Skip to main content
Log in

What’s your type: a multidimensional cyclist typology

  • Published:
Transportation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Increasing bicycle use for utilitarian trips is a common city objective for health and environmental improvement and congestion reduction, but cyclists react heterogeneously to interventions and infrastructure. Understanding cyclist types helps in comprehending and planning for this diverse population. This study uses data from 2004 surveyed Montreal cyclists to generate a multidimensional cyclist typology based on seven factors derived from 35 variables, mostly proven determinants of the intensity of bicycle usage. The analysis revealed four distinct cyclist types: dedicated cyclists, path-using cyclists, fairweather utilitarians, and leisure cyclists. The cycling frequencies of each group respond differently to potential interventions and vary within commuting rate ranges with apparent minima and maxima. Building a network adapted to different cyclist types and emphasizing its convenience, flexibility and speed, could be an effective strategy to increase cycling mode share and frequency among the various groups. Findings from this study can be of benefit to transportation engineers, planners and policy makers as they help in better understanding the impacts of various interventions on the different groups of cyclists.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agence Métropolitaine de Transport: Enquête Origine-Destination. Région Métropolitaine de Montréal (2008)

  • Banister, D., Pucher, J., Lee-Gosselin, M.: Making sustainable transport politically and publicly acceptableL Lessons from the EU, USA and Canada. In: Rietveld, P., Stough, R. (eds.) Institutions and Sustainable Transport: Regulatory Reform in Advanced Economies, pp. 17–50. Edward Edgar Publishing, Cheltenham (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergstrom, A., Magnusson, R.: Potential of transferring car trips to bicycle during winter. Transp. Res. Part A 37(8), 649–666 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhat, C., Sen, S., Eluru, N.: The impact of demographics, built environement attributes vehicle characteristics, and gasoline prices on household vehicle holding and use. Transp. Res. Part B 43(1), 1–18 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cervero, R., Kockelman, K.: Travel demand and the 3Ds: density, diversity, and design. Transp. Res. Part D 2(3), 199–219 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cleary, J., McClintock, H.: The Nottingham cycle-friendly employers project: lessons for encouraging cycle commuting. Local Environ. 5(2), 217–222 (2000). doi:10.1080/13549830050009364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Copenhagenize Design Co. (Producer): The Copenhagenize index 2013: Bicycle friendly cities (2013)

  • Daley, M., Rissel, C.: Perspectives and images of cycling as a barrier or facilitator of cycling. Transport Policy 18(1), 211–216 (2011). doi:10.1016/j.tranpol.2010.08.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dill, J., Carr, T.: Bicycle commuting and facilities in major US cities: if you build them, commuters will use them. Transp. Res. Rec. 1828, 116–123 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dill, J., McNeil, N.: Four types of cyclists? Examining a typology to better understand bicycling behavior and potential. Paper presented at the Transportation Research Board Annual Meeting, Washington (2013)

  • Dillman, D., Smyth, J., Christian, L.: Internet, Mail and Mixed-Mode Surveys: The Tailored Design Method, 3rd edn. John Wiley and Sons Inc, Hoboken (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  • Emond, C.R., Handy, S.L.: Factors associated with bicycling to high school: insights from Davis, CA. J. Transport Geogr. 20(1), 71–79 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gatersleben, B., Haddad, H.: Who is the typical bicyclist? Transp. Res. Part F 13(1), 41–48 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geller, R.: Four types of cyclists. Portland: Retrieved from http://www.portlandoregon.gov/transportation/article/264746 (2006). Accessed 19 April 2014

  • Gordon-Larsen, P., Nelson, M., Beam, K.: Associations among active transportation, physical activity, and weights status in young adults. Diet Phys. Act. 13(5), 868–875 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  • Guttenplan, M., Davis, B., Steiner, R., Miller, D.: Planning-level areawide multimodal level-of-service analysis: performance measures for congestion management. Transp. Res. Rec. 1858(2003), 61–68 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  • Handy, S., Cao, X., Mokhtarian, P.: Correlation or causality between the built environment and travel behavior? Evidence from Northern California. Transp. Res. Part D 10(6), 427–444 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Handy, S., Xing, Y.: Factors correlated with bicycle commuting: a study in six small US cities. Int. J. Sustain. Transp. 5(2), 91–110 (2010). doi:10.1080/15568310903514789

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobsen, P.: Safety in numbers: more walkers and bicyclists, safer walking and bicycling. Inj. Prev. 9(3), 205–209 (2003). doi:10.1136/ip.9.3.205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacques, C., Manaugh, K., El-Geneidy, A.: Rescuing the captive [mode] user: an alternative approach to transport market segragation. Transportation 40(3), 625–645 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, M.: Passion and hearth in transport—a sociological analysis on transport behaviour. Transp. Policy 6, 19–33 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johansson, M.: Environment and parental factors as determinants of mode for children’s leisure travel. J. Environ. Psychol. 26(2), 156–169 (2006). doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2006.05.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kitamura, R., Mokhtarian, P., Laidet, L.: A micro-analysis of land use and travel in five neighborhoods in San Francisco Bay area. Transportation 24(2), 125–158 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krizek, K., El-Geneidy, A.: Segmenting preferences and habits of transit users and non-users. J. Public Transp. 10(3), 71–94 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kroesen, M., Handy, S.: The relation between bicycle commuting and non-work cycling: results from a mobility panel. Transportation 1–21 (2013). doi: 10.1007/s11116-013-9491-4

