Abstract
Non-household carpools (where two or more commuters from different residences travel together in the same private vehicle) bring public benefits. To encourage and incentivise it, transport practitioners and researchers must understand its private motivations and deterrents. Existing studies often report conflicting results or non-generalisable findings. Thus, a quantitative systematic review of the literature body is needed. Using meta-analysis, this study synthesised 22 existing empirical studies (representing over 79,000 observations) to produce an integrated review of the carpooling literature. The meta-analysis determined 24 non-household carpooling factors, and their effect sizes. Factors such as number of employees (\(\bar{r} = 0.42\)), partner matching programs (\(\bar{r} = 0.42\)), female (\(\bar{r} = 0.22\)) and fixed work schedule (\(\bar{r} = 0.15\)) were found to have strong effects on carpooling while judgmental factors (such as the motivation to save costs) only exhibited small influence (\(\bar{r} < 0.1\)). Based on the significant effects, the paper discussed prospects for improving carpooling uptake by developing: (i) target demographics, (ii) selling points for marketing, (iii) carpooling partner programs and (iv) multiple employer ‘super-pools’. The results warrant caution due to the small amount of studies synthesised. Transport practitioners might plan carpooling policies based on the findings; and transportation researchers might use the list of factors to model carpooling behaviour.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
References marked with * indicates studies which were included in the meta-analysis
*Abrahamse, W., Keall, M.: Effectiveness of a web-based intervention to encourage carpooling to work: a case study of Wellington, New Zealand. Transp. Policy 21, 45–51 (2012)
Agatz, N., Erera, A., Savelsbergh, M., Wang, X.: Optimization for dynamic ride-sharing: a review. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 223, 295–303 (2012). doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2012.05.028
Andreoni, J., Harbaugh, W., Vesterlund, L.: The Carrot or the Stick: rewards, Punishments, and Cooperation. Am. Econ. Rev. 93, 893–902 (2003). doi:10.2307/3132122
Arbour-Nicitopoulos, K., Faulkner, G.E.J., Buliung, R.N., Lay, J., Stone, M.: The school run: exploring carpooling as an intervention option in the Greater Toronto and Hamilton Area (GTHA), Canada. Transp. Policy 21, 134–140 (2012). doi:10.1016/j.tranpol.2012.03.004
Baldassare, M., Ryan, S., Katz, C.: Suburban attitudes toward policies aimed at reducing solo driving. Transportation 25, 99–117 (1998). doi:10.1023/A:1004982709482
Bhat, C.R., Koppelman, F.S.: A retrospective and prospective survey of time-use research. Transportation 26, 119–139 (1999). doi:10.1023/A:1005196331393
Blumenberg, E., Smart, M.: Getting by with a little help from my friends…and family: immigrants and carpooling. Transportation 37, 429–446 (2010). doi:10.1007/s11116-010-9262-4
Bonsall, P., Spencer, A., Tang, W.: What Makes a Car Sharer? A Motivational Investigation. Transportation 12, 117–145 (1984)
Borenstein M, Hedges LV, Higgins JPT, R. RH (2009) Introduction to Meta-Analysis John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, UK
*Brownstone, D., Golob, T.F.: The effectiveness of ridesharing incentives: Discrete-choice models of commuting in Southern California. Reg. Sci. Urban Econ. 22, 5–24 (1992)
*Buliung, R.N., Soltys, K., Bui, R., Habel, C., Lanyon, R.: Catching a ride on the information super-highway: toward an understanding of internet-based carpool formation and use. Transportation 37, 849–873 (2010). doi:10.1007/s11116-010-9266-0
Cairns, S., Newson, C., Davis, A.: Understanding successful workplace travel initiatives in the UK. Transp. Res. Part A 44, 473–494 (2010). doi:10.1016/j.tra.2010.03.010
