Skip to main content
Log in

Transformational Leadership, Organizational Clan Culture, Organizational Affective Commitment, and Organizational Citizenship Behavior: A Case of South Korea's Public Sector

  • Published:
Public Organization Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The present study examines whether transformational leadership is associated with clan culture, affective commitment, and organizational citizenship behavior and whether affective commitment is positively related to organizational citizenship behavior. The study also examines whether affective commitment mediates the effects of clan culture on organizational citizenship behavior and whether clan culture mediates the effects of transformational leadership on affective commitment. The results of this study indicate a positive relationship between transformational leadership and clan culture as well as between transformational leadership and affective commitment; no significant relationship between clan culture and organizational citizenship behavior as well as between transformational leadership and organizational citizenship behavior; and a significant positive relationship between affective commitment and organizational citizenship behavior as well as between clan culture and affective commitment . Thus, the results clearly show that affective commitment fully mediates the relationship between clan culture and organizational citizenship behavior and that clan culture partially mediates the relationship between transformational leadership and affective commitment. Theoretical and practical implications of these findings as well as interesting avenues for future research are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Albrecht, S. (2005). Leadership climate in the public sector: feelings matter too. International Journal of Public Administration, 28, 397–416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen, N. J., & Meyer, J. P. (1990). The measurement and antecedents of affective, continuance and normative commitment to the organization. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 63, 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen, N. J., & Meyer, J. P. (1996). Affective, continuance, and normative commitment to the organization: an examination of construct validity. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 49, 252–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: a review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 411–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Avolio, B. J., & Yammarino, F. J. (1990). Operationalizing charismatic leadership using a levels-of-analysis framework. The Leadership Quarterly, 1, 193–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Avolio, B. J., Bass, B. M., & Jung, D. J. (1999). Re-examining the components of transformational and transactional leadership using the multifactor leadership questionnaire. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 72, 441–462.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Avolio, B. J., Bass, B. M., Walumbwa, F. O., & Zhu, W. (2004a). MLQ Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire: Technical report, leader form, rate form, and scoring key for MLQ form 5x-Short (3rd ed.). Redwood City: Mind Garden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Avolio, B. J., Zhu, W., Koh, W., & Bhatia, P. (2004b). Transformational leadership and organizational commitment: mediating role of psychological empowerment and moderating role of structural distance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25, 951–968.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Babcock, M., & Strickland, O. (2010). The relationship between charismatic leadership, work engagement, and organizational citizenship behaviors. Journal of Psychology, 144, 313–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barney, J. B. (1986). Organizational culture: can it be a source of sustained competitive advantage. Academy of Management Review, 11, 656–665.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bass, B. M. (1985a). Leadership and performance beyond expectations. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bass, B. M. (1985b). The multifactor leadership questionnaire: Form 5. Binghamton: State University of New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bass, B. M. (1990). From transactional to transformational leadership: learning to share the vision. Organizational Dynamics, 18, 19–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bass, B. M., & Avolio, B. J. (1990). The implications of transactional and transformational leadership for individual, team, and organizational development. Research in Organizational Change and Development, 4, 231–272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bass, B. M., & Avolio, B. J. (1994). Improving organizational effectiveness through transformational leadership. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bass, B. M., & Avolio, B. J. (1995). The multifactor leadership questionnaire. Redwood City: Mind Garden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bass, B. M., & Avolio, B. J. (1997). Full range leadership development: Manual for the multifactor leadership questionnaire. Redwood City: Mind Garden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bass, B. M., & Bass, R. B. (2008). The bass handbook of leadership: Theory, research, and managerial applications (4th ed.). New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bass, B. M., & Riggio, R. E. (2006). Transformational leadership. Mahwah: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 238–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bielby, D. D. (1992). Commitment to work and family. Annual Review of Sociology, 18, 281–301

    Google Scholar 

  • Bollen, K. A. (1989). A new incremental fit index for general structural equation models. Sociological Methods and Research, 17, 303–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models. Newbury Park: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burns, J. M. (1978). Leadership. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cameron, K. S., & Freeman, S. J. (1991). Cultural congruence, strength, and type: relationships to effectiveness. Research in Organizational Change and Development, 5, 81–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cameron, K. S., & Quinn, R. E. (1998). Diagnosing and changing organizational culture: Based on the competing values framework. Reading: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cameron, K. S., Quinn, R. E. (2010). Diagnosing and changing organizational culture: Based on the competing values framework. Jossey-Bass.

