Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The Institutional Trust Paradox in Bangladesh

  • Published:
Public Organization Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper maps institutional trust in Bangladesh and analyzes to what extent citizens perceive public institutions to be trustworthy. According to a number of expert evaluations, public and political institutions in Bangladesh do not stand out as very trustworthy. Yet, despite such expert evaluations, recent survey data indicate that popular trust is quite high in certain major institutions such as the parliament and the central government. Since it is misplaced, the high level of popular institutional trust presents a paradox. It implies some kind of blind or naive trust, which may be dysfunctional for the emergence of a democratic governance system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Nazma Akhter, president of Sommilito Garments Sramik Federation (United Garment Workers’ Federation) said, “It seems that workers [in garment factories] have no rights and dignity in Bangladesh”. The Bangladesh Garment Manufacturer Export Association (a trade body representing garment manufacturer and exporters) had utterly failed to protect the workers, she said. “It [the BGMEA] formed committees just for show. None of its reports has ever blamed factory owners for any accidents”, said Akhter (The Daily Star, 1 May, 2013 http://www.thedailystar.net/beta2/news/owners-probe-owners-fault/ [Accessed 1 May 2013]

  2. This study is based on a country-wide door-to-door questionnaire survey including 2,000 households conducted in 2009 in Bangladesh. The method was personal interview with a person who is 18 or above in a household. After selecting 21 districts from 6 divisions (Dhaka, Chittagong, Rajshahi, Khulna, Barisal, and Sylhet) and deciding the number of interviews from a district, the sample was again divided on the basis of upazila (or sub-district), and respondents were randomly selected from households from 43 upazilas. Sample distribution is presented in the appendix.

  3. Samaj literally means society in Bangla language.

References

  • Ali, T. & Hossain, N. (2006). Popular expectations of government: findings from three areas in Bangladesh. PRCPB Working Paper No. 13, Programme for Research on Chronic Poverty in Bangladesh (PRCPB) Bangladesh Institute of Development Studies (BIDS), Dhaka.

  • Askvik, S. (2007). Political regime and popular trust in the civil service: South Africa and Norway compared. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice. doi:10.1080/13876980601145748.

  • Askvik, S., & Bak, N. (Eds.). (2005). Trust in public institutions in South Africa. Aldershot: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Askvik, S. & Jamil, I. (2007). Citizens’ trust in public institutions: a key issue of governance in Bangladesh. Paper presented to the NFU Conference at Chr. Michelsen Institute, Bergen 5–7 November 2.

  • Askvik, S. (1995). Bangladesh. In P. Baehr (Ed.), Human rights in developing countries: Yearbook 1995 (pp. 91–126). The Hague: Kluwer Law.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bouckaert, G., Lægreid, P., & Van de Walle, S. (2005). Introduction. Public Performance and Management Review, 28(4), 460–464.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang, E. C. C., & Chu, Y. (2006). Corruption and trust: exceptionalism in Asian democracies. The Journal of Politics, 68(2), 259–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fukuyama, F. (1998). Asian values and civilization. Paper presented in the ICAS Fall Symposium ‘Asia’s Challenge Ahead,‘ University of Pennsylvania.

  • Haque, S. T. M. & Mohammad, S. M. (2012). Administrative culture and incidence of corruption in Bangladesh: A Search for the Potential Linkage. Unpublished paper.

  • Hofstede, G., Hofstede, G. J., & Minkov, M. (2010). Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hossain, N. (2009). Who trusts government? understanding political trust among the poor in Bangladesh. National University of Singapore: Asia Research Institute Working Paper No 103.

  • Hossain N. & Osman, F. (2007). Politics and governance in the social sectors in Bangladesh, 1991–2006. Research Monograph Series No. 34. Dhaka: Research and Evaluation Division, BRAC.

  • Inglehart, R. et al. (2004). Human beliefs and values. A cross-cultural source book based on the 1999–2002 Values surveys. Mexico, D.F.: Sigloveintiuno Editores S.A. de C.V.

  • Jamil, I. (2002). Administrative culture in Bangladesh: tension between tradition and modernity. International Review of Sociology, 12(1), 93–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jamil, I. (2007). Administrative culture in Bangladesh. Dhaka: A H Development Publishing House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jamil, I., & Haque, M. (2005). The culture of tadbir: the “building block” of decision-making in the civil service of Bangladesh. In R. B. Jain (Ed.), Globalization and good governance: Pressures for constructive reforms (xv (pp. 175–203). New Delhi: Deep and Deep.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jansen, E. (1990). Process of polarization and breaking up of patron-client relationship in rural Bangladesh. In O. D. K. Norbye (Ed.), Bangladesh faces the future. Dhaka: University Press Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kabeer, N. (2003). Making rights work for the poor: NijeraKori and the construction of collective capabilities in rural Bangladesh. IDS Working Paper 2003. Brighton, Sussex: Institute of Development Studies.

  • Kim, S. E. (2005). The role of trust in the modern administrative state: an integrative model. Administration & Society, 37(5), 611–634.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knox, C. (2009). Dealing with sectoral corruption in Bangladesh: developing citizen involvement. Public Administration and Development, 29, 117–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levi, M. (1998). A state of trust. In V. Braithwaite & M. Levi (Eds.), Trust and governance. New York: Russell Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mishler, W., & Rose, R. (2001). What are the origins of political trust? testing institutional and cultural theories in post-communist societies. Comparative Political Studies, 34(1), 30–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moniruzzaman, M. (2009). Parliamentary democracy in Bangladesh: an evaluation of the parliament during 1991–2006. Commonwealth & Comparative Politics, 47(1), 100–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Offe, C. (1999). How can we trust our fellow citizens? In M. E. Warren (Ed.), Democracy and trust (pp. 42–87). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, R. (1993). Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quadir, F. (2010). Consolidating democracy without trust: Bangladesh’s breakdown of consensus in 2007. The Round Table, 99(406), 65–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarker, A. B. (2009). The New mode of public governance and public accountability in developing countries: an analysis with particular reference to Bangladesh. International Journal of Public Administration, 32, 1101–1123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sztompka, P. (1999). Trust: A sociological theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van de Walle, S., & Bouckaert, G. (2003). Public service performance and trust in government: the problem of causality. International Journal of Public Administration, 26(8–9), 891–913.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van de Walle, S. & Six, F. (2013). Trust and distrust as distinct concepts: why studying distrust in institutions is important. In Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13876988.2013.785146

  • White, S. (1999). NGOs, civil society, and the state in Bangladesh: the politics of representing the poor. Development and Change, 30, 307–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wong, T. K., Wan, P., & Hsiao, H. M. (2011). The bases of political trust in six Asian societies: institutional and cultural explanations compared. International Political Science Review, 32(3), 263–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood, G. (2000). Prisoners and escapees: improving the institutional responsibility square in Bangladesh. Public Administration and Development, 20, 221–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. (2010). Bangladesh. Country assistance strategy 12011–2014. World Bank Office Dhaka. www.worldbank.org.bd/bds [Accessed 10 October 2010]

  • Zafarullah, H. M., & Siddiquee, N. A. (2001). Dissecting public sector corruption in Bangladesh: issues and problems of control. Public Organization Review: A Global Journal, 1, 465–486.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Steinar Askvik.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Askvik, S., Jamil, I. The Institutional Trust Paradox in Bangladesh. Public Organiz Rev 13, 459–476 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11115-013-0263-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11115-013-0263-6

Keywords

Navigation