Skip to main content
Log in

Geographic Information Systems and Spatial Data Processing in Demography: a Review

  • Published:
Population Research and Policy Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper reviews the use of geographic information systems (GIS) software for spatial data processing in demography. The review begins with an introduction to GIS. Next, it traces the three major types of spatial data problems confronting demographers: the geocoding and geoprocessing of microdata, estimation of detailed population surfaces, and combining data aggregated to incompatible zone systems. GIS and non-GIS solutions to these problems are contrasted, with examples from published research. Spatially pre-processed datasets available to demographers are then discussed. The author concludes by noting that the solutions GIS provides to previously intractable data problems in spatial demography might encourage a focus on dynamic processes of population change in local areas.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alba, R. D., Denton, N. A., Leung, S. J., & Logan, J. R. (1995). Neighborhood change under conditions of mass immigration: The New York City Region 1970–1990. International Migration Review, 29, 625–656.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen, J. P., & Turner, E. (2002). Changing faces, changing places: Mapping southern Californians. Northridge, CA: The Center for Geographical Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bracken, I., & Martin, D. (1989). The generation of spatial population distributions from census centroid data. Environment and Planning A, 21, 537–543.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, F. M., Brieman, R. F., Farley, M., Plikaytis, B., Deaver, K., & Cetron, M. S. (1998). Geocoding and linking data from population-based surveillance and the US census to evaluate the impact of median household income on the epidemiology of invasive Streptococcus pneumoniae infections. American Journal of Epidemiology, 148, 1212–1218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, W. A. V. (1996). Residential patterns: Avoidance, assimilation and succession. In R. Waldinger, & M. Bozorgmehr (Eds.), Ethnic Los Angeles (pp. 109–138). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cockings, S., Fisher P., & Langford, M. (1997). Parameterization and visualization of the errors in areal interpolation. Geographical Analysis, 29, 314–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coulson, N. E., & Leichenko, R. M. (2004). Historic preservation and neighborhood change. Urban Studies, 41, 1587–1600.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crowder, K. (2000). The racial context of white mobility: An individual-level assessment of the white flight hypothesis. Social Science Research, 29, 223–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Denton, N. A., & Massey, D. S. (1991). Patterns of neighborhood transition in a multi-ethnic world: U.S. metropolitan areas, 1970–1980. Demography, 28, 41–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dragicevic, S., & Marceau, D. J. (1999). Spatio-temporal interpolation and fuzzy logic for GIS simulation of rural-to-urban transition. Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 26, 125–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, O. D., & Duncan, B. (1957). The Negro population of Chicago. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eicher, C., & Brewer, C. (2001). Dasymetric mapping and areal interpolation: Implementation and evaluation. Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 28, 125–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellen, I. G. (2000). Race-based neighborhood projection: A proposed framework for understanding new data on racial integration. Urban Studies, 37, 1513–1533.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elliott, D. S., Quinn, M. A., & Mendelson, R. E. (1985). Maintenance behavior of large-scale landlords and theories of neighborhood succession. AREUEA Journal, 13, 424–445.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, M., Reibel, M., & Wright, R. (1999). Comparative metropolitan area analysis: Matching the 1980 and 1990 Census Public Use Microdata Samples for metropolitan areas. Urban Geography, 20, 75–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, P., & Langford, M. (1995). Modeling the errors in areal interpolation between zonal systems by Monte Carlo simulation. Environment and Planning A, 27, 211–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, P., & Langford, M. (1996). Modeling sensitivity to accuracy in classified imagery. Professional Geographer, 48, 299–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flowerdew, R., & Green, M. (1989). Statistical methods for inference between incompatible zone systems. In M. Goodchild, & S. Gopal (Eds.), The accuracy of spatial databases (pp. 239–247). London, England: Taylor and Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flowerdew, R., & Green, M. (1992). Developments in areal interpolation methods and GIS. Annals of Regional Science, 26, 67–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fong, E., & Gulia, M. (2000). Neighborhood changed within the Canadian ethnic mosaic, 1986–1991. Population Research and Policy Review, 19, 155–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fong, E., & Shibuya, K. (2003). Economic changes in Canadian neighborhoods. Population Research and Policy Review, 22, 147–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foster, E. M., & McLanahan, S. (1996). An illustration of the use of instrumental variables: Do neighborhood conditions affect a young person’s chance of finishing high school? Psychological Methods, 1, 249–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, L., & Rohe, W. (2000). Subsidized housing and neighborhood racial transition: An empirical investigation. Housing Policy Debate, 11, 67–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galster, G. (1990). White flight from racially integrated neighborhoods in the 1970s: The Cleveland experience. Urban Studies, 27, 385–399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galster G. (1998). A stock/flow model of defining racially integrated neighborhoods. Journal of Urban Affairs, 20, 43–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galster, G., Mincy, R., & Tobin, M. (1997). The disparate racial neighborhood impacts of metropolitan economic restructuring. Urban Affairs Review, 32, 797–824.