  • Deal, T. E., & Kennedy, A. A. (1982). Corporate cultures: The rites and rituals of corporate life. Reading: Addison-Wensley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dick, G.P.M. (2010). “The influence of managerial and job variables on organizational commitment in the police,” Public Administration (Early View), 1−20.

  • Dorfman, P. W., & House, R. J. (2004). Cultural influences on organizational leadership: Literlature review, theoretical rationale, and GLOBE project goals. In R. J. House, P. J. Hanges, M. Javidan, P. W. Dorfman, & V. Gupta (Eds.), Culture, leadership, and organizations: The GLOBE study of 62 societies (pp. 51–73). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finkelstein, M. A. (2006). Dispositional predictors of organizational citizenship behavior: motives, motive fulfillment, and role identity. Social Behavior & Personality, 34, 603–616.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluation structural equation models with unobservable variable and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 39–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gautam, T., Dick, R. V., Wagner, U., Upadhyay, N., & Davis, A. (2005). Organizational citizenship behavior and organizational commitment in Nepal. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 8, 305–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gong, Y., Law, K. S., Chang, S., & Xin, K. R. (2009). Human resources management and firm performance: the differential role of managerial affective and continuance commitment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(1), 263–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herold, D. M., Fedor, D. B., Caldwell, S., & Liu, Y. (2008). The effects of transformational and change leadership on employees’ commitment to a change: a multilevel study. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(2), 346–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across nations. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, G., & Hofstede, G. J. (2005). Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaussi, K. S. (2007). Attitudinal commitment: a three-dimensional construct. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 80, 51–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jung, D. I., & Avolio, B. J. (1999). Effects of leadership style and followers’ cultural orientation on performance in group and individual task conditions. Academy of Management Journal, 42, 208–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jung, Y. K., & Lee, K. M. (2000). An empirical study on the relationships between leadership behavior, organizational justice, and organizational citizenship behavior. Korean Public Administration Review, 34(4), 323–341.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, D. (1964). The motivational basis of organizational behavior. Behavioral Science, 9, 131–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, H. J. (2001). The effects of transformational/transactional leadership on the organizational commitment: a comparison of public and private sector employees. Korean Public Administration Review, 35(2), 197–216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, S. (2006). Public service motivation and organizational citizenship behavior in Korea. International Journal of Manpower, 27(8), 722–740.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, H. (2007). A study on the causal relationship among organizational justice, organizational trust, and organizational citizenship behavior. Korean Public Administration Review, 41(2), 69–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, H. (2009). A study on the relationship between leadership and organizational effectiveness. Journal of Social Science, 35(3), 69–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, H. (2012). Transformational leadership and organisational citizenship behavior in the public sector in South Korea: the mediating role of affective commitment. Local Government Studies, 38(6), 867–892.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirkman, B. L., Chen, G., Farh, J., Chen, Z. X., & Lowe, K. B. (2009). Individual power distance orientation and follower reactions to transformational leaders: a cross-level, cross-cultural examination. Academy of Management Journal, 53, 744–764.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koh, W. L., Steers, R. M., & Terborg, J. R. (1995). The effects of transformational leadership on teacher attitudes and student performance in Singapore. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 16, 319–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kotter, J. P., & Heskett, J. L. (1992). Corporate culture and performance. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lavelle, J. J., Rupp, D. E., & Brockner, J. (2007). Taking a multifoci approach to the study of justice, social exchange, and citizenship behavior: the target similarity model. Journal of Management, 33, 841–866.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lavelle, J. J., Brockner, J., Konovsky, M. A., Price, K. H., Henley, A. B., Taneja, A., & Vinekar, V. (2009). Commitment, procedural fairness, and organizational citizenship behavior: a multifoci analysis. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 30(3), 337–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leithwood, K., & Jantzi, D. (2000). The effects of transformational leadership on organizational conditions and student engagement with school. Journal of Educational Administration, 38, 112–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LePine, J. A., Erez, A., & Johnson, D. E. (2002). The nature of dimensionality of organizational citizenship behavior: a critical review and meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 52–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacKenzie, S. B., Podsakoff, P. M., & Ahearne, M. (1996). Effects of OCB on sales team effectiveness. Bloomington: Unpublished Data Analysis, Indiana University School of Business.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacKenzie, S. B., Podsakoff, P. M., & Rich, G. A. (2001). Transformational and transactional leadership and salesperson performance. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 29, 115–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, J. P., & Allen, N. J. (1991). A three component conceptualization of organizational commitment. Human Resource Management Review, 1, 61–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, J. P., Becker, T. E., & Vandenberghe, C. (2004). Employee commitment and motivation: a conceptual analysis and integrative model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 991–1007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mowday, R. T., Steers, R. M., & Porter, L. W. (1979). The measurement of organizational commitment. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 14, 224–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mowday, R. T., Porter, L. M., & Steers, R. M. (1982). Employee-organizational linkages: The psychology of commitment, absenteeism, and turnover. New York: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Reilly, C., & Chatman, J. (1986). Organizational commitment and psychological attachment: the effects of compliance, identification, and internalization on pro-social behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71, 492–499.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ogbonna, E., & Harris, L. G. (2002). Organizational culture: a ten year, two-phase study of change in the UK food retailing sector. Journal of Management Studies, 39, 673–706.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Organ, D. W. (1988). Organizational citizenship behavior: The good soldier syndrome. Toronto: Lexington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Organ, D. W., Podsakoff, P. M., & MacKenzie, S. B. (2006). Organizational citizenship behavior: Its nature, antecedents, and consequences. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