  • Landsberg, B., Plachta-Danielzik, S., Much, D., Johannsen, M., Lange, D.: Association between active commuting to school, fat mass and lifestyle factors in adolescents: the Kiel Obesity Prevention Study (KOPS). Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 62, 739–747 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larsen, J., El-Geneidy, A.: A travel behavior analysis of urban cycling facilities in Montreal Canada. Transp. Res. Part D 16(2), 172–177 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, J., Nam, J., Lee, S.: Built environment impacts on individual mode choice: an empirical study of the Houston-Galveston metropolitan area. Intern. J. Sustain. Transp. (2012). doi:10.1080/15568318.2012.716142

    Google Scholar 

  • Nankervis, M.: The effect of weather and climate on bicycle commuting. Transp. Res. Part A 33(6), 417–431 (1999). doi:10.1016/S0965-8564(98)00022-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nkurunziza, A., Zuidgeest, M., Van Maarseveen, M.: Identifying potential cycling market segments in Dar-es-Salaam, Tanzania. Habitat Intern. 36(1), 78–84 (2012). doi:10.1016/j.habitatint.2011.06.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Panter, J., Jones, A., van Sluijs, E., Griffin, S.: Attitudes, social support and environmental perceptions as predictors of active commuting behaviour in school children. [Research Support, Non-US Gov’t]. J. Epidemiol. Community Health 64(1), 41–48 (2010). doi:10.1136/jech.2009.086918

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Québec, Vélo: L’état du vélo au Québec en 2010: zoom sur Montréal. In: Québec, V. (ed.) L’état du vélo au Québec, p. 28. Vélo Québec, Montréal (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, C., Winters, M., Ries, F., & Gouge, B. (2010). Active transportation in urban areas: Exploring health benefits and risks. National Collaboration Centre for Environmental Health, 1–15

  • Richardson, A.: Estimating bicycle usage on a national cycle network. Transp. Res. Record 1982, 166–173 (2006). doi:10.3141/1982-22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Statistics Canada: Canadian Census (2006)

  • Statistics Canada: Canadian Census (2011)

  • Stinson, M., Bhat, C.: Frequency of bicycle commuting: internet-based survey analysis. Transp. Res. Rec. 1878, 122–130 (2004). doi:10.3141/1878-15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tal, G., Handy, S.: Children’s biking for non-school purposes: getting to soccer games in Davis. Transp. Res. Record 2074, 40–45 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Underwood, S., Handy, S.: Adolescent Attitudes Toward Active Transportation: Bicycling in Youth in Retrospect from Adulthood. University of California, California (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  • van Exel, N., Rietveld, P.: Perceptions of public transport travel time and their effect on choice-sets among car drivers. J. Transp. Land Use 2(3), 75–86 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  • van Lierop, D., Grimsrud, M., & El-Geneidy, A. (2013). Breaking into bicycle theft: insights from Montreal, Canada. Intern. J. Sustain. Transp. (Accepted)

  • Ville de Montréal : Réinventer Montréal: Plan de transport 2008. Montréal (2008)

  • Wegman, F., Zhand, F., Dijkstrat, A.: How to make more cycling good for road safety. Accid. Anal. Prev. 44(1), 19–29 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woodcock, J., Edwards, P., Tonne, C., Armstrong, B., Ashiru, O., Banister, D., Roberts, I. (2009). Public health benefits of strategies to reduce greenhouse-gas emissions: Urban land transport. www.thelancet.com, 374(9705), 1930–1943

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was funded through National Sciences in Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) Discovery program. The authors would like to thank Daniel Schwartz for helping with survey-related technical issues, and Évelyne St-Louis for survey translation. We are also grateful to the Coalition Vélo Montréal for input on Montreal bicycle issues and all to the Montreal cyclists who filled out the survey and wrote insightful and sometimes extensive comments. Thanks to Mr. Daniel Bergeron from Agence Métropolitaine de Transport for providing the OD-surevy data used in the comparisons. Thanks to Kevin Manaugh and Dea van Lierop as well as all the Transportation Research at McGill (TRAM) research group members for their support during survey preparation and data collection and their useful analysis insights. Last but not least we would like to that the four anonymous reviewers for their great feedback on the earlier versions of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ahmed M. El-Geneidy.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Damant-Sirois, G., Grimsrud, M. & El-Geneidy, A.M. What’s your type: a multidimensional cyclist typology. Transportation 41, 1153–1169 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-014-9523-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-014-9523-8

Keywords

Navigation