*Canning, P.E., Hughes, S.J., Hellawell, E.E., Gatersleben, B.C.M., Fairhead, C.J. Reasons for participating in formal employer-led carpool schemes as perceived by their users. Transp. Plan. Technol. 33, 733–745 (2010). doi:10.1080/03081060.2010.536627
Cervero, R., Griesenbeck, B.: Factors influencing commuting choices in suburban labor markets: a case analysis of Pleasanton, California. Transp. Res. Part A 22, 151–161 (1988). doi:10.1016/0191-2607(88)90033-7
Chan, N.D., Shaheen, S.A.: Ridesharing in North America: past, present, and future. Transp. Rev. 32, 93–112 (2012). doi:10.1080/01441647.2011.621557
Charles, K.K., Kline, P.: Relational costs and the production of social capital: evidence from Carpooling. Econ. J. 116, 581–604 (2006). doi:10.2307/3590432
*Ciari, F., Axhausen, K.W.: Choosing carpooling or carsharing as a mode: Swiss stated choice experiments (I). Education 65, 12 (2011)
Cline, M., Sparks, C., Eschbach, K.: Understanding carpool use by Hispanics in Texas. Transp. Res. Rec. 2118, 39–46 (2009). doi:10.3141/2118-06
Cochran, W.G.: The Combination of Estimates from Different Experiments. Biometrics 10, 101–129 (1954). doi:10.2307/3001666
Collura, J.: Evaluating ride-sharing programs: Massachusetts’ experience. J. Urban Plan. Dev. 120, 28–47 (1994). doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9488
*Cools, M., Tormans, H., Briers, S., Teller, J.: Unravelling the determinants of carpool behaviour in Flanders, Belgium: Integration of qualitative and quantitative research. In: Hesse M, Caruso G, Gerber P, Viti F (eds) BIVEC-GIBET Transport Research Days 2013, Zelzate, Belgium, University Press, pp 128–140 (2013)
*Correia, G., Viegas, J.M. Carpooling and carpool clubs: clarifying concepts and assessing value enhancement possibilities through a Stated Preference web survey in Lisbon, Portugal. Transp. Res. Part A 45, 81–90 (2011). doi:10.1016/j.tra.2010.11.001
*Daniels P.W.: Vehicle sharing for the journey to work by office employees. Transp. Res. Part A 15, 391–398 (1981). doi:10.1016/0191-2607(81)90145
DeLoach, S.B., Tiemann, T.K.: Not driving alone? American commuting in the twenty-first century. Transportation 39, 521–537 (2011). doi:10.1007/s11116-011-9374-5
Di Febbraro, A., Gattorna, E., Sacco, N.: Optimization of dynamic ridesharing systems. Transp. Res. Rec. 2359, 44–50 (2013). doi:10.3141/2359-06
Dieckmann, N.F., Malle, B.F., Bodner, T.E.: An empirical assessment of meta-analytic practice. Rev. Gen. Psychol. 13, 101–115 (2009). doi:10.1037/a0015107
Dill, J.: Mandatory employer-based trip reduction: what happened? Transp. Res. Rec. 1618, 103–110 (1998)
Dittmar, H.: The Social Psychology of Material Possessions: to Have is to be. Harvester Wheatsheaf, Hemel Hempstead (1992)
Dueker, K.J., Levin, I.P., Bair, B.O.: Ride sharing: psychological factors. Transp. Eng. J. 103, 685–692 (1977)
Eriksson, L., Friman, M., Gärling, T.: Stated reasons for reducing work-commute by car. Transp. Res. Part F 11, 427–433 (2008). doi:10.1016/j.trf.2008.04.001
Ferguson, E.: Demographics of carpooling. Transp. Res. Rec. 1496, 142–150 (1995)
*Ferguson, E.: The rise and fall of the American carpool: 1970–1990. Transportation 24, 349–376 (1997)
Field, A.: Meta-analysis of correlation coefficients: A Monte Carlo comparison of fixed- and random-effects methods. Psychol. Methods 6, 161–180 (2001)
Fishbein, M., Ajzen, I.: Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research. Addison-Wesley, Reading (1975)
Fisher, R.A.: Combining independent tests of significance. Am. Statist. 2, 30–31 (1948). doi:10.2307/2681650
Gardner, B., Abraham, C.: What drives car use? A grounded theory analysis of commuters’ reasons for driving. Transp. Res. Part F 10, 187–200 (2007). doi:10.1016/j.trf.2006.09.004
Gardner, B., Abraham, C.: Psychological correlates of car use: A meta-analysis. Transp. Res. Part F 11, 300–311 (2008). doi:10.1016/j.trf.2008.01.004