  • Park, T., & Kim, M. (2008). The effects of personnel administrative fairness on organizational citizenship behavior under the new liberalistic reform of personnel administration in Seoul metropolitan government. Korean Public Administration Review, 42(3), 261–291.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piccolo, R. F., & Colquitt, J. A. (2006). Transformational leadership and job behaviors: the mediating role of core job characteristics. Academy of Management Journal, 49, 327–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Moorman, R. H., & Fetter, R. (1990). Transformational leader behaviors and their effects on followers’ trust in leader, satisfaction, and organizational citizenship behaviors. The Leadership Quarterly, 1, 107–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Podsakoff, P. M., Mackenzie, S. B., & Bommer, W. H. (1996). Transformational leadership behavior and substitutes for leadership as determinants of employee satisfaction, commitment, trust and organizational citizenship behaviors. Journal of Management, 22, 259–298.

    Google Scholar 

  • Podsakoff, P. M., Mackenzie, S. B., Paine, J. B., & Bachrach, D. G. (2000). Organizational citizenship behaviors: a critical review of the theoretical and empirical literature and suggestions for future research. Journal of Management, 26(3), 513–563.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Podsakoff, P. M., Mackenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 879–903.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Podsakoff, N. P., Whiting, S. W., Podsakoff, P. M., & Blume, B. D. (2009). Individual- and organizational-level consequences of organizational citizenship behaviors: a meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 122–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Price, J., & Muller, C. (1981). Professional turnover: The case of nurses. New York: Medical and Scientific Books.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Riketta, M. (2008). The causal relation between job attitudes and performance: a meta-analysis of panel studies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(2), 472–481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romzek, B. S. (1989). Personal consequences of employee commitment. Academy of Management Journal, 32, 649–661.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romzek, B. S. (1990). Employee investment and commitment: the ties that bind. Public Administration Review, 50, 374–382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rowold, J., & Rohmann, A. (2009). Transformational and transactional leadership styles, followers’ positive and negative emotions, and performance in german nonprofit orchestras. Nonprofit Management & Leadership, 20, 41–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schappe, S. P. (1998). The influence of job satisfaction, organizational commitment, and fairness perceptions on organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Psychology, 132, 227–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schein, E. H. (1990). Organizational culture. American Psychologist, 48, 109–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Selig, J. P., & Preacher, K. J. (2009). Mediation models for longitudinal data in developmental research. Research in Human Development, 6(2–3), 144–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, C. A., Organ, D. W., & Near, J. P. (1983). Organizational citizenship behavior: its nature and antecedents. Journal of Applied Psychology, 68, 653–663.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Todd, S. Y., & Kent, A. (2006). Direct and indirect effects of task characteristics on organizational citizenship behavior. North American Journal of Psychology, 8, 253–268.

