Skip to main content
Log in

Who Stays? Who Goes? Selective Emigration Among the Foreign-Born

  • Published:
Population Research and Policy Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We investigate the level and selectivity of emigration from the United States among foreign-born adults. We use the CPS Matching Method (Van Hook et al. 2006) to estimate the probability of emigration among foreign-born adults aged 18–34, 35–64 and 65+ from 1996 to 2009 (N = 92,852). The results suggest higher levels of emigration than used in the production of official population estimates. Also, indicators of economic integration (home ownership, school enrollment, poverty) and social ties in the U.S. (citizenship, having young children, longer duration in the United States) deter emigration. Conversely, having connections with the sending society, such as living apart from a spouse, was associated with emigration, particularly among Mexican men. Health was least strongly related to emigration. Simulations suggest that selective emigration may alter the home ownership and marital status, but not health, composition of immigrant cohorts. The implications for public policy are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The logistic regression models include a wide range of predictor variables, including age, sex, ethnic origin, education, marital status, household composition, year, month-in-sample, self-reported health, home ownership, and poverty status.

  2. For example, a person at year t can be no more than 2 years younger than the matched case in year t + 1.

  3. The proportion of a cohort that emigrated (px) after x years with an annual emigration rate of e is: px = 1 − (1 − e)x.

  4. These estimates satisfy two constraints: that 0.66/1.08 = 0.61, and that the weighted average emigration rate = 1% (0.2 * 0.66 + 0.8 * 1.08 = 1).

References

  • Abraido-Lanza, A. F., Lohrenwend, B. P., Ng-Mak, D. S., & Turner, J. B. (1999). The Latino mortality paradox: A test of the ‘Salmon Bias’ and healthy migrant hypotheses. American Journal of Public Health, 89, 1543–1548.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahmed, B., & Robinson, J.G. (1994). Estimates of emigration of the foreign-born population: 1980–1990. Population Division Working Paper No. 9, U.S. Census Bureau. Washington, DC. http://www.census.gov/population/www/techpap.html.

  • Bauer, T., & Gang, I. N. (1998). Temporary migrants from Egypt: How long do they stay abroad? IZA Discussion Papers No. 3.

  • Bean, F. D., & Stevens, G. (2003). America’s newcomers and the dynamics of diversity. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benjamins, M., Hummer, R. A., Eberstein, I. W., & Nam, C. B. (2004). Self-reported health and adult mortality risk: An analysis of cause-specific mortality. Social Science and Medicine, 59(6), 1297–1306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borjas, G. J. (1989). Immigrant and emigrant earnings: A longitudinal study. Economic Inquiry, 27(1), 21–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borjas, G. J., & Bratsberg, B. (1996). Who leaves? The outmigration of the foreign-born. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 78(1), 165–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cerrutti, M., & Massey, D. S. (2001). On the auspices of female migration from Mexico to the United States. Demography, 38(2), 187–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cho, Y., Frisbie, W. P., Hummer, R. A., & Rogers, R. G. (2004). Nativity, duration of residence, and the health of Hispanic adults in the United States. International Migration Review, 38, 184–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Constant, A., & Massey, D. S. (2003). Self-selection, earnings, and out-migration: A longitudinal study of immigrants to Germany. Journal of Population Economics, 16, 631–653.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duleep, H. (1994). Social security and the emigration of immigrants. Social Security Bulletin, 57(1), 37–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duleep, H. O., & Dowhan, D. (2002). Insights from longitudinal data on the earnings growth of U.S. foreign-born men. Demography, 39(3), 485–506.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duleep, H. O., & Mark, C. R. (1997). Measuring immigrant wage growth using matched CPS files. Demography, 34(2), 239–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edin, P. A., LaLonde, R. J., & Aslund, O. (2000). Emigration of immigrants and measures of immigrant assimilation: Evidence from Sweden. Swedish Economic Review, 7(2), 163–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernandez, E. W. (1995). Estimates of the annual emigration of U.S. born persons by using foreign censuses and selected administrative data: Circa 1980. Population Division Technical Working Paper No. 10. U.S. Census Bureau: Washington, DC. http://www.census.gov/population/www/techpap.html.