Garling, T., Garling, A., Johansson, A.: Household choices of car-use reduction measures. Transp. Res. Part A 34, 309–320 (2000)
Gärling, T., Steg, L.: Threats from Car Traffic to the Quality of Urban Life: Problems, Causes, and Solutions. Elsevier, Amsterdam (2007)
Garrison, W.: Increasing the Flexibility of Legacy Systems. In: Anderson Distinguished Lecture in Applied Geography (2007)
Gensch, D.H.: A practical segmentation strategy to increase ride sharing. Transp. Res. Part A 15, 331–337 (1981). doi:10.1016/0191-2607(81)90015-7
Giuliano, G., Hwang, K., Wachs, M.: Employee trip reduction in Southern California: first year results. Transp. Res. Part A 27A, 125–137 (1993)
*Giuliano, G., Levine, D.W., Teal, R.F.: Impact of high occupancy vehicle lanes on carpooling behaviour. Transportation 17, 159–177 (1990)
Glover, S., Bumpus, M., Logan, J., Ciesla, J.: Re-examining the influence of individual values on ethical decision making. J. Bus. Ethics 16, 1319–1329 (1997). doi:10.1023/A:1005758402861
Gooding, P., Tarrier, N.: A systematic review and meta-analysis of cognitive-behavioural interventions to reduce problem gambling: Hedging our bets? Behav. Res. Ther. 47, 592–607 (2009). doi:10.1016/j.brat.2009.04.002
Graham-Rowe, E., Skippon, S., Gardner, B., Abraham, C.: Can we reduce car use and if so, how? A review of available evidence. Transp. Res. Part A 45, 401–418 (2011). doi:10.1016/j.tra.2011.02.001
Greene, D.L., Wegener, M.: Sustainable transport. J. Transp. Geogr. 5, 177–190 (1997)
*Habib, K.M.N., Tian, Y., Zaman, H.: Modelling commuting mode choice with explicit consideration of carpool in the choice set formation. Transportation 38, 587–604 (2011). doi:10.1007/s11116-011-9333-1
Hamari, J., Sjöklint, M., Ukkonen, A.: The sharing economy: why people participate in collaborative consumption. J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol. (2015)
Hedges, L.V., Olkin, I.: Statistical Methods for Meta-analysis. Academic Press, Orlando (1985)
Heinrichs, H.: sharing economy: a potential new pathway to sustainability. GAIA Ecol. Perspect. Sci. Soc. 22, 228–231 (2013)
Horowitz, A., Sheth, J.: Ridesharing to work: an attitudinal analysis. Transp. Res. Rec. 637, 1–8 (1978)
Howells, J., Bessant, J.: Introduction: innovation and economic geography: a review and analysis. J. Econ. Geogr. 12, 929–942 (2012). doi:10.1093/jeg/lbs029
Huang, H.-J., Yang, H., Bell, M.G.H.: The models and economics of carpools. Ann. Reg. Sci. 34, 55–68 (2000)
Hunter, J.E., Schmidt, F.L.: Methods of Meta-Analysis: Correcting Error and Bias in Research Findings, 2nd edn. SAGE Publications, Newbury Park, CA (2004)
Hwang, K., Giuliano, G.: The Determinants of Ridesharing: Literature Review. UCTC, Berkeley (1990)
Jacobson, S.H., King, D.M.: Fuel saving and ridesharing in the US: Motivations, limitations, and opportunities. Transp. Res. Part D 14, 14–21 (2009). doi:10.1016/j.trd.2008.10.001
Jakobsson, C., Fujii, S., Gärling, T.: Effects of economic disincentives on private car use. Transportation 29, 349–370 (2002). doi:10.1023/A:1016334411457
Kaufman, S: Why people (don’t) carpool and change for the better: A social capital framework for investigating environmental behaviour. In: 2nd National Conference of Sustainable Campuses, RMIT, Melbourne, 2002
Kilbourne, W.E., Beckmann, S.C., Thelen, E.: The role of the dominant social paradigm in environmental attitudes a multinational examination. J. Bus. Res. 55, 193–204 (2002)
Kingham, S., Dickinson, J., Copsey, S.: Travelling to work: will people move out of their cars. Transp. Policy 8, 151–160 (2001). doi:10.1016/S0967-070X(01)00005-1
Klöckner, C.A., Matthies, E.: How habits interfere with norm-directed behaviour: A normative decision-making model for travel mode choice. J. Environ. Psychol. 24, 319–327 (2004). doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2004.08.004
