Abstract
Increasing bicycle use for utilitarian trips is a common city objective for health and environmental improvement and congestion reduction, but cyclists react heterogeneously to interventions and infrastructure. Understanding cyclist types helps in comprehending and planning for this diverse population. This study uses data from 2004 surveyed Montreal cyclists to generate a multidimensional cyclist typology based on seven factors derived from 35 variables, mostly proven determinants of the intensity of bicycle usage. The analysis revealed four distinct cyclist types: dedicated cyclists, path-using cyclists, fairweather utilitarians, and leisure cyclists. The cycling frequencies of each group respond differently to potential interventions and vary within commuting rate ranges with apparent minima and maxima. Building a network adapted to different cyclist types and emphasizing its convenience, flexibility and speed, could be an effective strategy to increase cycling mode share and frequency among the various groups. Findings from this study can be of benefit to transportation engineers, planners and policy makers as they help in better understanding the impacts of various interventions on the different groups of cyclists.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Agence Métropolitaine de Transport: Enquête Origine-Destination. Région Métropolitaine de Montréal (2008)
Banister, D., Pucher, J., Lee-Gosselin, M.: Making sustainable transport politically and publicly acceptableL Lessons from the EU, USA and Canada. In: Rietveld, P., Stough, R. (eds.) Institutions and Sustainable Transport: Regulatory Reform in Advanced Economies, pp. 17–50. Edward Edgar Publishing, Cheltenham (2007)
Bergstrom, A., Magnusson, R.: Potential of transferring car trips to bicycle during winter. Transp. Res. Part A 37(8), 649–666 (2003)
Bhat, C., Sen, S., Eluru, N.: The impact of demographics, built environement attributes vehicle characteristics, and gasoline prices on household vehicle holding and use. Transp. Res. Part B 43(1), 1–18 (2009)
Cervero, R., Kockelman, K.: Travel demand and the 3Ds: density, diversity, and design. Transp. Res. Part D 2(3), 199–219 (1997)
Cleary, J., McClintock, H.: The Nottingham cycle-friendly employers project: lessons for encouraging cycle commuting. Local Environ. 5(2), 217–222 (2000). doi:10.1080/13549830050009364
Copenhagenize Design Co. (Producer): The Copenhagenize index 2013: Bicycle friendly cities (2013)
Daley, M., Rissel, C.: Perspectives and images of cycling as a barrier or facilitator of cycling. Transport Policy 18(1), 211–216 (2011). doi:10.1016/j.tranpol.2010.08.004
Dill, J., Carr, T.: Bicycle commuting and facilities in major US cities: if you build them, commuters will use them. Transp. Res. Rec. 1828, 116–123 (2003)
Dill, J., McNeil, N.: Four types of cyclists? Examining a typology to better understand bicycling behavior and potential. Paper presented at the Transportation Research Board Annual Meeting, Washington (2013)
Dillman, D., Smyth, J., Christian, L.: Internet, Mail and Mixed-Mode Surveys: The Tailored Design Method, 3rd edn. John Wiley and Sons Inc, Hoboken (2009)
Emond, C.R., Handy, S.L.: Factors associated with bicycling to high school: insights from Davis, CA. J. Transport Geogr. 20(1), 71–79 (2012)
Gatersleben, B., Haddad, H.: Who is the typical bicyclist? Transp. Res. Part F 13(1), 41–48 (2010)
Geller, R.: Four types of cyclists. Portland: Retrieved from http://www.portlandoregon.gov/transportation/article/264746 (2006). Accessed 19 April 2014
Gordon-Larsen, P., Nelson, M., Beam, K.: Associations among active transportation, physical activity, and weights status in young adults. Diet Phys. Act. 13(5), 868–875 (2005)
Guttenplan, M., Davis, B., Steiner, R., Miller, D.: Planning-level areawide multimodal level-of-service analysis: performance measures for congestion management. Transp. Res. Rec. 1858(2003), 61–68 (2007)
Handy, S., Cao, X., Mokhtarian, P.: Correlation or causality between the built environment and travel behavior? Evidence from Northern California. Transp. Res. Part D 10(6), 427–444 (2005)
Handy, S., Xing, Y.: Factors correlated with bicycle commuting: a study in six small US cities. Int. J. Sustain. Transp. 5(2), 91–110 (2010). doi:10.1080/15568310903514789
Jacobsen, P.: Safety in numbers: more walkers and bicyclists, safer walking and bicycling. Inj. Prev. 9(3), 205–209 (2003). doi:10.1136/ip.9.3.205
Jacques, C., Manaugh, K., El-Geneidy, A.: Rescuing the captive [mode] user: an alternative approach to transport market segragation. Transportation 40(3), 625–645 (2012)
Jensen, M.: Passion and hearth in transport—a sociological analysis on transport behaviour. Transp. Policy 6, 19–33 (1999)
Johansson, M.: Environment and parental factors as determinants of mode for children’s leisure travel. J. Environ. Psychol. 26(2), 156–169 (2006). doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2006.05.005