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gober, P. (1986). How and why Phoenix households changed: 1970–1980. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 76, 536–549.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodchild, M., Anselin, L., & Deichmann, U. (1993). A framework for the aerial interpolation of socioeconomic data. Environment and Planning A, 25, 383–397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodchild, M., & Lam, N. (1980). Aerial interpolation: A variant of the traditional spatial problem. Geo-Processing, 1, 297–312.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, D. R. (1999). “Property values drop when blacks move in, because...”: Racial and socioeconomic determinants of neighborhood desirability. American Sociological Review, 64, 461–479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krieger, N. (1992). Overcoming the absence of socioeconomic data in medical records: Validation and application of a census-based methodology. American Journal of Public Health, 82, 703–710.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krieger, N., Chen, J. T., Waterman, P. D., Soobader, M. J., Subramanian, S. V., & Carson, R. (2002). Geocoding and monitoring of US socioeconomic inequalities in mortality and cancer incidence: Does the choice of area-based measure and geographic level matter? The Public Health Disparities Geocoding Project. American Journal of Epidemiology, 156, 471–482.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krieger, N., Chen, J. T., Waterman, P. D., Soobader, M. J., Subramanian, S. V., & Carson, R. (2003a). Choosing area based socioeconomic measures to monitor social inequalities in low birth weight and childhood lead poisoning: The Public Health Disparities Geocoding Project (US). Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 57, 186–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krieger, N., Waterman, P. D., Chen, J. T., Soobader, M. J., & Subramanian, S. (2003b). Monitoring socioeconomic inequalities in sexually transmitted infections, tuberculosis, and violence: Geocoding and choice of area-based socioeconomic measures—The Public Health Disparities Geocoding Project (US). Public Health Reports, 118, 240–260.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krol, R., & Svarny, S. (2005). The effect of rent control on commute times. Journal of Urban Economics, 58, 421–436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Langford, M., Maguire, D., & Unwin, D. (1991). The areal interpolation problem: Estimating population using remote sensing in a GIS framework. In I. Masser, & M. Blakemore (Eds.), Handling geographic information: Methodology and potential applications (pp. 55–77). Harlow, Essex: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langford, M., & Unwin, D. (1994). Generating and mapping population density surfaces within a geographical information system. Cartographic Journal, 31, 21–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lauria, M., & Baxter, V. (1999). Residential mortgage foreclosure and racial transition in New Orleans. Urban Affairs Review, 34, 757–786.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, B. A. (1985). Racially mixed neighborhoods during the 1970s. Social Science Quarterly, 66, 346–364.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, B. A., & Wood, P. B. (1991). Is neighborhood racial succession place-specific? Demography, 28, 21–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lobo, A. P., Flores, R. J. O., & Salvo, J. J. (2002). The impact of Hispanic growth on the racial/ethnic composition of New York City neighborhoods. Urban Affairs Review, 37, 703–727.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Longley, P. A., Goodchild, M. F., Maguire, D. J., & Rhind, D. W. (2005). Geographic information systems and science (2nd ed.). New York: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, D. (1989). Mapping population data from zone centroid locations. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 14, 90–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Massey, D. S. (1983). A research note on residential succession: The Hispanic case. Social Forces, 61, 825–833.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Massey, D. S., Gross, A. B., & Shibuya, K. (1994). Migration, segregation, and the geographic concentration of poverty. American Sociological Review, 59, 425–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Massey, D. S., & Mullen, B. P. (1984). Processes of Hispanic and black spatial assimilation. American Journal of Sociology, 89, 836–873.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McHarg, I. L. (1969). Design with nature. New York: Doubleday/Natural History Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mennis, J. (2003). Generating surface models of population using dasymetric mapping. Professional Geographer, 55, 31–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monmonier, M., & Schnell, G. (1984). Land use and land cover data and the mapping of population density. International Yearbook of Cartography, 24, 115–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers, D. (1999). Demographic dynamism and metropolitan change: Comparing Los Angeles, New York, Chicago, and Washington, DC. Housing Policy Debate, 10, 919–954.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Campo, P., Xue, X., Wang, M. C., & Caughy, M. (1997). Neighborhood risk factors for low birth weight in Baltimore: A multilevel analysis. American Journal of Public Health, 87, 1113–1118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Odland, J., & Ellis, M. (2001). Changes in the inequality of earnings for young men in metropolitan labor markets, 1979–1989: The effects of declining wages and sectoral shifts within an efficiency wage framework. Economic Geography, 77, 148–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Openshaw, S. (1983). The modifiable areal unit problem. Concepts and techniques in modern geography, Vol. 38. Norwich, England: Geobooks.