Kocur, G., Hendrickson, C.: A model to assess cost and fuel savings from ride sharing. Transp. Res. Part B 17, 305–318 (1983). doi:10.1016/0191-2615(83)90048-6
*Koppelman, F.S., Bhat, C.R., Schofer, J.L.: Market research evaluation of actions to reduce suburban traffic congestion: commuter travel behavior and response to demand reduction actions. Transp. Res. Part A 27A, 383–393 (1993)
Kwon, J., Varaiya, P.: Effectiveness of California’s high occupancy vehicle (HOV) system. Transp. Res. Part C 16, 98–115 (2008). doi:10.1016/j.trc.2007.06.008
Leck, E.: The impact of urban form on travel behavior: a meta-analysis. Berkeley Plan. J. 19 (2006)
Levin, I.P.: Measuring tradeoffs in carpool driving arrangement preferences. Transportation 11, 71–85 (1982). doi:10.1007/BF00165595
Lois, D., López-Sáez, M.: The relationship between instrumental, symbolic and affective factors as predictors of car use: a structural equation modeling approach. Transp. Res. Part A 43, 790–799 (2009). doi:10.1016/j.tra.2009.07.008
Mann, E., Abraham, C.: The role of affect in UK commuters’ travel mode choices: an interpretative phenomenological analysis. Br. J. Psychol. 97, 155–176 (2006)
McClelland, L., Marks, M., Eidson, M., Cook, S.: Evaluating employer programs encouraging the use of alternate transportation modes: two studies. Transportation 10, 247–256 (1981). doi:10.1007/BF00148461
McKenzie, B., Rapino, M.: Commuting in the United States: 2009. Census Bureau, Washington, DC (2011)
Menczer, W.B.: Guaranteed ride home programs: a study of program characteristics, utilization, and cost. J. Public Transp. 10, 131–150 (2007)
Meyer, I., Kaniovski, S., Scheffran, J.: Scenarios for regional passenger car fleets and their CO2 emissions. Energy Policy 41, 66–74 (2012). doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2011.01.043
Meyer, M.D.: Demand management as an element of transportation policy: using carrots and sticks to influence travel behavior. Transp. Res. Part A 33, 575–599 (1999). doi:10.1016/S0965-8564(99)00008-7
Mokhtarian, P.L., Salomon, I.: How derived is the demand for travel? Some conceptual and measurement considerations. Transp. Res. Part A 35, 695–719 (2001)
Morency, C.: The ambivalence of ridesharing. Transportation 34, 239–253 (2006). doi:10.1007/s11116-006-9101-9
Möser, G., Bamberg, S.: The effectiveness of soft transport policy measures: a critical assessment and meta-analysis of empirical evidence. J. Environ. Psychol. 28, 10–26 (2008). doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2007.09.001
Ozanne L, Mollenkopf D (1999) Understanding consumer intentions to carpool: a test of alternative models. Research paper from New Zealand: Lincoln University
Park, A., Clery, E., Curtice, J., Phillips, M., Utting, D.: British Social Attitudes: the 29th Report. NatCen Social Research, London (2012)
Rietveld, P., Zwart, B., van Wee, B., van den Hoorn, T.: On the relationship between travel time and travel distance of commuters: reported versus network travel data in the Netherlands. Ann Reg Sci 33, 269–287 (1999)
Rosenbloom, S., Burns, E.: Gender differences in commuter travel in Tucson: implications for travel demand management programs. Transp. Res. Rec. 1404, 82–90 (1993)
Rosenthal, R., Di Matteo, M.R.: META-ANALYSIS: recent developments in quantitative methods for literature reviews. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 52, 59–82 (2001)
Rye, T.: Employer attitudes to employer transport plans: a comparison of UK and Dutch experience. Transp. Policy 6, 183–196 (1999). doi:10.1016/S0967-070X(99)00020-7
Schwartz, S.H.: Normative influences on altruism. In: Berkowitz L (ed), vol 10. NY Academic Press, pp 271, 221–271 (1977)
Shoup, D.C.: Evaluating the effects of cashing out employer-paid parking: eight case studies. Transp. Policy 4, 201–216 (1997)
