Abstract
This article uses data from the 2001 National Household Travel Survey (NHTS) to compare travel behavior in rural and urban areas of the U.S. As expected, the car is the overwhelmingly dominant mode of travel. Over 97% of rural households own at least one car vs. 92% of urban households; 91% of trips are made by car in rural areas vs. 86% in urban areas. Regardless of age, income, and race, almost everyone in rural areas relies on the private car for most travel needs. Mobility levels in rural areas are generally higher than in urban areas. That results from the more dispersed residences and activity sites in rural areas, which increase trip distances and force reliance on the car. Somewhat surprisingly, the rural elderly and poor are considerably more mobile than their urban counterparts, and their mobility deficit compared to the rural population average is strikingly less than for the urban elderly and poor compared to the urban average. Data limitations prevented a measurement of accessibility, however, and it seems likely that rural areas, by their very nature, are less accessible than urban areas, especially for the small percentage of car-less poor and elderly households.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- HOV:
-
high occupancy vehicle
- NHTS:
-
National Household Travel Survey
- NPTS:
-
Nationwide Personal Transportation Survey
- SOV:
-
single occupancy vehicle
References
American Public Transportation Association (2002) Public Transportation Fact Book 2002. Washington, DC: American Public Transportation Association.
C Beale (1999) ArticleTitleNonmetro population rebound: Still real but diminishing Rural Conditions and Trends 9 IssueID2 20–27
S Borgen (1998) ArticleTitleYou can get there from here Community Transportation 16 IssueID3 10–33
Community Transportation Association of America (2004) National Summary Statistics for Federally Funded Rural Transit Programs. Washington, DC: CTAA. Accessible at http://www.ctaa.org/ntrc/directories/intro_5311.asp.
N Foster P Damiano E Momany H McLeran (1995) ArticleTitleTravel pattern of rural elders Transportation Quarterly 49 IssueID3 51–65
Federal Transit Administration (2003) 2002 Statistical Summaries: Grant Assistance Programs.Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Transportation.
Federal Transit Administration (2003) National Transit Database 2001. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Transportation.
N Glascow R Blakely (2000) ArticleTitleOlder nonmetropolitan residents’ evalutations of their transportation arrangements Journal of Applied Gerontology 19 IssueID1 95–116
T Hagerstrand (1970) ArticleTitleWhat about people in regional science Papers of the Regional Sciences Association 24 7–21
K Halfacre (1995) ArticleTitleTalking about rurality: Social representations of rural as expressed by the residents of six English parishes Rural Studies 1 1–20
Handy S & Clifton K (2001) Evaluating neighborhood accessibility: Possibilities and practicalities.Journal of Transportation and Statistics, September/December 2001: 67–78.
S Handy D Niemeier (1997) ArticleTitleMeasuring accessibility Environment and Planning A29 1175–1194
S Hanson (1996) Getting there S Hanson (Eds) Geography of Urban Transportation Guilford Press New York 3–25
M Hibbard C Roemer (1999) ArticleTitlePlanning the global countryside: Comparing approaches to teaching rural planning Journal of Planning Education and Research 19 44–56
D Ingram (1971) ArticleTitleThe concept of accessibility: A search for an operational form Regional Studies 5 IssueID2 101–107
M Lapping T Daniels J Keller (1989) Rural Planning and Development in the United States Guilford Press New York
M Lapping (1992) ArticleTitleAmerican rural planning, development policy, and the centrality of the federal State: An interpretative history Rural History: Economic, Society, Culture 3 IssueID2 219–242
M Meyer E Miller (2001) Urban Transportation Planning McGraw-Hill New York
M Mosley (1979) Accessibility: The Rural Challenge Methuen London
C Ogden K Flegal M Carroll C Johnson (2002) ArticleTitlePrevalence and trends in overweight among US children and adolescents Journal of the American Medical Association 288 1728–1732
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (2002) Total Expenditures on Health per Capita, 1960–2000, in US Dollars, Purchasing Power Parity. OECD, Washington, DC. Accessible at http://www.oecd.org/xls/M00031000/M00031378.xls.
M Pacione (2001) Urban Geography: A Global Perspective Routledge London
J Pucher T Evans J Wenger (1998) ArticleTitleSocioeconomics of urban travel: Evidence from the 1995 NPTS Transportation Quarterly 52 IssueID3 15–33
J Pucher L Dijkstra (2003) ArticleTitlePromoting safe walking and cycling to improve public health: Lessons from the Netherlands and Germany American Journal of Public Health 93 1509–1516
J Pucher J Renne (2003) ArticleTitleSocioeconomics of urban travel: Evidence from the 2001 NHTS Transportation Quarterly 57 IssueID3 49–78
Ricketts T, Johnson-Webb K & Taylor P (1998) Definitions of Rural: A Handbook for Health Policy Makers and Researchers . Chapel Hill, NC: North Carolina Rural Research Health Program, University of North Carolina.
S Rosenbloom (2002) ArticleTitleFacing societal challenges: The need for new paradigms in rural transit service Community Transportation 20 IssueID4 16–27
S Rosenbloom (2003) ArticleTitleFacing societal challenges: The need for new paradigms in rural transit service Journal of Public Transportation 6 IssueID1 1–18
K Schaeffer E Sclar (1980) Access for All Columbia University Press New York
E Strunkel (1997) ArticleTitleRural public transportation and the mobility of older persons: Paradigms for policy Journal of Aging and Social Policy 9 IssueID3 67–86
InstitutionalAuthorNameTransportation Research Board (1999) New Paradigms for Local Public Transportation Organizations (TCRP Report 53) National Academy of Sciences Washington, DC
U.S. Department of Agriculture (1997) Understanding Rural America. Washington DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture Economic Research Service. Accessible at http://www. ers.usda.gov/publications/aib710/
U.S. Department of Agriculture (1997) Understanding Rural America. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service. Accessible at http://www. ers.usda.gov/publications/aib710/.
U.S. Department of Commerce (2002a) Census 2000 Basics U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, DC
U.S. Department of Commerce (2002b) Census 2000 Urban and Rural Classification . Washington, DC: U.S Census Bureau. Accessible at http://www.census.gov/geo/www/ua/ua_2k.html.
U.S. Department of Commerce (2003) Statistical Abstract of the United States U.S Government Printing Office Washington, DC
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (2002)One Department Serving Rural America: HHS Rural Task Force Report to the Secretary. Washington, DC: Office of Rural Health Policy, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
InstitutionalAuthorNameU.S. Department of Transportation (2001) Planning for Transportation in Rural Areas Federal Highway Adminstration Washington, DC
InstitutionalAuthorNameU.S. Department of Transportation (1999) 1995 Nationwide Personal Transportation Survey Federal Highway Administration Washington, DC
U.S. Department of Transportation (2003) 2001 National Household Travel Survey. Washington, DC: Federal Highway Administration and Bureau of Transportation Statistics. Accessible at http://nhts.ornl.gov/2001/index.shtml.
InstitutionalAuthorNameWorld Health Organization (2001) Estimates of Healthy Life Expectancy for 191 Countries in the Year 2000: Methods and Results World Health Organization Geneva, Switzerland
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pucher, J., Renne, J.L. Rural mobility and mode choice: Evidence from the 2001 National Household Travel Survey. Transportation 32, 165–186 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-004-5508-3
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-004-5508-3