  • Gibbs, J., Harper, G., Rubin, M., & Shin, H. (2003). Evaluating components of international migration: Native-born emigrants. Population Division Working Paper No. 63. http://www.census.gov/population/www/techpap.html.

  • Hanson, G. H. (2007). The economic logic of illegal immigration. The Bernard and Irene Schwartz Series on American Competitiveness, CRS No. 26 (April 2007). New York: Council on Foreign Affairs.

  • Hu, W.-Y. (2000). Immigrant earnings assimilation: estimates from longitudinal data. American Economic Review, 90(2), 368–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hummer, R. A., Gossman, G., Powers, D., Pullum, S. G., & Frisbie, W. P. (2007). Paradox found (again): Infant mortality among the Mexican origin population in the United States. Demography, 44, 441–457.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Idler, I., & Benyamini, Y. (1997). Self-rated health and mortality: A review of twenty-seven community studies. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 38, 21–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jasso, G., & Rosenzweig, M. R. (1982). Estimating the emigration rates of legal immigrants using administrative and survey data: The 1971 cohort of immigrants to the United States. Demography, 19(3), 279–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jasso, G., & Rosenzweig, M. (1988). How well do U.S. immigrants do? Vintage effects, emigration selectivity, and occupational mobility of immigrants. In P. T. Schultz (Ed.), Research of Population Economics 6 (pp. 229–253). Greenwich, CO, London: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jasso, G., & Rosenzweig, M. (1990). The new chosen people: Immigrants in the United States. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, P., & Pederson, P. J. (2007). To stay or not to stay? Out-migration of immigrants from Denmark. International Migration, 45(5), 87–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kraly, E. P. (1998). Emigration: Implications for U.S. immigration policy research. In Migration between Mexico and the United States: Binational study, Vol. 2 Research reports and background materials (pp. 587–618). Mexico City and Washington, DC: Mexican Ministry of Foreign Affairs and the U.S. Commission on Immigration Reform.

  • Liao, Y., Cooper, R. S., Cao, G., Durazo-Arvizu, R., Kaufman, J. S., Luke, A., et al. (1998). Mortality patterns among adult Hispanics: Findings from the NHIS, 1986 to 1990. American Journal of Public Health, 88, 227–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindstrom, D., & Massey, D. S. (1994). Selective emigration, cohort quality, and models of immigrant assimilation. Social Science Research, 23(4), 315–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lowell, L. B., Gelatt, J., & Batalova, J. (2006). Immigrants and labor force trends: The future, past, and present. Insight 17 (July 2006). Washington, DC: Migration Policy Institute.

  • Madrian, B. C., & Lefgren, L. J. (1999). An approach to longitudinally matching the current population survey. NBER Technical Working Paper No. 247. National Bureau of Economic Research. November. http://papers.nber.org/papers/T0247.

  • Markides, K. S., & Eschbach, K. (2005). Aging, migration, and mortality: Current status of research on the Hispanic Paradox. Journals of Gerontology, Series B, 60B(Special Issue II), 68–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Massey, D. S. (1987). Understanding Mexican migration to the United States. American Journal of Sociology, 92(6), 1332–1403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Massey, D. S. (1999). Why does immigration occur? In C. Hirschman, P. Kasinitz, & J. DeWind (Eds.), The handbook of international migration: The American experience (pp. 21–33). New York.: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Massey, D. S., Durand, J., & Malone, N. J. (2002). Beyond smoke and mirrors: Mexican migration in an era of economic integration. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGee, D. L., Liao, Y., Cao, G., & Cooper, R. S. (1999). Self-reported health status and mortality in a multiethnic U.S. cohort. American Journal of Epidemiology, 149, 41–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meissner, D., Meyers, D., Papademetriou, D. G., & Fix, M. (2006). Immigration and America’s future: A new chapter. Report of the independent task force on immigration and America’s future, Spencer Abraham and Lee H. Hamilton, Co-Chairs. Washington DC: Migration Policy Institute.

