Abstract
This study investigates the extent to which older (age 60 and over) and younger (age 20–34) Americans live in the same neighborhoods. It documents residential segregation by age in 1990, 2000, and 2010 at multiple scales and examines how degrees of age segregation vary across geographic space. Multi-level analysis illustrates the extent to which segregation occurs between states, between counties, between county subdivisions, and at the microscale between blocks within county subdivisions. Mapping and spatial analysis analyze geographic variation in age segregation, assessing regional patterns, and demonstrating spatial clustering. Results show that at the microscale older and younger adults are moderately segregated (at a similar extent as are Hispanics and non-Hispanic whites), and age segregation is stark in certain geographic areas that experience segregation at both macro- and micro-levels.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
While age 65 and over is a standard retirement age, I’ve used 60 and over because data suggest that retirement migration begins before age 65. Data from Census 2000 indicate that about 25 % of those age 60–64 move and that this proportion drops to 20% of those in their 70s. Similarly, net migration estimates by age (Winkler et al. 2013) suggest that retirement migration is strong at ages 60–64 as well as 65–69.
References
Anselin, L. (1988). Spatial econometrics: Methods and models. New York: Springer.
Attias-Donfut, C. (2000). Cultural and economic transfers between generations: One aspect of age integration. The Gerontologist, 40(3), 270–272.
Binstock, R. H. (2010). From compassionate ageism to intergenerational conflict. The Gerontologist, 50(5), 574–585.
Cowgill, D. O. (1978). Residential segregation by age in American metropolitan areas. Journal of Gerontology, 33(3), 446–453.
Duncan, O. D., & Duncan, B. (1955). A methodological analysis of segregation indices. American Sociological Review, 20, 210–217.
Foner, A. (2000). Age integration or age conflict as society ages? The Gerontologist, 40(3), 272–275.
Gadek, E.A. 2008. “Flocking together: Bridging and bonding ties in retirement migration.” Honors projects. Paper 14: Macalester College. http://digitalcommons.macalester.edu/soci_honors/14. Accessed 20 Aug 2012.
Hagestad, G. O., & Uhlenberg, P. (2006). Should we be concerned about age segregation? Some theoretical and empirical explorations. Research on Aging, 28(6), 638–653.
Lee, Barrett A., et al. (2008). Beyond the census tract: patterns and determinants of racial segregation at multiple geographic scales. American Sociological Review, 73(5), 766–791.
Lichter, D. T., Parisi, D., Grice, S. M., & Taquino, M. C. (2007). National estimates of racial segregation in rural and small-town America. Demography, 44(3), 563–581.
Massey, D. S., & Denton, N. A. (1988). The dimensions of residential segregation. Social Forces, 67(2), 281–315.
Parisi, D., Lichter, D. T., & Taquino, M. C. (2011). Multi-scale residential segregation: black exceptionalism and America’s changing color line. Social Forces, 89(3), 829–852.
Preston, S. (1984). Children and the elderly in the US. Scientific American, 51(6), 44–49.
Reardon, S. F. 2002. SEG: Stata module to compute multiple-group diversity and segregation indices. http://econpapers.repec.org/software/bocbocode/s375001.htm. Accessed 20 Aug 2012.
Riley, M. W., & Riley, J. W, Jr. (2000). Age integration: Conceptual and historical background. The Gerontologist, 40(3), 266–2670.
Uhlenberg, P. (2000). Introduction to essays on age integration: Why study age integration? The Gerontologist, 40(3), 261–266.
U.S. Census Bureau. (1992). Census of Population and Housing, 1990. Summary Tape File 1.
U.S. Census Bureau. (2001). 2000 Census Summary File 1.
U.S. Census Bureau. (2011). 2010 Census Summary File 1.
Winkler, R. L. (2013). Living on lakes: Segregated communities and social exclusion in a natural amenity destination. The Sociological Quarterly, 54(1), 105–129.
Winkler, R. L., Johnson K. M., Cheng C., Voss P. R., & Curtis K. J. (2013). “County-specific net migration by 5-year age groups, Hispanic origin, race and sex, 2000–2010.” CDE Working Paper No. 2013-04. Center for Demography and Ecology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI.
Acknowledgments
This work would not have been possible without the technical assistance provided by Rozalynn Klaas at the Applied Population Laboratory at the University of Wisconsin-Madison. I would also like to thank David Long (also of the APL) for his comments and suggestions. A map (co-authored with Rozalynn Klaas) related to this project is published online in the Journal of Maps, Volume 8, Issue 4. Related research was presented at the 2011 Rural Sociological Society annual meeting in Boise, ID, the 2011 Southern Demographic Association meeting in Tallahassee, FL and the 2012 Population Association of America annual meeting in San Francisco, CA. Comments and suggestions provided by several colleagues at those meetings, as well as those provided by the anonymous reviewers and editorial team at PRPR and for this special issue, have improved this project and this manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Manuscript prepared for submission as a Research Note to the Special Issue on Census 2010 in Population Research and Policy Review.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Winkler, R. Research Note: Segregated by Age: Are We Becoming More Divided?. Popul Res Policy Rev 32, 717–727 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11113-013-9291-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11113-013-9291-8