Kitamura, R., Mokhtarian, P., Laidet, L.: A micro-analysis of land use and travel in five neighborhoods in San Francisco Bay area. Transportation 24(2), 125–158 (1997)
Krizek, K., El-Geneidy, A.: Segmenting preferences and habits of transit users and non-users. J. Public Transp. 10(3), 71–94 (2007)
Kroesen, M., Handy, S.: The relation between bicycle commuting and non-work cycling: results from a mobility panel. Transportation 1–21 (2013). doi: 10.1007/s11116-013-9491-4
Landsberg, B., Plachta-Danielzik, S., Much, D., Johannsen, M., Lange, D.: Association between active commuting to school, fat mass and lifestyle factors in adolescents: the Kiel Obesity Prevention Study (KOPS). Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 62, 739–747 (2008)
Larsen, J., El-Geneidy, A.: A travel behavior analysis of urban cycling facilities in Montreal Canada. Transp. Res. Part D 16(2), 172–177 (2011)
Lee, J., Nam, J., Lee, S.: Built environment impacts on individual mode choice: an empirical study of the Houston-Galveston metropolitan area. Intern. J. Sustain. Transp. (2012). doi:10.1080/15568318.2012.716142
Nankervis, M.: The effect of weather and climate on bicycle commuting. Transp. Res. Part A 33(6), 417–431 (1999). doi:10.1016/S0965-8564(98)00022-6
Nkurunziza, A., Zuidgeest, M., Van Maarseveen, M.: Identifying potential cycling market segments in Dar-es-Salaam, Tanzania. Habitat Intern. 36(1), 78–84 (2012). doi:10.1016/j.habitatint.2011.06.002
Panter, J., Jones, A., van Sluijs, E., Griffin, S.: Attitudes, social support and environmental perceptions as predictors of active commuting behaviour in school children. [Research Support, Non-US Gov’t]. J. Epidemiol. Community Health 64(1), 41–48 (2010). doi:10.1136/jech.2009.086918
Québec, Vélo: L’état du vélo au Québec en 2010: zoom sur Montréal. In: Québec, V. (ed.) L’état du vélo au Québec, p. 28. Vélo Québec, Montréal (2010)
Reynolds, C., Winters, M., Ries, F., & Gouge, B. (2010). Active transportation in urban areas: Exploring health benefits and risks. National Collaboration Centre for Environmental Health, 1–15
Richardson, A.: Estimating bicycle usage on a national cycle network. Transp. Res. Record 1982, 166–173 (2006). doi:10.3141/1982-22
Statistics Canada: Canadian Census (2006)
Statistics Canada: Canadian Census (2011)
Stinson, M., Bhat, C.: Frequency of bicycle commuting: internet-based survey analysis. Transp. Res. Rec. 1878, 122–130 (2004). doi:10.3141/1878-15
Tal, G., Handy, S.: Children’s biking for non-school purposes: getting to soccer games in Davis. Transp. Res. Record 2074, 40–45 (2008)
Underwood, S., Handy, S.: Adolescent Attitudes Toward Active Transportation: Bicycling in Youth in Retrospect from Adulthood. University of California, California (2012)
van Exel, N., Rietveld, P.: Perceptions of public transport travel time and their effect on choice-sets among car drivers. J. Transp. Land Use 2(3), 75–86 (2010)
van Lierop, D., Grimsrud, M., & El-Geneidy, A. (2013). Breaking into bicycle theft: insights from Montreal, Canada. Intern. J. Sustain. Transp. (Accepted)
Ville de Montréal : Réinventer Montréal: Plan de transport 2008. Montréal (2008)
Wegman, F., Zhand, F., Dijkstrat, A.: How to make more cycling good for road safety. Accid. Anal. Prev. 44(1), 19–29 (2012)
Woodcock, J., Edwards, P., Tonne, C., Armstrong, B., Ashiru, O., Banister, D., Roberts, I. (2009). Public health benefits of strategies to reduce greenhouse-gas emissions: Urban land transport. www.thelancet.com, 374(9705), 1930–1943
Acknowledgments
This research was funded through National Sciences in Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) Discovery program. The authors would like to thank Daniel Schwartz for helping with survey-related technical issues, and Évelyne St-Louis for survey translation. We are also grateful to the Coalition Vélo Montréal for input on Montreal bicycle issues and all to the Montreal cyclists who filled out the survey and wrote insightful and sometimes extensive comments. Thanks to Mr. Daniel Bergeron from Agence Métropolitaine de Transport for providing the OD-surevy data used in the comparisons. Thanks to Kevin Manaugh and Dea van Lierop as well as all the Transportation Research at McGill (TRAM) research group members for their support during survey preparation and data collection and their useful analysis insights. Last but not least we would like to that the four anonymous reviewers for their great feedback on the earlier versions of the manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Damant-Sirois, G., Grimsrud, M. & El-Geneidy, A.M. What’s your type: a multidimensional cyclist typology. Transportation 41, 1153–1169 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-014-9523-8
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-014-9523-8