Skip to main content
Log in

Interaction Frequency and Quality as Two Dimensions of Complementarity: An Empirical Examination of Some Contingency Variables

  • Published:
Public Organization Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Suggesting a complementarity relationship between elected and administrative officials, recent literature emphasizes a frequent interaction based on mutual respect, reciprocal influence, and political responsiveness, all of which are presented as indicators of the quality of such interactions. Although interaction frequency and quality emerged as two important dimensions of what defines this complementarity relationship, very few studies, indeed, focused on the important question of what contributes to interaction frequency and quality. This paper first examines the concepts of interaction frequency and quality, and then identifies some important contingency variables that might have an impact on interaction frequency and quality.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aberbach, J. D. (1994). Civil Servants and policy makers: neutral or responsive competence? Governance, 7(4), 461–469.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Booth, D. (1968). Are elected mayors a threat to managers. Administrative Science Quarterly, 12(4), 572–589.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carrel, J. J. (1962). The city manager and his council: sources of conflict. Public Administration Review, 22(4), 203–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crewson, P. E., & Fisher, B. S. (1997). Growing older and wiser: the changing skill requirements of city administrators. Public Administration Review, 57(5), 380–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Demir, T. (2009). The complementarity view: exploring a continuum in political-administrative relations. Public Administration Review, 69(5), 876–888.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, D. D., & Legge, J. S. (2002). Politics and administration in U.S. local governments. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 12(3), 401–422.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ebdon, C., & Brucato, P. F. (2000). Government structures in large US cities: are forms converging? International Journal of Public Administration, 23(12), 2209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fleischmann, A. (1989). Politics, administration, and local land-use regulation. Public Administration Review, 49(4), 337–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fox, R. L., & Schuhmann, R. A. (1999). Gender and local government: a comparison of women and men city managers. Public Administration Review, 59(3), 231–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frederickson, G. H., & Johnson, G. A. (2001). The adapted American city: a study of institutional dynamics. Urban Affairs Review, 36(6), 872–884.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • French, E. P. (2005). Policy, management, and political activities: a current evaluation of the time allocations of mayors and managers in small cities and towns. The Social Science Journal, 42, 499–510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giegold, W. C., & Dunsing, R. J. (1978). Team-building in the local jurisdiction: two case studies. Public Administration Review, 38(1), 59–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Golembiewski, R. T., & Gabris, G. T. (1995). Tomorrow’s city management: guides for avoiding success-becoming-failure. Public Administration Review, 55(3), 240–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guy, M. E., & Newman, M. A. (2004). Women’s jobs, man’s jobs: sex segregation and emotional labor. Public Administration Review, 64(3), 289–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanbury, G. L., Sapat, A., & Washington, C. W. (2004). Know yourself and take charge of your own destiny: the “fit model” of leadership. Public Administration Review, 64(5), 566–576.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, K. M., & Ejersbo, N. (2002). The relationship between politicians and administrators—a logic of disharmony. Public Administration, 80(4), 733–750.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hasset, W. L., & Watson, D. J. (2002). Long-serving city managers: practical application of the academic literature. Public Administration Review, 62(5), 622–629.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, K., & Chang, S. (1990). Relative efficiency of city manager and mayor-council forms of government. Southern Economic Journal, 57(1), 167–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hubbell, L. (1991). Ronald Regan as presidential symbol maker: the Federal bureaucrat as loafer, incompetent buffoon, good ole boy, and tyrant. American Review of Public Administration, 21(3), 237–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ingraham, P. W., Thompson, J. R., & Eisenberg, E. F. (1995). Political management strategies and political/career relationships: where are we now in the federal government? Public Administration Review, 55(3), 263–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobsen, D. I. (2006). The relationship between politics and administration: the importance of contingency factors, formal structure, demography, and time. Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions., 19(2), 303–323.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaatz, J. B., French, E. P., & Prentiss-Cooper, H. (1999). City council conflict as a cause of psychological burnout and voluntary turnover among city managers. State and Local Government Review, 31(3), 162–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kiracofe, J. H. (1990). Managing tomorrow’s cities. Public Productivity & Management Review, 14(1), 1–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lorentzen, P. (1985). Stress in political-career executive relations. Public Administration Review, 45(3), 411–414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, D. W. (1988). The fading legacy of Woodrow Wilson. Public Administration Review, 48(2), 631–636.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nalbandian, J. (1994). Reflections of a ‘Pracademic’ on the logic of politics and administration. Public Administration Review, 54(6), 531–536.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nalbandian, J. (1999). Facilitating community, enabling democracy: new roles for local government managers. Public Administration Review, 59(3), 187–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nalbandian, J. (2004). Politics and administration in council-manager government: differences between newly elected and senior council members. Public Administration Review, 64(2), 200–2008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pelissero, J. P., & Krebs, T. B. (1997). City council legislative committees and policy making in large United States cities. American Journal of Political Science, 41(2), 499–518.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pfiffner, J. P. (1987). Political appointees and career executives: the democracy-bureaucracy nexus in the third century. Public Administration Review, 47(1), 57–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rourke, F. E. (1992). Responsiveness and neutral competence in American bureaucracy. Public Administration Review, 52(6), 539–546.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saltzstein, A. L. (1974). City managers and city councils: perceptions of the division of authority. The Western Political Quarterly, 27(2), 275–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, W. H., & Posner, B. Z. (1987). Values and expectations of city managers in California. Public Administration Review, 47(5), 404–409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stivers, C. M. (2002). Gender images in public administration: legitimacy and the administrative state. CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Streib, G. (1992). Professional skill and support for democratic principles: the case of local government department heads in Northern Illinois. Administration & Society, 24(1), 22–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Svara, J. H. (1987). Mayoral leadership in council-manager cities: preconditions versus preconceptions. Journal of Politics, 49(1), 207–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Svara, J. H. (1990). Official leadership in the city. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Svara, J. H. (1999). Complementarity of politics and administration as a legitimate alternative to the dichotomy model. Administration & Society, 30(6), 676–705.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Svara, J. H. (2001). The myth of the dichotomy: Complementarity of politics and administration in the past and future of public administration. Public Administration Review, 61(2), 176–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • West, W. F. (2005). Neutral competence and political responsiveness: an uneasy relationship. Policy Studies Journal, 33(2), 147–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wheeland, C. M. (2000). City management in the 1990s: responsibilities, roles, and practices. Administration & Society, 32(3), 255–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitaker, G. P., & DeHoog, R. H. (1991). City managers under fire: how conflict leads to turnover. Public Administration Review, 51(2), 156–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White, L. G. (1982). Improving the goal-setting process in local government. Public Administration Review, 42(1), 77–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wikstrom, N. (1979). The mayor as a policy leader in the council-manager form of government: a view from the field. Public Administration Review, 39(3), 270–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, P. J. (1999). Neutral and responsive competence: the Bureau of the Budget, 1939–1948 revisited. Administration & Society, 31(1), 142–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tansu Demir.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Demir, T. Interaction Frequency and Quality as Two Dimensions of Complementarity: An Empirical Examination of Some Contingency Variables. Public Organiz Rev 11, 265–281 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11115-010-0123-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11115-010-0123-6

Keywords

Navigation