    Google Scholar 

  • Triandis, H. C. (1995). Individualism and collectivism. Boulder: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tusi, A. S., Wang, H., & Xin, K. R. (2006). Organizational culture in China: an analysis of culture dimensions and culture types. Management and Organization Review, 2, 345–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Knippenberg, D., & Sitkin, S. B. (2013). A critical assessment of charismatic-transformational leadership research: Back to the drawing board? Academy of Management Annals, 7, 1–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vigoda, E., & Golembiewski, R. T. (2001). Citizenship behavior and the spirit of new Managerialism: a theoretical framework and challenge for governance. American Review of Public Administration, 31, 273–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, S. L., & Rush, M. C. (2000). Altruistic organizational citizenship behavior: context, disposition, and age. Journal of Social Psychology, 140(3), 379–391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walumbwa, F. O., & Lawer, J. J. (2003). Building effective organizations: transformational leadership, collectivist orientation, work-related attitudes, and withdrawal behaviors in three emerging economies. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 14, 266–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walumbwa, F. O., Orwa, B., Wang, P., & Lawer, J. J. (2005). Transformational leadership, organizational commitment, and job satisfaction: a comparative study of Kenyan and U.S. financial firms. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 16, 235–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walumbwa, F. O., Hartell, C. A., & Oke, A. (2010). Servant leadership, procedural justice climate, service climate, employee attitudes, and organizational citizenship behavior: a cross-level investigation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(3), 517–529.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, H., Law, K. S., Hackett, R. D., Wang, D., & Chen, Z. X. (2005). Leader-member exchange as a mediator of the relationship between transformational leadership and followers’ performance and organizational citizenship behavior. Academy of Management Journal, 48, 420–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, L. J., & Anderson, S. E. (1991). Job satisfaction and organizational commitment as predictors of organizational citizenship behaviors and in-role behaviors. Journal of Management, 17, 601–617.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea Grant funded by the Korean Government (NRF-2012S1A5A2A01018318).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hougyun Kim.

Appendix Scale Items

Appendix Scale Items

Transformational Leadership (Bass and Avolio 1997; MacKenzie et al. 2001; Organ et al. 2006; Podsakoff et al. 1990):

Items preceded by “My supervisor…”

  1. 1.

    articulates a vision (t1).

  2. 2.

    provides an appropriate model (t2).

  3. 3.

    facilitates the acceptance of group goals (t3).

  4. 4.

    challenges me to think about old problems in new ways (t4).

  5. 5.

    shows respect for my personal feelings (t5).

Clan Culture (Cameron and Quinn 1998)

  1. 1.

    The organization is like an extended family in that it is a very personal place (cc1).

  2. 2.

    People seem to share a lot of themselves (cc2).

  3. 3.

    Commitment to this organization runs high (cc3).

  4. 4.

    The organization emphasizes human development (including employee morale), participation, and consensus (cc4).

Affective Commitment (Allen and Meyer 1990, 1996; Meyer and Allen 1991; Mowday et al. 1982):

  1. 1.

    This organization has a great deal of personal meaning for me (ac1).

  2. 2.

    I enjoy discussing my organization with outsiders (ac2).

  3. 3.

    I would be happy to spend the rest of my career with this organization (ac3).

  4. 4.

    Most days, I am enthusiastic about my work (ac4).

  5. 5.

    I am willing and ready to do anything for my organization (ac5).

  6. 6.

    I am greatly interested in the future of my organization (ac6).

Organizational Citizenship Behavior (Podsakoff et al. 1990; 2000; Smith et al. 1983):

Items preceded by “I”

Altruism

  1. 1.

    help orient new people, even though it is not required (a1).

  2. 2.

    help others who have heavy workloads (a2).

  3. 3.

    am always ready to lend a helping hand to those around me (a3).

  4. 4.

    help others who have been absent (a4).

  5. 5.

    willingly help others who have work-related problems (a5).

Civic virtue

  1. 6.

    make constructive suggestions that can improve the operation of the organization (cv1).

  2. 7.

    keep abreast of changes in the organization (cv2).

  3. 8.

    attend functions that are not required but help the company image (cv3).

  4. 9.

    attend meetings that are not mandatory but are considered important (cv4).

Conscientiousness

  1. 10.

    do not take extra breaks (c1).

  2. 11.

    obey company rules and regulations, even when no one is watching (c2).

  3. 12.

    believe in giving an honest day’s work for an honest day’s pay (c3).

  4. 13.

    have a work attendance record that is above the norm (c4).

Sportsmanship (reverse-scored)

  1. 14.

    consume a lot of time complaining about trivial matters (s1).

  2. 15.

    always focus on what is wrong, rather than the positive side (s2).

  3. 16.

    always find faults with what the organization is doing (s3).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kim, H. Transformational Leadership, Organizational Clan Culture, Organizational Affective Commitment, and Organizational Citizenship Behavior: A Case of South Korea's Public Sector. Public Organiz Rev 14, 397–417 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11115-013-0225-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11115-013-0225-z

Keywords

Navigation