    Google Scholar 

  • Openshaw, S. (1984). Ecological fallacies and the analysis of areal census data. Environment and Planning A, 16, 17–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pozzi, F., Small, C., & Yetman, G. (2003). Modeling the distribution of human population with night-time satellite imagery and gridded population of the world. Earth Observation Magazine, 12(4), 24–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Qiu, F., Woller, K., & Briggs, R. (2003). Modeling urban population growth from remotely sensed imagery and TIGER GIS road data. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 69, 1031–1042.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quillian, L. (1999). Migration patterns and the growth of high-poverty neighborhoods, 1970–1990. American Journal of Sociology, 105, 1–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Radeloff, V. C., Hammer, R. B., Voss, P. R., Hagen, A. E., Field, D. R., & Mladenhoff, D. J. (2001). Human demographic trends and landscape level forest management in the northwest Wisconsin pine barrens. Forest Science, 47, 229–241.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reibel, M. (2000). Geographic variation in mortgage lending: Evidence from Los Angeles. Urban Geography, 21, 45–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reibel, M. (2003). Measures of geographically uneven subpopulation group change and local group transitions: Examples from Los Angeles. Geographical Analysis, 35, 257–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reibel, M., & Agrawal, A. (2005). Land use weighted areal interpolation. Paper presented at the GIS Planet 2005 International Conference, Estoril, Portugal, May.

  • Reibel, M., & Agrawal, A. (2007). Areal interpolation of population counts using pre-classified land cover data. Population Research and Policy Review, 26(5–6), doi:10.1007/s11113-007-9050-9.

  • Reibel, M., & Bufalino, M. E. (2005). A test of street weighted areal interpolation using geographic information systems. Environment and Planning A, 37, 127–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryznar, R. M., & Wagner, T. W. (2001). Using remotely sensed imagery to detect urban change: Viewing Detroit from space. Journal of the American Planning Association, 67, 327–336.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sadahiro, Y. (2000). Accuracy of count data transferred through the areal weighting interpolation method. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 14, 25–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, R. A. (1991). The measurement of segregation change through integration and deconcentration, 1970–1980. Urban Affairs Quarterly, 26, 477–496.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • South, S. J., & Crowder, K. D. (1997a). Residential mobility between cities and suburbs: Race, suburbanization, and back-to-the-city moves. Demography, 34, 525–538.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • South, S. J., & Crowder, K. D. (1997b). Escaping distressed neighborhoods: Individual, community and metropolitan influences. American Journal of Sociology, 103, 1040–1084.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • South, S. J., & Crowder, K. D. (1998a). Leaving the ’hood: Residential mobility between black, white, and integrated neighborhoods. American Sociological Review, 63, 17–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • South, S. J., & Crowder, K. D. (1998b). Housing discrimination and residential mobility: Impacts for blacks and whites. Population Research and Policy Review, 17, 369–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • South, S. J., & Crowder, K. D. (1999). Neighborhood effects on family formation: Concentrated poverty and beyond. American Sociological Review, 64, 113–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Subramanian, S. V., Chen, J. T., Rehkopf, D. H., Waterman, P. D., & Krieger, N. (2005). Racial disparities in context: A multilevel analysis of neighborhood variations in poverty and excess mortality among black populations in Massachusetts. American Journal of Public Health, 95, 260–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sucoff, C. A., & Upchurch, D. M. (1998). Neighborhood context and the risk of childbearing among metropolitan-area black adolescents. American Sociological Review, 63, 571–585.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sucoff, C., Upchurch, D., & Aneshensel, C. (1999). Neighborhood influences on parent-child relations: Implications for adolescent health. Journal of Adolescent Health, 24, 113–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taeuber, K. E., & Taeuber, A. F. (1965). Negroes in cities. Chicago, IL: Aldine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tatian, P. A. (2002). Neighborhood change data base 1970-2000 tract data. Data users’ guide, short form release. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Temkin, K., & Rohe, W. M. (1998). Social capital and neighborhood stability: An empirical investigation. Housing Policy Debate, 9, 61–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tobler, W. (1979). Smooth pycnophylactic interpolation for geographical regions. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 74, 519–536.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vandell, K. (1981). The effects of racial composition on neighborhood succession. Urban Studies, 18, 315–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ward, D., Phinn, S. R., & Murray, A. T. (2000). Monitoring growth in rapidly urbanizing areas using remotely sensed data. Professional Geographer, 52, 371–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, J. K. (1936). A method of mapping densities of population with Cape Cod as an example. Geographical Review, 26, 103–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, R., Ellis, M., & Reibel, M. (1997). The linkage between immigration and internal migration in large metropolitan areas in the United States. Economic Geography, 73, 234–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael Reibel.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Reibel, M. Geographic Information Systems and Spatial Data Processing in Demography: a Review. Popul Res Policy Rev 26, 601–618 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11113-007-9046-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11113-007-9046-5

Keywords

Navigation