Steg, L.: Car use: lust and must. Instrumental, symbolic and affective motives for car use. Transp. Res. Part A 39, 147–162 (2005). doi:10.1016/j.tra.2004.07.001
Steg L, Vlek C (1996) Car use as a social dilemma: conditions for behaviour change in reducing the use of motor vehicles. London
Steg, L., Vlek, C., Slotegraaf, G.: Cognitive-reasoned and affective-emotional motives for using a motor car. Transp. Res. F 4, 1–19 (2001)
Stradling SG, Meadows ML, Beatty S Identity and independence: two dimensions of driver autonomy. In: behavioural research in road safety: proceedings of the 10th seminar on behavioural research in road safety, 2001
Su, Q., Zhou, L.: Parking management, financial subsidies to alternatives to drive alone and commute mode choices in Seattle. Reg. Sci. Urban Econ. 42, 88–97 (2012). doi:10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2011.07.002
Taylor, E., Humphrey, A., Pickering, K., Tipping, S.: National Travel Survey: 2012. Department for Transport, London (2013)
Teal, R.F.: Carpooling: who, how and why. Transp. Res. Part A 21A, 203–214 (1987)
*Techanakamron, S.: Determining the Key Factors that Impact on the Level of Lift-sharing within the University of Southampton Community (2011)
Tischer, M.L., Dobson, R.: An empirical analysis of behavioral intentions of single-occupant auto drivers to shift to high occupancy vehicles. Transp. Res. Part A 13A, 143–158 (1979)
Triandis, H.C.: Interpersonal Behavior. Brooks/Cole, Monterey (1977)
Tsao, H.S.J., Lin, D.J.: Spatial and Temporal Factors in Estimating the Potential of Ride-sharing for Demand Reduction University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley (1999)
*Vanoutrive, T., Van De Vijver, E., Van Malderen, L., Jourquin, B., Thomas, I., Verhetsel, A., Witlox, F.: What determines carpooling to workplaces in Belgium: location, organisation, or promotion? J. Transp. Geogr. 22, 77–86 (2012). doi:10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2011.11.006
Verplanken, B., Aarts, H., Van Knippenberg, A., Van Knippenberg, C.: Attitude versus general habit: Antecedents of travel mode choice. J Appl Soc Psychol, 24, 285–300 (1994)
Vovsha, P., Petersen, E., Donnelly, R.: Explicit modeling of joint travel by household members: Statistical evidence and applied approach. Transp. Res. Rec. 1831/2003, 1–10 (2003)
Wall. R, Brög, W., Erl, E., Ryle, J, Barta, F.: A response to: Möser, G., & Bamberg, S. (2008). The effectiveness of soft transport policy measures: A critical assessment and meta-analysis of empirical evidence. J. Environ. Psychol., 28, 10–26. J. Environ. Psychol. 31, 266–269. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2011.05.004
*Washbrook, K., Haider, W., Jaccard, M.: Estimating commuter mode choice: A discrete choice analysis of the impact of road pricing and parking charges. Transportation 33, 621–639 (2006). doi:10.1007/s11116-005-5711-x
*Willson, R.W.: Estimating the travel and parking demand effects of employer-paid parking. Reg. Sci. Urban Econ. 22, 133–145 (1992). doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0166-0462(92)90029-Z
Wolf, F.M.: Meta-Analysis. Sage University Paper Series on Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences. SAGE, Newbury Park, CA (1986)
*Zhou, J.: Sustainable commute in a car-dominant city: Factors affecting alternative mode choices among university students. Transp. Res. Part A 46, 1013–1029 (2012). s10.1016/j.tra.2012.04.001
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank the three anonymous reviewers for their constructive and valuable feedback.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Neoh, J.G., Chipulu, M. & Marshall, A. What encourages people to carpool? An evaluation of factors with meta-analysis. Transportation 44, 423–447 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-015-9661-7
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-015-9661-7