotte Department of Transportation: Charlotte BIKES. City of Charlotte, North Carolina (2017). http://charlottenc.gov/Transportation/Programs/Documents/Charlotte%20BIKES%20Final.pdf
Cho, J.Y., Lee, E.-H.: Reducing confusion about grounded theory and qualitative content analysis: similarities and differences. Qual. Rep. 19(32), 1 (2014)
Cleary, J., Mcclintock, H.: The Nottingham cycle-friendly employers project: lessons for encouraging cycle commuting. Local Environ. 5(2), 217–222 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1080/13549830050009364
Dill, J., Carr, T.: Bicycle commuting and facilities in major US cities: if you build them, commuters will use them. Transp. Res. Rec. J. Transp. Res. Board 1828, 116–123 (2003)
Dill, J., Voros, K.: Factors affecting bicycling demand: initial survey findings from the Portland, Oregon, Region. Transp. Res. Rec. J. Transp. Res. Board 2031(December), 9–17 (2007). https://doi.org/10.3141/2031-02
Gatersleben, B., Appleton, K.M.: Contemplating cycling to work: attitudes and perceptions in different stages of change. Transp. Res. Part A: Policy Pract. 41(4), 302–312 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2006.09.002
Glaser, B., Strauss, A.: The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Aldine Transaction, New Brunswick (1967)
Guell, C., Panter, J., Ogilvie, D.: Walking and cycling to work despite reporting an unsupportive environment: insights from a mixed-method exploration of counterintuitive findings. BMC Public Health 13(497), 1–10 (2013)
Hamidi, S., Ewing, R.: A longitudinal study of changes in urban sprawl between 2000 and 2010 in the United States. Landsc. Urban Plan. 128(August), 72–82 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.04.021
Handy, S.L., Xing, Y.: Factors correlated with bicycle commuting: a study in six small US cities. Int. J. Sustain. Transp. 5(2), 91–110 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1080/15568310903514789
Heinen, E., Maat, K., van Wee, B.: The role of attitudes toward characteristics of bicycle commuting on the choice to cycle to work over various distances. Transp. Res. D: Transp. Environ. 16(2), 102–109 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2010.08.010
Hunt, J.D., Abraham, J.E.: Influences on bicycle use. Transportation 34(4), 453–470 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-006-9109-1
Jackson, K.T.: The drive-in culture of contemporary America. In: LeGates, R.T. (ed.) City Reader. Taylor & Francis, London (1985)
Krizek, K.J., Barnes, G., Thompson, K.: Analyzing the effect of bicycle facilities on commute mode share over time. J. Urban Plan. Dev. 135(2), 66–73 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9488(2009)135:2(66)
Larson, J., El-Geneidy, A.M.: A travel behavior analysis of urban cycling facilities in Montréal, Canada. Transp. Res. D: Transp. Environ. 16(2), 172–177 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2010.07.011
Lindlof, T.R., Taylor, B.C.: Qualitative Communication Research Methods, 2nd edn. Sage, Thousand Oaks (2002)
Mitra, R., Ziemba, R.A., Hess, P.M.: Mode substitution effect of urban cycle tracks: case study of a downtown street in Toronto, Canada. Int. J. Sustain. Transp. 11(4), 248–256 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1080/15568318.2016.1249443
Monsere, C., Dill, J., McNeil, N., Clifton, K.J., Foster, N., Goddard, T., Berkow, M., et al.: Lessons from the green lanes: evaluating protected bike lanes in the US (2014). https://works.bepress.com/kelly_clifton/6/
Nehme, E.K., Pérez, A., Ranjit, N., Amick, B.C., Kohl, H.W.: Sociodemographic factors, population density, and bicycling for transportation in the United States. J. Phys. Activity Health 13(1), 36–43 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1123/jpah.2014-0469
Nelson, A.C., Allen, D.: If you build them, commuters will use them. Transp. Res. Rec. 1578, 79–83 (1997)
Prins, R.G., Panter, J., Heinen, E., Griffin, S.J., Ogilvie, D.B.: Causal pathways linking environmental change with health behaviour change: natural experimental study of new transport infrastructure and cycling to work. Prev. Med. 87(June), 175–182 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2016.02.042
Pucher, J., Buehler, R.: Why Canadians cycle more than Americans: a comparative analysis of bicycling trends and policies. Transp. Policy 13(3), 265–279 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2005.11.001
Pucher, J., Buehler, R.: Making cycling irresistible: lessons from The Netherlands, Denmark and Germany. Transp. Rev. 28(4), 495–528 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1080/01441640701806612
