Skip to main content
Log in

The call of the road: factors predicting students’ car travelling intentions and behaviour

  • Published:
Transportation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The most common daily trip for employed persons and students is the commute to and from work and/or place of study. Though there are clear environmental, health and safety benefits from using public transport instead of private vehicles for these trips, a high proportion of commuters still choose private vehicles to get to work or study. This study reports an investigation of psychological factors influencing students’ travel choices from the perspective of the Theory of Planned Behaviour (TPB). Students from three different university campuses (n = 186) completed a cross-sectional survey on their car commuting behaviour. Particular focus was given to whether car commuting habits could add to understanding of commuting behaviour over and above behavioural intentions. Results indicated that, as expected, behavioural intention to travel by car was the strongest TPB predictor of car commuting behaviour. Further, general car commuting habits explained additional variance over and above TPB constructs, though the contribution was modest. No relationship between habit and intentions was found. Overall results suggest that, although student car commuting behaviour is habitual in nature, it is predominantly guided by reasoned action. Implications of these findings are that in order to alter the use of private vehicles, the factors influencing commuters’ intentions to travel by car must be addressed. Specifically, interventions should target the perceived high levels of both the acceptability of commuting by car and the perceived control over travel undertaken by private vehicle.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. While the order in which the variables were entered into the hierarchical regression was theoretically determined, a second regression was conducted for exploratory purposes. In this exploratory regression, Habit and Intentions were entered simultaneously at step 1, followed by the Interaction at step 2. This model confirmed that Intentions was the stronger predictor, with a β of 0.575 as compared to Habit, which had a β of 0.248. Although both of these β were significant, Habit only accounted for 10% of the unique variance (sr2 = 0.1) compared to Intentions which accounted for 36% (sr2 = 0.36).

References

  • Aarts, H., Verplanken, B., Van Kippenberg, A.: Habit and information use in travel mode choice. Acta. Psychol. 96, 1–14 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ajzen, I.: The theory of planned behavior. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 50, 179–211 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Armitage, C.J., Conner, M.: Efficacy of the theory of planned behaviour: a meta-analytic review. Br. J. Soc. Psychol. 40(4), 471–499 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Australian Bureau of Statistics.: Australian social trends 1996 transport—special features: car use. Retrieved April 25, 2004, from http://www.abs.gov.au/Ausstats/abs@nsf/0/73f5696b10a8f71dca2569d000164394?OpenDocument (1996)

  • Australian Government Department of Environment and Heritage.: Global warming: cool it! transport. Retrieved April 25, 2004, from http://www.greenhouse.gov.au/gwci/transport.html (2005)

  • Australian Transport Safety Bureau.: Retrieved April 25, 2004, from http://www.atsb.gov.au/index.cfm (2005)

  • Bamberg, S., Ajzen, I., Schmidt, P.: Choice of travel mode in the theory of planned behavior: the roles of past behavior, habit, and reasoned action. Basic Appl. Soc. Psychol. 25(3), 175–187 (2003a)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bamberg, S., Rolle, D., Weber, C.: Does habitual car use not lead to more resistance to change of travel mode? Transportation 30(1), 97–108 (2003b)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daily, J.M., Martin, J.H.: Situational analysis of bus riders and non-riders for different transportation methods. Logist. Transp. Rev. 24(2), 185–199 (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidov, E., Schmidt, P., Bamberg, S.: Time and money an empirical explanation of behavior in the context of travel-mode choice with the german microcensus. Eur. Sociol. Rev. 19(3), 267–280 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doyle, B.: Travel to and from work and place of study, Brisbane and Moreton statistical divisions. Retreived April 25, 2004, from http://www.ausstats.abs.gov.au/ausstats/subscriber.nsf/0/CA25687100069892CA2568890028AA92/$File/92013_Oct%201997.pdf (1998)

  • Elliott, M.A., Armitage, C.J., Baughan, C.J.: Drivers’ compliance with speed limits: an application of the theory of planned behaviour. J. Appl. Psychol. 88, 964–972 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Francis, J., Eccles, M., Johnston, M., Walker, A., Grimshaw, J., Foy, R., Kaner, E., Smith, L., Bonetti, D.: Constructing Questionnaire Based on the Theory of Planned Behaviour. Centre for Health Services Research, UK (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  • Fujii, S., Kitamura, R.: What does a one-month free bus ticket do to habitual drivers? Transportation 30(1), 81–95 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garvill, J., Marell, A., Nordlund, A.: Effects of increased awareness on choice of travel mode. Transportation 30(1), 63–79 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenslade, J.H., White, K.M.: The prediction of above regular participation in volunteerism: a test of theory of planned behaviour and the volunteers functions inventory. J. Soc. Psychol. 145(2), 155–172 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanna, J.B., Drea, J.T.: Understanding and predicting passenger rail travel: an empirical study. Transp. J. 38(1), 38–46 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  • Newnam, S.A., Watson, B.C., Murray, W.: Factors predicting intentions to speed in a work and personal vehicle. Transp. Res. Part F: Traffic Psychol. Behav. 7(4–5), 287–300 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oullette, J.A., Wood, W.: Habit and intention in everyday life: the multiple processes by which past behavior predicts future behavior. Psychol. Bull. 124(1), 54–74 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quit South Australia.: Tobacco in Australia. Available at: http://www.quitsa.org.au/cms_resources/documents/infosheet_tobacco_in_australia.pdf (2008)

  • Rhodes, R.E., Courneya, K.S.: Relationship between personality, an extended theory of planned behaviour model and exercise. J. Health Psychol. 1, 19–36 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  • Verplanken, B., Aarts, H., van Knippenberg, A.: Habit, information acquisition, and the process of making travel mode choices. Eur. J. Soc. Psychol. 27, 539–560 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verplanken, B., Aarts, H., van Knippenberg, A., Moonen, A.: Habit versus planned behavior: a field experiment. Br. J. Soc. Psychol. 37, 111–128 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alexia Lennon.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kerr, A., Lennon, A. & Watson, B. The call of the road: factors predicting students’ car travelling intentions and behaviour. Transportation 37, 1–13 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-009-9217-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-009-9217-9

Keywords

Navigation