  • Mulder, T. (2003). Foreign-born emigration from the United States: 1990 to 2000. Paper presented at the 2003 annual meetings of the Population Association of America, Minneapolis, MN.

  • Myers, D. (2006). Immigrants and boomers. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palloni, A., & Arias, E. (2004). Paradox lost: Explaining the Hispanic adult mortality advantage. Demography, 41(3), 385–416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parrado, E. A., & Flippen, C. A. (2005). Migration and gender among Mexican women. American Sociological Review, 70(4), 606–632.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pessar, P. R. (1999). The role of gender, households, and social networks. In C. Hirschman, P. Kasinitz, & J. DeWind (Eds.), The handbook of international migration: The American experience (pp. 34–52). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramos, F. A. (1992). Out-migration and return migration of Puerto Ricans. In G. J. Borjas & R. Freeman (Eds.), Immigration and the work force. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reagan, P. B., & Olsen, R. J. (2000). You can go home again: Evidence from longitudinal data. Demography, 37(3), 339–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rendall, M. S., Brownell, P., & Kups, S. (2009). Declining return migration from the United States to Mexico in the late-2000s Recession. Rand Labor and Population Working Paper (WR-720): Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corporation.

  • Rendall, M. S., & Torr, B. M. (2008). Emigration and schooling among second-generation Mexican-American children. International Migration Review, 42(3), 729–738.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riosmena, F. (2004). Return versus settlement among undocumented Mexican migrants: 1980 to 1996. In J. Durand & D. S. Massey (Eds.), Crossing the border: Research from the Mexican migration project (pp. 265–280). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, C. M. (1994). The country of origin, family structure and return migration of germany’s guest-workers. Viertaljahrsheft zur Wirtschaftsforschung, 63(1), 119–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turra, C. M., & Elo, I. T. (2008). The impact of Salmon Bias on the Hispanic mortality advantage: New evidence from social security data. Population Research and Policy Review, 27(5), 515–530.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Census Bureau (2002). Current population survey: Design and methodology. Technical Paper No. 63RV. Washington, DC. March. http://www.bls.census.gov/cps/tp/tp63.htm.

  • U.S. Census Bureau (2010). Methodology for the United States resident population estimates by age, sex, race, and Hispanic origin (Vintage 2009): April 1, 2000 to July 1, 2009. Washington, DC. Accessed March 29, 2010, http://www.census.gov/popest/topics/methodology/2009-nat-meth.pdf.

  • Van Hook, J., & Frank, D. B. (2009). Explaining the Distinctiveness of Mexican-Immigrant Welfare Behaviors: The Importance of Employment Related Cultural Repertoires. American Sociological Review, 74(3), 423–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Hook, J., Zhang, W., Bean, F. D., & Passel, J. S. (2006). Foreign-born emigration: A new approach and estimates based on matches CPS files. Demography, 43, 361–382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warren, R., & Peck, J. M. (1980). Foreign-born Emigration from the United States: 1960 to 1970. Demography, 17(1), 71–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White, M. J., & Lindstrom, D. P. (2006). Internal migration. In D. L. Poston & M. Micklin (Eds.), Handbook of population (pp. 311–346). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to acknowledge the support of the U.S. Census Bureau, Sabre Systems, Inc., and the Department for Homeland Security. This research was also supported through infrastructure grants to the Population Research Institute at the Pennsylvania State University by the National Institutes of Health.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jennifer Van Hook.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Van Hook, J., Zhang, W. Who Stays? Who Goes? Selective Emigration Among the Foreign-Born. Popul Res Policy Rev 30, 1–24 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11113-010-9183-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11113-010-9183-0

Keywords

Navigation