Pucher, J., Buehler, R., Seinen, M.: Bicycling renaissance in North America? an update and re-appraisal of cycling trends and policies. Transp. Res. Part A: Policy Pract. 45(6), 451–475 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2011.03.001
Shove, E., Walker, G.: What is energy for? social practice and energy demand. Theory Cult. Soc. 31(5), 41–58 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276414536746
Shove, E.: Beyond the ABC: climate change policy and theories of social change. Environ. Plan. A 42(6), 1273–1285 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1068/a42282
Shove, E., Pantzar, M., Watson, M.: The Dynamics of Social Practice: Everyday Life and How It Changes. Sage, Thousand Oaks (2012)
Strauss, A., Corbin, J.: Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques. Sage, Thousand Oaks (1998)
Suddaby, R.: From the editors: what grounded theory is not. Acad. Manag. J. 49(4), 633–642 (2006)
Wardman, M., Tight, M., Page, M.: Factors influencing the propensity to cycle to work. Transp. Res. Part A: Policy Pract. 41(4), 339–350 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2006.09.011
Watson, M.: How theories of practice can inform transition to a decarbonised transport system. J. Transp. Geogr. 24(September), 488–496 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2012.04.002
Acknowledgements
This paper is derived from research conducted for the completion of the first author’s unpublished Masters Capstone Project. Preliminary results were presented at the 2017 conference of the American Association of Geographers (Boston, MA). The authors wish to thank the anonymous interview subjects that participated in the study, Dr. Heather Smith and Dr. Loril Gossett for their methodological and theoretical guidance, as well as Dr. Jennifer Bonham for her comments on a earlier draft.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Appendix 1
Appendix 1
See Table 2.
Appendix 2: Interview guide
Phase One: Setting the Stage.
[The goal of this section is to make participants feel comfortable by asking them questions designed to gauge how long they have been on a bike.]
-
Q1: Tell me about the first time you rode a bike.
-
Did you ride a bike to and from school or university?
-
-
Q2: How do you feel when riding a bike? Why do you do it?
-
Q3: How long have you been riding, and in what capacity? For recreation, to commute? For fitness? To run errands?
-
Q4: Where do you work now? What do you do?
Phase Two: From home and to the workplace.
-
Q1: Take me through your most recent commute. Was it this morning? A couple of days ago? Can you describe what you did to get ready?
-
What did you bring with you?
-
What clothes did you wear?
-
-
Q2: Why did you start commuting by bike? When did you begin?
-
Q3: When you first started commuting by bike, how long did it take you to get used to your new commuting routine?
-
Did you ever make any mistakes? What were they?
-
How did you learn your route?
-
Do (or did) you ever feel unsafe? How did you respond?
-
-
Q4: Do you ever not bike to work? What might lead you to decide to take other forms of transit?
-
Q5: What are the best parts of your commute? The worst? Can you compare this to how you feel when you use other forms of transit, such as a car?
-
Q6: In general, after commuting to and from work by bike, do you find yourself biking more (e.g. recreationally, socially, or for errands) than you used to?
Phase Three: Discussing the workplace.
-
Q1: Has it been easy/is it easy to bike to work where you are employed?
-
OR Do you think your work would be accommodating if you biked to and from work?
-
-
Q2: How do your coworkers feel about your biking to work? How do you feel around them when you arrive with your bike in tow?
-
OR How do you think your coworkers would feel about you biking to and from work?
-
Phase Four: Wrapping things up.
-
Q1: What are some lessons that you would say are essential to anyone interested in commuting by bike?
-
Q2: In general, what does it mean to commute by bike?
-
Q3: Is there anything that we haven’t covered that you think we should discuss?
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Caldwell, K.B., Boyer, R.H.W. Bicycle commuting in an automobile-dominated city: how individuals become and remain bike commuters in Charlotte, North Carolina. Transportation 46, 1785–1806 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-018-9883-6
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-018-9883-6